Time is up - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:41, 18 February 2021

2021-02-18T07:41:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:41, 18 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−		+	== Pens down please - time is up. ==
−	== ~~'''~~Pens down please - time is up. ~~'''~~ ==	+

	Thanks so much to everyone who entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.		Thanks so much to everyone who entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.
Line 12:		Line 11:
	Try Googling the articles written by our previous competition winners “Geothermal Pile Foundations” and “The History of the Architectural Profession” - you should find they come top.		Try Googling the articles written by our previous competition winners “Geothermal Pile Foundations” and “The History of the Architectural Profession” - you should find they come top.

−	----	+	-----
−		+
	== Featured articles ==		== Featured articles ==

Line 22:		Line 20:
	Construction disputes:		Construction disputes:

−	"It was clear that dealing with the building industry was just as tricky as dealing with the KGB." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Causes_of_construction_disputes Read more]	+	"It was clear that dealing with the building industry was just as tricky as dealing with the KGB." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Causes_of_construction_disputes Read more]

	Architect’s fees:		Architect’s fees:
Line 30:		Line 28:
	The design timeframe for smart cities:		The design timeframe for smart cities:

−	80 weeks or 80 years? "Develop a roadmap that focuses on short, medium and long-term strategies." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Smart_cities_design_timeframe Read more]	+	80 weeks or 80 years? "Develop a roadmap that focuses on short, medium and long-term strategies." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Smart_cities_design_timeframe Read more]

−	[[Category:~~News~~]] [[Category:DCN_News]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_News]] [[Category:News]] [[Category:Site_Information]]
−	[[Category:Site_Information]]	+

Designing Buildings at 07:07, 7 May 2013

2013-05-07T07:07:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 7 May 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	----		----

−	== ~~'''A bit of light reading for the Bank Holiday Weekend'''~~ ==	+	== Featured articles ==

	The green belt:		The green belt:
Line 28:		Line 28:
	This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]		This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]

−	~~----~~	+	The design timeframe for smart cities:

−	[[Category:News]]	+	80 weeks or 80 years? "Develop a roadmap that focuses on short, medium and long-term strategies." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Smart_cities_design_timeframe Read more]
		+
		+	[[Category:News]] [[Category:DCN_News]]
	[[Category:Site_Information]]		[[Category:Site_Information]]

Designing Buildings at 16:53, 3 May 2013

2013-05-03T16:53:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 3 May 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== '''Pens down please - time is up. ''' ==		== '''Pens down please - time is up. ''' ==

−	Thanks so much to everyone who	+	Thanks so much to everyone who entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.
−		+
−	entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.	+

	Wow – what an amazing variety of entries we've had. Everything from using spiders to get rid of woodworm, to conical roof slating, to plastic bridges. We will spend the next few weeks reading through them all to produce a shortlist of 5 from which one overall winner will be selected (it's a bit like MasterChef). We will announce the winners and commended articles in the second week of June.		Wow – what an amazing variety of entries we've had. Everything from using spiders to get rid of woodworm, to conical roof slating, to plastic bridges. We will spend the next few weeks reading through them all to produce a shortlist of 5 from which one overall winner will be selected (it's a bit like MasterChef). We will announce the winners and commended articles in the second week of June.

Designing Buildings at 16:52, 3 May 2013

2013-05-03T16:52:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 3 May 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== '''Pens down please - time is up. ''' ==		== '''Pens down please - time is up. ''' ==

−	Thanks so much to everyone who	+	Thanks so much to everyone who

	entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.		entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.

Designing Buildings at 16:51, 3 May 2013

2013-05-03T16:51:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 3 May 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:

	This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]		This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]
−
−	~~<br/>~~

	----		----

Designing Buildings at 16:51, 3 May 2013

2013-05-03T16:51:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 3 May 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== '''Pens down please - time is up. ''' ==		== '''Pens down please - time is up. ''' ==

−	Thanks so much to everyone ~~that entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.~~	+	Thanks so much to everyone who

−	Wow – what an amazing variety of entries we've had. Everything from using spiders to get rid of woodworm, to conical roof slating, to plastic bridges. We will spend the next few weeks reading through them all to produce a ~~short list~~ of 5 from which one overall winner will be selected (it's a bit like MasterChef). We will announce the winners and commended articles in the second week of June.	+	entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.
		+
		+	Wow – what an amazing variety of entries we've had. Everything from using spiders to get rid of woodworm, to conical roof slating, to plastic bridges. We will spend the next few weeks reading through them all to produce a shortlist of 5 from which one overall winner will be selected (it's a bit like MasterChef). We will announce the winners and commended articles in the second week of June.

	But now you have the hang of it, and realise it really isn’t difficult, why not keep on writing?		But now you have the hang of it, and realise it really isn’t difficult, why not keep on writing?
Line 27:		Line 29:

	This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]		This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]
		+
		+	<br/>
		+
		+	----

	[[Category:News]]		[[Category:News]]
	[[Category:Site_Information]]		[[Category:Site_Information]]

Designing Buildings at 16:01, 3 May 2013

2013-05-03T16:01:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 3 May 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Thanks so much to everyone that entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.		Thanks so much to everyone that entered The Chartered Institute of Building article competition.

−	Wow – what an amazing variety of entries we'	+	Wow – what an amazing variety of entries we've had. Everything from using spiders to get rid of woodworm, to conical roof slating, to plastic bridges. We will spend the next few weeks reading through them all to produce a short list of 5 from which one overall winner will be selected (it's a bit like MasterChef). We will announce the winners and commended articles in the second week of June.
−		+
−	ve had. Everything from using spiders to get rid of woodworm, to conical roof slating, to plastic bridges. We will spend the next few weeks reading through them all to produce a short list of 5 from which one overall winner will be selected (it's a bit like MasterChef). We will announce the winners and commended articles in the second week of June.	+

	But now you have the hang of it, and realise it really isn’t difficult, why not keep on writing?		But now you have the hang of it, and realise it really isn’t difficult, why not keep on writing?

Designing Buildings: Protected "Time is up" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2013-05-03T16:00:29Z

Protected "Time is up" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

← Older revision

Revision as of 16:00, 3 May 2013

Designing Buildings at 16:00, 3 May 2013

2013-05-03T16:00:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 3 May 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== '''A bit of light reading for the Bank Holiday Weekend''' ==		== '''A bit of light reading for the Bank Holiday Weekend''' ==

−	The green belt:	+	The green belt:

	Sensible protection for the countryside, or a barrier to growth that preserves industrial agriculture whilst exacerbating flooding? [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Green_belt Read more]		Sensible protection for the countryside, or a barrier to growth that preserves industrial agriculture whilst exacerbating flooding? [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Green_belt Read more]
Line 30:		Line 30:
	This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]		This one inevitably continues to attract controversy, particularly in relation to the 2012 BD survey that suggested “…55% are paid fee levels of 4% or less...” Surely 8-12% is a more normal and sustainable level? Take a few deep breaths, have a look and comment or edit. [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architect%27s_fees Read more]

		+	[[Category:News]]
	[[Category:Site_Information]]		[[Category:Site_Information]]

Designing Buildings at 15:45, 3 May 2013

2013-05-03T15:45:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 3 May 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:
	----		----

−	== '''A bit of light reading for the Bank Holiday Weekend:''' ==	+	== '''A bit of light reading for the Bank Holiday Weekend''' ==

−	The green belt: Sensible protection for the countryside, or a barrier to growth that preserves industrial agriculture whilst exacerbating flooding? [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Green_belt Read more]	+	The green belt:
		+
		+	Sensible protection for the countryside, or a barrier to growth that preserves industrial agriculture whilst exacerbating flooding? [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Green_belt Read more]

	Construction disputes:		Construction disputes:

	"It was clear that dealing with the building industry was just as tricky as dealing with the KGB." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Causes_of_construction_disputes Read more]		"It was clear that dealing with the building industry was just as tricky as dealing with the KGB." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Causes_of_construction_disputes Read more]
−
−	~~Contract claims:~~
−
−	~~"Avoid unnecessary optimism and be willing to accept a reasonable offer of settlement." [http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Contract_claims Read more]~~

	Architect’s fees:		Architect’s fees: