https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?feed=atom&target=CatClarkson&title=Special%3AContributions 2026-05-30T08:38:38Z From Designing Buildings MediaWiki 1.17.4 https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Indoor_pollutants_VOCs 2019-01-17T10:57:41Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this issue is to improve indoor air quality for building occupants through the specification of materials to internal spaces with low VOC content.<br /> <br /> VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) are substances that have a high vapour pressure at room temperature. In effect, this means they are released in to the air from materials without having to heat them.<br /> <br /> VOCs can be human made, or naturally occuring and not all VOCs are harmful to human health. Most smells/odours are VOCs including smells from plants used to communicate. However, many VOCs are harmful to human health, and while typically not imminently toxic in the concentrations likely come across, there is significant evidence that they have a compound effect over time on human health. Issues can range from experiencing sick building syndrome, to increases in chances of leukemia.<br /> <br /> VOC concentrations can be up to 1000 times higher indoors than outdoors (although likely five times higher), and with significant time being spent indoors by a large proportion of the population, this presents a problem. The concentrations of VOCs are frequently higher in new build/refurbishments.<br /> <br /> By reducing VOC content in materials used in the building, the benefit to occupants of the building is a more pleasant working environment (VOCs smell!), and reduced impact on their health.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> It is important for the success of the credit to ensure early engagement is undertaken by the Design Team. The Assessor should ideally get the architect to complete a specification document confirming that the initially specified finishes (i.e. paints, varnishes, wood panels) meet the BREEAM compliance in line with Table 20.<br /> <br /> In addition, where &amp;quot;Equal and approved&amp;quot; products are acceptable, the specific standards required by the product should be included in the architectural specification.<br /> <br /> The second point at which this credit need be considered is when letting packages to sub contractors. The requirements of the credit need to be clearly stated in the sub contractors tender pack and then contract so that they are fully aware of the products that need to be used. There is frequently (although not always) a small cost uplift in using low VOC products.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> Awaiting content<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Awaiting content<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> Awaiting content<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Awaiting content<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> Awaiting content<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * List applicable schemes here<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> = Find out more =<br /> <br /> === Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===<br /> <br /> * Air quality.<br /> * At a glance - Indoor air quality.<br /> * BREEAM and air quality.<br /> * BREEAM Indoor air quality plan.<br /> * BREEAM Indoor air quality Ventilation.<br /> * Clean indoor air for healthy living - New air filter standards.<br /> * Indoor air quality.<br /> * Indoor environmental quality.<br /> * Volatile Organic Compounds.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:42:22Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> There are however also a selection of changes that seem somewhat poorly thought through in my opinion:<br /> <br /> == Sustainable Procurement Plan ==<br /> <br /> The production of a sustainable procurement plan during RIBA Stage 1, in my opinion, is a poor decision by BRE. During RIBA Stage 1 the extent of information surrounding the project should be limited, and as such being able to set a sensible set of aims, objectives and targets is unreasonable. I feel as a result of this, very generic sustainable procurement plans will be produced, rather than well thought through plans with SMART targets which may drive procurement activities.<br /> <br /> == LCA Submission ==<br /> <br /> I may well live to be proven wrong about this. But I feel submitting MAT 01 results to BRE at RIBA Stage 2/pre-planning is going to be an administrative disaster. Many BREEAM projects will not be registered during RIBA Stage 2, and as such there will be relatively little to link the MAT 01 submission to the assessment. While an assessor can use their email submission as BREEAM evidence that this was completed, I can't help but feel this process has not been thoroughly thought through.<br /> <br /> = Timing of Release and Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2018 prior to the full range of required documents being available. In addition, registrations for the previous scheme (BREEAM 2014) have been closed, so unfortunately there is currently no fully functioning BREEAM scheme available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which personally I believe make BREEAM 2018 unreasonably difficult to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04. That unfortunately is a rather large chunk of a BREEAM assessment which I'd typically expect to achieve at least some of on an assessment. While my projects may go through significant early stage ecology work, without the documentation available from BRE, I'm unable to confirm to design teams that they can achieve the credits. Therefore my buildings will score artificially low scores due to BRE's late running scheme.<br /> <br /> == Scoring and Reporting Tool ==<br /> <br /> While BREEAM projects is available to assess projects and conduct pre-assessments, BRE have yet to release an offline scoring and reporting tool. Following significant consultation with the assessor base which appear to overwhelmingly suggest that a fully online system is not currently appropriate, it's surprising that this tool was not produced prior to the closure of registrations of BREEAM 2014.<br /> <br /> == ENE 01 Methodology ==<br /> <br /> This is probably a lesser problem for me personally, however, there is currently no methodology available for ENE 01. The criteria in the manual is somewhat suggestive of it being the same/similar methodology to BREEAM 2014, but with the quantity of credits available and the ease of achieving said credits made harder. Having reviewed the ENE 01 section of the projects website, it now seems that an energy performance ratio can have a negative value. This is a fairly significant change from previous BREEAM schemes. Unfortunately the ENE 01 calculator on BREEAM projects is not displaying said negative values, so quantifying the impact is incredibly difficult.<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = My current feeling towards using the scheme =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:36:34Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> There are however also a selection of changes that seem somewhat poorly thought through in my opinion:<br /> <br /> == Sustainable Procurement Plan ==<br /> <br /> == LCA Submission ==<br /> <br /> = Timing of Release and Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2018 prior to the full range of required documents being available. In addition, registrations for the previous scheme (BREEAM 2014) have been closed, so unfortunately there is currently no fully functioning BREEAM scheme available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which personally I believe make BREEAM 2018 unreasonably difficult to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04. That unfortunately is a rather large chunk of a BREEAM assessment which I'd typically expect to achieve at least some of on an assessment. While my projects may go through significant early stage ecology work, without the documentation available from BRE, I'm unable to confirm to design teams that they can achieve the credits. Therefore my buildings will score artificially low scores due to BRE's late running scheme.<br /> <br /> == Scoring and Reporting Tool ==<br /> <br /> While BREEAM projects is available to assess projects and conduct pre-assessments, BRE have yet to release an offline scoring and reporting tool. Following significant consultation with the assessor base which appear to overwhelmingly suggest that a fully online system is not currently appropriate, it's surprising that this tool was not produced prior to the closure of registrations of BREEAM 2014.<br /> <br /> == ENE 01 Methodology ==<br /> <br /> This is probably a lesser problem for me personally, however, there is currently no methodology available for ENE 01. The criteria in the manual is somewhat suggestive of it being the same/similar methodology to BREEAM 2014, but with the quantity of credits available and the ease of achieving said credits made harder. Having reviewed the ENE 01 section of the projects website, it now seems that an energy performance ratio can have a negative value. This is a fairly significant change from previous BREEAM schemes. Unfortunately the ENE 01 calculator on BREEAM projects is not displaying said negative values, so quantifying the impact is incredibly difficult.<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:35:39Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> There are however also a selection of changes that seem somewhat poorly thought through in my opinion:<br /> <br /> == Sustainable Procurement Plan ==<br /> <br /> == LCA Submission ==<br /> <br /> = Timing =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2018 prior to the full range of required documents being available. In addition, registrations for the previous scheme (BREEAM 2014) have been closed, so unfortunately there is currently no fully functioning BREEAM scheme available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which personally I believe make BREEAM 2018 unreasonably difficult to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04. That unfortunately is a rather large chunk of a BREEAM assessment which I'd typically expect to achieve at least some of on an assessment. While my projects may go through significant early stage ecology work, without the documentation available from BRE, I'm unable to confirm to design teams that they can achieve the credits. Therefore my buildings will score artificially low scores due to BRE's late running scheme.<br /> <br /> == Scoring and Reporting Tool ==<br /> <br /> While BREEAM projects is available to assess projects and conduct pre-assessments, BRE have yet to release an offline scoring and reporting tool. Following significant consultation with the assessor base which appear to overwhelmingly suggest that a fully online system is not currently appropriate, it's surprising that this tool was not produced prior to the closure of registrations of BREEAM 2014.<br /> <br /> == ENE 01 Methodology ==<br /> <br /> This is probably a lesser problem for me personally, however, there is currently no methodology available for ENE 01. The criteria in the manual is somewhat suggestive of it being the same/similar methodology to BREEAM 2014, but with the quantity of credits available and the ease of achieving said credits made harder. Having reviewed the ENE 01 section of the projects website, it now seems that an energy performance ratio can have a negative value. This is a fairly significant change from previous BREEAM schemes. Unfortunately the ENE 01 calculator on BREEAM projects is not displaying said negative values, so quantifying the impact is incredibly difficult.<br /> <br /> = Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:34:30Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> There are however also a selection of changes that seem somewhat poorly thought through in my opinion:<br /> <br /> == Sustainable Procurement Plan ==<br /> <br /> == LCA Submission ==<br /> <br /> = Timing =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2018 prior to the full range of required documents being available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which make BREEAM 2018 unreasonably difficult to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04. That unfortunately is a rather large chunk of a BREEAM assessment which I'd typically expect to achieve at least some of on an assessment. While my projects may go through significant early stage ecology work, without the documentation available from BRE, I'm unable to confirm to design teams that they can achieve the credits. Therefore my buildings will score artificially low scores due to BRE's late running scheme.<br /> <br /> == Scoring and Reporting Tool ==<br /> <br /> While BREEAM projects is available to assess projects and conduct pre-assessments, BRE have yet to release an offline scoring and reporting tool. Following significant consultation with the assessor base which appear to overwhelmingly suggest that a fully online system is not currently appropriate, it's surprising that this tool was not produced prior to the closure of registrations of BREEAM 2014.<br /> <br /> == ENE 01 Methodology ==<br /> <br /> This is probably a lesser problem for me personally, however, there is currently no methodology available for ENE 01. The criteria in the manual is somewhat suggestive of it being the same/similar methodology to BREEAM 2014, but with the quantity of credits available and the ease of achieving said credits made harder. Having reviewed the ENE 01 section of the projects website, it now seems that an energy performance ratio can have a negative value. This is a fairly significant change from previous BREEAM schemes. Unfortunately the ENE 01 calculator on BREEAM projects is not displaying said negative values, so quantifying the impact is incredibly difficult.<br /> <br /> = Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:31:41Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> There are however also a selection of changes that seem somewhat poorly thought through in my opinion:<br /> <br /> == Sustainable Procurement Plan ==<br /> <br /> == LCA Submission ==<br /> <br /> = Timing =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2018 prior to the full range of required documents being available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which make BREEAM 2018 unreasonably difficult to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04. That unfortunately is a rather large chunk of a BREEAM assessment which I'd typically expect to achieve at least some of on an assessment. While my projects may go through significant early stage ecology work, without the documentation available from BRE, I'm unable to confirm to design teams that they can achieve the credits. Therefore my buildings will score artificially low scores due to BRE's late running scheme.<br /> <br /> == Scoring and Reporting Tool ==<br /> <br /> While BREEAM projects is available to assess projects and conduct pre-assessments, BRE have yet to release an offline scoring and reporting tool. Following significant consultation with the assessor base which appear to overwhelmingly suggest that a fully online system is not currently appropriate, it's surprising that this tool was not produced prior to the closure of registrations of BREEAM 2014.<br /> <br /> = Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:29:32Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> There are however also a selection of changes that seem somewhat poorly thought through in my opinion:<br /> <br /> == Sustainable Procurement Plan ==<br /> <br /> == LCA Submission ==<br /> <br /> = Timing =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2018 prior to the full range of required documents being available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which make BREEAM 2018 unreasonably difficult to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04. That unfortunately is a rather large chunk of a BREEAM assessment which I'd typically expect to achieve at least some of on an assessment. While my projects may go through significant early stage ecology work, without the documentation available from BRE, I'm unable to confirm to design teams that they can achieve the credits. Therefore my buildings will score artificially low scores due to BRE's late running scheme.<br /> <br /> = Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:26:08Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> = Timing =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2018 prior to the full range of required documents being available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which make BREEAM 2018 essentially impossible to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04.<br /> <br /> = Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:25:51Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> = Timing =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2014 prior to the full range of required documents being available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> As of 28/3/18 9am (3 weeks after launch) there are still 3 significant resources outstanding, which make BREEAM 2018 essentially impossible to use:<br /> <br /> == Guidance Notes - Ecology ==<br /> <br /> GN34 is unavailable. This is a checklist which confirms whether an ecologist is required prior to site configuration being set in order to achieve LE 02. Unfortunately LE 02 is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 03, which in turn is a pre-requisite to achieving LE 04.<br /> <br /> = Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:21:07Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Technical Criteria =<br /> <br /> On a first read of the BREEAM 2018 criteria, the majority of changes seem reasonable, with some being pleasantly forward thinking. I've listed a few below which I feel are some of the noteable changes:<br /> <br /> = Timing =<br /> <br /> As per usual with the release of BREEAM schemes, BRE have released BREEAM 2014 prior to the full range of required documents being available. There also does not seem to have been much in the way of testing of tools etc prior to their release.<br /> <br /> = Availability of Resources =<br /> <br /> = Training =<br /> <br /> = See Also =<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Sending_a_positive_message_to_the_team_regarding_BREEAM Sending a positive message to the team regarding BREEAM]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_2018_-_An_Assessor_view_at_Launch_Stage 2018-03-28T10:09:13Z

<p>CatClarkson: Created page with &quot; Category:Articles_needing_more_work Category:BREEAM&quot;</p> <hr /> <div><br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]<br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Construction_waste_management 2018-03-27T09:39:46Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To promote resource efficiency via the effective management and reduction of construction waste.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> Pre demolition audit needs to be considered before demolition takes place.<br /> <br /> Resource Management Plan (RMP)/ Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) needs to be considered before work on site starts<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> Pre demolition audit<br /> <br /> Pre-demo audit should be produced by the company doing the demolition (could be main contractor or a demolition contractor). Make sure it lists any materials on the existing site, amounts and potential applications.<br /> <br /> i.e. Timber doors-20 m3- recycle<br /> <br /> OR<br /> <br /> Concrete-100m3- crush and re-use on site.<br /> <br /> Make sure the pre-demo audit is referenced in the RMP/SWMP<br /> <br /> SWMP/RMP<br /> <br /> Most contractors will have their own template. Make sure it contains all the information required for BREEAM.<br /> <br /> A compliant RMP is one that defines:<br /> <br /> # A target benchmark for resource efficiency, i.e. m³ of waste per 100m² or tonnes of waste per 100m²<br /> # Procedures and commitments for minimising non-hazardous waste in line with the target benchmark<br /> # Procedures for minimising hazardous waste<br /> # A waste minimisation target and details of waste minimisation actions to be undertaken<br /> # Procedures for estimating, monitoring, measuring and reporting hazardous and non-hazardous site waste. If waste data is obtained from licensed external waste contractors, the data needs to be reliable and verifiable, e.g. by using data from EA/SEPA/EA Wales/NIEA Waste Return Forms<br /> # Procedures for sorting, reusing and recycling construction waste into defined waste groups (see additional guidance section), either on-site or through a licensed external contractor<br /> # Procedures for reviewing and updating the plan<br /> # The name or job title of the individual responsible for implementing the above.<br /> <br /> When setting targets ask the contractor to look back at previous projects final waste figures to give a sensible estimate for the next project. It’s easy to set a tight target and get credits at design stage, but if the target isn’t met credits may be lost at Post Construction stage.<br /> <br /> At PC stage get final waste figures from waste carrier/s and contractor. Calculate total waste per 100 sq m GIFA. This should exclude excavation waste.<br /> <br /> Get final figures from waste carrier/s, contractor and demo contractor for diverting waste from landfill.<br /> <br /> Report all figures on the BREEAM scoring and reporting tool.<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Is site team aware that RMP is required and must be updated throughout construction?<br /> <br /> Is demo contractor aware that pre-demo audit must be carried out before demolition?<br /> <br /> Is demo contractor aware that diversion from landfill rates will be needed after demolition has taken place?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> Example pre-demolition audits and SWMP/RMP can be found on the internet by googling them. Also see [https://docs.google.com/document/d/19uvuGrxtikMeQEnHWtvMY7tAwwilVFHPPgec4oxum8A/edit?usp=sharing here] for a bare bones template compliant with BREEAM 2014.<br /> <br /> Follow guidance from:<br /> <br /> * Defra (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) [https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/waste-and-recycling https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/waste-and-recycling]<br /> * BRE (Building Research Establishment Ltd) [https://www.bre.co.uk/Waste_and_recycling.html https://www.bre.co.uk/Waste_and_recycling.html]<br /> * WRAP (Waste and Resources Action Programme) [http://www.wrap.org.uk/ http://www.wrap.org.uk/]<br /> * Welsh Government. [http://gov.wales/?lang=en http://gov.wales/?lang=en]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Most contractors will have other useful documents that may be used to supplement SWMPs where they don’t contain all the information needed. e.g. Project Environmental Plan. Reference this and submit as evidence.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> SWMP/RMP<br /> <br /> Pre-demolition audit<br /> <br /> Final waste figures<br /> <br /> KPIs<br /> <br /> Waste carrier records<br /> <br /> Project Environmental Plan<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * List applicable schemes here<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> --[[User:Alison_Ewins|Alison Ewins]] 11:36, 23 Feb 2018 (BST)<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Adaptation_to_climate_change 2018-02-15T10:45:51Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to identify how extreme weather conditions arising from climate change may affect the building's fabric and structure, and to mitigate against these effects.<br /> <br /> Please note, many other credits in BREEAM look at various aspects of climate change - such as POL 03 - Flood Risk, HEA 04 - Thermal Comfort and as such this credit ONLY relates to building fabric and structure.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> An initial climate change adaptation strategy appraisal (catchy) must be produced during RIBA Stage 2.<br /> <br /> The recommendations from the appraisal should be implemented in to the design during RIBA Stages 3 and 4.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> Bill Gethings has produced significant work on climate change, which is clear and accessible. The following book may be of significant help for designers looking for background information [[Bill_Gething_and_Katie_Puckett_-_Design_for_Climate_Change|Bill Gething and Katie Puckett - Design for Climate Change]]<br /> <br /> The [http://ukclimateprojections.metoffice.gov.uk/ UK Climate Change Projections] have data for various predicted future scenarios for climate change.<br /> <br /> The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_adaptation wikipedia] article is actually quite informative, and contains a lot of useful links.<br /> <br /> The [https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/gla_migrate_files_destination/Adaptation-oct11.pdf Mayor of London's Climate Change Adaptation Strategy] contains good background information, and recommendations for buildings in London. While the recommendations are designed for a larger scale (e.g. to combat the urban heat island effect), many also provide benefit on a microscale.<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * (eg) International New Construction 2016<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Adaptation_to_climate_change 2018-02-15T10:37:12Z

<p>CatClarkson: Created page with &quot;= Aim and benefits = The aim of this credit is to identify how extreme weather conditions arising from climate change may affect the building's fabric and structure, and to miti...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to identify how extreme weather conditions arising from climate change may affect the building's fabric and structure, and to mitigate against these effects.<br /> <br /> Please note, many other credits in BREEAM look at various aspects of climate change - such as POL 03 - Flood Risk, HEA 04 - Thermal Comfort and as such this credit ONLY relates to building fabric and structure.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> An initial climate change adaptation strategy appraisal (catchy) must be produced during RIBA Stage 2.<br /> <br /> The recommendations from the appraisal should be implemented in to the design during RIBA Stages 3 and 4.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * (eg) International New Construction 2016<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_UK_Non-domestic_New_Construction_2018_manual 2018-02-12T13:32:06Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Issue 1.0 =<br /> <br /> Issue 1.0 of BREEAM UK Non Domestic New Construction is expected to be released on 7/3/18.<br /> <br /> = Consultation Period =<br /> <br /> [[File:Breeammanual.jpg|link=File:Breeammanual.jpg]]<br /> <br /> In September 2017, the DRAFT technical manual for the BREEAM UK Non-domestic New Construction 2018 manual was opened to comments.<br /> <br /> The launch of the DRAFT scheme marks the end of a 12-month process of intense consultation and technical development. Over the last 12 months, the team have been working hard to deliver a DRAFT manual which we hope represents another step change in BREEAM, to continue to reflect best practice and drive the industry to innovate.<br /> <br /> BREEAM have scrutinised every issue in the manual, asking questions like; ‘is this still relevant?’ ‘Does this still represent best practice?’ ‘Does the criteria deliver the intended outcome?', and many more. This enabled the development of proposals for what is thought needs to change.<br /> <br /> From December 2016 to April 2017, BREEAM then went through a period of consultation to test these proposals, which included an online survey and a series of workshops with a wide range of stakeholder groups. The response from the industry was amazing, with almost 300 responses to the online survey.<br /> <br /> All those comments were then tirelessly reviewed and considered by the team, which ultimately then fed into what is now the live DRAFT manual, ready for further comments.<br /> <br /> The draft manual can be downloaded from [http://www.breeam.com/breeam-uk-new-construction-2018-consultation here], where you will also find details on how to feedback.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> This article was originally published [http://brebuzz.net/2017/09/21/breeam-uk-new-construction-2018-draft-manual-is-now-live-for-consultation/ here] by BRE Buzz on 21 Sept 2017. It was written by Charlotte Hardy.<br /> <br /> --[[User:BRE_Buzz|BRE Buzz]]<br /> <br /> = Find out more =<br /> <br /> === Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===<br /> <br /> * BRE Buzz articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.<br /> * BREEAM associate online training.<br /> * BREEAM In-Use International.<br /> * BREEAM USA.<br /> * BREEAM: Value multiplies while costs plummet.<br /> * Passivhaus.<br /> * Performance in use.<br /> * Roof insulation.<br /> * Ska rating.<br /> * Strategic ecology framework SEF.<br /> * Sustainability.<br /> * WELL and BREEAM align.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[Category:News]] [[Category:DCN_News]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_LZC_technologies 2018-02-12T12:51:02Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To assess the possibility of using LZC technologies early on in the design process, so as not to limit the possibilities due to fixed site layouts etc.<br /> <br /> LZC technologies are one of the steps in the energy heirarchy (after reducing energy demand through passive measures, and that controls and energy use is efficient). Their purpose is to reduce demand on fossil fuels.<br /> <br /> Please note, this issue only covers on or near site LZC technologies. Currently, using an 100% renewable electricity supplier does not meet the requirements, as an occupier could change supplier at any point.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> A feasibility study must be carried out by the completion of the Concept Design stage (RIBA Stage 2 or equivalent) by an energy specialist to establish the most appropriate recognised local (on-site or near-site) low or zero carbon (LZC) energy source(s) for the building/development.<br /> <br /> When completed at a later date, an additional element would need to be included within the report to highlight the local LZC energy sources which had been discounted due to the constraints placed on the project by the late consideration, and the reason for omission. If all local LZC is infeasible due to the late stage the study was considered, the credit must be withheld.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> An LZC feasibility should be provided, dated at RIBA STage 2. The LZC study should cover as a minimum:<br /> <br /> 1. Energy generated from LZC energy source per year<br /> <br /> 2. Carbon dioxide savings from LZC energy source per year<br /> <br /> 3. Life cycle cost of the potential specification, accounting for payback<br /> <br /> 4. Local planning criteria, including land use and noise<br /> <br /> 5. Feasibility of exporting heat/electricity from the system<br /> <br /> 6. Any available grants<br /> <br /> 7. All technologies appropriate to the site and energy demand of the development.<br /> <br /> 8. Reasons for excluding other technologies<br /> <br /> 9. Where appropriate to the building type, connecting the proposed building to an existing local community CHP system or source of waste heat or power OR specifying a building/site CHP system or source of waste heat or power with the potential to export excess heat or power via a local community energy scheme.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> The specified local LZC technologies must be shown to provide a meaningful reduction in regulated carbon dioxide emissions. A meaningful reduction is not specified but as a guide, the installation should contribute to a reduction of at least 5% of overall building energy demand and /or CO2 emissions. The demand reduction with the low and/or zero carbon (LZC) technologies is demonstrated by comparing regulated carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions with LZC technologies to the actual building regulated emissions without LZCs.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> For the specified technology/technologies, the demand reductions are modelled using dynamic simulation modelling. The energy supply used for the base case is mains gas and grid electricity. If mains gas were not available at the site, then oil may be used instead. The base case includes any passive design or free cooling measures adopted for the first two credits. The actual building energy demands are calculated as for the passive design analysis. Then the carbon dioxide emissions factors used for the building regulations calculations are applied.<br /> <br /> It must be checked that the feasibility study has been completed by a suitably qualified energy specialist.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> Energy specialist: An individual who has acquired substantial expertise or a recognised qualification for undertaking assessments, designs and installations of low or zero carbon solutions in the commercial buildings sector and is not professionally connected to a single low or zero carbon technology or manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> * Has an LZC feasibility study been done during RIBA Stage 2?<br /> * Who completed the feasibility study?<br /> * Has modelling been done for scenarios with and without LZCs?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/content/06_energy/ene04.htm BREEAM 2014 V. 5.0 ENE 4 - Low Carbon Design]<br /> <br /> [https://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/energy-breeam_uk_nc_2014/ene04/ Knowledge Base - UK New Construction 2014]<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Renewable_energy https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Renewable_energy]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Energy specialist: An individual who has acquired substantial expertise or a recognised qualification for undertaking assessments, designs and installations of low or zero carbon solutions in the commercial buildings sector and is not professionally connected to a single low or zero carbon technology or manufacturer.<br /> <br /> For shell only developments, in order to achieve criterion 1, thermal modelling can be completed on the basis of a typical notional layout and equipment specification for the particular building type (retail, restaurants, cinema etc.) can be used to demonstrate compliance.<br /> <br /> For a shell only project, compliance may be assessed on the built form only i.e. demonstrating that sufficient space and clearance for the installation of future LZCs has been considered, the built form is suitably sited, and that massing and orientation are optimised for the future systems.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> 1.A copy of the LZC Feasiblity Study, including<br /> <br /> * All content requirements<br /> * Confirmation it was produced by an “Energy Specialist”<br /> * Confirmation it was produced during RIBA Stage 2 OR confirmation that the late consideration placed no constraints on the project and that no technologies were excluded as a result<br /> <br /> 2. Confirmation of the demand reduction in CO2 emissions from the specified technology. This should be in the form of 2 x Part L reports (a baseline using gas and grid electric and the actual case). If your project is in London, you may find these labelled as the “Lean” and “Green” scenarios as part of the modelling done to meet The London Plan.<br /> <br /> 3. Specification or drawings showing technology has been implemented into the design.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> # A copy of the BREEAM Assessor’s site inspection report, confirming that LZC technology has been installed<br /> # As built drawing/equipment schedule showing specified option<br /> # Confirmation that no changes have occured to the design stage specification, OR, Part L modelling as per design stage assessment for the as built scenario.<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * First issue written to BREEAM UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> This document was originally created on 7/2/18 in a collaboration of the following [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM BREEAM] Professionals: Jane Morning, Cat Clarkson and Azita Dezfouli,<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_LZC_technologies 2018-02-12T12:47:59Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To assess the possibility of using LZC technologies early on in the design process, so as not to limit the possibilities due to fixed site layouts etc.<br /> <br /> LZC technologies are one of the steps in the energy heirarchy (after reducing energy demand through passive measures, and that controls and energy use is efficient). Their purpose is to reduce demand on fossil fuels.<br /> <br /> Please note, this issue only covers on or near site LZC technologies. Currently, using an 100% renewable electricity supplier does not meet the requirements, as an occupier could change supplier at any point.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> * Has an LZC feasibility study been done during RIBA Stage 2?<br /> * Who completed the feasibility study?<br /> * Has modelling been done for scenarios with and without LZCs?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/content/06_energy/ene04.htm BREEAM 2014 V. 5.0 ENE 4 - Low Carbon Design]<br /> <br /> [https://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/energy-breeam_uk_nc_2014/ene04/ Knowledge Base - UK New Construction 2014]<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Renewable_energy https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Renewable_energy]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> 1.A copy of the LZC Feasiblity Study, including<br /> <br /> * All content requirements<br /> * Confirmation it was produced by an “Energy Specialist”<br /> * Confirmation it was produced during RIBA Stage 2 OR confirmation that the late consideration placed no constraints on the project and that no technologies were excluded as a result<br /> <br /> 2. Confirmation of the demand reduction in CO2 emissions from the specified technology. This should be in the form of 2 x Part L reports (a baseline using gas and grid electric and the actual case). If your project is in London, you may find these labelled as the “Lean” and “Green” scenarios as part of the modelling done to meet The London Plan.<br /> <br /> 3. Specification or drawings showing technology has been implemented into the design.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> # A copy of the BREEAM Assessor’s site inspection report, confirming that LZC technology has been installed<br /> # As built drawing/equipment schedule showing specified option<br /> # Confirmation that no changes have occured to the design stage specification, OR, Part L modelling as per design stage assessment for the as built scenario.<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * First issue written to BREEAM UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> This document was originally created on 7/2/18 in a collaboration of the following [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM BREEAM] Professionals: Jane Morning, Cat Clarkson and Azita Dezfouli,<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_LZC_technologies 2018-02-12T12:46:11Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To assess the possibility of using LZC technologies early on in the design process, so as not to limit the possibilities due to fixed site layouts etc.<br /> <br /> LZC technologies are one of the steps in the energy heirarchy (after reducing energy demand through passive measures, and that controls and energy use is efficient). Their purpose is to reduce demand on fossil fuels.<br /> <br /> Please note, this issue only covers on or near site LZC technologies. Currently, using an 100% renewable electricity supplier does not meet the requirements, as an occupier could change supplier at any point.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/content/06_energy/ene04.htm BREEAM 2014 V. 5.0 ENE 4 - Low Carbon Design]<br /> <br /> [https://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/energy-breeam_uk_nc_2014/ene04/ Knowledge Base - UK New Construction 2014]<br /> <br /> [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Renewable_energy https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Renewable_energy]<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> 1.A copy of the LZC Feasiblity Study, including:<br /> <br /> # ## All content requirements<br /> ## Confirmation it was produced by an “Energy Specialist”<br /> ## Confirmation it was produced during RIBA Stage 2 OR confirmation that the late consideration placed no constraints on the project and that no technologies were excluded as a result<br /> <br /> 2. Confirmation of the demand reduction in CO2 emissions from the specified technology. This should be in the form of 2 x Part L reports (a baseline using gas and grid electric and the actual case). If your project is in London, you may find these labelled as the “Lean” and “Green” scenarios as part of the modelling done to meet The London Plan.<br /> <br /> 3. Specification or drawings showing technology has been implemented into the design.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> Post Construction Stage<br /> <br /> # A copy of the BREEAM Assessor’s site inspection report, confirming that LZC technology has been installed<br /> # As built drawing/equipment schedule showing specified option<br /> # Confirmation that no changes have occured to the design stage specification, OR, Part L modelling as per design stage assessment for the as built scenario.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * First issue written to BREEAM UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_LZC_technologies 2018-02-09T10:10:10Z

<p>CatClarkson: Created page with &quot;= Aim and benefits = tbc = When to consider = tbc = Step by step guidance = tbc = Questions to ask while seeking compliance = tbc = Tools and resources = tbc = Tips and...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * (eg) International New Construction 2016<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Enhancing_site_ecology 2018-02-07T15:33:43Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To encourage enhancement in the ecology of the site post development.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> Criteria 1 of this credit required a Suitably Qualified Ecologist to be appointed by the end of RIBA Stage 1 or equivalent.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> During RIBA Stage 2, the ecologist must conduct a site visit/survey, and produce a report.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> During RIBA Stage 1, the ecologist will likely only provide very high level advice. During stage 2 hoever, they’re likely to provide detailed ecological recommendations based on their site survey.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> Prior/during RIBA stage 2 - ensure a Suitably Qualified Ecologist is appointed<br /> <br /> RIBA stage 4 - a BREEAM compliant report from the ecologist to be ready. Preferably the ecologist can use the BRE’s Guidance on relating ecology reports template, which is available on knowledge base<br /> <br /> Client/contractor to confirm commitment to imply ecologist’s ‘additional’ recommendations<br /> <br /> Refer to BREEAM Minimising impact on existing site ecology for more information<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> * Was a Suitably Qualified Ecologist appointed during RIBA Stage 1? [Remember, RIBA Stage 1 might have lasted since, for instance, a previous planning application]<br /> * Was an ecology report produced by a Suitably Qualified Ecologist during RIBA Stage 2?<br /> * Did the ecology report include a pack of recommendations?<br /> * Have we included more species post development than pre-development?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [https://kb.breeam.com/?s=ecology&amp;amp;post_type%5B%5D=st_kb Knowledge Base - Ecology]<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/content/11_landuse/le04.htm BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Issue 5.0: LE 04 Enhancing Site Ecology]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> * Use any available enhancements to the site in an infill construction where there is no space for ecological enhancements within the site<br /> * The Ecologist must have been on board from early stages<br /> * Seek opportunities for off-site ecological enhancement specially for developments in lands with high ecological value and with the risk of removing species - refer to knowledge base note ref:: KBCN0651<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> Design Stage<br /> <br /> * Confirmation that the ecologist was appointed prior to RIBA Stage 1 and that they meet the definition of a Suitably Qualified Ecologist. Where appointed at a later stage, the ecologist must confirm that this has not hindered their ability to make recommendations or maximise potential ecological enhancement.<br /> * Copy the Ecologist’s Report or completed GN13 template listing the ecologist’s recommendations for ecological enhancement and calculations to show the increase in plant species from the existing to the proposed site.<br /> * Landscape/site plans for the existing and proposed site<br /> * Written confirmation from the project team that the recommendations of the ecologist will be included within the final design.<br /> <br /> Post Construction Stage<br /> <br /> * As built landscape plans<br /> * Assessor site inspection/photos showing the recommendations and planting schemes have been implemented.<br /> * Where the landscape is not complete at the time of the inspection, due to phasing or it not being an appropriate planting season, written confirmation that any planting will be completed within 18months from the completion of the development.<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * First issue written with regard to BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Issue 5.0<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Enhancing_site_ecology 2018-02-07T15:24:04Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To encourage enhancement in the ecology of the site post development.&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> Criteria 1 of this credit required a Suitably Qualified Ecologist to be appointed by the end of RIBA Stage 1 or equivalent.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> During RIBA Stage 2, the ecologist must conduct a site visit/survey, and produce a report.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> During RIBA Stage 1, the ecologist will likely only provide very high level advice. During stage 2 hoever, they’re likely to provide detailed ecological recommendations based on their site survey.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> * Was a Suitably Qualified Ecologist appointed during RIBA Stage 1? [Remember, RIBA Stage 1 might have lasted since, for instance, a previous planning application]<br /> * Was an ecology report produced by a Suitably Qualified Ecologist during RIBA Stage 2?<br /> * Did the ecology report include a pack of recommendations?<br /> * Have we included more species post development than pre-development?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [https://kb.breeam.com/?s=ecology&amp;amp;post_type%5B%5D=st_kb Knowledge Base - Ecology]<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/content/11_landuse/le04.htm BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Issue 5.0: LE 04 Enhancing Site Ecology]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * (eg) International New Construction 2016<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Minimising_impact_on_existing_site_ecology 2018-02-07T14:58:53Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to have a new development which is as close to (or better than!) the ecological value of the site pre-development.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> During RIBA Stage 2, begin to consider whether there is enough space on the site (with the proposed building footprint) to allow for sufficient planting. If your building footprint is much bigger than the existing site (or you’re building on a greenfield site), it may be that you want to consider a green roof (please note, you’ll need an ecologist for this).<br /> <br /> During RIBA Stages 3 and 4, the design team should identify the exact number of species of plants required to give an ecological value of the site sufficient to award your target credits.<br /> <br /> = &lt;br /&gt;<br /> Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> * [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/off-site-ecological-enhancement/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/off-site-ecological-enhancement/]<br /> * [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/downloads/GN13_BREEAM_Relating_ecologists_report_and_BREEAM_v1.1.pdf?id=0000000000000000000100000000000000037117&amp;amp;type=.pdf https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/downloads/GN13_BREEAM_Relating_ecologists_report_and_BREEAM_v1.1.pdf?id=0000000000000000000100000000000000037117&amp;amp;type=.pdf]<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> Design Stage<br /> <br /> If you have a Suitably Qualified Ecologist:<br /> <br /> * Typically they will produce a report confirming the pre-development areas, based on their phase 1 habitat survey. This typically comes in a table.<br /> * They may include calculations of the post development areas, based on the planting plan, in a similar table. However, it may be the landscape architect that produces this information.<br /> * Accompany this with a copy of the planting plan and to be thorough, confirmation from the contractor that they will plant as per the planting plan.<br /> <br /> If you don’t have a Suitably Qualified Ecologist:<br /> <br /> * Formal written confirmation of the pre-development areas and species richness using BRE’s pre-defined information.<br /> * Formal written confirmation of the post-development areas and species richness.<br /> * Accompany this with a copy of the planting plan and to be thorough, confirmation from the contractor that they will plant as per the planting plan.<br /> <br /> == &lt;br /&gt;<br /> Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * A copy of “As built” drawings, showing planting - or a copy of Construction drawings plus written confirmation from the contractor that the planting has been done as per the construction stage drawings.<br /> * Confirmation that no changes have occurred to the design stage specification, and as such no further ecology calculations are required OR updated ecology calculations confirming areas and species richness for the as built development.<br /> * Site Inspection report confirming that planting is as per the planting plan.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = Applicable schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * (eg) International New Construction 2016<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Energy_efficient_cold_storage 2018-02-07T14:54:03Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To reduce the energy demand and as a result the associated operational greenhouse gas emissions.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> At your pre-assessment, consider whether this credit is applicable or not. If you're not sure, the chances are more than likely it is NOT applicable.<br /> <br /> This credit does not apply to:<br /> <br /> * Domestic scale white goods<br /> * Catering scale white goods<br /> * Refrigerated display cabinets in cafes<br /> * Usually walk in fridge and freezers in schools/cafes<br /> <br /> The credit ONLY applies to refrigeration units cooled by the building's chillers, rather than their own stand alone refrigeration units. You may find this in:<br /> <br /> * Warehouses<br /> * Supermarkets<br /> * Factories<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> * Is the refrigeration powered by the building's chillers? Or are they stand alone refrigeration units?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> * Formal written confirmation from the refrigeration system designer (who may in turn get the information from a manufacturer) that it has been designed in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Carbon Reduction in the refrigeration retail sector and BS EN 378-2.<br /> * Formal written confirmation from the refrigeration system designer (who may in turn get the information from a manufacturer) that robust and tested refrigeration systems/components have been used.<br /> * A copy of the ERs, or written commitment from the contractor, or M&amp;amp;E sub contractor that the refrigeration system will be installed and commissioning in accordance with Code of Conduct for Carbon Reduction in the refrigeration retail sector and BS EN 378-2.<br /> * Retail:<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * (eg) International New Construction 2016<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Energy_efficient_cold_storage 2018-02-06T11:03:53Z

<p>CatClarkson: Created page with &quot;= Aim and benefits = tbc = When to consider = At your pre-assessment, consider whether this credit is applicable or not. If you're not sure, the chances are more than likely i...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> At your pre-assessment, consider whether this credit is applicable or not. If you're not sure, the chances are more than likely it is NOT applicable.<br /> <br /> This credit does not apply to:<br /> <br /> * Domestic scale white goods<br /> * Catering scale white goods<br /> * Refrigerated display cabinets in cafes<br /> * Usually walk in fridge and freezers in schools/cafes<br /> <br /> The credit ONLY applies to refrigeration units cooled by the building's chillers, rather than their own stand alone refrigeration units. You may find this in:<br /> <br /> * Warehouses<br /> * Supermarkets<br /> * Factories<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * (eg) International New Construction 2016<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Drying_space 2018-02-06T10:55:18Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to allow residents a space to dry clothes which is not energy intensive (tumble drying), and does not cause damp in the home.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> During RIBA Stage 2, establish whether drying space in individual residences is more appropriate, or a communal drying area.<br /> <br /> If a communal drying area is suggested, allow sufficient space in the concept design.<br /> <br /> Drying spaces in residences can be considered relatively late on in the process, around RIBA Stage 3 to 4, as there are very space efficient methods of achieving the credit, so premium space is not necessarily required.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> Ideas for alternative styles of drying rack to typical solution:<br /> <br /> [[File:Capture.PNG|link=File:Capture.PNG]][[File:Drying_space_2.PNG|link=File:Drying_space_2.PNG]]<br /> <br /> [[File:Drying_space_3.PNG|628px|link=File:Drying_space_3.PNG]]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Often clients do not particularly want to include drying space. This is because the standard solution (a pull out rack over a bath) isn't the most attractive of options. It may be that you need to remind the client of what the purpose of this credit is, and perhaps suggest alternative drying rack options which still meet the aims of the credit but meet the aesthetic of the property better.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> === Individual drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> === Communal drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] Architectural (or M&amp;amp;E) specification detailing access controls<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] Details of how external space is accessible only to residents (marked up drawing, access statement)<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * As per design stage, plus<br /> * Site Inspection Report with photographs confirming<br /> ** Location of drying space<br /> ** Sufficient length<br /> ** Access controls<br /> ** Permanent fixing<br /> ** Heating and ventilation provision<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * Written to cover UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Sustainability]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Drying_space 2018-02-06T10:53:09Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to allow residents a space to dry clothes which is not energy intensive (tumble drying), and does not cause damp in the home.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> During RIBA Stage 2, establish whether drying space in individual residences is more appropriate, or a communal drying area.<br /> <br /> If a communal drying area is suggested, allow sufficient space in the concept design.<br /> <br /> Drying spaces in residences can be considered relatively late on in the process, around RIBA Stage 3 to 4, as there are very space efficient methods of achieving the credit, so premium space is not necessarily required.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> Ideas for alternative styles of drying rack to typical solution:<br /> <br /> [[File:Capture.PNG|430px|link=File:Capture.PNG]][[File:Drying_space_2.PNG|391px|link=File:Drying_space_2.PNG]]<br /> <br /> [[File:Drying_space_3.PNG|628px|link=File:Drying_space_3.PNG]]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Often clients do not particularly want to include drying space. This is because the standard solution (a pull out rack over a bath) isn't the most attractive of options. It may be that you need to remind the client of what the purpose of this credit is, and perhaps suggest alternative drying rack options which still meet the aims of the credit but meet the aesthetic of the property better.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> === Individual drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> === Communal drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] Architectural (or M&amp;amp;E) specification detailing access controls<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] Details of how external space is accessible only to residents (marked up drawing, access statement)<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * As per design stage, plus<br /> * Site Inspection Report with photographs confirming<br /> ** Location of drying space<br /> ** Sufficient length<br /> ** Access controls<br /> ** Permanent fixing<br /> ** Heating and ventilation provision<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * Written to cover UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Sustainability]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Drying_space 2018-02-06T10:51:48Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to allow residents a space to dry clothes which is not energy intensive (tumble drying), and does not cause damp in the home.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> During RIBA Stage 2, establish whether drying space in individual residences is more appropriate, or a communal drying area.<br /> <br /> If a communal drying area is suggested, allow sufficient space in the concept design.<br /> <br /> Drying spaces in residences can be considered relatively late on in the process, around RIBA Stage 3 to 4, as there are very space efficient methods of achieving the credit, so premium space is not necessarily required.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> Ideas for alternative styles of drying rack to typical solution:<br /> <br /> [[File:Capture.PNG|429px|link=File:Capture.PNG]][[File:Drying_space_2.PNG|370px|link=File:Drying_space_2.PNG]]<br /> <br /> [[File:Drying_space_3.PNG|628px|link=File:Drying_space_3.PNG]]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Often clients do not particularly want to include drying space. This is because the standard solution (a pull out rack over a bath) isn't the most attractive of options. It may be that you need to remind the client of what the purpose of this credit is, and perhaps suggest alternative drying rack options which still meet the aims of the credit but meet the aesthetic of the property better.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> === Individual drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> === Communal drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] Architectural (or M&amp;amp;E) specification detailing access controls<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] Details of how external space is accessible only to residents (marked up drawing, access statement)<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * As per design stage, plus<br /> * Site Inspection Report with photographs confirming<br /> ** Location of drying space<br /> ** Sufficient length<br /> ** Access controls<br /> ** Permanent fixing<br /> ** Heating and ventilation provision<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * Written to cover UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Sustainability]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Drying_space 2018-02-06T10:50:33Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to allow residents a space to dry clothes which is not energy intensive (tumble drying), and does not cause damp in the home.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> During RIBA Stage 2, establish whether drying space in individual residences is more appropriate, or a communal drying area.<br /> <br /> If a communal drying area is suggested, allow sufficient space in the concept design.<br /> <br /> Drying spaces in residences can be considered relatively late on in the process, around RIBA Stage 3 to 4, as there are very space efficient methods of achieving the credit, so premium space is not necessarily required.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> Ideas for alternative styles of drying rack to typical solution:<br /> <br /> [[File:Capture.PNG|349px]][[File:Drying space 2.PNG|300px]]<br /> <br /> [[File:Drying space 3.PNG|1091px]]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Often clients do not particularly want to include drying space. This is because the standard solution (a pull out rack over a bath) isn't the most attractive of options. It may be that you need to remind the client of what the purpose of this credit is, and perhaps suggest alternative drying rack options which still meet the aims of the credit but meet the aesthetic of the property better.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> === Individual drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> === Communal drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] Architectural (or M&amp;amp;E) specification detailing access controls<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] Details of how external space is accessible only to residents (marked up drawing, access statement)<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * As per design stage, plus<br /> * Site Inspection Report with photographs confirming<br /> ** Location of drying space<br /> ** Sufficient length<br /> ** Access controls<br /> ** Permanent fixing<br /> ** Heating and ventilation provision<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * Written to cover UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Sustainability]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:Drying_space_3.PNG 2018-02-06T10:46:34Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div></div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:Drying_space_2.PNG 2018-02-06T10:43:05Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div></div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:Capture.PNG 2018-02-06T10:41:29Z

<p>CatClarkson: Alternative drying space option</p> <hr /> <div>Alternative drying space option</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Drying_space 2018-02-06T10:34:58Z

<p>CatClarkson: Created page with &quot;= Aim and benefits = The aim of this credit is to allow residents a space to dry clothes which is not energy intensive (tumble drying), and does not cause damp in the home. = W...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> The aim of this credit is to allow residents a space to dry clothes which is not energy intensive (tumble drying), and does not cause damp in the home.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> During RIBA Stage 2, establish whether drying space in individual residences is more appropriate, or a communal drying area.<br /> <br /> If a communal drying area is suggested, allow sufficient space in the concept design.<br /> <br /> Drying spaces in residences can be considered relatively late on in the process, around RIBA Stage 3 to 4, as there are very space efficient methods of achieving the credit, so premium space is not necessarily required.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Often clients do not particularly want to include drying space. This is because the standard solution (a pull out rack over a bath) isn't the most attractive of options. It may be that you need to remind the client of what the purpose of this credit is, and perhaps suggest alternative drying rack options which still meet the aims of the credit but meet the aesthetic of the property better.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> === Individual drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> === Communal drying space: ===<br /> <br /> * Architectural drawing(s) showing location of drying space<br /> * Architectural specification detailing manufacturer of drying rack<br /> * Manufacturer's data stating length of drying line<br /> * [If internal] Architectural (or M&amp;amp;E) specification detailing access controls<br /> * [If internal] M&amp;amp;E specification stating required heating and ventilation for room with drying rack in<br /> * [If external] Details of how external space is accessible only to residents (marked up drawing, access statement)<br /> * [If external] details of posts/footings/fixings<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * As per design stage, plus<br /> * Site Inspection Report with photographs confirming<br /> ** Location of drying space<br /> ** Sufficient length<br /> ** Access controls<br /> ** Permanent fixing<br /> ** Heating and ventilation provision<br /> <br /> = Applicable Schemes =<br /> <br /> The guidelines collated in this ISD aim to support sustainable best practice in the topic described. This issue may apply in multiple BREEAM schemes covering different stages in the life of a building, different building types and different year versions. Some content may be generic but scheme nuances should also be taken into account. Refer to the comments below and related articles to this one to understand these nuances. See [[BREEAM_Issue_support_document_template|this document]] for further guidelines.<br /> <br /> * Written to cover UK New Construction 2014<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Sustainability]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Speculative_floor_%26_ceiling_finishes 2018-01-17T15:16:27Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> This credit is designed to minimise the waste involved in installing undesirable floor finishes in office spaces.<br /> <br /> It is common that when a tenant moves in to an office, they replace floor and/or ceiling finishes to match their corporate branding, or corporate tastes. If floor/ceiling finishes have already been installed by the developer, frequently these will be removed and disposed of. By reducing the quantity of installed floor finishes, or agreeing with the occupant in advance, this waste can be near eliminated.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/#10_waste/wst04.htm#Wst_04_Speculative_floor_and_ceiling_finishes%3FTocPath%3D10.0%2520Waste%7C_____4 BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 SD5076 – Issue: 5.0 - WST 04]<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/waste-breeam_uk_nc_2014/wst04/ Knowledge Base Articles - UK New Construction 2014 - WST 04]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Speculative_floor_%26_ceiling_finishes 2018-01-17T15:15:42Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> This credit is designed to minimise the waste involved in installing undesirable floor finishes in office spaces.<br /> <br /> It is common that when a tenant moves in to an office, they replace floor and/or ceiling finishes to match their corporate branding, or corporate tastes. If floor/ceiling finishes have already been installed by the developer, frequently these will be removed and disposed of. By reducing the quantity of installed floor finishes, or agreeing with the occupant in advance, this waste can be near eliminated.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T14:34:23Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> This issue issue should be considered prior to any works starting on site, as background noise level measurements must be taken. While it may be feasible to stop all works on site so as to take the measurements, it's not especially practical. Equally, it's high risk as plant will have been specified during RIBA Stages 3/4 which may not meet requirements, as the required noise ratings are unknown.<br /> <br /> You may find that this is considered much earlier in the project (Typically RIBA Stage 2) as frequently a noise impact assessment is required as part of the planning application.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> == Pre-Assessment ==<br /> <br /> # Establish whether there are any noise sensitive receptors within 800m of the development.<br /> # Establish whether there's actually any plant that makes any noise going in. It may be possible for an acoustician to confirm there's no external plant and no significant noise sources and award the credit by default.<br /> # If there are noise sensitive receptors, and plant, establish whether there are plans to do a noise impact assessment, for planning puporses or otherwise.<br /> # If there are no plans to do this credit, an acoustician would need to be appointed specifically for this BREEAM credit.<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> # Collect a copy of the noise impact assessment, which clearly states background noise levels. Make sure this clearly states acoustician's details.<br /> # Collect either a copy of calculations showing compliance, or details of recommended noise levels.<br /> # Collect confirmation or a copy of ERs stating that contractor must provide additional attenuation if required background noise levels are not met.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> # If detailed calculations were done during design stage, make sure the specified plant has been installed (site inspection, schedule)<br /> # If not, get a copy of the testing report.<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? Frost protection? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/pollution-breeam_uk_nc_2014/pol05/ UK New Construction 2014 Knowledge Base Articles]<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/#12_pollution/pol05.htm%3FTocPath%3D12.0%2520Pollution%7C_____5 BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 SD5076 – Issue: 5.0 - POL 05]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> * If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T14:34:13Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> This issue issue should be considered prior to any works starting on site, as background noise level measurements must be taken. While it may be feasible to stop all works on site so as to take the measurements, it's not especially practical. Equally, it's high risk as plant will have been specified during RIBA Stages 3/4 which may not meet requirements, as the required noise ratings are unknown.<br /> <br /> You may find that this is considered much earlier in the project (Typically RIBA Stage 2) as frequently a noise impact assessment is required as part of the planning application.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> == Pre-Assessment ==<br /> <br /> # Establish whether there are any noise sensitive receptors within 800m of the development.<br /> # Establish whether there's actually any plant that makes any noise going in. It may be possible for an acoustician to confirm there's no external plant and no significant noise sources and award the credit by default.<br /> # If there are noise sensitive receptors, and plant, establish whether there are plans to do a noise impact assessment, for planning puporses or otherwise.<br /> # If there are no plans to do this credit, an acoustician would need to be appointed specifically for this BREEAM credit.<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> # Collect a copy of the noise impact assessment, which clearly states background noise levels. Make sure this clearly states acoustician's details.<br /> # Collect either a copy of calculations showing compliance, or details of recommended noise levels.<br /> # Collect confirmation or a copy of ERs stating that contractor must provide additional attenuation if required background noise levels are not met.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> # If detailed calculations were done during design stage, make sure the specified plant has been installed (site inspection, schedule)<br /> # If not, get a copy of the testing report.<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? Frost protection? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/pollution-breeam_uk_nc_2014/pol05/ UK New Construction 2014 Knowledge Base Articles]<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/#12_pollution/pol05.htm%3FTocPath%3D12.0%2520Pollution%7C_____5 BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 SD5076 – Issue: 5.0 - POL 05]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> * If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T14:29:49Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> This issue issue should be considered prior to any works starting on site, as background noise level measurements must be taken. While it may be feasible to stop all works on site so as to take the measurements, it's not especially practical. Equally, it's high risk as plant will have been specified during RIBA Stages 3/4 which may not meet requirements, as the required noise ratings are unknown.<br /> <br /> You may find that this is considered much earlier in the project (Typically RIBA Stage 2) as frequently a noise impact assessment is required as part of the planning application.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> == Pre-Assessment ==<br /> <br /> # Establish whether there are any noise sensitive receptors within 800m of the development.<br /> # Establish whether there's actually any plant that makes any noise going in. It may be possible for an acoustician to confirm there's no external plant and no significant noise sources and award the credit by default.<br /> # If there are noise sensitive receptors, and plant, establish whether there are plans to do a noise impact assessment, for planning puporses or otherwise.<br /> # If there are no plans to do this credit, an acoustician would need to be appointed specifically for this BREEAM credit.<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> sadf<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? Frost protection? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/pollution-breeam_uk_nc_2014/pol05/ UK New Construction 2014 Knowledge Base Articles]<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/#12_pollution/pol05.htm%3FTocPath%3D12.0%2520Pollution%7C_____5 BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 SD5076 – Issue: 5.0 - POL 05]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> * If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T13:59:00Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> This issue issue should be considered prior to any works starting on site, as background noise level measurements must be taken. While it may be feasible to stop all works on site so as to take the measurements, it's not especially practical. Equally, it's high risk as plant will have been specified during RIBA Stages 3/4 which may not meet requirements, as the required noise ratings are unknown.<br /> <br /> You may find that this is considered much earlier in the project (Typically RIBA Stage 2) as frequently a noise impact assessment is required as part of the planning application.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? Frost protection? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/section/new-construction/uk/2014-uk/pollution-breeam_uk_nc_2014/pol05/ UK New Construction 2014 Knowledge Base Articles]<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/#12_pollution/pol05.htm%3FTocPath%3D12.0%2520Pollution%7C_____5 BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 SD5076 – Issue: 5.0 - POL 05]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> * If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T12:34:52Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> This issue issue should be considered prior to any works starting on site, as background noise level measurements must be taken. While it may be feasible to stop all works on site so as to take the measurements, it's not especially practical. Equally, it's high risk as plant will have been specified during RIBA Stages 3/4 which may not meet requirements, as the required noise ratings are unknown.<br /> <br /> You may find that this is considered much earlier in the project (Typically RIBA Stage 2) as frequently a noise impact assessment is required as part of the planning application.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? Frost protection? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> * If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T12:30:53Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> This issue issue should be considered prior to any works starting on site, as background noise level measurements must be taken. While it may be feasible to stop all works on site so as to take the measurements, it's not especially practical. Equally, it's high risk as plant will have been specified during RIBA Stages 3/4 which may not meet requirements, as the required noise ratings are unknown.<br /> <br /> You may find that this is considered much earlier in the project (Typically RIBA Stage 2) as frequently a noise impact assessment is required as part of the planning application.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> * If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> * If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T12:28:27Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> This issue issue should be considered prior to any works starting on site, as background noise level measurements must be taken. While it may be feasible to stop all works on site so as to take the measurements, it's not especially practical. Equally, it's high risk as plant will have been specified during RIBA Stages 3/4 which may not meet requirements, as the required noise ratings are unknown.<br /> <br /> You may find that this is considered much earlier in the project (Typically RIBA Stage 2) as frequently a noise impact assessment is required as part of the planning application.<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> <br /> If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T12:25:10Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, with confirmation of best practice testing from 7445, as per the knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> <br /> If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T12:23:07Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, as per the relevant knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> == ==<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> == Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Typically you will receive a Noise Impact Assessment, which may well have been completed for the planning application. In addition, you may receive a report from the Acoustician which outlines either:<br /> <br /> * The background noise levels required post development to achieve the BREEAM credits/planning condition, OR;<br /> * Calculations of the background noise levels predicted following the installation of the specified equipment.<br /> <br /> == Post Construction Stage ==<br /> <br /> If accurate calculations were provided at design stage, you will only require robust evidence (site inspection/delivery note/schedule) showing what plant was installed.<br /> <br /> If accurate calculations were not provided at design stage, you will need a copy of the Acoustician's test report, which details the background noise levels post development.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Reduction_of_Noise_Pollution 2018-01-17T12:14:32Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To avoid any significant noise impact on other noise sensitive receptors near the building or development under consideration<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Are any noise sensitive properties within 800m of your building? If not, then the credit can be awarded.<br /> <br /> Is there a planning condition relating to noise pollution. If there is, does complying with it automatically meet the BREEAM requirement?<br /> <br /> Will there be plant running at night? If so, have background noise levels been measured both during the day and night?<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> == BS7445 / BS4142 ==<br /> <br /> Many acoustic reports will state that the noise impact assessment has been done in accordance to BS4142 rather than BS7445. Please note, this is also acceptable, as per the relevant knowledge base article:<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-bs-7445-defines-the-testing-methodology-for-noise-attenuation-but-gives-no-noise-level-requirements-which-are-covered-in-bs-4142-can-bs-4142-be-used-to-comply-with-this-issue/]<br /> <br /> == Accurate Modelling at Design Stage ==<br /> <br /> Please note there's a compliance note that states if accurate modelling is completed and design stage (and there are no changes to the specification), no post construction testing is required.<br /> <br /> [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/ http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/nc14-pol-05-do-noise-levels-need-to-be-measured-post-construction-once-the-plant-specified-has-been-installed/]<br /> <br /> == ==<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Impact_of_refrigerants 2018-01-17T10:54:42Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To reduce the levels of greenhouse gas emissions arising from refrigerants leaking in the development.<br /> <br /> == What's the problem with refrigerants? ==<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> At the pre-assessment, it's useful to establish:<br /> <br /> - Will there be refrigerants? Will they likely have more than 6kg charge in each unit?<br /> <br /> - Are there any plans to use a very low GWP refrigerants?<br /> <br /> - Are we planning to have chillers? or a VRF system?<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Frequently, your M&amp;amp;E engineer may well nod along that these credits are all achievable. Please consider:<br /> <br /> - DELC &amp;lt;100 or GWP &amp;lt;10 -- Unless you're using a &amp;quot;strange&amp;quot; system with refrigerants such as ammonia, water -- you probably won't achieve these credits. Less than 1000 however, is relatively OK if you use R134a/R32 or something similar.<br /> <br /> - You probably (as of Jan 2018) won't find a leak detection system for a VRF system, only if you have centralised chillers.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Regulations]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[Category:Design]] [[Category:Procurement]] [[Category:Products_/_components]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Impact_of_refrigerants 2018-01-17T10:51:35Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> To reduce the levels of greenhouse gas emissions arising from refrigerants leaking in the development.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> At the pre-assessment, it's useful to establish:<br /> <br /> - Will there be refrigerants? Will they likely have more than 6kg charge in each unit?<br /> <br /> - Are there any plans to use a very low GWP refrigerants?<br /> <br /> - Are we planning to have chillers? or a VRF system?<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> Frequently, your M&amp;amp;E engineer may well nod along that these credits are all achievable. Please consider:<br /> <br /> - DELC &amp;lt;100 -- Unless you're using a &amp;quot;strange&amp;quot; system with refrigerants such as ammonia, water -- you probably won't achieve these credits. Less than 1000 however, is relatively OK if you use R134a/R32 or something similar.<br /> <br /> - You probably (as of Jan 2018) won't find a leak detection system for a VRF system, only if you have centralised chillers.<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Regulations]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[Category:Design]] [[Category:Procurement]] [[Category:Products_/_components]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_Impact_of_refrigerants 2018-01-17T10:45:30Z

<p>CatClarkson: Created page with &quot;= Aim and benefits = tbc = When to consider = tbc = Step by step guidance = tbc = Questions to ask while seeking compliance = tbc = Tools and resources = tbc = Tips and...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Step by step guidance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tools and resources =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> tbc<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Regulations]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[Category:Design]] [[Category:Procurement]] [[Category:Products_/_components]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Changing_BREEAM_Assessor_Organisation 2018-01-17T10:43:14Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Introduction =<br /> <br /> The aim of this article is to ease the process of changing BREEAM Assessor and AP Licenses over when you change your assessor organisation.<br /> <br /> = When you leave your previous organisation =<br /> <br /> Don't forget that you, personally, that is responsible for &amp;quot;looking after&amp;quot; your BREEAM license. This includes things such as reading process notes. As such, when you leave an organisation, you may no longer have access to emails that BRE send, and potentially no access to the extranet or projects. As such, it may be worth telling BRE your leaving date at that company, so that you can be removed from their licenses.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, please also remember that if you are not a licensed assessor for a period of 12 months, you will need to redo your training for each scheme you have not been licensed in. This is because BRE deem that you are no longer up to date with BRE information (such as process notes).<br /> <br /> If you wish to remove your license from the existing organisation, email [mailto:breeam@bre.co.uk breeam@bre.co.uk] with details of the license you'd like removed. If you were the account holder at the existing company, provide updated contact details in the case that a license termination agreement needs to be sent to the previous company.<br /> <br /> = When you start your new organisation =<br /> <br /> == BREEAM AP ==<br /> <br /> Email [mailto:BREEAM@BRE.co.uk BREEAM@BRE.co.uk] with the details which need changing on Greenbook Live. Your renewal date will remain the same. There is no charge for this service.<br /> <br /> == BREEAM Assessor ==<br /> <br /> To register at your new organisation you will need to complete an &amp;quot;Assessor License Application&amp;quot;. This is available here on the extranet:<br /> <br /> [https://tools.breeam.com/index.jsp Home] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/index.jsp Extranet] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/document.jsp?addtoid=null&amp;amp;pid=4 BREEAM Assessor Guidance] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/document.jsp?id=0000000000000000000100000000000000014980&amp;amp;addtoid=null&amp;amp;pid=4 Licensing Application and Information] » BREEAM / CSH / International / Communities Licence Application and T&amp;amp;Cs<br /> <br /> Please note, this may (or may not) result in additional fees being payable by your new company dependent on the existing and future licenses. Please make sure you have purchase orders and suitable approval sorted prior to submitting the form for your license.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Changing_BREEAM_Assessor_Organisation 2018-01-17T10:41:06Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Introduction =<br /> <br /> The aim of this article is to ease the process of changing BREEAM Assessor and AP Licenses over when you change your assessor organisation.<br /> <br /> = When you leave your previous organisation =<br /> <br /> Don't forget that you, personally, that is responsible for &amp;quot;looking after&amp;quot; your BREEAM license. This includes things such as reading process notes. As such, when you leave an organisation, you may no longer have access to emails that BRE send, and potentially no access to the extranet or projects. As such, it may be worth telling BRE your leaving date at that company, so that you can be removed from their licenses.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, please also remember that if you are not a licensed assessor for a period of 12 months, you will need to redo your training for each scheme you have not been licensed in. This is because BRE deem that you are no longer up to date with BRE information (such as process notes).<br /> <br /> If you wish to remove your license from the existing organisation, email [mailto:breeam@bre.co.uk breeam@bre.co.uk] with details of the license you'd like removed. If you were the account holder at the existing company, provide updated contact details in the case that a license termination agreement needs to be sent to the previous company.<br /> <br /> = When you start your new organisation =<br /> <br /> == BREEAM AP ==<br /> <br /> Email [mailto:BREEAM@BRE.co.uk BREEAM@BRE.co.uk] with the details which need changing on Greenbook Live. Your renewal date will remain the same. There is no charge for this service.<br /> <br /> == BREEAM Assessor ==<br /> <br /> To register at your new organisation you will need to complete an &amp;quot;Assessor License Application&amp;quot;. This is available here on the extranet:<br /> <br /> [https://tools.breeam.com/index.jsp Home] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/index.jsp Extranet] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/document.jsp?addtoid=null&amp;amp;pid=4 BREEAM Assessor Guidance] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/document.jsp?id=0000000000000000000100000000000000014980&amp;amp;addtoid=null&amp;amp;pid=4 Licensing Application and Information] » BREEAM / CSH / International / Communities Licence Application and T&amp;amp;Cs<br /> <br /> Please note, this may (or may not) result in additional fees being payable by your new company dependent on the existing and future licenses. Please make sure you have purchase orders and suitable approval sorted prior to submitting the form for your license.<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Changing_BREEAM_Assessor_Organisation 2018-01-10T15:03:41Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Introduction =<br /> <br /> The aim of this article is to ease the process of changing BREEAM Assessor and AP Licenses over when you change your assessor organisation.<br /> <br /> = When you leave your previous organisation =<br /> <br /> Don't forget that you, personally, that is responsible for &amp;quot;looking after&amp;quot; your BREEAM license. This includes things such as reading process notes. As such, when you leave an organisation, you may no longer have access to emails that BRE send, and potentially no access to the extranet or projects. As such, it may be worth telling BRE your leaving date at that company, so that you can be removed from their licenses.<br /> <br /> On the other hand, please also remember that if you are not a licensed assessor for a period of 12 months, you will need to redo your training for each scheme you have not been licensed in. This is because BRE deem that you are no longer up to date with BRE information (such as process notes).<br /> <br /> = When you start your new organisation =<br /> <br /> == BREEAM AP ==<br /> <br /> Email [mailto:BREEAM@BRE.co.uk BREEAM@BRE.co.uk] with the details which need changing on Greenbook Live. Your renewal date will remain the same. There is no charge for this service.<br /> <br /> == BREEAM Assessor ==<br /> <br /> To register at your new organisation you will need to complete an &amp;quot;Assessor License Application&amp;quot;. This is available here on the extranet:<br /> <br /> [https://tools.breeam.com/index.jsp Home] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/index.jsp Extranet] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/document.jsp?addtoid=null&amp;amp;pid=4 BREEAM Assessor Guidance] » [https://tools.breeam.com/extranet/document.jsp?id=0000000000000000000100000000000000014980&amp;amp;addtoid=null&amp;amp;pid=4 Licensing Application and Information] » BREEAM / CSH / International / Communities Licence Application and T&amp;amp;Cs<br /> <br /> -----<br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:BREEAM]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]]</div>

CatClarkson https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/BREEAM_NOx_emissions 2018-01-10T14:59:52Z

<p>CatClarkson: </p> <hr /> <div>= Aim and benefits =<br /> <br /> Under BREEAM UK New Construction, the aim of this credit is to minimise NATIONAL NOx emissions.<br /> <br /> There is slight variance to this aim in BREEAM International, where fully electrically heated premises are awarded the credits by default as there are no on site emissions.<br /> <br /> = When to consider =<br /> <br /> == Stage 2 ==<br /> <br /> Mechanical Engineer calculates that their concept achieves credits. They tell BREEAM assessor to target 3 credits. This should then gets written into the ERs, ideally in an M&amp;amp;E document and in a BREEAM document.<br /> <br /> == Stage 3 ==<br /> <br /> Mechanical Engineer doing Stage 3 design should calculate their design still achieves 3 credits. This may be the contractor's engineer, or could still be the client side engineer, depending on how the project is being tendered.<br /> <br /> == Stage 4 ==<br /> <br /> If there was a design change, as part of either:<br /> <br /> The technical submission to the client team regarding the design change, the POL 02 credits should have been recalculated by the contractor side mechanical engineer and approved by the client side engineer,<br /> <br /> OR<br /> <br /> The client side mechanical engineer should recalculate the POL 02 credits, and confirm their new design complies.<br /> <br /> == Stage 5 ==<br /> <br /> The contractor's Mechanical Sub Contractor should submit a technical submittal for the kit they propose is procured including updated POL 02 calculations. The AP and/or M&amp;amp;E designers should approve the technical submittal having checked the proposed kit meets POL 02 (among other) requirements.<br /> <br /> The contractor should submit purchase orders/delivery notes to BREEAM assessor, along with as built heating/hot water drawings/schematics.<br /> <br /> The BREEAM assessor should then confirm accuracy during their site inspection.<br /> <br /> = Questions to ask while seeking compliance =<br /> <br /> Do you have any electric heating?<br /> <br /> Be wary under BREEAM UK New Construction as the NOx emissions for electric heating are so high, that a couple of electric heaters (over the door? small quantity of office areas in an otherwise unheated building?) can make it nearly impossible to achieve many credits.<br /> <br /> Did you include the domestic hot water (DHW) heating system into the calculation?<br /> <br /> DHW heating can be excluded from the calculation where designer can demonstrate it is less than 10% of the building's total energy consumption (e.g. via Building's Energy Performance Certificate). Point of use water heaters are excluded by default.<br /> <br /> Does the calculation use values for sources' operation under normal conditions to meet the building’s heating demand?<br /> <br /> Normal conditions means without any redundant capacity, stand-by or back-up source for maintenance or emergency heating.<br /> <br /> Does the project incorporate a new CHP? or is it being connected to an existing CHP system?<br /> <br /> The reason to ask this is because the NOx for the CHP system will have to be calculated separately, and under BREEAM 2014 UK New Construction schemes and earlier, the methodology is very favourable to CHP leading to more available credits. Note: under BREEAM 2018 UK New Construction this is not the case.<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/#12_pollution/pol02.htm%3FTocPath%3D12.0%20Pollution%7C_____2 BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Issue 5.0 Criteria - POL 02]<br /> <br /> [http://www.breeam.com/BREEAMUK2014SchemeDocument/#12_pollution/pol02.htm%3FTocPath%3D12.0%20Pollution%7C_____2 BREEAM International New Construction 2016 Issue 2.0 Criteria - POL 02]<br /> <br /> = Tips and best practice =<br /> <br /> District heating system:<br /> <br /> For project connected to the district heating system which is not under the developer's control and mandated by a local authority (or other statutory body) maximum number of credits to be awarded. Where this is not mandatory the NOx emissions calculation to be provided. (see [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/district-heating-systems/ KBCN0979]) Where a district heating system also generates electricity, this can be used to off-set NOx emissions from grid electricity, the calculation methodology for CHP systems can be used. (see [http://kb.breeam.com/knowledgebase/district-heating-systems-that-off-set-grid-electricity/ KBCN0857])<br /> <br /> = Typical evidence =<br /> <br /> Typical design stage evidence may include:<br /> <br /> * Boiler/CHP/Heat Emitter/Cooling/Heater schedules<br /> * Drawings showing quantity of each item of heating/hot water/cooling equipment<br /> * Datasheets and/or manufacturer emails confirming NOx emissions for each piece of equipment<br /> * Letter or calculation sheet (be careful that a calc sheet is robust - signed? dated?) calculating the NOx emissions for the development.<br /> <br /> BRE Global does not endorse any of the content posted and use of the content will not guarantee the meeting of certification criteria.<br /> <br /> = Find out more =<br /> <br /> [[Air_quality|Air quality]]<br /> <br /> [[Combined_heat_and_power_CHP|Combined heat and power CHP]]<br /> <br /> [[Renewable_energy|Renewable energy]]<br /> <br /> --[[User:Sandra_Turcaniova|Sandra Turcaniova]] 15:11, 03 Jan 2018 (BST)<br /> <br /> [[Category:BREEAM]]</div>

CatClarkson