<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/skins/common/feed.css?301"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ARegularly_and_diligently</id>
		<title>Talk:Regularly and diligently - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ARegularly_and_diligently"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Regularly_and_diligently&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-19T15:26:56Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.17.4</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Regularly_and_diligently&amp;diff=208132&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>84.70.156.57: Created page with &quot;Could you expand on what 'regularly and diligently' can practically mean, with examples? Where have cases been decided where it's borderline.  For example, I have a home extensio...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Regularly_and_diligently&amp;diff=208132&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2021-07-06T07:29:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Could you expand on what &amp;#039;regularly and diligently&amp;#039; can practically mean, with examples? Where have cases been decided where it&amp;#039;s borderline.  For example, I have a home extensio...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Could you expand on what 'regularly and diligently' can practically mean, with examples? Where have cases been decided where it's borderline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, I have a home extension project that has gone from the initial 3 months of consistent 20-30 person-days of labour per week, to the current series of weeks of 5, 1, 7, 0.5, 0, 10 and then 2 person-days per week. Not regular in my book, but I suspect the builder is trying to do the absolute minimum they can do to not be in breach of contract.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>[IP address hidden]</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>