<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/skins/common/feed.css?301"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AStakeholder_management_for_building_design_and_construction</id>
		<title>Talk:Stakeholder management for building design and construction - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AStakeholder_management_for_building_design_and_construction"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stakeholder_management_for_building_design_and_construction&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-12T11:47:42Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.17.4</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stakeholder_management_for_building_design_and_construction&amp;diff=246918&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Designing Buildings at 10:30, 19 January 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stakeholder_management_for_building_design_and_construction&amp;diff=246918&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2023-01-19T10:30:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;
			&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
			&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
			&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
			&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
		&lt;tr valign='top'&gt;
		&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 10:30, 19 January 2023&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;=== To make a comment about this article, or to suggest changes, click 'Add a comment' above. Separate your comments from any existing comments by inserting a horizontal line. ===&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;-----&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;I like the stakeholder categories which covers all key categories. It may also be worth considering stakeholders not just by category, but also by power and interest. To this use a square split it into four smaller squares, label the bottom of the square interest and the left side of the square power. Analyse your stakeholders using these two parameters so that you identify key players - high interest &amp;amp;amp; high power, least important - low interest &amp;amp;amp; low power and so on. This page [http://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-analysis.html http://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-analysis.html] gives a step by step tutorial to analyse stakeholders.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;I like the stakeholder categories which covers all key categories. It may also be worth considering stakeholders not just by category, but also by power and interest. To this use a square split it into four smaller squares, label the bottom of the square interest and the left side of the square power. Analyse your stakeholders using these two parameters so that you identify key players - high interest &amp;amp;amp; high power, least important - low interest &amp;amp;amp; low power and so on. This page [http://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-analysis.html http://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-analysis.html] gives a step by step tutorial to analyse stakeholders.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;-----&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Designing Buildings</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stakeholder_management_for_building_design_and_construction&amp;diff=59881&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>86.171.74.104: Created page with &quot;I like the stakeholder categories which covers all key categories. It may also be worth considering stakeholders not just by category, but also by power and interest. To this use...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stakeholder_management_for_building_design_and_construction&amp;diff=59881&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2016-09-19T15:43:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;I like the stakeholder categories which covers all key categories. It may also be worth considering stakeholders not just by category, but also by power and interest. To this use...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I like the stakeholder categories which covers all key categories. It may also be worth considering stakeholders not just by category, but also by power and interest. To this use a square split it into four smaller squares, label the bottom of the square interest and the left side of the square power. Analyse your stakeholders using these two parameters so that you identify key players - high interest &amp;amp;amp; high power, least important - low interest &amp;amp;amp; low power and so on. This page [http://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-analysis.html http://www.stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-analysis.html] gives a step by step tutorial to analyse stakeholders.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>[IP address hidden]</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>