Stakeholder management: a quality perspective - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 11:43, 15 December 2021

2021-12-15T11:43:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 15 December 2021
Line 224:		Line 224:
	* [http://www.instituteforcollaborativeworking.com/ The Institute for collaborative working]		* [http://www.instituteforcollaborativeworking.com/ The Institute for collaborative working]
	* [https://www.bsria.co.uk/services/design/soft-landings/ BSRIA Soft Landings Framework]		* [https://www.bsria.co.uk/services/design/soft-landings/ BSRIA Soft Landings Framework]
−	* ~~[http://www.bimtaskgroup.org/gsl/~~ Government soft landings framework]	+	* Government soft landings framework
	* [http://www.bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000 Collaborative Business Relationships]		* [http://www.bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000 Collaborative Business Relationships]
	* [https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain Highways England - Collaborative planning]		* [https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain Highways England - Collaborative planning]

Designing Buildings at 08:31, 20 November 2020

2020-11-20T08:31:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 20 November 2020
Line 255:		Line 255:
	* User panels.		* User panels.

−	[[Category:~~Projects_and_case_studies~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Project_Knowledge~~]] [[Category:Construction_management]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Construction_management]]

Designing Buildings at 07:51, 24 January 2020

2020-01-24T07:51:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:51, 24 January 2020
Line 242:		Line 242:
	* Collaborative practices		* Collaborative practices
	* Consultation process.		* Consultation process.
		+	* Cost of quality.
	* Design quality.		* Design quality.
	* Design review.		* Design review.
Line 254:		Line 255:
	* User panels.		* User panels.

−	[[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Construction_management]]	+	[[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:DCN_Project_Knowledge]] [[Category:Construction_management]]

Designing Buildings at 10:57, 28 December 2019

2019-12-28T10:57:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 28 December 2019
Line 238:		Line 238:
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

		+	* BREEAM project delivery stakeholders.
	* Champions.		* Champions.
	* Collaborative practices		* Collaborative practices

Designing Buildings at 09:29, 19 September 2019

2019-09-19T09:29:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 19 September 2019
Line 243:		Line 243:
	* Design quality.		* Design quality.
	* Design review.		* Design review.
		+	* Digital quality management in construction.
	* Early BREEAM stakeholder engagement.		* Early BREEAM stakeholder engagement.
	* Egan report.		* Egan report.

Designing Buildings at 17:21, 18 February 2019

2019-02-18T17:21:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 18 February 2019
Line 247:		Line 247:
	* Latham Report.		* Latham Report.
	* Stakeholders.		* Stakeholders.
−	* ~~Stkeholder~~ management.	+	* Stakeholder management.
	* Stakeholder map.		* Stakeholder map.
	* Third party dependencies.		* Third party dependencies.

Designing Buildings at 17:20, 18 February 2019

2019-02-18T17:20:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 18 February 2019
Line 32:		Line 32:
	See the example summary for the Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.		See the example summary for the Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.

−	[[File:~~CQI Stakeholder management diag 1~~.png]]	+	[[File:CQI_Stakeholder_management_diag_1.png\|link=File:CQI_Stakeholder_management_diag_1.png]]

	Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.		Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.
Line 85:		Line 85:
	Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below		Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below

−	[[File:~~CQI Stakeholder management diag 2~~.png]]	+	[[File:CQI_Stakeholder_management_diag_2.png\|link=File:CQI_Stakeholder_management_diag_2.png]]

	Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.		Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.
Line 221:		Line 221:
	= Bibliography / further information sources =		= Bibliography / further information sources =

−	[https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/construction-2025-strategy UK government’s policy paper – 2025: Construction]	+	* [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/construction-2025-strategy UK government’s policy paper – 2025: Construction]
		+	* [http://www.instituteforcollaborativeworking.com/ The Institute for collaborative working]
		+	* [https://www.bsria.co.uk/services/design/soft-landings/ BSRIA Soft Landings Framework]
		+	* [http://www.bimtaskgroup.org/gsl/ Government soft landings framework]
		+	* [http://www.bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000 Collaborative Business Relationships]
		+	* [https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain Highways England - Collaborative planning]
		+	* [http://www.ccscheme.org.uk/ Considerate Constructor Scheme]
		+	* [http://www.stakeholder-management.com/ Stakeholder circle – managing the right stakeholders]
		+	* [http://www.communityplanningtoolkit.org/ Community Planning Toolkit]
		+	* [http://www.scdc.org.uk/what/national-standards/ Scottish National Standards for Community Engagement]

−	~~[http://www~~.~~instituteforcollaborativeworking.com/ The Institute for collaborative working]~~	+	Original article written by Ian Mills on behalf of the CQI Construction Special Interest Group and accepted for publication by the Competency Working Group.

−	[~~https~~:~~//www.bsria.co.uk/services/design/soft-landings/ BSRIA Soft Landings Framework~~]	+	--[[User:ConSIG_CWG\|ConSIG CWG]] 13:39, 01 Feb 2019 (BST)

−	~~[http://www.bimtaskgroup.org/gsl/ Government soft landings framework]~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

−	~~[http://www~~.~~bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000~~ Collaborative ~~Business Relationships]~~	+	* Champions.
−		+	* Collaborative practices
−	~~[https://www~~.~~gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain Highways England - Collaborative planning]~~	+	* Consultation process.
−		+	* Design quality.
−	~~[http://www~~.~~ccscheme.org.uk/ Considerate Constructor Scheme]~~	+	* Design review.
−		+	* Early BREEAM stakeholder engagement.
−	~~[http://www.~~stakeholder~~-management~~.~~com/ Stakeholder circle – managing the right stakeholders]~~	+	* Egan report.
−		+	* Latham Report.
−	~~[http://www~~.~~communityplanningtoolkit~~.~~org/ Community Planning Toolkit]~~	+	* Stakeholders.
−		+	* Stkeholder management.
−	~~[http://www~~.~~scdc.org.uk/what/national-standards/ Scottish National Standards for Community Engagement]~~	+	* Stakeholder map.
−		+	* Third party dependencies.
−	~~Original article written by Ian Mills on behalf of the CQI Construction Special Interest Group and accepted for publication by the Competency Working Group~~.	+	* User panels.
−		+
−	~~--[[~~User~~:ConSIG_CWG\|ConSIG CWG]] 13:39, 01 Feb 2019 (BST)~~	+

	[[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Construction_management]]		[[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Construction_management]]

ConSIG CWG at 14:07, 1 February 2019

2019-02-01T14:07:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 1 February 2019
Line 30:		Line 30:
	As early as possible brainstorm the key players on a project to understand how they interact and influence the project and identify with a much granularity as possible.		As early as possible brainstorm the key players on a project to understand how they interact and influence the project and identify with a much granularity as possible.

−	See example summary Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.	+	See the example summary for the Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.

−	[[~~w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial~~:~~Upload%26wpDestFile%3DAdmin-ajax.php%3Faction%3Dimgedit-preview%26_ajax_nonce%3D41cfafc3d7%26postid%3D1180%26rand%3D90697%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&action=edit&redlink=~~1~~\|File:Admin-ajax~~.~~php?action=imgedit-preview& ajax nonce=41cfafc3d7&postid=1180&rand=90697~~]]	+	[[File:CQI Stakeholder management diag 1.png]]

	Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.		Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.
Line 85:		Line 85:
	Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below		Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below

−	[[~~w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DStakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&action=edit&redlink=1\|~~File:Stakeholder-management~~-diag2-300x226~~.png]]	+	[[File:CQI Stakeholder management diag 2.png]]

	Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.		Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.
Line 231:		Line 231:
	[http://www.bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000 Collaborative Business Relationships]		[http://www.bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000 Collaborative Business Relationships]

−	[https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain ~~https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative~~-planning~~-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain~~]	+	[https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain Highways England - Collaborative planning]

	[http://www.ccscheme.org.uk/ Considerate Constructor Scheme]		[http://www.ccscheme.org.uk/ Considerate Constructor Scheme]

ConSIG CWG at 13:53, 1 February 2019

2019-02-01T13:53:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 1 February 2019
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Taking each of the six steps in more detail:-		Taking each of the six steps in more detail:-

−	== 1. Define and map stakeholders ==	+	== Define and map stakeholders ==

	As early as possible brainstorm the key players on a project to understand how they interact and influence the project and identify with a much granularity as possible.		As early as possible brainstorm the key players on a project to understand how they interact and influence the project and identify with a much granularity as possible.
Line 32:		Line 32:
	See example summary Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.		See example summary Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.

−	[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DAdmin-ajax.php%3Faction%3Dimgedit-preview%26_ajax_nonce%3D41cfafc3d7%26postid%3D1180%26rand%3D90697&action=edit&redlink=1\|File:Admin-ajax.php?action=imgedit-preview& ajax nonce=41cfafc3d7&postid=1180&rand=90697]]	+	[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DAdmin-ajax.php%3Faction%3Dimgedit-preview%26_ajax_nonce%3D41cfafc3d7%26postid%3D1180%26rand%3D90697%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&action=edit&redlink=1\|File:Admin-ajax.php?action=imgedit-preview& ajax nonce=41cfafc3d7&postid=1180&rand=90697]]

	Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.		Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.
Line 85:		Line 85:
	Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below		Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below

−	[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DStakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png&action=edit&redlink=1\|File:Stakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png]]	+	[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DW/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DStakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png%26action%3Dedit%26redlink%3D1&action=edit&redlink=1\|File:Stakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png]]

	Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.		Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.

ConSIG CWG at 13:52, 1 February 2019

2019-02-01T13:52:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 1 February 2019
Line 32:		Line 32:
	See example summary Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.		See example summary Olympic Delivery Authority legacy diagram, below.

−	[[w/index.php?title=~~Special~~:Upload~~&wpDestFile=Admin~~-ajax.php%3Faction%3Dimgedit-preview%26_ajax_nonce%3D41cfafc3d7%26postid%3D1180%26rand%3D90697\|File:Admin-ajax.php?action=imgedit-preview& ajax nonce=41cfafc3d7&postid=1180&rand=90697]]	+	[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DAdmin-ajax.php%3Faction%3Dimgedit-preview%26_ajax_nonce%3D41cfafc3d7%26postid%3D1180%26rand%3D90697&action=edit&redlink=1\|File:Admin-ajax.php?action=imgedit-preview& ajax nonce=41cfafc3d7&postid=1180&rand=90697]]

	Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.		Initially, capture the interest and needs for each stakeholder (usually takes additional research to identify their actual requirements and to identify their interest/influence/importance) – this can be summarised in a long table.

	{\|		{\|
−	~~\|width="25%"~~\| Stakeholders (group by types)	+	\| Stakeholders (group by types)
−	~~\|width="25%"~~\| Interest	+	\| Interest
−	~~\|width="25%"~~\| Influence (Power or impact on project)	+	\| Influence (Power or impact on project)
−	~~\|width="25%"~~\| Importance (Priority)	+	\| Importance (Priority)
	\|-		\|-
	\| Primary		\| Primary
Line 85:		Line 85:
	Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below		Typically use a 4- or 6- box map to identify stakeholders with common positioning and requirements see 4-box map below

−	[[w/index.php?title=~~Special~~:Upload~~&wpDestFile=Stakeholder~~-management-diag2-300x226.png\|File:Stakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png]]	+	[[w/index.php?title=W/index.php%3Ftitle%3DSpecial:Upload%26wpDestFile%3DStakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png&action=edit&redlink=1\|File:Stakeholder-management-diag2-300x226.png]]

	Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.		Those in quadrant D will generally require greater focus and should form the core of any stakeholder strategy.
Line 231:		Line 231:
	[http://www.bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000 Collaborative Business Relationships]		[http://www.bsigroup.co.uk/en-GB/bs-11000-collaborative-business-relationships/ BSI – BS 11000 Collaborative Business Relationships]

−	[~~http~~://www~~.highways~~.gov.uk/~~knowledge/projects~~/collaborative-planning-~~and~~-~~bim~~/ ~~Highways Agency –~~ collaborative planning]	+	[https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain https://www.gov.uk/guidance/collaborative-planning-a-guide-for-highways-england-supply-chain]

	[http://www.ccscheme.org.uk/ Considerate Constructor Scheme]		[http://www.ccscheme.org.uk/ Considerate Constructor Scheme]
Line 243:		Line 243:
	Original article written by Ian Mills on behalf of the CQI Construction Special Interest Group and accepted for publication by the Competency Working Group.		Original article written by Ian Mills on behalf of the CQI Construction Special Interest Group and accepted for publication by the Competency Working Group.

−	--[[User:~~ConSIG CWG~~\|ConSIG CWG]] 13:39, 01 Feb 2019 (BST)	+	--[[User:ConSIG_CWG\|ConSIG CWG]] 13:39, 01 Feb 2019 (BST)

	[[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Construction_management]]		[[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Construction_management]]