Taylor Review - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:25, 9 November 2020

2020-11-09T07:25:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:25, 9 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	= Introduction =		= Introduction =

Line 15:		Line 14:

	Taylor was asked to review the 7,000 plus pages of government planning practice guidance (largely ‘owned’ by DCLG) that supports national planning policy, with a view to dramatically reducing it and replacing it with more accessible and effective guidance. He was asked to recommend:		Taylor was asked to review the 7,000 plus pages of government planning practice guidance (largely ‘owned’ by DCLG) that supports national planning policy, with a view to dramatically reducing it and replacing it with more accessible and effective guidance. He was asked to recommend:
−	*The scope and form of guidance that should be provided in future.	+
−	*What new or updated practice guidance should be published.	+	* The scope and form of guidance that should be provided in future.
−	*What guidance should be cancelled.	+	* What new or updated practice guidance should be published.
−	*What scope there was to encourage the planning sector to produce appropriate guidance.	+	* What guidance should be cancelled.
		+	* What scope there was to encourage the planning sector to produce appropriate guidance.

	Lord Taylor said '...it is very clear that the old way of doing things is no longer fit for purpose. We have made recommendations for a modern web-based resource that is clear, up-to-date, coherent and easily usable, not just by planners and developers, but the public too.'		Lord Taylor said '...it is very clear that the old way of doing things is no longer fit for purpose. We have made recommendations for a modern web-based resource that is clear, up-to-date, coherent and easily usable, not just by planners and developers, but the public too.'

	Taylor proposed that:		Taylor proposed that:
−	*Guidance should be restricted to that which is essential.	+
−	*Guidance should clarify the ‘ground rules’ for the planning process but should not attempt to replace local skills and judgement.	+	* Guidance should be restricted to that which is essential.
−	*Best practice is best managed by practitioner bodies and should be removed from guidance. It should however be sign-posted from government sources.	+	* Guidance should clarify the ‘ground rules’ for the planning process but should not attempt to replace local skills and judgement.
−	*Government planning practice guidance may explain requirements, but should not unnecessarily restate regulations and statutory instruments.	+	* Best practice is best managed by practitioner bodies and should be removed from guidance. It should however be sign-posted from government sources.
−	*Regulations and statutory instruments should be written clearly so they can be understood without having to piece together a trail of historic amendments.	+	* Government planning practice guidance may explain requirements, but should not unnecessarily restate regulations and statutory instruments.
−	*Guidance should be 'live managed' to ensure it does not get into a confused state again.	+	* Regulations and statutory instruments should be written clearly so they can be understood without having to piece together a trail of historic amendments.
−	*It should be more clear what is formal government planning practice guidance. Guidance should be clearly identified, referenced, dated and accessible in one place.	+	* Guidance should be 'live managed' to ensure it does not get into a confused state again.
−	*Government planning practice guidance should be published in a web-based, live resource, accessible free of charge.	+	* It should be more clear what is formal government planning practice guidance. Guidance should be clearly identified, referenced, dated and accessible in one place.
−	*Users users should be able to post their comments on the site, allowing a ‘crowd-sourced’ check to ensure the contents of the site remain current.	+	* Government planning practice guidance should be published in a web-based, live resource, accessible free of charge.
		+	* Users users should be able to post their comments on the site, allowing a ‘crowd-sourced’ check to ensure the contents of the site remain current.

	A detailed review of individual pieces of planning guidance was also presented in the report along with proposals for changing or cancelling that guidance.		A detailed review of individual pieces of planning guidance was also presented in the report along with proposals for changing or cancelling that guidance.
Line 45:		Line 46:
	On 28 August 2013, the [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. On 6 March 2014 the DCLG launched the final NPPG website. This was accompanied by a [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/local-planning Written Ministerial Statement] which includes a [http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/cancelled-guidance_06032014.pdf list of the previous planning practice guidance documents cancelled] when this site was launched.		On 28 August 2013, the [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. On 6 March 2014 the DCLG launched the final NPPG website. This was accompanied by a [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/local-planning Written Ministerial Statement] which includes a [http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/cancelled-guidance_06032014.pdf list of the previous planning practice guidance documents cancelled] when this site was launched.

−	In October 2013, Planning Minister Nick Boles announced [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-regulations-will-make-planning-easier ~~a phased~~ programme to reduce the number of technical planning regulations] to 78 - a reduction of 57 per cent. This will:	+	In October 2013, Planning Minister Nick Boles announced [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-regulations-will-make-planning-easier a phased programme to reduce the number of technical planning regulations] to 78 - a reduction of 57 per cent. This will:
−	*Consolidate rules on permitted development.	+
−	*Tackle unnecessary and overly burdensome requirements for applications.	+	* Consolidate rules on permitted development.
−	*Scrap 38 redundant regulations.	+	* Tackle unnecessary and overly burdensome requirements for applications.
		+	* Scrap 38 redundant regulations.
		+
		+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	* Egan report.
		+	* Growth and Infrastructure Act.
		+	* Killian Pretty Review.
		+	* Latham report.
		+	* National Planning Practice Guidance.
		+	* National Planning Policy Framework.
		+	* Neighbourhood planning.
		+	* Penfold review.
		+	* Planning permission.
		+	* Planning policy replaced by the NPPF.
		+	* Sustainability.

−	==~~= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===~~	+	= External references. =
−	*Egan report.	+
−	*Growth and Infrastructure Act.	+
−	*Killian Pretty Review.	+
−	*Latham report.	+
−	*National Planning Practice Guidance.	+
−	*National Planning Policy Framework.	+
−	*Neighbourhood planning.	+
−	*Penfold review.	+
−	*Planning permission.	+
−	*Planning policy replaced by the NPPF.	+
−	*Sustainability.	+

−	~~=== External references. ===~~	+	* [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/external-review-of-government-planning-practice-guidance The report in full].
−	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/external-review-of-government-planning-practice-guidance The report in full].	+	* [https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-planning-practice-guidance Taylor review consultation process].
−	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-planning-practice-guidance Taylor review consultation process].	+	* DCLG: [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf Government response to the external review of government planning practice guidance consultation and report]. May 2013.
−	*DCLG: [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf Government response to the external review of government planning practice guidance consultation and report]. May 2013.	+	* The legislation, policy and guidance that underpins planning in England can be found on the government's [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] website.
−	*The legislation, policy and guidance that underpins planning in England can be found on the government's [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] website.	+

−	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Report]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]
−	[[Category:Planning_permission]]	+

Designing Buildings at 14:01, 8 July 2014

2014-07-08T14:01:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 8 July 2014
Line 71:		Line 71:
	*The legislation, policy and guidance that underpins planning in England can be found on the government's [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] website.		*The legislation, policy and guidance that underpins planning in England can be found on the government's [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] website.

−	[[Category:~~History~~]]	+	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]]
	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]

Designing Buildings at 14:00, 13 June 2014

2014-06-13T14:00:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 13 June 2014
Line 44:		Line 44:

	On 28 August 2013, the [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. On 6 March 2014 the DCLG launched the final NPPG website. This was accompanied by a [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/local-planning Written Ministerial Statement] which includes a [http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/cancelled-guidance_06032014.pdf list of the previous planning practice guidance documents cancelled] when this site was launched.		On 28 August 2013, the [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. On 6 March 2014 the DCLG launched the final NPPG website. This was accompanied by a [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/local-planning Written Ministerial Statement] which includes a [http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/cancelled-guidance_06032014.pdf list of the previous planning practice guidance documents cancelled] when this site was launched.
−
−	~~<br/>~~

	In October 2013, Planning Minister Nick Boles announced [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-regulations-will-make-planning-easier a phased programme to reduce the number of technical planning regulations] to 78 - a reduction of 57 per cent. This will:		In October 2013, Planning Minister Nick Boles announced [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-regulations-will-make-planning-easier a phased programme to reduce the number of technical planning regulations] to 78 - a reduction of 57 per cent. This will:

80.79.211.150 at 13:08, 12 June 2014

2014-06-12T13:08:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 12 June 2014
Line 43:		Line 43:
	The government welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013. In May 2103 the Government response to the review and consultation (ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf DCLG]) suggested that the timeframe for change might be extended, stating 'We believe that the current guidance should remain in place until the new guidance suite is ready. We consider this important to ensure that there is no gap or perceived gap in the provision of guidance, and so will not be accepting the recommendation to cancel any material ahead of the new guidance being available.'		The government welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013. In May 2103 the Government response to the review and consultation (ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf DCLG]) suggested that the timeframe for change might be extended, stating 'We believe that the current guidance should remain in place until the new guidance suite is ready. We consider this important to ensure that there is no gap or perceived gap in the provision of guidance, and so will not be accepting the recommendation to cancel any material ahead of the new guidance being available.'

−	On 28 August 2013, the [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. ~~The beta site~~ was ~~closed on 14 October 2013~~. ~~Following consideration~~ of ~~comments, DCLG will launch~~ the ~~full site and cancel the current~~ planning practice guidance.	+	On 28 August 2013, the [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. On 6 March 2014 the DCLG launched the final NPPG website. This was accompanied by a [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/local-planning Written Ministerial Statement] which includes a [http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/cancelled-guidance_06032014.pdf list of the previous planning practice guidance documents cancelled] when this site was launched.
		+
		+	<br/>

	In October 2013, Planning Minister Nick Boles announced [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-regulations-will-make-planning-easier a phased programme to reduce the number of technical planning regulations] to 78 - a reduction of 57 per cent. This will:		In October 2013, Planning Minister Nick Boles announced [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-regulations-will-make-planning-easier a phased programme to reduce the number of technical planning regulations] to 78 - a reduction of 57 per cent. This will:

Designing Buildings at 11:37, 28 November 2013

2013-11-28T11:37:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 28 November 2013
Line 43:		Line 43:
	The government welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013. In May 2103 the Government response to the review and consultation (ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf DCLG]) suggested that the timeframe for change might be extended, stating 'We believe that the current guidance should remain in place until the new guidance suite is ready. We consider this important to ensure that there is no gap or perceived gap in the provision of guidance, and so will not be accepting the recommendation to cancel any material ahead of the new guidance being available.'		The government welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013. In May 2103 the Government response to the review and consultation (ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf DCLG]) suggested that the timeframe for change might be extended, stating 'We believe that the current guidance should remain in place until the new guidance suite is ready. We consider this important to ensure that there is no gap or perceived gap in the provision of guidance, and so will not be accepting the recommendation to cancel any material ahead of the new guidance being available.'

−	On 28 August 2013, the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. The beta site was closed on 14 October 2013. Following consideration of comments, DCLG will launch the full site and cancel the current planning practice guidance.	+	On 28 August 2013, the [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. The beta site was closed on 14 October 2013. Following consideration of comments, DCLG will launch the full site and cancel the current planning practice guidance.
		+
		+	In October 2013, Planning Minister Nick Boles announced [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/simplified-regulations-will-make-planning-easier a phased programme to reduce the number of technical planning regulations] to 78 - a reduction of 57 per cent. This will:
		+	*Consolidate rules on permitted development.
		+	*Tackle unnecessary and overly burdensome requirements for applications.
		+	*Scrap 38 redundant regulations.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =

Designing Buildings at 10:34, 18 October 2013

2013-10-18T10:34:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, 18 October 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:
	= Criticism =		= Criticism =

−	Taylor suggested that the great majority of this work should be completed by July 2013. However, ~~this is a major undertaking, and~~ coming so close on the heels of the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework ~~– itself a very significant change to the planning system –~~ there ~~are~~ concerns that planning could be thrown into disarray.	+	Taylor suggested that the great majority of this work should be completed by July 2013. However, coming so close on the heels of the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework there were concerns that planning could be thrown into disarray. Some campaigners described the findings of the review as giving the go ahead for a bonfire of planning rules, creating a charter for development and putting the countryside at risk.

−	~~Some campaigners have described the findings of the review as giving the go ahead for a bonfire of planning rules, creating a charter for development and putting the countryside at risk.~~	+	= Progress =

−	The government ~~however~~ welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013.	+	The government welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013. In May 2103 the Government response to the review and consultation (ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf DCLG]) suggested that the timeframe for change might be extended, stating 'We believe that the current guidance should remain in place until the new guidance suite is ready. We consider this important to ensure that there is no gap or perceived gap in the provision of guidance, and so will not be accepting the recommendation to cancel any material ahead of the new guidance being available.'

−	~~In May 2103~~ the ~~Government response to~~ the ~~review~~ and ~~consultation~~ (~~ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf~~ DCLG]) ~~suggested that the timeframe for change might be extended, stating 'We believe that the current guidance should remain in place until the new guidance suite is ready~~. ~~We consider this important~~ to ~~ensure that there is no gap or perceived gap in~~ the ~~provision~~ of guidance, ~~and so~~ will ~~not be accepting~~ the ~~recommendation to~~ cancel ~~any material ahead of~~ the ~~new~~ guidance ~~being available~~.'	+	On 28 August 2013, the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) website was launched as a beta site by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It claimed to have reduced the volume of guidance by over 90 per cent. The beta site was closed on 14 October 2013. Following consideration of comments, DCLG will launch the full site and cancel the current planning practice guidance.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =
Line 52:		Line 52:
	*Killian Pretty Review.		*Killian Pretty Review.
	*Latham report.		*Latham report.
		+	*National Planning Practice Guidance.
	*National Planning Policy Framework.		*National Planning Policy Framework.
	*Neighbourhood planning.		*Neighbourhood planning.

2.25.59.200 at 08:19, 11 September 2013

2013-09-11T08:19:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 11 September 2013
Line 62:		Line 62:
	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/external-review-of-government-planning-practice-guidance The report in full].		*[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/external-review-of-government-planning-practice-guidance The report in full].
	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-planning-practice-guidance Taylor review consultation process].		*[https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-planning-practice-guidance Taylor review consultation process].
−	*DCLG: [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf Government response to the external review of government planning practice guidance consultation and report]. May 2013	+	*DCLG: [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf Government response to the external review of government planning practice guidance consultation and report]. May 2013.
		+	*The legislation, policy and guidance that underpins planning in England can be found on the government's [http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ National Planning Practice Guidance] website.

	[[Category:History]]		[[Category:History]]
	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]

Designing Buildings at 07:14, 7 July 2013

2013-07-07T07:14:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 7 July 2013
Line 49:		Line 49:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===
	*Egan report.		*Egan report.
		+	*Growth and Infrastructure Act.
	*Killian Pretty Review.		*Killian Pretty Review.
	*Latham report.		*Latham report.

Designing Buildings at 07:18, 6 July 2013

2013-07-06T07:18:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 6 July 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	In March 2012, the coalition government published the National Planning Policy Framework which replaced a wide range of previous planning policy statements and planning policy guidance with a much more streamlined approach. The framework also dismantled the regional planning apparatus and introduced neighbourhood planning. The framework stated in no uncertain terms that ‘...the purpose of planning is to help achieve sustainable development……Development that is sustainable should go ahead, without delay.’		In March 2012, the coalition government published the National Planning Policy Framework which replaced a wide range of previous planning policy statements and planning policy guidance with a much more streamlined approach. The framework also dismantled the regional planning apparatus and introduced neighbourhood planning. The framework stated in no uncertain terms that ‘...the purpose of planning is to help achieve sustainable development……Development that is sustainable should go ahead, without delay.’

−	The framework was widely cited as reducing planning policy from over 1000 pages to around 50, however, whilst the framework itself was just 50 pages long, other planning policies remained effective unless they were specifically revoked by the framework.	+	The framework was widely cited as reducing planning policy from over 1000 pages to around 50, however, whilst the framework itself was just 50 pages long, other planning policies remained effective unless they were specifically revoked by the framework (see Planning policy replaced by the NPPF)

	In 2012, the coalition government commissioned the Taylor Report, a further review of the remaining planning policy guidance.		In 2012, the coalition government commissioned the Taylor Report, a further review of the remaining planning policy guidance.
Line 37:		Line 37:
	= Criticism =		= Criticism =

−	Taylor suggested that the great majority of this work should be completed by July 2013. However, this is a major undertaking, and coming so close on the heels of the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework – itself a very significant change to the planning system – there are concerns that planning could be thrown into disarray.	+	Taylor suggested that the great majority of this work should be completed by July 2013. However, this is a major undertaking, and coming so close on the heels of the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework – itself a very significant change to the planning system – there are concerns that planning could be thrown into disarray.

	Some campaigners have described the findings of the review as giving the go ahead for a bonfire of planning rules, creating a charter for development and putting the countryside at risk.		Some campaigners have described the findings of the review as giving the go ahead for a bonfire of planning rules, creating a charter for development and putting the countryside at risk.
Line 55:		Line 55:
	*Penfold review.		*Penfold review.
	*Planning permission.		*Planning permission.
		+	*Planning policy replaced by the NPPF.
	*Sustainability.		*Sustainability.

Designing Buildings at 13:50, 23 May 2013

2013-05-23T13:50:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 23 May 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:
	= Criticism =		= Criticism =

−	Taylor suggested that the great majority of this work should be completed by July 2013. However, this is a major undertaking, and coming so close on the heels of the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework – itself a very significant change to the planning system – there are concerns that planning could be thrown into disarray.	+	Taylor suggested that the great majority of this work should be completed by July 2013. However, this is a major undertaking, and coming so close on the heels of the introduction of the National Planning Policy Framework – itself a very significant change to the planning system – there are concerns that planning could be thrown into disarray.

	Some campaigners have described the findings of the review as giving the go ahead for a bonfire of planning rules, creating a charter for development and putting the countryside at risk.		Some campaigners have described the findings of the review as giving the go ahead for a bonfire of planning rules, creating a charter for development and putting the countryside at risk.

	The government however welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013.		The government however welcomed the findings of the review and launched a consultation to seeks views on the review’s recommendations. The consultation closed on 15 February 2013.
		+
		+	In May 2103 the Government response to the review and consultation (ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf DCLG]) suggested that the timeframe for change might be extended, stating 'We believe that the current guidance should remain in place until the new guidance suite is ready. We consider this important to ensure that there is no gap or perceived gap in the provision of guidance, and so will not be accepting the recommendation to cancel any material ahead of the new guidance being available.'

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =
Line 58:		Line 60:
	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/external-review-of-government-planning-practice-guidance The report in full].		*[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/external-review-of-government-planning-practice-guidance The report in full].
	*[https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-planning-practice-guidance Taylor review consultation process].		*[https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/review-of-planning-practice-guidance Taylor review consultation process].
		+	*DCLG: [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200522/Government_response_to_the_external_review_of_government_planning_practice_guidance_consultation_and_report.pdf Government response to the external review of government planning practice guidance consultation and report]. May 2013

	[[Category:History]]		[[Category:History]]
	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]