Selection criteria - Revision history

Editor at 16:47, 14 September 2021

2021-09-14T16:47:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 14 September 2021
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* Best value procurement.		* Best value procurement.
	* Bid evaluation.		* Bid evaluation.
		+	* Competitive procedure with negotiation.
	* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors.		* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors.
	* Innovative partnership procedure.		* Innovative partnership procedure.

Editor at 15:25, 31 August 2021

2021-08-31T15:25:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 31 August 2021
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* Best value procurement.		* Best value procurement.
	* Bid evaluation.		* Bid evaluation.
−	* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors	+	* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors.
		+	* Innovative partnership procedure.
	* Invitation to tender.		* Invitation to tender.
	* Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT).		* Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT).

Designing Buildings at 12:53, 1 October 2020

2020-10-01T12:53:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 1 October 2020
Line 42:		Line 42:
	* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.		* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.

−	[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]

Editor at 10:16, 9 April 2020

2020-04-09T10:16:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 9 April 2020
Line 31:		Line 31:
	* Auction theory.		* Auction theory.
	* Best value.		* Best value.
		+	* Best value procurement.
	* Bid evaluation.		* Bid evaluation.
	* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors		* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors

Designing Buildings at 10:46, 25 February 2020

2020-02-25T10:46:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 25 February 2020
Line 38:		Line 38:
	* Procurement route.		* Procurement route.
	* Tender evaluation.		* Tender evaluation.
		+	* Tender price appraisal.
	* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.		* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.

	[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]		[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]

Designing Buildings at 10:31, 25 February 2020

2020-02-25T10:31:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, 25 February 2020
Line 24:		Line 24:
	More complex assessments might include additional benchmarks. For example, there may be certain criteria that are straight-forward pass/fail issues. There may also be criteria for which a very low rating is unacceptable irrespective of scores for other criteria.		More complex assessments might include additional benchmarks. For example, there may be certain criteria that are straight-forward pass/fail issues. There may also be criteria for which a very low rating is unacceptable irrespective of scores for other criteria.

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===	+

	* Accelerated debrief.		* Accelerated debrief.

Designing Buildings at 07:34, 14 June 2018

2018-06-14T07:34:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:34, 14 June 2018
Line 29:		Line 29:

	* Accelerated debrief.		* Accelerated debrief.
		+	* Adversarial behaviour in the UK construction industry.
	* Appointing consultants.		* Appointing consultants.
	* Auction theory.		* Auction theory.

Editor at 16:17, 31 January 2018

2018-01-31T16:17:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 31 January 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Selection criteria (sometimes referred to as award criteria or evaluation criteria) are lists of items against which a prospective supplier can be assessed before a selection is made and a contract awarded. They might also be used to help identify suitable individuals when seeking new employees.		Selection criteria (sometimes referred to as award criteria or evaluation criteria) are lists of items against which a prospective supplier can be assessed before a selection is made and a contract awarded. They might also be used to help identify suitable individuals when seeking new employees.

−	Defining specific selection criteria can help an employer agree ~~amongst~~ themselves the characteristics that they value. This helps ensure they identify the best value submission, rather than simply the lowest price submission. When the employer is evaluating submissions, referring to the selection criteria, or perhaps even giving marks against each criteria can help focus the assessment and prevent it being dominated by personal preferences or by forceful individuals.	+	Defining specific selection criteria can help an employer agree among themselves the characteristics that they value. This helps ensure they identify the best value submission, rather than simply the lowest price submission. When the employer is evaluating submissions, referring to the selection criteria, or perhaps even giving marks against each criteria can help focus the assessment and prevent it being dominated by personal preferences or by forceful individuals.

	Informing applicants what the selection criteria are can create a fairer process, enabling applicants to consider in advance whether they are suitable, and helping them tailor their submissions. It also makes the application process more transparent and so less open to challenge.		Informing applicants what the selection criteria are can create a fairer process, enabling applicants to consider in advance whether they are suitable, and helping them tailor their submissions. It also makes the application process more transparent and so less open to challenge.
Line 22:		Line 22:
	The overall score for a submission can be calculated by multiplying the score for each criteria by its weighting and then adding together or averaging the results for each assessor. Where there are very different scores between assessors, a meeting might be held to discuss the reasons.		The overall score for a submission can be calculated by multiplying the score for each criteria by its weighting and then adding together or averaging the results for each assessor. Where there are very different scores between assessors, a meeting might be held to discuss the reasons.

−	More complex assessments might include additional benchmarks. For example, there may be certain criteria that are straight-forward pass / fail issues. There may also be criteria for which a very low rating is unacceptable irrespective of scores for other criteria.	+	More complex assessments might include additional benchmarks. For example, there may be certain criteria that are straight-forward pass/fail issues. There may also be criteria for which a very low rating is unacceptable irrespective of scores for other criteria.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =
Line 28:		Line 28:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===

−	~~<ul>~~	+	* Accelerated debrief.
−	~~<li>~~	+	* Appointing consultants.
−		+	* Auction theory.
−		+	* Best value.
−		+	* Bid evaluation.
−		+	* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors
−	Accelerated debrief.~~</li>~~	+	* Invitation to tender.
−	~~<li>~~Appointing consultants.~~</li>~~	+	* Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT).
−	~~<li>~~Auction theory.~~</li>~~	+	* Pre qualification questionnaire.
−	~~<li>~~Best value.~~</li>~~	+	* Procurement route.
−	~~<li>~~Bid evaluation.~~</li>~~	+	* Tender evaluation.
−	~~<li>~~Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors~~</li>~~	+	* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.
−	~~<li>~~Invitation to tender.~~</li>~~	+
−	~~<li>~~Pre qualification questionnaire.~~</li>~~	+
−	~~<li>~~Procurement route.~~</li>~~	+
−	~~<li>~~Tender evaluation.~~</li>~~	+
−	~~<li>~~The benefits of e-procurement in construction.~~</li></ul>~~	+

	[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]		[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]

Editor at 12:25, 9 November 2017

2017-11-09T12:25:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 9 November 2017
Line 28:		Line 28:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===

−	* Appointing consultants.	+	<ul>
−	* Auction theory.	+	<li>
−	* Best value.	+
−	* Bid evaluation.	+
−	* Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors	+
−	* Invitation to tender.	+
−	* Pre qualification questionnaire.	+	Accelerated debrief.</li>
−	* Procurement route.	+	<li>Appointing consultants.</li>
−	* Tender evaluation.	+	<li>Auction theory.</li>
−	* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.	+	<li>Best value.</li>
		+	<li>Bid evaluation.</li>
		+	<li>Due diligence when selecting contractors or subcontractors</li>
		+	<li>Invitation to tender.</li>
		+	<li>Pre qualification questionnaire.</li>
		+	<li>Procurement route.</li>
		+	<li>Tender evaluation.</li>
		+	<li>The benefits of e-procurement in construction.</li></ul>

	[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]		[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]

Construction Link Ltd at 07:31, 7 August 2017

2017-08-07T07:31:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:31, 7 August 2017
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* Procurement route.		* Procurement route.
	* Tender evaluation.		* Tender evaluation.
		+	* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.

	[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]		[[Category:Appointments]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]