Rosewell review - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:57, 27 February 2021

2021-02-27T07:57:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:57, 27 February 2021
Line 43:		Line 43:
	* Planning related applications for judicial review.		* Planning related applications for judicial review.

−	[[Category:Planning_permission]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Report]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]

Designing Buildings at 16:46, 9 March 2020

2020-03-09T16:46:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 9 March 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:

	It was reported that out of the 22 recommendations, the Planning Inspectorate had implemented 16, which included streamlining the process, reforming the statement of case, earlier inspector engagement and overhauling statements of common ground.		It was reported that out of the 22 recommendations, the Planning Inspectorate had implemented 16, which included streamlining the process, reforming the statement of case, earlier inspector engagement and overhauling statements of common ground.
		+
		+	On 9 March 2020, the Planning Inspectorate published an update to the Review Action Plan first published in May 2019, setting out how the recommendations from the Review were being implemented. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/16-out-of-22-rosewell-recommendations-implemented-as-planning-inspectorate-publishes-updated-action-plan https://www.gov.uk/government/news/16-out-of-22-rosewell-recommendations-implemented-as-planning-inspectorate-publishes-updated-action-plan]

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

Designing Buildings at 14:51, 18 February 2020

2020-02-18T14:51:01Z

Designing Buildings at 14:47, 18 February 2020

2020-02-18T14:47:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 18 February 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In June 2018, Communities Secretary ~~Rt. Hon~~ James Brokenshire MP appointed Bridget Rosewell to chair an independent review into planning appeal inquiries. The review was set up ~~with the aim of reducing~~ the time it takes to determine inquiries established to resolve disputed planning proposals, whilst still ensuring quality decision making.	+	In June 2018, Communities Secretary James Brokenshire MP appointed Bridget Rosewell to chair an independent review into planning appeal inquiries. The review was set up to reduce the time it takes to determine inquiries established to resolve disputed planning proposals, whilst still ensuring quality decision making.

−	On 19 December 2018 ~~Bridget~~ Rosewell submitted ~~an independent~~ report ~~on planning appeal inquiries~~ following a review ~~requested by~~ the ~~Secretary~~ of ~~State~~.	+	On 19 December 2018 Rosewell submitted a report following the review. The report made 22 recommendations about how the planning appeal inquiry process could be improved and decisions made more quickly, proposing that the average time to decide a planning appeal inquiry could be slashed from an average of 47 weeks to around 26 weeks.

−	The report summarises the findings of the review and makes 22 recommendations on how the planning appeal inquiry process can be improved and decisions made more quickly, proposing that the average time to decide a planning appeal inquiry could be slashed from an average of 47 weeks to around 26 weeks.	+	She concluded that outdated administrative processes and poor IT infrastructure were unnecessarily holding up cases and that a lack of suitably qualified inspectors was hampering efforts to set up inquiry hearings on time. Recommendations included committing the Planning Inspectorate to introducing a new online portal for the submission of inquiry appeals, setting out a strategy for recruiting additional inspectors so inquiries can be scheduled sooner, amd reducing the length of time they take to conclude.
−		+
−	She concluded that outdated administrative processes and poor IT infrastructure were unnecessarily holding up cases and that a lack of suitably qualified inspectors was hampering efforts to set up inquiry hearings on time. Recommendations included committing the Planning Inspectorate to introducing a new online portal for the submission of inquiry appeals to setting out a strategy for recruiting additional inspectors so inquiries can be scheduled sooner, reducing the length of time they take to conclude.	+

	Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report]		Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report]
Line 17:		Line 15:
	An update on progress implementing the recommendations of the review was published on 3 May 2019. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update]		An update on progress implementing the recommendations of the review was published on 3 May 2019. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update]

−	On 14 May 2019, the Planning Inspectorate published its action plan to implement the recommendations of the inquiries review. Ref https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan	+	On 14 May 2019, the Planning Inspectorate published its action plan to implement the recommendations of the inquiries review. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan]

	In January 2020 it was reported that 15 of the 22 recommendations had been implemented. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020]		In January 2020 it was reported that 15 of the 22 recommendations had been implemented. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020]

Designing Buildings: Created page with "In June 2018, Communities Secretary Rt. Hon James Brokenshire MP appointed Bridget Rosewell to chair an independent review into planning appeal inquiries. The review was set up w..."

2020-02-18T14:39:51Z

Created page with "In June 2018, Communities Secretary Rt. Hon James Brokenshire MP appointed Bridget Rosewell to chair an independent review into planning appeal inquiries. The review was set up w..."

New page

In June 2018, Communities Secretary Rt. Hon James Brokenshire MP appointed Bridget Rosewell to chair an independent review into planning appeal inquiries. The review was set up with the aim of reducing the time it takes to determine inquiries established to resolve disputed planning proposals, whilst still ensuring quality decision making.

On 19 December 2018 Bridget Rosewell submitted an independent report on planning appeal inquiries following a review requested by the Secretary of State.

The report summarises the findings of the review and makes 22 recommendations on how the planning appeal inquiry process can be improved and decisions made more quickly, proposing that the average time to decide a planning appeal inquiry could be slashed from an average of 47 weeks to around 26 weeks.

She concluded that outdated administrative processes and poor IT infrastructure were unnecessarily holding up cases and that a lack of suitably qualified inspectors was hampering efforts to set up inquiry hearings on time. Recommendations included committing the Planning Inspectorate to introducing a new online portal for the submission of inquiry appeals to setting out a strategy for recruiting additional inspectors so inquiries can be scheduled sooner, reducing the length of time they take to conclude.

Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report]

Communities Secretary, Rt Hon James Brokenshire MP, commenting on the review, said: “Planning appeal inquiries have held up development and kept communities waiting in limbo – 47 weeks on average is far too long to wait for a decision on something so important as a proposal for new development… Reducing the time it takes to secure crucial decisions ensures the delivery of more homes, in the right places, and will help us reach our ambition of 300,000 new homes a year by the mid-2020s.”

= Progress =

In March 2019 it was announced that the Planning Inspectorate would run a pilot scheme for inquiries in response to the recommendations of the inquiries review. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review]

An update on progress implementing the recommendations of the review was published on 3 May 2019. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update]

On 14 May 2019, the Planning Inspectorate published its action plan to implement the recommendations of the inquiries review. Ref https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan

In January 2020 it was reported that 15 of the 22 recommendations had been implemented. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020]

On 12 February 2020, Bridget Rosewell, together with the Planning Inspectorate and the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) hosted an event to mark one year since publication of the Review. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/one-year-on-from-rosewell-review-what-have-we-learnt-so-far https://www.gov.uk/government/news/one-year-on-from-rosewell-review-what-have-we-learnt-so-far]

It was reported that out of the 22 recommendations, the Planning Inspectorate had implemented 16 which included streamlining the process, reforming the statement of case, earlier inspector engagement and overhauling statements of common ground.

= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

* Detailed planning permission.
* Enforcement notice.
* Judicial review.
* Outline planning permission.
* National Planning Policy Framework.
* Planning appeal.
* Planning court.
* Planning enforcement.
* Planning fees.
* Planning inspectorate.
* Planning objection.
* Planning obligations.
* Planning permission.
* Recovered planning appeal.
* Planning related applications for judicial review.

[[Category:Planning_permission]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 18 February 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In June 2018, Communities Secretary James Brokenshire MP appointed Bridget Rosewell to chair an independent review into planning appeal inquiries. The review was set up to reduce the time it takes to determine inquiries established to resolve disputed planning proposals, whilst still ensuring quality decision making.		In June 2018, Communities Secretary James Brokenshire MP appointed Bridget Rosewell to chair an independent review into planning appeal inquiries. The review was set up to reduce the time it takes to determine inquiries established to resolve disputed planning proposals, whilst still ensuring quality decision making.

−	On 19 December 2018 Rosewell submitted a report following the review. The report made 22 recommendations about how the planning appeal inquiry process could be improved and decisions made more quickly, proposing that the average time to decide a planning appeal inquiry could be slashed from an average of 47 weeks to around 26 weeks.	+	On 19 December 2018 Rosewell submitted a [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report report] following the review. The report made 22 recommendations about how the planning appeal inquiry process could be improved and decisions made more quickly, proposing that the average time to decide a planning appeal inquiry could be slashed from an average of 47 weeks to around 26 weeks.

−	She concluded that outdated administrative processes and poor IT infrastructure were unnecessarily holding up cases and that a lack of suitably qualified inspectors was hampering efforts to set up inquiry hearings on time. Recommendations included committing the Planning Inspectorate to introducing a new online portal for the submission of inquiry appeals, setting out a strategy for recruiting additional inspectors so inquiries can be scheduled sooner, ~~amd~~ reducing the length of time they take to conclude.	+	She concluded that outdated administrative processes and poor IT infrastructure were unnecessarily holding up cases and that a lack of suitably qualified inspectors was hampering efforts to set up inquiry hearings on time. Recommendations included committing the Planning Inspectorate to introducing a new online portal for the submission of inquiry appeals, setting out a strategy for recruiting additional inspectors so inquiries can be scheduled sooner, and reducing the length of time they take to conclude.

	Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report]		Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-planning-appeal-inquiries-report]

−	~~Communities Secretary, Rt Hon~~ James Brokenshire ~~MP, commenting on the review,~~ said: “Planning appeal inquiries have held up development and kept communities waiting in limbo – 47 weeks on average is far too long to wait for a decision on something so important as a proposal for new development… Reducing the time it takes to secure crucial decisions ensures the delivery of more homes, in the right places, and will help us reach our ambition of 300,000 new homes a year by the mid-2020s.”	+	James Brokenshire said: “Planning appeal inquiries have held up development and kept communities waiting in limbo – 47 weeks on average is far too long to wait for a decision on something so important as a proposal for new development… Reducing the time it takes to secure crucial decisions ensures the delivery of more homes, in the right places, and will help us reach our ambition of 300,000 new homes a year by the mid-2020s.”

	= Progress =		= Progress =

−	In March 2019 it was announced that the Planning Inspectorate would run a pilot scheme for inquiries in response to the recommendations ~~of the inquiries review~~. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review]	+	In March 2019 it was announced that the Planning Inspectorate would run a pilot scheme for inquiries in response to the recommendations made. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review]

	An update on progress implementing the recommendations of the review was published on 3 May 2019. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update]		An update on progress implementing the recommendations of the review was published on 3 May 2019. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rosewell-inquiry-review-update]

−	On 14 May 2019, the Planning Inspectorate published its action plan to implement the recommendations of the ~~inquiries~~ review. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan]	+	On 14 May 2019, the Planning Inspectorate published its action plan to implement the recommendations of the review. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inquiries-review-action-plan]

	In January 2020 it was reported that 15 of the 22 recommendations had been implemented. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020]		In January 2020 it was reported that 15 of the 22 recommendations had been implemented. Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/performance-update-moving-ahead-in-2020]
Line 21:		Line 21:
	On 12 February 2020, Bridget Rosewell, together with the Planning Inspectorate and the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) hosted an event to mark one year since publication of the Review. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/one-year-on-from-rosewell-review-what-have-we-learnt-so-far https://www.gov.uk/government/news/one-year-on-from-rosewell-review-what-have-we-learnt-so-far]		On 12 February 2020, Bridget Rosewell, together with the Planning Inspectorate and the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) hosted an event to mark one year since publication of the Review. [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/one-year-on-from-rosewell-review-what-have-we-learnt-so-far https://www.gov.uk/government/news/one-year-on-from-rosewell-review-what-have-we-learnt-so-far]

−	It was reported that out of the 22 recommendations, the Planning Inspectorate had implemented 16 which included streamlining the process, reforming the statement of case, earlier inspector engagement and overhauling statements of common ground.	+	It was reported that out of the 22 recommendations, the Planning Inspectorate had implemented 16, which included streamlining the process, reforming the statement of case, earlier inspector engagement and overhauling statements of common ground.

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =