<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/skins/common/feed.css?301"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=Alanmossman&amp;title=Special%3AContributions%2FAlanmossman</id>
		<title>Designing Buildings - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=Alanmossman&amp;title=Special%3AContributions%2FAlanmossman"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/Alanmossman"/>
		<updated>2026-06-01T03:13:46Z</updated>
		<subtitle>From Designing Buildings</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.17.4</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Analytic_Hierarchy_Process_AHP</id>
		<title>Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Analytic_Hierarchy_Process_AHP"/>
				<updated>2021-08-06T08:05:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:AHPDecisionMaking.jpg|link=File:AHPDecisionMaking.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP - or analytical hierarchy process) is a form of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) that applies mathematics and psychology to the selection process - with minimal bias - when no clear choice is apparent. AHP can help to identify the most beneficial solution using a systematic approach that ranks different options based on importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AHP was developed in the 1970s by Thomas Saaty, a university professor who specialised in statistics and operations research. Along with AHP, Saaty created two other decision-making approaches - the Analytic Network Process or ANP (for decisions that depend on feedback) and Neural Network Process or NNP (which incorporates the mathematics of ANP and applies neural firing and synthesis).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Overview =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AHP takes a problem and examines it in three phases:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The goal. What issue needs to be resolved?&lt;br /&gt;
# The solutions. What are all of the available alternatives?&lt;br /&gt;
# The criteria. What criteria will be used to judge the possible solutions?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After phase three has been determined, it is then possible to calculate an importance weighting for each criterion. This is achieved through pairwise comparisons, a method of analysis that evaluates two criteria at the same time rather than comparing several criteria at once. Pairwise comparisons make it easier to select the most appropriate choice once the utility factor has been calculated. Utility is defined as a numerical representation of how useful or beneficial something is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Addressing the calculation process =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Linear algebra is a type of mathematics that can be used along with pairwise comparisons to prioritise the criteria, based on the weight of its importance. Criteria with higher numbers are seen as more important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite being technically valid and practically useful, AHP has been criticised for its reliance on mathematics. However, basic AHP calculations can be performed by readily available tools such as Excel. More advanced software is also available to automate the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assist in the calculation process, Saaty created a sample nine-point scale, which is reproduced in the study, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178692/ Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Construction Material Selection for Performance Improvement of Building Construction: The Case of a Concrete System Form].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Definition&lt;br /&gt;
| Intensity of importance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally important&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Moderately more important&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Strongly more important&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very strongly more important&lt;br /&gt;
| 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Extremely important&lt;br /&gt;
| 9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Intermediate values&lt;br /&gt;
| 2, 4, 6, 8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Applying AHP =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because AHP is designed to assist in the analysis of complex situations, it has been used in business, manufacturing and other industries. Rather than prescribing a &amp;amp;quot;correct&amp;amp;quot; decision, AHP helps decision makers find one that best suits their values and their understanding of the problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this reason, AHP is sometimes used in engineering, construction management, portfolio management, facilities maintenance, material selection and other important situations. In the US, engineers used an AHP rating system to prioritise maintenance projects for thousands of public structures, including nearly 3,000 bridges in need of repair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a material selection tool, AHP is designed to look beyond a product’s price or life cycle while removing conflicting or biased evaluation criteria based on less quantifiable factors such as personal preference or previous experience. Instead, it helps make selections based on qualitative properties such as performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critique of AHP =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn-Ballard-2/publication/275182794_Comparing_AHP_and_CBA_as_Decision_Methods_to_Resolve_the_Choosing_Problem_in_Detailed_Design/links/5b7ecd27299bf1d5a7202eb8/Comparing-AHP-and-CBA-as-Decision-Methods-to-Resolve-the-Choosing-Problem-in-Detailed-Design.pdf Arroyo, Tommelein and Ballard] (2014) offered a critique of AHP in a paper in the Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. They suggested that Choosing by Advantages (CBA) is preferable to AHP at least in the context of detailed design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBA:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# provides a more context-based analysis than AHP,&lt;br /&gt;
# does not incorporate conflicting judgments for weighing factors as AHP does,&lt;br /&gt;
# does not assume linear trade-offs between factors as AHP does,&lt;br /&gt;
# does not assume that factors have zero as a natural scale as AHP does,&lt;br /&gt;
# focuses on differentiating between alternatives more than AHP,&lt;br /&gt;
# maintains the result of the decision when non-differentiating factors are removed, whereas AHP may not, and&lt;br /&gt;
# defers subjective judgments until late in the decision-making process, whereas AHP requires expressing them earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBA is now being used in UK by Highways England and the East Thames Crossing project among others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on CBA see e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/748 Deciding a Sustainable Alternative by Choosing by Advantages' in the AEC industry]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/1479 Applying Choosing by Advantages in the Public Tendering Procedure]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/1721 Does Choosing by Advantages Promote Inclusiveness in Group Decision-Making?]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/1817 Does Your Decision-Making Process Protect Customer Value?]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/1896 Choosing by Advantages for the Selection of a New Member of the Project Team]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Case-based reasoning CBR.&lt;br /&gt;
* Decision making on building design and construction projects.&lt;br /&gt;
* Double diamond design process.&lt;br /&gt;
* Project manager.&lt;br /&gt;
* Six sigma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= External resources =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178692/ Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Construction Material Selection for Performance Improvement of Building Construction: The Case of a Concrete System Form].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/analytic-hierarchy-process-prioritize-projects-6608 Using the analytic hierarchy process (ahp) to select and prioritize projects in a portfolio].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2020.00078 What to Do? Let’s Think It Through! Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Make Decisions].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn-Ballard-2/publication/275182794_Comparing_AHP_and_CBA_as_Decision_Methods_to_Resolve_the_Choosing_Problem_in_Detailed_Design/links/5b7ecd27299bf1d5a7202eb8/Comparing-AHP-and-CBA-as-Decision-Methods-to-Resolve-the-Choosing-Problem-in-Detailed-Design.pdf Comparing AHP and CBA as Decision Methods to Resolve the Choosing Problem in Detailed Design]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Analytic_Hierarchy_Process_AHP</id>
		<title>Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Analytic_Hierarchy_Process_AHP"/>
				<updated>2021-08-06T08:01:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:AHPDecisionMaking.jpg|link=File:AHPDecisionMaking.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP - or analytical hierarchy process) is a form of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) that applies mathematics and psychology to the selection process - with minimal bias - when no clear choice is apparent. AHP can help to identify the most beneficial solution using a systematic approach that ranks different options based on importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AHP was developed in the 1970s by Thomas Saaty, a university professor who specialised in statistics and operations research. Along with AHP, Saaty created two other decision-making approaches - the Analytic Network Process or ANP (for decisions that depend on feedback) and Neural Network Process or NNP (which incorporates the mathematics of ANP and applies neural firing and synthesis).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Overview =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AHP takes a problem and examines it in three phases:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The goal. What issue needs to be resolved?&lt;br /&gt;
# The solutions. What are all of the available alternatives?&lt;br /&gt;
# The criteria. What criteria will be used to judge the possible solutions?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After phase three has been determined, it is then possible to calculate an importance weighting for each criterion. This is achieved through pairwise comparisons, a method of analysis that evaluates two criteria at the same time rather than comparing several criteria at once. Pairwise comparisons make it easier to select the most appropriate choice once the utility factor has been calculated. Utility is defined as a numerical representation of how useful or beneficial something is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Addressing the calculation process =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Linear algebra is a type of mathematics that can be used along with pairwise comparisons to prioritise the criteria, based on the weight of its importance. Criteria with higher numbers are seen as more important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite being technically valid and practically useful, AHP has been criticised for its reliance on mathematics. However, basic AHP calculations can be performed by readily available tools such as Excel. More advanced software is also available to automate the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To assist in the calculation process, Saaty created a sample nine-point scale, which is reproduced in the study, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178692/ Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Construction Material Selection for Performance Improvement of Building Construction: The Case of a Concrete System Form].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Definition&lt;br /&gt;
| Intensity of importance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally important&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Moderately more important&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Strongly more important&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Very strongly more important&lt;br /&gt;
| 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Extremely important&lt;br /&gt;
| 9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Intermediate values&lt;br /&gt;
| 2, 4, 6, 8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Applying AHP =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because AHP is designed to assist in the analysis of complex situations, it has been used in business, manufacturing and other industries. Rather than prescribing a &amp;amp;quot;correct&amp;amp;quot; decision, AHP helps decision makers find one that best suits their values and their understanding of the problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this reason, AHP is sometimes used in engineering, construction management, portfolio management, facilities maintenance, material selection and other important situations. In the US, engineers used an AHP rating system to prioritise maintenance projects for thousands of public structures, including nearly 3,000 bridges in need of repair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a material selection tool, AHP is designed to look beyond a product’s price or life cycle while removing conflicting or biased evaluation criteria based on less quantifiable factors such as personal preference or previous experience. Instead, it helps make selections based on qualitative properties such as performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Critique of AHP =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn-Ballard-2/publication/275182794_Comparing_AHP_and_CBA_as_Decision_Methods_to_Resolve_the_Choosing_Problem_in_Detailed_Design/links/5b7ecd27299bf1d5a7202eb8/Comparing-AHP-and-CBA-as-Decision-Methods-to-Resolve-the-Choosing-Problem-in-Detailed-Design.pdf Arroyo, Tommelein and Ballard] (2014) offered a critique of AHP in a paper in the Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. They suggested that Choosing by Advantages (CBA) is preferable to AHP at least in the context of detailed design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBA:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# provides a more context-based analysis than AHP,&lt;br /&gt;
# does not incorporate conflicting judgments for weighing factors as AHP does,&lt;br /&gt;
# does not assume linear trade-offs between factors as AHP does,&lt;br /&gt;
# does not assume that factors have zero as a natural scale as AHP does,&lt;br /&gt;
# focuses on differentiating between alternatives more than AHP,&lt;br /&gt;
# maintains the result of the decision when non-differentiating factors are removed, whereas AHP may not, and&lt;br /&gt;
# defers subjective judgments until late in the decision-making process, whereas AHP requires expressing them earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CBA is now being used in UK by Highways England and the East Thames Crossing project among others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on CBA see e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/748 Deciding a Sustainable Alternative by Choosing by Advantages' in the AEC industry]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/1479 Applying Choosing by Advantages in the Public Tendering Procedure]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/1721 Does Choosing by Advantages Promote Inclusiveness in Group Decision-Making?]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.iglc.net/Papers/Details/1817 Does Your Decision-Making Process Protect Customer Value?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Case-based reasoning CBR.&lt;br /&gt;
* Decision making on building design and construction projects.&lt;br /&gt;
* Double diamond design process.&lt;br /&gt;
* Project manager.&lt;br /&gt;
* Six sigma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= External resources =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178692/ Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Construction Material Selection for Performance Improvement of Building Construction: The Case of a Concrete System Form].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/analytic-hierarchy-process-prioritize-projects-6608 Using the analytic hierarchy process (ahp) to select and prioritize projects in a portfolio].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2020.00078 What to Do? Let’s Think It Through! Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Make Decisions].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn-Ballard-2/publication/275182794_Comparing_AHP_and_CBA_as_Decision_Methods_to_Resolve_the_Choosing_Problem_in_Detailed_Design/links/5b7ecd27299bf1d5a7202eb8/Comparing-AHP-and-CBA-as-Decision-Methods-to-Resolve-the-Choosing-Problem-in-Detailed-Design.pdf Comparing AHP and CBA as Decision Methods to Resolve the Choosing Problem in Detailed Design]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Lean_construction</id>
		<title>Lean construction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Lean_construction"/>
				<updated>2016-01-11T14:38:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean production (sometimes referred to as lean manufacturing) was pioneered by Toyota in Japan after the second world war. The Toyota Production System was considered to be the most efficient in the world, and it was recognised that their lean production principles could be applied not only to any other manufacturing process, but also to other business activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term 'lean construction' is an adaptation of lean production techniques applied to the construction industry. Very broadly it can be characterised as techniques aimed at maximising value and minimising waste.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= UK construction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The construction industry in the UK has consistently performed in a way that is thought to be wasteful compared to other industries. There is a general perception that it does not deliver good value for its customers. In part this is due to the unusual nature of construction, where, unlike a production line, each building is a one off. But in addition, the nature of contracting arrangements means that it can be adversarial, with significant potential for disputes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, the then Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott set up the Construction Task Force, chaired by Sir John Egan. In 1998, the task force published ‘Rethinking Construction' (the Egan Report), on the scope for improving the quality and efficiency of UK construction. Amongst other things, Egan advocated lean thinking, suggesting that it “…presents a powerful and coherent synthesis of the most effective techniques for eliminating waste and delivering significant sustained improvements in efficiency and quality….We recommend that the UK construction industry should also adopt lean thinking as a means of sustaining performance improvement.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other countries around the world have also made attempts to apply lean thinking to construction, notably Denmark, USA, Chile, Brazil and Australia (ref Lean Thinking in Construction).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Lean construction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean construction is a broad philosophy that has been defined in many different ways and includes a range of different approached, tools and techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is defined by the [http://www.leanconstruction.org.uk/what-is Lean Construction Institute] as “…the application of lean thinking to the design &amp;amp;amp; construction process creating improved project delivery to meet client needs and improved efficiency for constructors.” Other definitions include, &amp;amp;quot;...a philosophy for working based on continuous delivering of better value to customers whilst increasing business profitability and competitiveness&amp;amp;quot; (ref Lean Thinking in Construction) and &amp;amp;quot;... managing and improving the construction process to profitably deliver what the customer needs&amp;amp;quot; (ref Constructing Excellence).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst the goals of lean construction and lean production may be similar, the approaches are necessarily different, due largely to the fact that developing a building is a ‘project’ rather than ‘programme’ (ie it has a start and end rather than an ongoing activity such as a production line) and the product is is often a one off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean construction is a continuous process that applies through design, procurement, manufacture and construction. It is an integrated process in which clients, designers, contractors, and suppliers must be committed to working together, focussing on delivering value (as seen by the ultimate customer) rather than low cost, and striving to get it ‘right first time’.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the varied principles underpinning lean construction include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Improving communication.&lt;br /&gt;
* Eliminating waste and errors.&lt;br /&gt;
* Direct intervention to drive immediate and apparent change.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improving work planning and forward scheduling.&lt;br /&gt;
* Specifying value from the perspective of the customer.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identifying the processes that deliver customer value (the value stream).&lt;br /&gt;
* Eliminating activities that do not add value.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensuring the working environment is clean, safe, and efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the techniques that can be adopted include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using modelling and visualisation techniques to improve planning and communication.&lt;br /&gt;
* Early planning, to improve workflow, focussing on defining achievable tasks and avoiding mistakes, duplicated effort, out of sequence working and activity that does not add customer value. The objective is the maximisation of workflow and the minimisation of performance variation rather than point speed.&lt;br /&gt;
* Look-ahead scheduling.&lt;br /&gt;
* Pre-fabrication and modular building to reduce activity on site and better distribute the workload.&lt;br /&gt;
* Just-in-time deliveries.&lt;br /&gt;
* Value management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrating the supply chain through partnering and collaborative practices.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking techniques and the use of key performance indicators.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The_Last_Planner_System|Last Planner System]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Critical path analysis and management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Risk management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous improvement from one project to another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Uptake =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is some suggestion that the adoption of lean construction has not been entirely successful. To a certain extent this is because some of its techniques are already part of best practice, however successive reports assessing the industry continue to be highly critical. Notably, the Government Construction Strategy, published in May 2011, suggested “..the UK does not get full value from public sector construction… “ and that “…there is broad consensus, spread both across the industry and its customers, that construction under-performs”, advocating a “leaning” of the procurement process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Egan report itself was not entirely welcomed, and there was some suggestion that applying experience in manufacturing to construction was unrealistic (Sir John Egan was chief executive of Jaguar Cars from 1984 to 1990, and chief executive of BAA from 1990 to 1999). In May 2008, ten years after publication of Rethinking Construction, Sir John Egan stated that &amp;amp;quot;...we have to say we’ve got pretty patchy results. And certainly nowhere near the improvement we could have achieved, or that I expected to achieve…..I guess if I were giving marks out of 10 after 10 years I’d probably only give the industry about four out of 10&amp;amp;quot; (ref [http://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/CLIP/SirJohnEgan21-05-08.pdf Egan: I’d give construction about 4 of 10]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Briefing documents.&lt;br /&gt;
* Egan report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Government construction strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
* Latham report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lessons learned report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mean lean green.&lt;br /&gt;
* Output-based specification.&lt;br /&gt;
* Performance in use.&lt;br /&gt;
* Post project review.&lt;br /&gt;
* Soft landings.&lt;br /&gt;
* Value management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Whole life costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org.uk Lean Construction Institute UK]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers search [http://www.iglc.net/ iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal]&lt;br /&gt;
* Constructing Excellence: [http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/pdf/fact_sheet/lean.pdf Lean construction].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=355 The Construction Lean Improvement Programme] (CLIP)&lt;br /&gt;
* Egan: [http://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/CLIP/SirJohnEgan21-05-08.pdf I’d give construction about four out of 10], 21 May, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.ntu.ac.uk/apps/research/groups/22/home.aspx/group/142953/overview/lean_project_management Centre for Lean Projects, Nottingham Trent University]&lt;br /&gt;
* [mailto:gl51hb@me.com?subject=%5BDBwiki%5D%20Please%20tell%20me%20more%20about%20the%20ECI%20Lean%20Task%20Force European Construction Institute Lean Task Force]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lcnetwork Lean Construction Network on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/glossary/ Lean Construction Glossary LCI]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://publish.coursebaker.com/lean/ Lean Construction Glossary]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Client_procedures]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Construction_techniques]] [[Category:Public_procedures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Mean_lean_green</id>
		<title>Mean lean green</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Mean_lean_green"/>
				<updated>2016-01-08T09:24:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The “Mean Lean Green” philosophy aims to produce developments that lower the demand for resources, provide efficient structures and deploy innovative technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is based on the hierarchy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mean. Reducing the demand for materials, energy, water and other resources. For example, creating guidelines for building designers to ensure demand is low from the outset, by utilising passive measures such as natural heating, lighting, ventilation and external shading.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean. Ensuring that materials and systems are used responsibly and efficiently. For example, reducing distribution losses for energy (or water) between generation and usage. This might involve supplying heat, cooling, power and water from an on-site source.&lt;br /&gt;
* Green. Supplying any remaining requirements from renewable sources to minimise residual carbon emissions. For example, solar power or rainwater harvesting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developers can tend to jump straight to the ‘green’ aspect , that is, renewable energy generation, but the other two – using less and making sure as much as possible gets to the point of usage – are equally important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The philosophy applies to environmental assessments and strategies at all scales, including; the design of buildings and infrastructure, new city developments and climate change adaptation projects, as well as implementing strategies to reduce carbon and take advantage of carbon finance and trading. Being Mean, Lean and Green in its broadest sense requires integration of central and local government policy, legislation, building regulations, client policy and design strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mean Lean Green approach was adopted by the Olympic Delivery Authority in the development of the London 2012 Olympic Park (ref ODA: [http://www.london2012.com/documents/general/mean-lean-and-green.pdf Mean, lean and green, Powering the Olympic Park]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst the Mean Lean Green approach is popular in the ‘Global North’ it can be less useful in the ‘Global South’ where the ‘lean’ aspect may already happen through necessity, and in fact increased resource consumption may be required to improve quality of life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NB The term 'Lean Construction' was coined by the International Group for Lean Construction in 1993. It is, in part, an adaptation of the principles of lean manufacturing concerned with maximising the value delivered to clients/customers/end-users while minimising cost and waste through the entire construction supply chain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Circular economy.&lt;br /&gt;
* Climate Change Act.&lt;br /&gt;
* Emission rates.&lt;br /&gt;
* Energy targets.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
* Recycling.&lt;br /&gt;
* Smart cities.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sustainability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sustainable materials&lt;br /&gt;
* Zero carbon homes.&lt;br /&gt;
* Zero carbon non domestic buildings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ODA: [http://www.london2012.com/documents/general/mean-lean-and-green.pdf Mean, lean and green, Powering the Olympic Park].&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean, Mean &amp;amp;amp; Green: [http://blog.thedetroithub.com/2012/10/16/lean-mean-green-reimaging-detroit-and-other-post-industrial-cities-too/ Reimaging Detroit and other post-industrial cities too].&lt;br /&gt;
* Commission for a Sustainable London 2012: [http://www.cslondon.org/sustainable-games/case-study-renewable-energy/ Case Study: Renewable energy].&lt;br /&gt;
* Public Service Review: PROFILE- Green Solutions – without the upfront cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[Category:Client_procedures]] [[Category:Design]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T14:03:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of plan detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Measurement &amp;amp;amp; learning =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System has a number of measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (often referred to as PPC, a measure of plan reliability)]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks made ready (a measure of the effectiveness of the Make Ready Process)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks anticipated (a measure of the ability of the team to anticipate the work they need to plan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metrics are calculated for the project as a whole. The reason for using these metrics is to learn. If the metrics are used for any other purpose than as an aid to learning and improvement their value as a learning aid diminishes as those involved start to 'game the system'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When tasks are not completed as promised the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_Whys 5Why] process can be used to find the root cause of the late or early delivery and then [https://leadingtransformation.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/addressing-problems-with-countermeasures-rather-than-solutions/ countermeasures] developed to reduce the chances that the problem will happen again. In this way learning this week is built into operations next week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (first formulated by Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 (Ballard et al 2009)]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Breakdowns/Noticing_and_Declaring_Breakdowns.pdf Learn from breakdowns].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (see above) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. J Constr Eng &amp;amp;amp; Proj Mgmt, 124(1) 11–17. [this is an important paper and still very relevant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, G. , Hammond, J. &amp;amp;amp; Nickerson, R. (2009) [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 Production Control Principles] IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn (2014) The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* LPC (2011) [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials]&lt;br /&gt;
* Macomber Bettler (2011) [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery] [LPC] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Baldwin David Bordoli 2014 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118838167.ch7/summary Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling] App2 362-366 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=iibphp2k&amp;amp;amp;s=12d1683fba6a3069ef63dc7ff20fc16593fc0f5d The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The make ready process (called 'forward planning') did not bring the whole team together and there was no explicit learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T14:02:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of plan detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Measurement &amp;amp;amp; learning =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System has a number of measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (often referred to as PPC, a measure of plan reliability)]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks made ready (a measure of the effectiveness of the Make Ready Process)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks anticipated (a measure of the ability of the team to anticipate the work they need to plan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metrics are calculated for the project as a whole. The reason for using these metrics is to learn. If the metrics are used for any other purpose than as an aid to learning and improvement their value as a learning aid diminishes as those involved start to 'game the system'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When tasks are not completed as promised the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_Whys 5Why] process can be used to find the root cause of the late or early delivery and then [https://leadingtransformation.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/addressing-problems-with-countermeasures-rather-than-solutions/ countermeasures] developed to reduce the chances that the problem will happen again. In this way learning this week is built into operations next week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (first formulated by Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 (Ballard et al 2009)]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Breakdowns/Noticing_and_Declaring_Breakdowns.pdf Learn from breakdowns].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (see above) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. J Constr Eng &amp;amp;amp; Proj Mgmt, 124(1) 11–17. [this is an important paper and still very relevant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, G. , Hammond, J. &amp;amp;amp; Nickerson, R. (2009) [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 Production Control Principles] IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn (2014) The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* LPC (2011) [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials]&lt;br /&gt;
* Macomber Bettler (2011) [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery] [LPC] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Baldwin David Bordoli 2014 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118838167.ch7/summary Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling] App2 362-366 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=iibphp2k&amp;amp;amp;s=12d1683fba6a3069ef63dc7ff20fc16593fc0f5d The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The make ready process (called 'forward planning') did not bring the whole team together and there was no explicit learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T13:57:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of plan detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Measurement &amp;amp;amp; learning =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System has a number of measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (often referred to as PPC, a measure of plan reliability)]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks made ready (a measure of the effectiveness of the Make Ready Process)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks anticipated (a measure of the ability of the team to anticipate the work they need to plan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metrics are calculated for the project as a whole. The reason for using these metrics is to learn. If the metrics are used for any other purpose than as an aid to learning and improvement their value as a learning aid diminishes as those involved start to 'game the system'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When tasks are not completed as promised the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_Whys 5Why] process can be used to find the root cause of the late or early delivery and then [https://leadingtransformation.wordpress.com/2012/04/07/addressing-problems-with-countermeasures-rather-than-solutions/ countermeasures] developed to reduce the chances that the problem will happen again. In this way learning this week is built into operations next week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (first formulated by Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 (Ballard et al 2009)]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Breakdowns/Noticing_and_Declaring_Breakdowns.pdf Learn from breakdowns].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (see above) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. J Constr Eng &amp;amp;amp; Proj Mgmt, 124(1) 11–17. [this is an important paper and still very relevant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, G. , Hammond, J. &amp;amp;amp; Nickerson, R. (2009) [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 Production Control Principles] IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn (2014) The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* LPC (2011) [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Baldwin David Bordoli 2014 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/summary Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling] App2 362-366 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=iibphp2k&amp;amp;amp;s=12d1683fba6a3069ef63dc7ff20fc16593fc0f5d The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The make ready process (called 'forward planning') did not bring the whole team together and there was no explicit learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T13:48:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of plan detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Measurement &amp;amp;amp; learning =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System has a number of measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (often referred to as PPC, a measure of plan reliability)]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks made ready (a measure of the effectiveness of the Make Ready Process)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tasks anticipated (a measure of the ability of the team to anticipate the work they need to plan)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metrics are calculated for the project as a whole. The reason for using these metrics is to learn. If the metrics are used for any other purpose than as an aid to learning and improvement their value as a learning aid diminishes as those involved start to 'game the system'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When tasks are not completed as promised the 5Why process can be used to find the root cause of the late or early delivery and then countermeasures developed to reduce the chances that the problem will happen again. In this way learning this week is built into operations next week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (first formulated by Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 (Ballard et al 2009)]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Breakdowns/Noticing_and_Declaring_Breakdowns.pdf Learn from breakdowns].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (see avove) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. J Constr Eng &amp;amp;amp; Proj Mgmt, 124(1) 11–17. [this is an important paper and still very relevant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, G. , Hammond, J. &amp;amp;amp; Nickerson, R. (2009) [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 Production Control Principles] IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn (2014) The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* LPC (2011) [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Baldwin David Bordoli 2014 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/summary Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling] App2 362-366 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=iibphp2k&amp;amp;amp;s=12d1683fba6a3069ef63dc7ff20fc16593fc0f5d The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The make ready process (called 'forward planning') did not bring the whole team together and there was no explicit learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T13:33:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of plan detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (first formulated by Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 (Ballard et al 2009)]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Breakdowns/Noticing_and_Declaring_Breakdowns.pdf Learn from breakdowns].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. J Constr Eng &amp;amp;amp; Proj Mgmt, 124(1) 11–17. [this is an important paper and still very relevant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, G. , Hammond, J. &amp;amp;amp; Nickerson, R. (2009) [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 Production Control Principles] IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn (2014) The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* LPC (2011) [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Baldwin David Bordoli 2014 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/summary Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling] App2 362-366 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=iibphp2k&amp;amp;amp;s=12d1683fba6a3069ef63dc7ff20fc16593fc0f5d The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The make ready process (called 'forward planning') did not bring the whole team together and there was no explicit learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T13:12:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of plan detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (first formulated by Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to [http://www.iglc.net/papers/Details/623 (Ballard et al 2009)]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Breakdowns/Noticing_and_Declaring_Breakdowns.pdf Learn from breakdowns].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T00:13:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of plan detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-18T00:08:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf remove constraints] on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lean construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T23:49:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T23:40:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of constructors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/czrq0k8vp2b2rod/Macomber%202011%20Securing-Reliable-Promises-on-Projects-v-3.11.pdf?dl=0 Make and secure reliable promises].&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T23:02:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T23:00:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard ca. 1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:50:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning] [Note that this version of LPS, like many that use the terms Collaborative Planning or Pull Planning, is only a partial implementation of Last Planner. The forward planning is not collaborative and there is no learning process built in. Despite this the benefits for Shepherd were significant.]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:40:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/9781118838167.app2/asset/app2.pdf;jsessionid=DA3906E60C9FD14179C7B6555EDC9379.f03t01?v=1&amp;amp;amp;t=ii9ejd8v&amp;amp;amp;s=12b27ba87f103e22105a5da88e2bb686b329938e The Shepherd Way and Collaborative Planning]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:36:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/wp-content/uploads/Responsibility-based-Project-Delivery-LPC.pdf Responsibility-based Project Delivery™] — an agile adaptation of LPS for use in design&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:33:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen or design team leaders (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:31:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week) – this is often referred to as Weekly Work Planning (WWP)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:23:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversational processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard, Glenn 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:22:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf constraint free]) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System increases plan detail as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is (Ballard)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/project/smartlog/seminarer/2014/g-ballard.pdf Ballard 2014 The Last Planner System of Production Planning &amp;amp;amp; Control Norway ppt.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:06:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanproject.com/lpc-downloads/_ Last Planner System - Just the Essentials] [LPC]&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T22:01:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png|link=File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440448_UNDERSTANDING_PERCENT_PLAN_COMPLETE_DATA_USING_STATISTICAL_QUALITY_CONTROL_CHARTS Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability)] and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/media/library/id45/Rethinking_Lookahead_Planning_to_Optimize_Construction_Workflow.pdf Improve workflow] as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T20:03:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS levels of detail time diagram for DBwiki.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png</id>
		<title>File:LPS levels of detail time diagram for DBwiki.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T20:02:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;LPS_levels_of_detail_time_diagram_for_DBwiki.png&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T19:54:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS levels of detail |800px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T19:13:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&amp;amp;wpDestFile=LPS_levels_of_detail|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T19:09:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS levels of detail ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T19:08:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer. In the UK it is sometimes known as Collaborative Planning and, in the USA, sometimes called Pull Planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows [http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~tommelein/pt191report/CII%20Lean%20Construction%20Final%20Report.pdf lean construction principles]. It was developed by [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glenn_Ballard Glenn Ballard] and [http://www.leanproject.com/who-we-are/our-team/greg-howell/ Greg Howell] who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process (or conversation) within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T18:51:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DLPS_levels_of_detail%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&amp;amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;amp;redlink=1|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T18:48:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DLPS_levels_of_detail%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Find_out_more Find out more] =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lastplanner Last Planner User Group on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Lean_construction</id>
		<title>Lean construction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Lean_construction"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T18:45:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean production (sometimes referred to as lean manufacturing) was pioneered by Toyota in Japan after the second world war. The Toyota Production System was considered to be the most efficient in the world, and it was recognised that their lean production principles could be applied not only to any other manufacturing process, but also to other business activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term 'lean construction' is an adaptation of lean production techniques applied to the construction industry. Very broadly it can be characterised as techniques aimed at maximising value and minimising waste.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= UK construction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The construction industry in the UK has consistently performed in a way that is thought to be wasteful compared to other industries. There is a general perception that it does not deliver good value for its customers. In part this is due to the unusual nature of construction, where, unlike a production line, each building is a one off. But in addition, the nature of contracting arrangements means that it can be adversarial, with significant potential for disputes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, the then Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott set up the Construction Task Force, chaired by Sir John Egan. In 1998, the task force published ‘Rethinking Construction' (the Egan Report), on the scope for improving the quality and efficiency of UK construction. Amongst other things, Egan advocated lean thinking, suggesting that it “…presents a powerful and coherent synthesis of the most effective techniques for eliminating waste and delivering significant sustained improvements in efficiency and quality….We recommend that the UK construction industry should also adopt lean thinking as a means of sustaining performance improvement.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other countries around the world have also made attempts to apply lean thinking to construction, notably Denmark, USA, Chile, Brazil and Australia (ref Lean Thinking in Construction).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Lean construction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean construction is a broad philosophy that has been defined in many different ways and includes a range of different approached, tools and techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is defined by the [http://www.leanconstruction.org.uk/what-is Lean Construction Institute] as “…the application of lean thinking to the design &amp;amp;amp; construction process creating improved project delivery to meet client needs and improved efficiency for constructors.” Other definitions include, &amp;amp;quot;...a philosophy for working based on continuous delivering of better value to customers whilst increasing business profitability and competitiveness&amp;amp;quot; (ref Lean Thinking in Construction) and &amp;amp;quot;... managing and improving the construction process to profitably deliver what the customer needs&amp;amp;quot; (ref Constructing Excellence).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst the goals of lean construction and lean production may be similar, the approaches are necessarily different, due largely to the fact that developing a building is a ‘project’ rather than ‘programme’ (ie it has a start and end rather than an ongoing activity such as a production line) and the product is is often a one off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean construction is a continuous process that applies through design, procurement, manufacture and construction. It is an integrated process in which clients, designers, contractors, and suppliers must be committed to working together, focussing on delivering value (as seen by the ultimate customer) rather than low cost, and striving to get it ‘right first time’.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the varied principles underpinning lean construction include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Improving communication.&lt;br /&gt;
* Eliminating waste and errors.&lt;br /&gt;
* Direct intervention to drive immediate and apparent change.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improving work planning and forward scheduling.&lt;br /&gt;
* Specifying value from the perspective of the customer.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identifying the processes that deliver customer value (the value stream).&lt;br /&gt;
* Eliminating activities that do not add value.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensuring the working environment is clean, safe, and efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the techniques that can be adopted include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using modelling and visualisation techniques to improve planning and communication.&lt;br /&gt;
* Early planning, to improve workflow, focussing on defining achievable tasks and avoiding mistakes, duplicated effort, out of sequence working and activity that does not add customer value. The objective is the maximisation of workflow and the minimisation of performance variation rather than point speed.&lt;br /&gt;
* Look-ahead scheduling.&lt;br /&gt;
* Pre-fabrication and modular building to reduce activity on site and better distribute the workload.&lt;br /&gt;
* Just-in-time deliveries.&lt;br /&gt;
* Value management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrating the supply chain through partnering and collaborative practices.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking techniques and the use of key performance indicators.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The_Last_Planner_System|Last Planner System]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Critical path analysis and management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Risk management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous improvement from one project to another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Uptake =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is some suggestion that the adoption of lean construction has not been entirely successful. To a certain extent this is because some of its techniques are already part of best practice, however successive reports assessing the industry continue to be highly critical. Notably, the Government Construction Strategy, published in May 2011, suggested “..the UK does not get full value from public sector construction… “ and that “…there is broad consensus, spread both across the industry and its customers, that construction under-performs”, advocating a “leaning” of the procurement process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Egan report itself was not entirely welcomed, and there was some suggestion that applying experience in manufacturing to construction was unrealistic (Sir John Egan was chief executive of Jaguar Cars from 1984 to 1990, and chief executive of BAA from 1990 to 1999). In May 2008, ten years after publication of Rethinking Construction, Sir John Egan stated that &amp;amp;quot;...we have to say we’ve got pretty patchy results. And certainly nowhere near the improvement we could have achieved, or that I expected to achieve…..I guess if I were giving marks out of 10 after 10 years I’d probably only give the industry about four out of 10&amp;amp;quot; (ref [http://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/CLIP/SirJohnEgan21-05-08.pdf Egan: I’d give construction about 4 of 10]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Briefing documents.&lt;br /&gt;
* Egan report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Government construction strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
* Latham report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lessons learned report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mean lean green.&lt;br /&gt;
* Output-based specification.&lt;br /&gt;
* Performance in use.&lt;br /&gt;
* Post project review.&lt;br /&gt;
* Soft landings.&lt;br /&gt;
* Value management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Whole life costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org.uk Lean Construction Institute UK]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers search [http://www.iglc.net/ iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal]&lt;br /&gt;
* Constructing Excellence: [http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/pdf/fact_sheet/lean.pdf Lean construction].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=355 The Construction Lean Improvement Programme] (CLIP)&lt;br /&gt;
* Egan: [http://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/CLIP/SirJohnEgan21-05-08.pdf I’d give construction about four out of 10], 21 May, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.ntu.ac.uk/apps/research/groups/22/home.aspx/group/142953/overview/lean_project_management Centre for Lean Projects, Nottingham Trent University]&lt;br /&gt;
* [mailto:gl51hb@me.com?subject=%5BDBwiki%5D%20Please%20tell%20me%20more%20about%20the%20ECI%20Lean%20Task%20Force European Construction Institute Lean Task Force]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linkd.in/lcnetwork Lean Construction Network on LinkedIn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Client_procedures]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Construction_techniques]] [[Category:Public_procedures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-16T18:25:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DLPS_levels_of_detail%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Find_out_more Find out more] =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and [https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner+System Google Scholar]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T14:19:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DLPS_levels_of_detail%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Find_out_more Find out more] =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and Google Scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (1998) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T14:12:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DLPS_levels_of_detail%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Find_out_more Find out more] =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and Google Scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Lean_construction</id>
		<title>Lean construction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Lean_construction"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T14:10:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= Introduction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean production (sometimes referred to as lean manufacturing) was pioneered by Toyota in Japan after the second world war. The Toyota Production System was considered to be the most efficient in the world, and it was recognised that their lean production principles could be applied not only to any other manufacturing process, but also to other business activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term 'lean construction' is an adaptation of lean production techniques applied to the construction industry. Very broadly it can be characterised as techniques aimed at maximising value and minimising waste.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= UK construction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The construction industry in the UK has consistently performed in a way that is thought to be wasteful compared to other industries. There is a general perception that it does not deliver good value for its customers. In part this is due to the unusual nature of construction, where, unlike a production line, each building is a one off. But in addition, the nature of contracting arrangements means that it can be adversarial, with significant potential for disputes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, the then Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott set up the Construction Task Force, chaired by Sir John Egan. In 1998, the task force published ‘Rethinking Construction' (the Egan Report), on the scope for improving the quality and efficiency of UK construction. Amongst other things, Egan advocated lean thinking, suggesting that it “…presents a powerful and coherent synthesis of the most effective techniques for eliminating waste and delivering significant sustained improvements in efficiency and quality….We recommend that the UK construction industry should also adopt lean thinking as a means of sustaining performance improvement.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other countries around the world have also made attempts to apply lean thinking to construction, notably Denmark, USA, Chile, Brazil and Australia (ref Lean Thinking in Construction).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Lean construction =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean construction is a broad philosophy that has been defined in many different ways and includes a range of different approached, tools and techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is defined by the [http://www.leanconstruction.org.uk/what-is Lean Construction Institute] as “…the application of lean thinking to the design &amp;amp;amp; construction process creating improved project delivery to meet client needs and improved efficiency for constructors.” Other definitions include, &amp;amp;quot;...a philosophy for working based on continuous delivering of better value to customers whilst increasing business profitability and competitiveness&amp;amp;quot; (ref Lean Thinking in Construction) and &amp;amp;quot;... managing and improving the construction process to profitably deliver what the customer needs&amp;amp;quot; (ref Constructing Excellence).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst the goals of lean construction and lean production may be similar, the approaches are necessarily different, due largely to the fact that developing a building is a ‘project’ rather than ‘programme’ (ie it has a start and end rather than an ongoing activity such as a production line) and the product is is often a one off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lean construction is a continuous process that applies through design, procurement, manufacture and construction. It is an integrated process in which clients, designers, contractors, and suppliers must be committed to working together, focussing on delivering value (as seen by the ultimate customer) rather than low cost, and striving to get it ‘right first time’.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the varied principles underpinning lean construction include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Improving communication.&lt;br /&gt;
* Eliminating waste and errors.&lt;br /&gt;
* Direct intervention to drive immediate and apparent change.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improving work planning and forward scheduling.&lt;br /&gt;
* Specifying value from the perspective of the customer.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identifying the processes that deliver customer value (the value stream).&lt;br /&gt;
* Eliminating activities that do not add value.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensuring the working environment is clean, safe, and efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the techniques that can be adopted include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Using modelling and visualisation techniques to improve planning and communication.&lt;br /&gt;
* Early planning, to improve workflow, focussing on defining achievable tasks and avoiding mistakes, duplicated effort, out of sequence working and activity that does not add customer value. The objective is the maximisation of workflow and the minimisation of performance variation rather than point speed.&lt;br /&gt;
* Look-ahead scheduling.&lt;br /&gt;
* Pre-fabrication and modular building to reduce activity on site and better distribute the workload.&lt;br /&gt;
* Just-in-time deliveries.&lt;br /&gt;
* Value management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
* Integrating the supply chain through partnering and collaborative practices.&lt;br /&gt;
* Benchmarking techniques and the use of key performance indicators.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The_Last_Planner_System|Last Planner System]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Critical path analysis and management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Risk management techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous improvement from one project to another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Uptake =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is some suggestion that the adoption of lean construction has not been entirely successful. To a certain extent this is because some of its techniques are already part of best practice, however successive reports assessing the industry continue to be highly critical. Notably, the Government Construction Strategy, published in May 2011, suggested “..the UK does not get full value from public sector construction… “ and that “…there is broad consensus, spread both across the industry and its customers, that construction under-performs”, advocating a “leaning” of the procurement process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Egan report itself was not entirely welcomed, and there was some suggestion that applying experience in manufacturing to construction was unrealistic (Sir John Egan was chief executive of Jaguar Cars from 1984 to 1990, and chief executive of BAA from 1990 to 1999). In May 2008, ten years after publication of Rethinking Construction, Sir John Egan stated that &amp;amp;quot;...we have to say we’ve got pretty patchy results. And certainly nowhere near the improvement we could have achieved, or that I expected to achieve…..I guess if I were giving marks out of 10 after 10 years I’d probably only give the industry about four out of 10&amp;amp;quot; (ref [http://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/CLIP/SirJohnEgan21-05-08.pdf Egan: I’d give construction about 4 of 10]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Find out more =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Briefing documents.&lt;br /&gt;
* Egan report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Government construction strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
* Latham report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lessons learned report.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mean lean green.&lt;br /&gt;
* Output-based specification.&lt;br /&gt;
* Performance in use.&lt;br /&gt;
* Post project review.&lt;br /&gt;
* Soft landings.&lt;br /&gt;
* Value management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Whole life costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Constructing Excellence: [http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/pdf/fact_sheet/lean.pdf Lean construction].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=355 The Construction Lean Improvement Programme] (CLIP)&lt;br /&gt;
* Egan: [http://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/CLIP/SirJohnEgan21-05-08.pdf I’d give construction about four out of 10], 21 May, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
* Loughborough University: Lean Thinking in Construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Client_procedures]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Construction_techniques]] [[Category:Public_procedures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T14:02:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the [http://www.leanconstruction.org Lean Construction Institute] at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DLPS_levels_of_detail&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and Google Scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T14:01:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the Lean Construction Institute at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&amp;amp;wpDestFile=LPS_levels_of_detail|File:LPS levels of detail]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Last Planner principles =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and Google Scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T14:00:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations or processes. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These systematic processes increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the Lean Construction Institute at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Five key processes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS levels of detail ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Mossman 2015] with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Last Planner principles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&lt;br /&gt;
* == [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Find_out_more Find out more] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and Google Scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:LPS_levels_of_detail_%26_time_diagram_for_ICEwiki.png</id>
		<title>File:LPS levels of detail &amp; time diagram for ICEwiki.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:LPS_levels_of_detail_%26_time_diagram_for_ICEwiki.png"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T13:56:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:LPS levels of detail &amp;amp; time diagram for ICEwiki.png&amp;amp;quot;: each conversation becomes progressively more detailed in the Last Planner System&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In the Last Planner System levels of detail increase as the time for starting the activity approaches&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System</id>
		<title>Last Planner System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Last_Planner_System"/>
				<updated>2015-12-15T13:53:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Alanmossman: Created page with &amp;quot;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Last Planner System (LPS) is a collaborative short-term planning process that involves trade foremen (the last planners) in planning in greater and greater detail as the time for the work to be done gets closer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS was created to enable more reliable and predictable production in projects. It also:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* supports the flow of work through the project&lt;br /&gt;
* builds trust and collaboration with a project team&lt;br /&gt;
* delivers safer projects faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS brings together those who will execute the work (the team) to plan when and how work will be done through a series of conversations. It requires the team to collaboratively remove constraints as a team and to promise delivery of each task. These conversations increase the chances that work flows reliably, and recognizes that personal relationships and peer pressure are critical to that process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS is a planning, monitoring and control system that follows lean construction principles. It was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell who later founded the Lean Construction Institute at the behest of a number of contractors who had benefited from their use of LPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Five key processes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each process within the system brings its own benefits. When all are working together they reinforce each other and the overall benefits are greater. The processes are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Collaborative Programming[[#_ftn1|[1]]] —creating and agreeing the production sequence (+ compressing it if required) and agreeing the key hand-overs from one trade or design team to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make Ready[[#_ftn2|[2]]] — Making tasks in the Look Ahead period ready (i.e. constraint free) so that they can be done when the team want to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Planning — collaboratively agreeing production tasks for the next period (e.g. shift, day or week)&lt;br /&gt;
# Production Management — collaboratively monitoring production to keep activities on track, generally on a daily basis&lt;br /&gt;
# Measurement, learning and continual improvement — learning and improving project, planning and production processes so as to improve the flow and the rate of flow of the work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LPS levels of detail ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: In the Last Planner System the level of detail increases as the day for the work to be done approaches (source: Mossman 2015 with permission)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Last Planner principles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* all plans are forecasts; all forecasts are wrong&lt;br /&gt;
* the longer the forecast, the more wrong it gets&lt;br /&gt;
* the more detailed the forecast, the wronger it is&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The implication of these principles are that it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plan in greater detail as you get closer to doing the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce plans collaboratively with those who will do the work.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reveal and remove constraints on planned tasks as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, it is important to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;[http://www.reformingprojectmanagement.com/docs/securing-reliable-promises-on-projects.pdf Make and secure reliable promises.]&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Measure promises kept (planning capabilities, Percent Plan (or Promises) Complete (PPC, a measure of plan reliability) and improve by learning from early, late or incomplete deliveries and workflow disruptions.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Improve workflow as a team based on what has been learned.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;== [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Find_out_more Find out more] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Related articles on [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Designing_Buildings_Wiki Designing Buildings Wiki] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lean_construction|Lean Construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== External references ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/the-last-planner/ Lean Construction Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* For recent papers about LPS search [http://www.iglc.net iglc.net], [http://www.leanconstruction.org/training/lcj/journal-papers/ Lean Construction Journal], [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&amp;amp;amp;rls=en&amp;amp;amp;q=Last+Planner Google] and Google Scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard, Glenn (2000). [http://www.leanconstruction.org/pdf/ballard2000-dissertation.pdf Last Planner™ System of Production Control] (pdf) (Ph.D.). UK: University of Birmingham. [note: LPS has moved on in the 15 years since Ballard completed his thesis – both theory and practice have developed since then.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://toip.uchile.cl/~mcerda/Sup/creators%20The%20Last%20Planner%20System.pdf An update on Last Planner]. IGLC&lt;br /&gt;
* Ballard Glenn &amp;amp;amp; Gregory A. Howell (2003) [http://leanconstruction.org.uk/media/docs/ShieldingProduction.PDF Shielding Production: An Essential Step in Production Control]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 11 – 17.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gregory Howell and Hal Macomber (2011) [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Last_Planner_System_as_Network_of_Commitments_LPC-4.pdf The Last Planner System: Conversations that Design and Activate the Network of Commitments] LPC&lt;br /&gt;
* Mossman, Alan (2015) [http://bit.ly/LPS-5cc Last Planner®: 5 + 1 crucial &amp;amp;amp; collaborative conversations for predictable design &amp;amp;amp; construction delivery]. 36pp&lt;br /&gt;
* for more on reliable promising read [http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1478378484 Fernando Flores (2013) Conversations for Action]; LCI's [http://leanconstruction.org/media/learning_laboratory/Reliable_Promising/Reliable_Promising.pdf Reliable Promising]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
[[#_ftnref1|[1]]] sometimes called pull scheduling, pull planning, reverse phase scheduling, collaborative planning, collaborative mapping, sticky-note planning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[#_ftnref2|[2]]] sometimes called LookAhead planning [all plans look ahead!]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Alanmossman</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>