Regulatory Impact Assessment - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:20, 17 March 2022

2022-03-17T07:20:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:20, 17 March 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	It was proposed that policy makers should evaluate a range of options (including not regulating) and encourage self-regulation where feasible.		It was proposed that policy makers should evaluate a range of options (including not regulating) and encourage self-regulation where feasible.

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* Approved documents.		* Approved documents.
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* CDM.		* CDM.
	* Health and safety.		* Health and safety.
		+	* Impact assessment.
	* Planning permission.		* Planning permission.
	* Statutory approvals.		* Statutory approvals.

Designing Buildings at 08:04, 13 January 2021

2021-01-13T08:04:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 13 January 2021
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* Statutory authorities.		* Statutory authorities.

−	[[Category:~~Regulations~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Regulation~~]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Regulations]]

Designing Buildings at 15:37, 25 March 2019

2019-03-25T15:37:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 25 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	Regulations can safeguard people and property, boost the economy and protect the environment, but they can also impose an administrative burden and significant costs, particularly on small businesses. Regulatory Impact Assessments (RIA sometimes referred to as a Regulatory Impact Analysis) were introduced by government in response to these concerns.		Regulations can safeguard people and property, boost the economy and protect the environment, but they can also impose an administrative burden and significant costs, particularly on small businesses. Regulatory Impact Assessments (RIA sometimes referred to as a Regulatory Impact Analysis) were introduced by government in response to these concerns.

Line 5:		Line 4:

	In a report to Parliament in 2001, [http://www.nao.org.uk/report/better-regulation-making-good-use-of-regulatory-impact-assessments/ Better Regulation: Making Good Use of Regulatory Impact Assessments], Sir John Bourn, Head of the National Audit Office (NAO) suggested that RIAs had contributed to better policy making and reduced costs to business but that there was room for improvement. He suggested three factors which characterised good RIAs:		In a report to Parliament in 2001, [http://www.nao.org.uk/report/better-regulation-making-good-use-of-regulatory-impact-assessments/ Better Regulation: Making Good Use of Regulatory Impact Assessments], Sir John Bourn, Head of the National Audit Office (NAO) suggested that RIAs had contributed to better policy making and reduced costs to business but that there was room for improvement. He suggested three factors which characterised good RIAs:
−	*Starting early.	+
−	*Consulting effectively.	+	* Starting early.
−	*Analysing costs and benefits appropriately.	+	* Consulting effectively.
		+	* Analysing costs and benefits appropriately.

	It was proposed that policy makers should evaluate a range of options (including not regulating) and encourage self-regulation where feasible.		It was proposed that policy makers should evaluate a range of options (including not regulating) and encourage self-regulation where feasible.

−	= ~~Find out more~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

−	~~=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===~~	+	* Approved documents.
−	*Approved documents.	+	* Aspects of construction works.
−	*Building regulations.	+	* Building regulations.
−	*CDM.	+	* CDM.
−	*Health and safety.	+	* Health and safety.
−	*Planning permission.	+	* Planning permission.
−	*Statutory approvals.	+	* Statutory approvals.
−	*Statutory authorities.	+	* Statutory authorities.

−	[[Category:Regulations]]	+	[[Category:Regulations]] [[Category:DCN_Regulation]]

Designing Buildings at 09:10, 3 July 2015

2015-07-03T09:10:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:10, 3 July 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Government departments and agencies proposing new regulations, or amendments to existing regulations, prepare a Regulatory Impact Assessment which assesses its likely impact. They explain the objective of the proposed regulation, its likely costs, risks and benefits. Changes should only be introduced when other alternatives have first been considered and rejected and where the benefits justify the burdens.		Government departments and agencies proposing new regulations, or amendments to existing regulations, prepare a Regulatory Impact Assessment which assesses its likely impact. They explain the objective of the proposed regulation, its likely costs, risks and benefits. Changes should only be introduced when other alternatives have first been considered and rejected and where the benefits justify the burdens.

−	In a report to Parliament in 2001, [http://www.nao.org.uk/report/better-regulation-making-good-use-of-regulatory-impact-assessments/ Better Regulation: Making Good Use of Regulatory Impact Assessments], Sir John Bourn, Head of the National Audit Office (NAO) suggested that RIAs had contributed to better policy making and reduced costs to business but that there was room for improvement. He suggested ~~that~~ three factors which characterised good RIAs ~~were~~:	+	In a report to Parliament in 2001, [http://www.nao.org.uk/report/better-regulation-making-good-use-of-regulatory-impact-assessments/ Better Regulation: Making Good Use of Regulatory Impact Assessments], Sir John Bourn, Head of the National Audit Office (NAO) suggested that RIAs had contributed to better policy making and reduced costs to business but that there was room for improvement. He suggested three factors which characterised good RIAs:
	*Starting early.		*Starting early.
	*Consulting effectively.		*Consulting effectively.

Designing Buildings: Created page with " Regulations can safeguard people and property, boost the economy and protect the environment, but they can also impose an administrative burden and significant costs, particular..."

2015-07-03T09:08:07Z

Created page with " Regulations can safeguard people and property, boost the economy and protect the environment, but they can also impose an administrative burden and significant costs, particular..."

New page

Regulations can safeguard people and property, boost the economy and protect the environment, but they can also impose an administrative burden and significant costs, particularly on small businesses. Regulatory Impact Assessments (RIA sometimes referred to as a Regulatory Impact Analysis) were introduced by government in response to these concerns.

Government departments and agencies proposing new regulations, or amendments to existing regulations, prepare a Regulatory Impact Assessment which assesses its likely impact. They explain the objective of the proposed regulation, its likely costs, risks and benefits. Changes should only be introduced when other alternatives have first been considered and rejected and where the benefits justify the burdens.

In a report to Parliament in 2001, [http://www.nao.org.uk/report/better-regulation-making-good-use-of-regulatory-impact-assessments/ Better Regulation: Making Good Use of Regulatory Impact Assessments], Sir John Bourn, Head of the National Audit Office (NAO) suggested that RIAs had contributed to better policy making and reduced costs to business but that there was room for improvement. He suggested that three factors which characterised good RIAs were:
*Starting early.
*Consulting effectively.
*Analysing costs and benefits appropriately.

It was proposed that policy makers should evaluate a range of options (including not regulating) and encourage self-regulation where feasible.

= Find out more =

=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===
*Approved documents.
*Building regulations.
*CDM.
*Health and safety.
*Planning permission.
*Statutory approvals.
*Statutory authorities.

[[Category:Regulations]]