Protection of Function: Why We Need It - Revision history

Danrig at 09:25, 9 April 2025

2025-04-09T09:25:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 9 April 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* Higher risk buildings.		* Higher risk buildings.
	* Independent Grenfell Tower Inquiry.		* Independent Grenfell Tower Inquiry.
		+	* Insights: Learning from the UK Veterinary Regulatory Landscape.
	* It’s all about the Money: Learning from Barristers.		* It’s all about the Money: Learning from Barristers.
	* It’s All About the Money: Fees and Resources.		* It’s All About the Money: Fees and Resources.
	* It's All About the Money: The Value Equation.		* It's All About the Money: The Value Equation.
−	* Learning from the UK Veterinary Regulatory Landscape.
	* Moving Beyond Compliance.		* Moving Beyond Compliance.
	* National Regulator of Construction Products.		* National Regulator of Construction Products.

Danrig at 09:19, 9 April 2025

2025-04-09T09:19:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 9 April 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	--[[User:Enframe\|enframe]]		--[[User:Enframe\|enframe]]
		+
		+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =
		+
		+	* Architects Registration Board.
		+	* Building a Safer Future - Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety (Hackitt Review).
		+	* Building Safety Regulator.
		+	* Building Safety wiki.
		+	* Golden thread.
		+	* Grenfell Tower tragedy.
		+	* Higher risk buildings.
		+	* Independent Grenfell Tower Inquiry.
		+	* It’s all about the Money: Learning from Barristers.
		+	* It’s All About the Money: Fees and Resources.
		+	* It's All About the Money: The Value Equation.
		+	* Learning from the UK Veterinary Regulatory Landscape.
		+	* Moving Beyond Compliance.
		+	* National Regulator of Construction Products.
		+	* New Homes Ombudsman.
		+	* Principal Accountable Person.
		+	* Principal Contractor.
		+	* Principal Designer.
		+	* Support for Architects.
		+	* The Culture Change We Desperately Need.
		+	* The Grenfell Tragedy Changed Everything.

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Organisations]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]] [[Category:Building_safety]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Organisations]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]] [[Category:Building_safety]]

Danrig at 09:08, 9 April 2025

2025-04-09T09:08:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 9 April 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Sign-up to read the article and comment here: [https://open.substack.com/pub/enframe/p/09-protection-of-function-why-we?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Enframe Substack Protection of Function: Why We Need It]		Sign-up to read the article and comment here: [https://open.substack.com/pub/enframe/p/09-protection-of-function-why-we?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Enframe Substack Protection of Function: Why We Need It]
		+
		+	--[[User:Enframe\|enframe]]

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Organisations]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]] [[Category:Building_safety]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Organisations]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]] [[Category:Building_safety]]

Danrig at 08:51, 9 April 2025

2025-04-09T08:51:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 9 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[File:~~Enframe Will Freeman Substack 9 1000~~.jpg]]	+	[[File:Enframe_Will_Freeman_Substack_9_1000.jpg\|link=File:Enframe_Will_Freeman_Substack_9_1000.jpg]]
		+
		+	This is an article summary from the Rethinking the Architectural Profession in the Post-Grenfell Era essay series written by enframe. Summaries available on the Building Safety wki and full articles via Substack links in each article.

	Complex, often controversial and regularly debated in the industry, Protection of Function is the focus of our next series of articles. We’ll be looking at why we need it; how we define it; historical context and some uncomfortable truths; and how we might move forward with a unified approach.<br />		Complex, often controversial and regularly debated in the industry, Protection of Function is the focus of our next series of articles. We’ll be looking at why we need it; how we define it; historical context and some uncomfortable truths; and how we might move forward with a unified approach.<br />

Danrig: Created page with "File:Enframe Will Freeman Substack 9 1000.jpg Complex, often controversial and regularly debated in the industry, Protection of Function is the focus of our next series of a..."

2025-04-09T08:43:20Z

Created page with "File:Enframe Will Freeman Substack 9 1000.jpg Complex, often controversial and regularly debated in the industry, Protection of Function is the focus of our next series of a..."

New page

[[File:Enframe Will Freeman Substack 9 1000.jpg]]

Complex, often controversial and regularly debated in the industry, Protection of Function is the focus of our next series of articles. We’ll be looking at why we need it; how we define it; historical context and some uncomfortable truths; and how we might move forward with a unified approach. 
 
In the UK, the title "architect" is protected under the Architects Act 1997, but the function of architectural work is not. 
 
Not protecting function allows unregulated individuals to perform critical tasks like submitting Building Regulations applications, managing High-Risk Buildings (HRBs), and even supervising construction projects. 
 
This lack of regulatory oversight exposes the public to significant risks. With an estimated 20,000 unregulated ‘architectural designers’ or ‘consultants’ operating alongside approximately 42,000 registered architects, the system fails to ensure safety, accountability, and professional standards. 
 
Grenfell Tower is a stark warning of what can go wrong when architectural functions are performed without proper regulation. The tragedy revealed the devastating consequences of unqualified individuals overseeing complex, high-risk projects. 
 
Other professions already protect their function. Doctors, lawyers, and veterinary surgeons cannot legally perform their roles without regulation. So why is architecture so different? 
 
It's time to move beyond protection of Title and start protecting the function of architectural work to safeguard public safety, uphold professional standards, restore trust and value the Architect. 
 
We want to hear from you. Should architectural functions be protected by law? What are your ideas, or solutions?

Sign-up to read the article and comment here: [https://open.substack.com/pub/enframe/p/09-protection-of-function-why-we?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Enframe Substack Protection of Function: Why We Need It]

[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Organisations]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]] [[Category:Building_safety]]