Things gone right - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 11:08, 14 March 2023

2023-03-14T11:08:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 14 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~[https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Construction-Innovation-Hub_Construction-Quality-Planning-Guide.pdf~~ Construction Quality Planning Guide, Draft for Consultation], Published by the Construction Innovation Hub in May 2020, suggests that Things-Gone-Right (TGR) is: ‘A term with its roots in the automotive industry, originally used in interpreting and quantifying the positive results from customer satisfaction surveys. In CQP (Construction Quality Planning) TGR is used during Lessons Learnt in Phase 5 (although can be done at any time in relation to any process with outcomes). As part of the Lessons Learnt review the reviewing team would list out points (TGR) where they feel they had achieved the objectives of the project i.e., what the team felt was successful. The required objectives of the project and or key metrics (Quality Cost, Delivery, Product Performance, and Process Performance) can be used to assess this quantitatively but could also be qualitative based on the view of the teams. The review would then try to understand what it was that contributed to that success in relation to the process followed (i.e., CQP), the tools used and how the team worked. The aim of the review is it then ensure that the contributing factors to TGR are actioned and rolled into the CQP process, tools used, working behaviours and future products.’	+	Construction Quality Planning Guide, Draft for Consultation, Published by the Construction Innovation Hub in May 2020, suggests that Things-Gone-Right (TGR) is: ‘A term with its roots in the automotive industry, originally used in interpreting and quantifying the positive results from customer satisfaction surveys. In CQP (Construction Quality Planning) TGR is used during Lessons Learnt in Phase 5 (although can be done at any time in relation to any process with outcomes). As part of the Lessons Learnt review the reviewing team would list out points (TGR) where they feel they had achieved the objectives of the project i.e., what the team felt was successful. The required objectives of the project and or key metrics (Quality Cost, Delivery, Product Performance, and Process Performance) can be used to assess this quantitatively but could also be qualitative based on the view of the teams. The review would then try to understand what it was that contributed to that success in relation to the process followed (i.e., CQP), the tools used and how the team worked. The aim of the review is it then ensure that the contributing factors to TGR are actioned and rolled into the CQP process, tools used, working behaviours and future products.’

	See also: Things gone wrong.		See also: Things gone wrong.

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* Advanced product quality planning.		* Advanced product quality planning.

Editor at 20:44, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T20:44:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 4 March 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* Things gone wrong.		* Things gone wrong.

−	[[Category:~~Definitions~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Definition~~]] [[Category:Construction_management]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:Definitions]] [[Category:Construction_management]]

Designing Buildings: moved Things-Gone-Right to Things gone right

2020-06-01T06:21:16Z

moved Things-Gone-Right to Things gone right

← Older revision

Revision as of 06:21, 1 June 2020

Designing Buildings: Created page with "[https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Construction-Innovation-Hub_Construction-Quality-Planning-Guide.pdf Construction Quality Planning Guide, Draf..."

2020-06-01T06:20:40Z

Created page with "[https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Construction-Innovation-Hub_Construction-Quality-Planning-Guide.pdf Construction Quality Planning Guide, Draf..."

New page

[https://constructioninnovationhub.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Construction-Innovation-Hub_Construction-Quality-Planning-Guide.pdf Construction Quality Planning Guide, Draft for Consultation], Published by the Construction Innovation Hub in May 2020, suggests that Things-Gone-Right (TGR) is: ‘A term with its roots in the automotive industry, originally used in interpreting and quantifying the positive results from customer satisfaction surveys. In CQP (Construction Quality Planning) TGR is used during Lessons Learnt in Phase 5 (although can be done at any time in relation to any process with outcomes). As part of the Lessons Learnt review the reviewing team would list out points (TGR) where they feel they had achieved the objectives of the project i.e., what the team felt was successful. The required objectives of the project and or key metrics (Quality Cost, Delivery, Product Performance, and Process Performance) can be used to assess this quantitatively but could also be qualitative based on the view of the teams. The review would then try to understand what it was that contributed to that success in relation to the process followed (i.e., CQP), the tools used and how the team worked. The aim of the review is it then ensure that the contributing factors to TGR are actioned and rolled into the CQP process, tools used, working behaviours and future products.’

See also: Things gone wrong.

= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

* Advanced product quality planning.
* Bill of quantities breakdown structures.
* Construction Innovation Hub.
* Construction product approval process.
* Construction quality planning.
* Lessons learnt.
* Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA).
* Poka-yoke.
* Product Breakdown Structure.
* Product design requirements.
* Product validation.
* Production readiness review.
* Project quality plan.
* Quality control.
* Quality in construction projects.
* Quality.
* Six Sigma.
* Things gone wrong.

[[Category:Definitions]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:Construction_management]]