This is Architecture: writing on buildings - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 06:04, 13 October 2024

2024-10-13T06:04:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 13 October 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[File:~~This is architecture~~.jpg]]	+	[[File:This_is_architecture.jpg\|link=File:This_is_architecture.jpg]]

−	This is Architecture: writing on buildings, Edited by Stephen Bailey and Robert Bargery, Unicorn, 2022, 112 pages, 48 colour and black-and-white illustrations.	+	This is Architecture: writing on buildings. Edited by Stephen Bailey and Robert Bargery, Unicorn, 2022, 112 pages, 48 colour and black-and-white illustrations.

	-----		-----

Designing Buildings at 05:58, 13 October 2024

2024-10-13T05:58:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:58, 13 October 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[File:This is architecture.jpg]]
		+
	This is Architecture: writing on buildings, Edited by Stephen Bailey and Robert Bargery, Unicorn, 2022, 112 pages, 48 colour and black-and-white illustrations.		This is Architecture: writing on buildings, Edited by Stephen Bailey and Robert Bargery, Unicorn, 2022, 112 pages, 48 colour and black-and-white illustrations.

		+	-----
	The Royal Fine Art Commission (RFAC) was established in 1987 to advise the government on matters of public interest and aesthetics. It was replaced by the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) in 1999, which was later merged with the Design Council. Strangely, the RFAC is survived by the Royal Fine Art Commission Trust, a charity that was set up in association with the RFAC to promote good design. Its Building Beauty Awards have been its principal activity over the past two years. It has also turned to commissioning books.		The Royal Fine Art Commission (RFAC) was established in 1987 to advise the government on matters of public interest and aesthetics. It was replaced by the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) in 1999, which was later merged with the Design Council. Strangely, the RFAC is survived by the Royal Fine Art Commission Trust, a charity that was set up in association with the RFAC to promote good design. Its Building Beauty Awards have been its principal activity over the past two years. It has also turned to commissioning books.

Designing Buildings: Protected "This is Architecture: writing on buildings" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2024-10-13T05:55:39Z

Protected "This is Architecture: writing on buildings" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

← Older revision

Revision as of 05:55, 13 October 2024

Designing Buildings: Created page with "This is Architecture: writing on buildings, Edited by Stephen Bailey and Robert Bargery, Unicorn, 2022, 112 pages, 48 colour and black-and-white illustrations. The Royal Fine Ar..."

2024-10-13T05:55:27Z

Created page with "This is Architecture: writing on buildings, Edited by Stephen Bailey and Robert Bargery, Unicorn, 2022, 112 pages, 48 colour and black-and-white illustrations. The Royal Fine Ar..."

New page

This is Architecture: writing on buildings, Edited by Stephen Bailey and Robert Bargery, Unicorn, 2022, 112 pages, 48 colour and black-and-white illustrations.

The Royal Fine Art Commission (RFAC) was established in 1987 to advise the government on matters of public interest and aesthetics. It was replaced by the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) in 1999, which was later merged with the Design Council. Strangely, the RFAC is survived by the Royal Fine Art Commission Trust, a charity that was set up in association with the RFAC to promote good design. Its Building Beauty Awards have been its principal activity over the past two years. It has also turned to commissioning books.

This is Architecture is edited by Stephen Bayley, chair of the trust, and Robert Bargery, its director. Their intention is to ‘enhance popular appreciation of architecture and to celebrate those who are architecture’s eloquent champions.’ They do this by selecting examples of writing about architecture by a wide variety of authors, over 90 in number, chosen for the quality of their writing alone. Their criterion for inclusion is writing that is clear, instructive and (ideally) entertaining; and they have excluded the self-consciously clever and, above all, the turgid and jargon laden. Not all the subjects are great buildings, some are vernacular or quite commonplace, and not all the writers are associated with architecture.

Obvious choices such as Ruskin, Summerson, Jane Jacobs, Pevsner, Reyner Banham, Robert Byron and Goethe are all there but so too are Virginia Woolf, Guy de Maupassant, Trollope, Ouida, André Gide and Will Self, all of whom, sometimes surprisingly, have something interesting to say about buildings.

Several of the pieces are derogatory: Banham, who admires the boldness of James Stirling’s Cambridge History Faculty, sees its practical flaws and predicts with irony that in time it will be accepted by Cambridge as part of its heritage, and then no one will have the guts to pull it down when it has outlived its useful life. SG Sebald’s critique of the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, included in his novel Austerlitz, is a hundred times more damning. There is a moving extract from The Road to Wigan Pier by George Orwell, who describes the ‘lunar landscape of slagheaps’ and the ‘pools of stagnant water that had seeped into the hollows caused by the subsidence of ancient pits.’

But mostly the selected writers display admiration for their subjects and in their varied perspectives can open our eyes to new ways of seeing. Attractively designed, and with full-page photographs, it is a book to be dipped into, and worth reading more than once.

-----
This article originally appeared as ‘Eloquent champions’ in the Institute of Historic Building Conservation’s (IHBC’s) [https://ihbconline.co.uk/cont_arch/?p=1463 Context 179], published in March 2024. It was written by Peter de Figueiredo, reviews editor of Context.

--[[User:Institute_of_Historic_Building_Conservation|Institute of Historic Building Conservation]]

= Related articles on Designing Buildings Conservation. =

* Architectural styles.
* Becoming Jane Jacobs.
* Conservation.
* Conservation as action and reaction.
* Heritage.
* Historic environment.
* IHBC articles.
* Institute of Historic Building Conservation.
* Nikolaus Pevsner.
* Reading Ruskin's Cultural Heritage: conservation and transformation.

SOS Brutalism: a global survey

[[Category:DCN_Collection]] [[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Report]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Conservation]]