Talk:Specifying insulation for inverted roofs - Revision history

94.206.212.139 at 13:43, 2 June 2020

2020-06-02T13:43:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 2 June 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	-bo		-bo
−
−

	Thank you for your comment. The loads given are correct as this is specific to our high density product for inverted roofs application. I hope this answers your query. Many thanks,		Thank you for your comment. The loads given are correct as this is specific to our high density product for inverted roofs application. I hope this answers your query. Many thanks,

	Jablite Team		Jablite Team
		+
		+	This page is written as if EPS is the best solution for all applications (from a supplier of EPS), without listing any benefits of XPS. From my understanding, XPS also has benefits such as:
		+
		+	* Less likely to be damaged by freeze-thaw weathering (water cannot permeate between the beads). Also means EPS has reduced performance when wet?
		+	* Higher compressive strength for comparable densities
		+	* Less likely to have condensation forming as the water is not retained below the insulation
		+
		+	It is important for readers to understand when each option should be used as they are both valid solutions
		+
		+	-AB

Jablite at 15:57, 11 September 2017

2017-09-11T15:57:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 11 September 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	-bo		-bo
		+
		+
		+
		+	Thank you for your comment. The loads given are correct as this is specific to our high density product for inverted roofs application. I hope this answers your query. Many thanks,
		+
		+	Jablite Team

109.134.101.160: Created page with "Are the loads given in the introduction for AHU correct 73-90 kN/m² seem so large that I wonder whether a decimal point might be missing? (I.e 7.3-9.0 Knus/m²). -bo "

2017-06-20T19:31:36Z

Created page with "Are the loads given in the introduction for AHU correct 73-90 kN/m² seem so large that I wonder whether a decimal point might be missing? (I.e 7.3-9.0 Knus/m²). -bo "

New page

Are the loads given in the introduction for AHU correct 73-90 kN/m² seem so large that I wonder whether a decimal point might be missing? (I.e 7.3-9.0 Knus/m²).

-bo