Sea City - Revision history

Editor at 22:54, 23 March 2026

2026-03-23T22:54:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 23 March 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Sea City celebrates its 25th Anniversary.~~	+	= A concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement celebrates its 25th Anniversary. =
−		+
−	= A concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement =	+

	== Background ==		== Background ==
Line 27:		Line 25:
	Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an offshore settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an offshore development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could be re-appropriated for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.		Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an offshore settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an offshore development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could be re-appropriated for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.

−	[[File:~~Sea City~~ (Option1).jpeg]]	+	[[File:Sea_City_%28Option1%29.jpeg\|link=File:Sea_City_(Option1).jpeg]]

	=== Sea City – Option 1 (Original Concept Design) ===		=== Sea City – Option 1 (Original Concept Design) ===

−	[[File:~~Sea City~~ (~~Option 2~~).jpeg]]	+	[[File:Sea_City_%28Option_2%29.jpeg\|link=File:Sea_City_(Option_2).jpeg]]

	=== Sea City – Option 2 ===		=== Sea City – Option 2 ===

−	[[File:~~Sea City~~ (~~Option 3~~).jpeg]]	+	[[File:Sea_City_%28Option_3%29.jpeg\|link=File:Sea_City_(Option_3).jpeg]]

	=== Sea City – Option 3 ===		=== Sea City – Option 3 ===

CAD at 15:57, 20 March 2026

2026-03-20T15:57:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 20 March 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Background ==		== Background ==

−	Cast your minds back to the mid ~~90's~~. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:All_at_Sea_-_The_City_of_the_Future.pdf 'All at Sea'].	+	Cast your minds back to the mid 1990s. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:All_at_Sea_-_The_City_of_the_Future.pdf 'All at Sea'].

	== Community ==		== Community ==
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg]]

−	=== i) Industrial Zone ===	+	=== i) Sketch Design - Industrial Zone ===

	[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg]]

−	=== ii) Leisure Centre ===	+	=== ii) Sketch Design - Leisure Centre ===

	[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg]]

−	=== iii) Residential Quarter ===	+	=== iii) Sketch Design - Residential Quarter ===

	== Construction ==		== Construction ==

−	Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an ~~off-shore~~ settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an ~~off-shore~~ development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could be ~~reppropriated~~ for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.	+	Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an offshore settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an offshore development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could be re-appropriated for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.

−	[[File:~~Sea_City_CGI_-_1~~.~~jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg~~]]	+	[[File:Sea City (Option1).jpeg]]

−	=== Sea City – Option 1 ( Original) ===	+	=== Sea City – Option 1 (Original Concept Design) ===

−	[[File:~~Sea_City_CGI_-_2~~.~~jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_2.jpg~~]]	+	[[File:Sea City (Option 2).jpeg]]

	=== Sea City – Option 2 ===		=== Sea City – Option 2 ===

−	[[File:~~Sea_City_CGI_-_3~~.~~jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_3.jpg~~]]	+	[[File:Sea City (Option 3).jpeg]]

	=== Sea City – Option 3 ===		=== Sea City – Option 3 ===
Line 41:		Line 41:
	== Sustainability ==		== Sustainability ==

−	An oceanic settlement, constructed from pre-fabricated units on floating pontoons, would have minimal effect on the environment. It could also utilise the energy from the sea, sun and wind. Since my original scheme, ~~off-shore~~ wind farms have become commonplace, and are now a big industry in Hull. As the old oil and gas fields are wound down, there is now a more sustainable industry in the North Sea - which will require maintaining. With a diverse population, a mixed use floating settlement would also be socially and economically sustainable. Recent events further afield have also shown how a floating ~~off-shore~~ settlement could provide sanctuary to displaced populations throughout the world.	+	An oceanic settlement, constructed from pre-fabricated units on floating pontoons, would have minimal effect on the environment. It could also utilise the energy from the sea, sun and wind. Since my original scheme, offshore wind farms have become commonplace, and are now a big industry in Hull. As the old oil and gas fields are wound down, there is now a more sustainable industry in the North Sea - which will require maintaining. With a diverse population, a mixed use floating settlement would also be socially and economically sustainable. Recent events further afield have also shown how a floating offshore settlement could provide sanctuary to displaced populations throughout the world.

	== The Future ==		== The Future ==

−	Originally designed in 1997, the ~~graphics look a bit dated now, but the~~ concept is just as relevant today. The slow response of governments to climate change, means that global warming and rising sea levels are an even more pressing issue now. There has also been renewed interest in building at sea. The Seasteading Institute, based in California, promotes the concept of floating oceanic communities and recently work has begun on a floating settlement in the Maldives – a country on the front line of rising sea levels. Since Sea City was first designed, advances in technology and communications mean that people and businesses can now work remotely from ~~the~~ the mainland, without the extra costs of land based property. First conceived in the maritime city of Hull, Sea City could be the catalyst for our seafaring nation to once again take to the worlds oceans in search of a more sustainable future....	+	Originally designed in 1997, the Sea City concept is just as relevant today. The slow response of governments to climate change, means that global warming and rising sea levels are an even more pressing issue now. There has also been renewed interest in building at sea. The Seasteading Institute, based in California, promotes the concept of floating oceanic communities and recently work has begun on a floating settlement in the Maldives – a country on the front line of rising sea levels. Since Sea City was first designed, advances in technology and communications mean that people and businesses can now work remotely from the mainland, without the extra costs of land based property. First conceived in the maritime city of Hull, Sea City could be the catalyst for our seafaring nation to once again take to the worlds oceans in search of a more sustainable future....

	“The sound, the light, the wetness of living on water changes earthbound society, offering a new perspective of openness, a new sensitivity to human relationships, which are not defined by earth’s boundaries.” Bertrand Goldberg		“The sound, the light, the wetness of living on water changes earthbound society, offering a new perspective of openness, a new sensitivity to human relationships, which are not defined by earth’s boundaries.” Bertrand Goldberg

CAD at 13:46, 2 March 2023

2023-03-02T13:46:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 2 March 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Background ==		== Background ==

−	Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled '[https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:All_at_Sea_-~~_25th_Anniversary~~.pdf All at Sea]'.	+	Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:All_at_Sea_-_The_City_of_the_Future.pdf 'All at Sea'].

	== Community ==		== Community ==

CAD at 13:53, 10 February 2023

2023-02-10T13:53:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 10 February 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Background ==		== Background ==

−	Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled [[All_at_Sea_-_25th_Anniversary.pdf\|'All at Sea']].	+	Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled '[https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/File:All_at_Sea_-_25th_Anniversary.pdf All at Sea]'.

	== Community ==		== Community ==

CAD at 15:00, 8 February 2023

2023-02-08T15:00:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 8 February 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Background ==		== Background ==

−	Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled 'All at Sea'.	+	Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled [[All_at_Sea_-_25th_Anniversary.pdf\|'All at Sea']].

	== Community ==		== Community ==

CAD at 16:14, 29 October 2022

2022-10-29T16:14:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:14, 29 October 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:
	== Construction ==		== Construction ==

−	Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an off-shore settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an off-shore development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could ~~re-appropriated~~ for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.	+	Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an off-shore settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an off-shore development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could be reppropriated for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.

	[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg]]

Editor at 07:01, 29 October 2022

2022-10-29T07:01:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 29 October 2022
Line 67:		Line 67:
	* Rainwater harvesting.		* Rainwater harvesting.
	* Thames Tideway update.		* Thames Tideway update.
−	* Water.	+	* Water-based communities.
	* Water engineering.		* Water engineering.

	[[Category:DCN_Collection]] [[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Project_Knowledge]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Water]]		[[Category:DCN_Collection]] [[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Project_Knowledge]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Water]]

Editor at 13:17, 28 October 2022

2022-10-28T13:17:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 28 October 2022
Line 55:		Line 55:
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

		+	* Aquatecture - review.
	* Drina river house.		* Drina river house.
	* Floating church.		* Floating church.

Editor at 10:13, 28 October 2022

2022-10-28T10:13:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 28 October 2022
Line 52:		Line 52:

	--[[User:CAD\|CAD]]		--[[User:CAD\|CAD]]
		+
		+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =
		+
		+	* Drina river house.
		+	* Floating church.
		+	* Hydroponics and buildings.
		+	* Hydroinformatics.
		+	* Landscape design.
		+	* Living facade.
		+	* Norway could build world-first floating tunnel
		+	* Planting.
		+	* Rain garden.
		+	* Rainwater harvesting.
		+	* Thames Tideway update.
		+	* Water.
		+	* Water engineering.

	[[Category:DCN_Collection]] [[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Project_Knowledge]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Water]]		[[Category:DCN_Collection]] [[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Project_Knowledge]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Water]]

Editor at 10:07, 28 October 2022

2022-10-28T10:07:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:07, 28 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Sea City (25th Anniversary)	+	Sea City celebrates its 25th Anniversary.

−	A concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement	+	= A concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement =

−	Background	+	== Background ==

	Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled 'All at Sea'.		Cast your minds back to the mid 90's. Global warming was in the news (even then), and the Kyoto Protocol had just been signed. I was a student at Hull School of Architecture (now sadly closed). The school had been involved in the Coastwise Europe project, where schools of architecture from around Europe had studied a stretch of coastline near to their University. We looked at the stretch of coast from Spurn Point at the tip of the Humber estuary to Flamborough head in the north. It was interesting to discover the number of small settlements and villages, which had been lost due to coastal erosion over the years. For small settlements such as these, government policy was not to try and defend them (as this can exacerbate the problem further down the coast) - instead people were forced to abandon their properties and simply retreat further in land. With the anticipated impact of global warming causing sea levels to rise, this situation was clearly only going to get worse. As a result, I started to look at an alternative solution – what if instead of retreating, we could create an oceanic settlement located off the coast, which wouldn't be affected by the rising sea levels? To this end, I started researching the credibility of building oceanic settlements off the coast of Britain, in a dissertation entitled 'All at Sea'.

−	Community	+	== Community ==

	Apart from the potential to accommodate displaced communities, an oceanic settlement could also be a destination in itself. A hotel and leisure facilities could attract people looking to escape from a hectic life on the mainland – with activities such as water sports, diving and fishing, or simply unwinding with the relaxing sound of the sea. The settlement could also be the base for a satellite campus for the University of Hull, for courses involved with the study of the sea and marine life. The North Sea is already home to small communities in the form of off-shore oil and gas rigs. However, the accommodation is poor quality and means that the workers have to work shifts. What if there was a near-by settlement, with all the facilities of a small village on the mainland, where they could stay with their families? The fishing industry could also benefit from having an off-shore base, with processing facilities and workshops, which would reduce travel and costs. Before long there is the basis for a mixed community, with all the supporting facilities of shops, cinema, gymnasium etc. A regular ferry service to the mainland, would ensure a healthy exchange of people, produce and culture.		Apart from the potential to accommodate displaced communities, an oceanic settlement could also be a destination in itself. A hotel and leisure facilities could attract people looking to escape from a hectic life on the mainland – with activities such as water sports, diving and fishing, or simply unwinding with the relaxing sound of the sea. The settlement could also be the base for a satellite campus for the University of Hull, for courses involved with the study of the sea and marine life. The North Sea is already home to small communities in the form of off-shore oil and gas rigs. However, the accommodation is poor quality and means that the workers have to work shifts. What if there was a near-by settlement, with all the facilities of a small village on the mainland, where they could stay with their families? The fishing industry could also benefit from having an off-shore base, with processing facilities and workshops, which would reduce travel and costs. Before long there is the basis for a mixed community, with all the supporting facilities of shops, cinema, gymnasium etc. A regular ferry service to the mainland, would ensure a healthy exchange of people, produce and culture.
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design_-_Industrial_Zone.jpg]]

−	i) Industrial Zone	+	=== i) Industrial Zone ===

	[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-2.jpg]]

−	ii) Leisure Centre	+	=== ii) Leisure Centre ===

	[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_Sketch_Design-3.jpg]]

−	iii) Residential Quarter	+	=== iii) Residential Quarter ===

−	Construction	+	== Construction ==

	Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an off-shore settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an off-shore development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could re-appropriated for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.		Together with an engineer from the Easington Gas Terminal on the Holderness coast, I investigated the best location for an off-shore settlement, based on weather conditions and the depth of the sea bed etc. Initially, I started looking at a 'fixed' settlement, with piled construction. This technique has a rich heritage, from Asian ‘water villages’ to the British pleasure pier, and is still practised today. However, inspired by floating oil rigs and pontoon bridges, the opportunities of a floating, more dynamic settlement, soon became apparent. The versatility of floating foundations would enable the structure to be towed out to sea before being joined together and secured onto the seabed. This would facilitate land based, dry dock construction, and enable an off-shore development to be constructed in a piecemeal fashion. The settlement could then evolve in response to demand, with different configurations to suit the location. Having created a secure floating substructure, the superstructure could then be developed. Accommodation units would be prefabricated and assembled on site (old shipping containers could re-appropriated for this purpose), whilst the larger 'public' buildings would be built utilising the principles of 'high-tech' architecture, so that they could be readily assembled (and dismantled). With a leeward entrance, the substructure would create a protected harbour, whilst a tensile translucent fabric canopy would provide protection from the worst of the weather and evoke nautical images of sails.
Line 29:		Line 29:
	[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_1.jpg]]

−	Sea City – Option 1 ( Original)	+	=== Sea City – Option 1 ( Original) ===

	[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_2.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_2.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_2.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_2.jpg]]

−	Sea City – Option 2	+	=== Sea City – Option 2 ===

	[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_3.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_3.jpg]]		[[File:Sea_City_CGI_-_3.jpg\|link=File:Sea_City_CGI_-_3.jpg]]

−	Sea City – Option 3	+	=== Sea City – Option 3 ===

−	Sustainability	+	== Sustainability ==

	An oceanic settlement, constructed from pre-fabricated units on floating pontoons, would have minimal effect on the environment. It could also utilise the energy from the sea, sun and wind. Since my original scheme, off-shore wind farms have become commonplace, and are now a big industry in Hull. As the old oil and gas fields are wound down, there is now a more sustainable industry in the North Sea - which will require maintaining. With a diverse population, a mixed use floating settlement would also be socially and economically sustainable. Recent events further afield have also shown how a floating off-shore settlement could provide sanctuary to displaced populations throughout the world.		An oceanic settlement, constructed from pre-fabricated units on floating pontoons, would have minimal effect on the environment. It could also utilise the energy from the sea, sun and wind. Since my original scheme, off-shore wind farms have become commonplace, and are now a big industry in Hull. As the old oil and gas fields are wound down, there is now a more sustainable industry in the North Sea - which will require maintaining. With a diverse population, a mixed use floating settlement would also be socially and economically sustainable. Recent events further afield have also shown how a floating off-shore settlement could provide sanctuary to displaced populations throughout the world.

−	The Future	+	== The Future ==

	Originally designed in 1997, the graphics look a bit dated now, but the concept is just as relevant today. The slow response of governments to climate change, means that global warming and rising sea levels are an even more pressing issue now. There has also been renewed interest in building at sea. The Seasteading Institute, based in California, promotes the concept of floating oceanic communities and recently work has begun on a floating settlement in the Maldives – a country on the front line of rising sea levels. Since Sea City was first designed, advances in technology and communications mean that people and businesses can now work remotely from the the mainland, without the extra costs of land based property. First conceived in the maritime city of Hull, Sea City could be the catalyst for our seafaring nation to once again take to the worlds oceans in search of a more sustainable future....		Originally designed in 1997, the graphics look a bit dated now, but the concept is just as relevant today. The slow response of governments to climate change, means that global warming and rising sea levels are an even more pressing issue now. There has also been renewed interest in building at sea. The Seasteading Institute, based in California, promotes the concept of floating oceanic communities and recently work has begun on a floating settlement in the Maldives – a country on the front line of rising sea levels. Since Sea City was first designed, advances in technology and communications mean that people and businesses can now work remotely from the the mainland, without the extra costs of land based property. First conceived in the maritime city of Hull, Sea City could be the catalyst for our seafaring nation to once again take to the worlds oceans in search of a more sustainable future....
Line 49:		Line 49:
	“The sound, the light, the wetness of living on water changes earthbound society, offering a new perspective of openness, a new sensitivity to human relationships, which are not defined by earth’s boundaries.” Bertrand Goldberg		“The sound, the light, the wetness of living on water changes earthbound society, offering a new perspective of openness, a new sensitivity to human relationships, which are not defined by earth’s boundaries.” Bertrand Goldberg

−	Concept, design and images by Tim Chetham of Chetham Architecture Design	+	Concept, design and images provided by Tim Chetham of Chetham Architecture Design (user CAD)

−	[[Category:Education]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Water]]	+	--[[User:CAD\|CAD]]
		+
		+	[[Category:DCN_Collection]] [[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Project_Knowledge]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Theory]] [[Category:Water]]