Talk:Construction invoice fraud - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:25, 11 February 2021

2021-02-11T07:25:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:25, 11 February 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Although the construction companies surveyed expressed more concern than most other industries about the problem, only 11% said they would take action if they received a suspicious invoice. A further 6% of firms would not know what to do if a suspicious invoice was received, while only 54% would contact the police or a similar reporting service.'		Although the construction companies surveyed expressed more concern than most other industries about the problem, only 11% said they would take action if they received a suspicious invoice. A further 6% of firms would not know what to do if a suspicious invoice was received, while only 54% would contact the police or a similar reporting service.'

−	~~-----~~
	-----		-----
	It is a bit difficult to track down 4 years later - the original report could have been updated or removed - but the same facts were reported in a number of different places at the time.		It is a bit difficult to track down 4 years later - the original report could have been updated or removed - but the same facts were reported in a number of different places at the time.

Designing Buildings at 07:24, 11 February 2021

2021-02-11T07:24:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 11 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can you please advise where the data came from in this article? I have looked through the Tungsten website but can't dind anything.		Can you please advise where the data came from in this article? I have looked through the Tungsten website but can't dind anything.

		+	-----
	See [https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud]		See [https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud]

		+	-----
	Thanks for linking this, I had seen this article but it doesnt contain a lot of the details your article does?		Thanks for linking this, I had seen this article but it doesnt contain a lot of the details your article does?

Line 12:		Line 14:

	Although the construction companies surveyed expressed more concern than most other industries about the problem, only 11% said they would take action if they received a suspicious invoice. A further 6% of firms would not know what to do if a suspicious invoice was received, while only 54% would contact the police or a similar reporting service.'		Although the construction companies surveyed expressed more concern than most other industries about the problem, only 11% said they would take action if they received a suspicious invoice. A further 6% of firms would not know what to do if a suspicious invoice was received, while only 54% would contact the police or a similar reporting service.'
		+
		+	-----
		+	-----
		+	It is a bit difficult to track down 4 years later - the original report could have been updated or removed - but the same facts were reported in a number of different places at the time.

165.225.114.110 at 22:59, 10 February 2021

2021-02-10T22:59:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 10 February 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:

	See [https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud]		See [https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud]
		+
		+	Thanks for linking this, I had seen this article but it doesnt contain a lot of the details your article does?
		+
		+	For example, from your article 'One in six construction firms believe fraudulent invoices have cost them more than £5,000 in the last year alone, with businesses losing on average £1,948 a year as a result.' However the article you have linked doesn't specify it is one in six construction firms, just one in six of those surveyed.
		+
		+	And then this information from your article is nowhere to be found in the one linked (except for the national average of 47%)
		+
		+	'The data also revealed that 60% of firms surveyed received a fraudulent or suspicious invoice in the past year, compared with a national average of 47%.
		+
		+	Although the construction companies surveyed expressed more concern than most other industries about the problem, only 11% said they would take action if they received a suspicious invoice. A further 6% of firms would not know what to do if a suspicious invoice was received, while only 54% would contact the police or a similar reporting service.'

Designing Buildings at 22:25, 10 February 2021

2021-02-10T22:25:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 10 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can you please advise where the data came from in this article? I have looked through the Tungsten website but can't dind anything.		Can you please advise where the data came from in this article? I have looked through the Tungsten website but can't dind anything.
		+
		+	See [https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud https://www.tungsten-network.com/blog/the-staggering-scale-of-invoice-fraud]

165.225.114.110: Created page with "Can you please advise where the data came from in this article? I have looked through the Tungsten website but can't dind anything. "

2021-02-10T22:08:13Z

Created page with "Can you please advise where the data came from in this article? I have looked through the Tungsten website but can't dind anything. "

New page

Can you please advise where the data came from in this article? I have looked through the Tungsten website but can't dind anything.