Talk:Construction slump - perfect storm - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 17:48, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T17:48:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 28 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	To ~~join the~~ discussion about this article, click 'Add ~~to this discussion~~' above and add your thoughts to this page. ~~Clicking the submit comment button will not start a discussion, it will just send a comment to our admin team.~~	+	To start a discussion about this article, click 'Add a comment' above and add your thoughts to this discussion page. <br/>

	----		----

Designing Buildings at 08:02, 10 December 2013

2013-12-10T08:02:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:02, 10 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+
		+	To join the discussion about this article, click 'Add to this discussion' above and add your thoughts to this page. Clicking the submit comment button will not start a discussion, it will just send a comment to our admin team.
		+
		+	----
		+
	Too many people believe the tap can be turned on and off easily and the full flow of employment and economic benefit will be quickly reached. This is not the case. Construction projects have a lead time that generally takes longer than the build period - new airport facilities (such as Terminal 5) take over a decade in planning and design.		Too many people believe the tap can be turned on and off easily and the full flow of employment and economic benefit will be quickly reached. This is not the case. Construction projects have a lead time that generally takes longer than the build period - new airport facilities (such as Terminal 5) take over a decade in planning and design.

Line 4:		Line 9:

	Here are Designing Buildings Wiki’s top five solutions:		Here are Designing Buildings Wiki’s top five solutions:
−
	#Re-introduce tax relief on mortgages. This would instantly encourage house builders to dust off their mothballed schemes to meet the surge in demand and affordability.		#Re-introduce tax relief on mortgages. This would instantly encourage house builders to dust off their mothballed schemes to meet the surge in demand and affordability.
	#Re-introduce a selective employment tax giving tax breaks for employees engaged in manufacturing. This would help redress the balance between manufacturing and service industries and act as a catalyst for construction companies to seek out ways of prefabricating assemblies off site in factories. Inevitably this will lead to regions hard hit by the downturn capturing contracts for sites that might be hundreds of miles away.		#Re-introduce a selective employment tax giving tax breaks for employees engaged in manufacturing. This would help redress the balance between manufacturing and service industries and act as a catalyst for construction companies to seek out ways of prefabricating assemblies off site in factories. Inevitably this will lead to regions hard hit by the downturn capturing contracts for sites that might be hundreds of miles away.

Designing Buildings at 17:45, 27 August 2012

2012-08-27T17:45:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 27 August 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Here are Designing Buildings Wiki’s top five solutions:		Here are Designing Buildings Wiki’s top five solutions:

−	1. Re-introduce tax relief on mortgages. This would instantly encourage house builders to dust off their mothballed schemes to meet the surge in demand and affordability.	+	#Re-introduce tax relief on mortgages. This would instantly encourage house builders to dust off their mothballed schemes to meet the surge in demand and affordability.
−		+	#Re-introduce a selective employment tax giving tax breaks for employees engaged in manufacturing. This would help redress the balance between manufacturing and service industries and act as a catalyst for construction companies to seek out ways of prefabricating assemblies off site in factories. Inevitably this will lead to regions hard hit by the downturn capturing contracts for sites that might be hundreds of miles away.
−	2. Re-introduce a selective employment tax giving tax breaks for employees engaged in manufacturing. This would help redress the balance between manufacturing and service industries and act as a catalyst for construction companies to seek out ways of prefabricating assemblies off site in factories. Inevitably this will lead to regions hard hit by the downturn capturing contracts for sites that might be hundreds of miles away.	+	#Re-introduce stock relief allowances. This would encourage continuity of supplies instead of the current stop/go “just in time” policies that hamper efficient production right up the supply chain.
−		+	#Avoid focusing on new grand projects. Instead kick start those projects that have been placed on hold, that have planning consent and that have a completed design. These are the projects where funding dried up following the banking crisis. A National Development Agency staffed by highly qualified individuals should examine such schemes and assess economic viability prior to the government standing as guarantor to a reputable funding institution.
−	3. Re-introduce stock relief allowances. This would encourage continuity of supplies instead of the current stop/go “just in time” policies that hamper efficient production right up the supply chain.	+	#Re-introduce capital allowances. Ernst & Young calculate that UK corporations are sitting on a staggering £750 billion, around half the UK’s GDP. These companies prefer to use the cash to reduce debt, rather than take it on. To get things moving and release this cash the government should re-introduce generous capital allowances not only for plant, machinery and stock but for refurbishment of premises. Refurbishment requires short lead in times and seldom involves planning consent. It is fast turnover with labour peeking much more quickly than for new developments.
−		+
−	4. Avoid focusing on new grand projects. Instead kick start those projects that have been placed on hold, that have planning consent and that have a completed design. These are the projects where funding dried up following the banking crisis. A National Development Agency staffed by highly qualified individuals should examine such schemes and assess economic viability prior to the government standing as guarantor to a reputable funding institution.	+
−		+
−	5. Re-introduce capital allowances. Ernst & Young calculate that UK corporations are sitting on a staggering £750 billion, around half the UK’s GDP. These companies prefer to use the cash to reduce debt, rather than take it on. To get things moving and release this cash the government should re-introduce generous capital allowances not only for plant, machinery and stock but for refurbishment of premises. Refurbishment requires short lead in times and seldom involves planning consent. It is fast turnover with labour peeking much more quickly than for new developments.	+

Designing Buildings: Created page with "Too many people believe the tap can be turned on and off easily and the full flow of employment and economic benefit will be quickly reached. This is not the case. Construction p..."

2012-08-27T17:44:13Z

Created page with "Too many people believe the tap can be turned on and off easily and the full flow of employment and economic benefit will be quickly reached. This is not the case. Construction p..."

New page

Too many people believe the tap can be turned on and off easily and the full flow of employment and economic benefit will be quickly reached. This is not the case. Construction projects have a lead time that generally takes longer than the build period - new airport facilities (such as Terminal 5) take over a decade in planning and design.

So how should the government address these issues in order to galvanise the construction industry and stimulate the economy, beyond possible plans to ease planning laws and reduce enforced quotas for social housing?

Here are Designing Buildings Wiki’s top five solutions:

1. Re-introduce tax relief on mortgages. This would instantly encourage house builders to dust off their mothballed schemes to meet the surge in demand and affordability.

2. Re-introduce a selective employment tax giving tax breaks for employees engaged in manufacturing. This would help redress the balance between manufacturing and service industries and act as a catalyst for construction companies to seek out ways of prefabricating assemblies off site in factories. Inevitably this will lead to regions hard hit by the downturn capturing contracts for sites that might be hundreds of miles away.

3. Re-introduce stock relief allowances. This would encourage continuity of supplies instead of the current stop/go “just in time” policies that hamper efficient production right up the supply chain.

4. Avoid focusing on new grand projects. Instead kick start those projects that have been placed on hold, that have planning consent and that have a completed design. These are the projects where funding dried up following the banking crisis. A National Development Agency staffed by highly qualified individuals should examine such schemes and assess economic viability prior to the government standing as guarantor to a reputable funding institution.

5. Re-introduce capital allowances. Ernst & Young calculate that UK corporations are sitting on a staggering £750 billion, around half the UK’s GDP. These companies prefer to use the cash to reduce debt, rather than take it on. To get things moving and release this cash the government should re-introduce generous capital allowances not only for plant, machinery and stock but for refurbishment of premises. Refurbishment requires short lead in times and seldom involves planning consent. It is fast turnover with labour peeking much more quickly than for new developments.