Designing Buildings at 07:03, 20 October 2024

2024-10-20T07:03:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 20 October 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	-----		-----
−	This article originally appeared in the Institute of Historic Building Conservation’s (IHBC’s) [https://ihbconline.co.uk/cont_arch/?p=1463 Context 179], published in March 2024. It was written Alexandra Fairclough, conservation officer for Cheshire East, a lecturer and a member of the IHBC legal panel. A former planning inspector, she was called to the Bar in 2009, and before that was IHBC law and practice coordinator.	+	This article originally appeared in the Institute of Historic Building Conservation’s (IHBC’s) [https://ihbconline.co.uk/cont_arch/?p=1463 Context 179], published in March 2024. It was written by Alexandra Fairclough, conservation officer for Cheshire East, a lecturer and a member of the IHBC legal panel. A former planning inspector, she was called to the Bar in 2009, and before that was IHBC law and practice coordinator.

	--[[User:Institute_of_Historic_Building_Conservation\|Institute of Historic Building Conservation]]		--[[User:Institute_of_Historic_Building_Conservation\|Institute of Historic Building Conservation]]

Designing Buildings: Created page with "R v Evetts A case heard in Gloucester Crown Court (heard in Winchester Crown Court) on 14 December 2023 between John Evetts and Cotswold District Council regarded unauthorised w..."

2024-10-20T06:57:05Z

Created page with "R v Evetts A case heard in Gloucester Crown Court (heard in Winchester Crown Court) on 14 December 2023 between John Evetts and Cotswold District Council regarded unauthorised w..."

New page

R v Evetts

A case heard in Gloucester Crown Court (heard in Winchester Crown Court) on 14 December 2023 between John Evetts and Cotswold District Council regarded unauthorised works to a Grade II listed building, Middle Hill Farm, Saintbury. This became national news as John Evetts was a key heritage adviser for the Landmark Trust and therefore knew that he was breaching planning laws. Between July 2020 and December 2021, Evetts undertook a wide range of works to the farmhouse without consent from Cotswold District Council. Pleading guilty, Evetts received a 12-month conditional discharge and is required to complete the outstanding works within this time. He was ordered to contribute £6,000 towards the council’s costs and pay a victim surcharge of £22.

I understand that this case is unreported, but more information can be found in this earlier appeal decision and via Cotswold District Council’s website: Appeal A Ref: APP/F1610/F/22/3301911 Middle Hill Farm, Saintbury, Broadway, Gloucestershire, WR12 7PX.

-----
This article originally appeared in the Institute of Historic Building Conservation’s (IHBC’s) [https://ihbconline.co.uk/cont_arch/?p=1463 Context 179], published in March 2024. It was written Alexandra Fairclough, conservation officer for Cheshire East, a lecturer and a member of the IHBC legal panel. A former planning inspector, she was called to the Bar in 2009, and before that was IHBC law and practice coordinator.

--[[User:Institute_of_Historic_Building_Conservation|Institute of Historic Building Conservation]]

= Related articles on Designing Buildings Conservation. =

* Conservation.
* Heritage.
* Historic environment.
* IHBC articles.
* Institute of Historic Building Conservation.
* Listed building.
* National Planning Policy Framework.

[[Category:DCN_Case_Law]] [[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:Conservation]]

R v Evetts - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:03, 20 October 2024

Designing Buildings: Created page with "R v Evetts A case heard in Gloucester Crown Court (heard in Winchester Crown Court) on 14 December 2023 between John Evetts and Cotswold District Council regarded unauthorised w..."