<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/skins/common/feed.css?301"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ALearning_from_the_Genoa_bridge_collapse</id>
		<title>Talk:Learning from the Genoa bridge collapse - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ALearning_from_the_Genoa_bridge_collapse"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Learning_from_the_Genoa_bridge_collapse&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-02T07:09:46Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.17.4</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Learning_from_the_Genoa_bridge_collapse&amp;diff=124130&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>62.8.108.89: Created page with &quot;The assessment of the dynamic behaviour of [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Railway railway] [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bridge bridges] often shows a ma...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Talk:Learning_from_the_Genoa_bridge_collapse&amp;diff=124130&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2019-01-08T14:34:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;The assessment of the dynamic behaviour of [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Railway railway] [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bridge bridges] often shows a ma...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The assessment of the dynamic behaviour of [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Railway railway] [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bridge bridges] often shows a marked difference between theoretical calculated behaviour and that measured by [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Inspection inspection]. Typically, this would be in the form of lower measured natural frequencies than calculated by the structural analysis. This is often attributed to additional [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Stiffness stiffness] provided by the ballast and the track that are usually not included in the strength [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Model model].&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increased stiffness would generally lead to higher natural frequencies, and high mass to lower natural frequencies. Perhaps there is a typo in the above paragraph?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>[IP address hidden]</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>