Planning objection - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 09:43, 10 September 2020

2020-09-10T09:43:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 10 September 2020
Line 64:		Line 64:
	* Temporary stop notice.		* Temporary stop notice.

−	[[Category:Planning_permission]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Legislation]] [[Category:DCN_Regulation]] [[Category:Planning_permission]]

Designing Buildings at 13:52, 4 February 2020

2020-02-04T13:52:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 4 February 2020
Line 47:		Line 47:
	If the applicant appeals against the decision there should be a further opportunity to object.		If the applicant appeals against the decision there should be a further opportunity to object.

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===	+

	* Community Infrastructure Levy.		* Community Infrastructure Levy.

Editor at 13:04, 14 March 2018

2018-03-14T13:04:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 14 March 2018
Line 52:		Line 52:

	* Community Infrastructure Levy.		* Community Infrastructure Levy.
		+	* Delegated powers.
	* Enforcement notice.		* Enforcement notice.
	* How long does it take to get planning permission.		* How long does it take to get planning permission.

Editor at 15:47, 19 January 2018

2018-01-19T15:47:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 19 January 2018
Line 63:		Line 63:
	* Planning appeal.		* Planning appeal.
	* Stop notice.		* Stop notice.
		+	* Temporary stop notice.

	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]

Editor at 15:30, 19 January 2018

2018-01-19T15:30:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 19 January 2018
Line 62:		Line 62:
	* Planning policy.		* Planning policy.
	* Planning appeal.		* Planning appeal.
		+	* Stop notice.

	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]

Editor at 16:55, 12 January 2018

2018-01-12T16:55:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 12 January 2018
Line 52:		Line 52:

	* Community Infrastructure Levy.		* Community Infrastructure Levy.
		+	* Enforcement notice.
	* How long does it take to get planning permission.		* How long does it take to get planning permission.
	* How long does planning permission last.		* How long does planning permission last.

Designing Buildings at 11:45, 31 January 2017

2017-01-31T11:45:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:45, 31 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	When a planning application is submitted to a local planning authority, there must be a public consultation period of three to eight weeks to give people affected by the application the opportunity to comment, either supporting the application or objecting to it. When groups of people work together to prepare their comments, they will have a much greater chance of influencing the decision that the local planning authority reaches.		When a planning application is submitted to a local planning authority, there must be a public consultation period of three to eight weeks to give people affected by the application the opportunity to comment, either supporting the application or objecting to it. When groups of people work together to prepare their comments, they will have a much greater chance of influencing the decision that the local planning authority reaches.

Line 7:		Line 6:

	Objections that are generally valid include:		Objections that are generally valid include:
−	*The proposed development is contrary to national, regional or local planning policy, government circulars, orders or statutory instruments.	+
−	*The proposed development is not in keeping with the stylistic context or scale of the local area.	+	* The proposed development is contrary to national, regional or local planning policy, government circulars, orders or statutory instruments.
−	*The proposed development will have a negative impact on the amenity of another property, through noise, overlooking, overshadowing, smells, light pollution, loss of daylight, loss of privacy, dust, vibration or late night activities.	+	* The proposed development is not in keeping with the stylistic context or scale of the local area.
−	*The proposed use is not compatible with existing uses, for example an industrial use in a residential area.	+	* The proposed development will have a negative impact on the amenity of another property, through noise, overlooking, overshadowing, smells, light pollution, loss of daylight, loss of privacy, dust, vibration or late night activities.
−	*The development may cause traffic problems such as traffic generation, access or safety problems.	+	* The proposed use is not compatible with existing uses, for example an industrial use in a residential area.
−	*The proposal reduces the amount car parking available or provides insufficient parking space itself.	+	* The development may cause traffic problems such as traffic generation, access or safety problems.
−	*There is a history of rejecting similar developments in the area.	+	* The proposal reduces the amount car parking available or provides insufficient parking space itself.
−	*Approval would create a precedent meaning that it would be difficult to object to similar proposals.	+	* There is a history of rejecting similar developments in the area.
−	*Local infrastructure is not adequate to service the proposed development.	+	* Approval would create a precedent meaning that it would be difficult to object to similar proposals.
−	*The proposal is a piecemeal development that would prevent proper development of the area.	+	* Local infrastructure is not adequate to service the proposed development.
−	*The proposal will have an economic impact, such as impacting on tourism or on small businesses.	+	* The proposal is a piecemeal development that would prevent proper development of the area.
−	*The proposal will have environmental health impacts such as the use of hazardous materials or ground contamination.	+	* The proposal will have an economic impact, such as impacting on tourism or on small businesses.
−	*The proposed development will impact on listed buildings or a conservation area.	+	* The proposal will have environmental health impacts such as the use of hazardous materials or ground contamination.
−	*The layout and density of the proposed development is inappropriate.	+	* The proposed development will impact on listed buildings or a conservation area.
−	*The proposal is an inappropriate development within a green belt.	+	* The layout and density of the proposed development is inappropriate.
−	*Proposed advertising creates visual clutter.	+	* The proposal is an inappropriate development within a green belt.
−	*The proposed development includes insufficient landscaping.	+	* Proposed advertising creates visual clutter.
−	*The proposed development will demolish or adversely affect an ancient monument or site of cultural or architectural value.	+	* The proposed development includes insufficient landscaping.
−	*The proposed development will damage the natural environment or will result in significant loss of trees or the loss of trees for which tree protection orders are in place.	+	* The proposed development will demolish or adversely affect an ancient monument or site of cultural or architectural value.
−	*The cumulative impact of the development when considered alongside other development will have an adverse impact on the area.	+	* The proposed development will damage the natural environment or will result in significant loss of trees or the loss of trees for which tree protection orders are in place.
−	*There is inadequate access for people with disabilities.	+	* The cumulative impact of the development when considered alongside other development will have an adverse impact on the area.
−	*Archaeological issues.	+	* There is inadequate access for people with disabilities.
−	*The type of housing proposed will not satisfy local housing needs.	+	* Archaeological issues.
		+	* The type of housing proposed will not satisfy local housing needs.

	Objections that are generally not valid include:		Objections that are generally not valid include:
−	*Building regulations issues.	+
−	*Private issues such as boundary disputes.	+	* Building regulations issues.
−	*Reduction in the value of properties affected by the proposed development.	+	* Private issues such as boundary disputes.
−	*Impacts resulting from the construction of the development.	+	* Reduction in the value of properties affected by the proposed development.
−	*Loss of existing views.	+	* Impacts resulting from the construction of the development.
−	*The possibility of the proposed development causing problems in the future.	+	* Loss of existing views.
−	*The personal or business circumstances of the applicant	+	* The possibility of the proposed development causing problems in the future.
−	*Problems with notification of the application.	+	* The personal or business circumstances of the applicant
−	*Competition with existing companies.	+	* Problems with notification of the application.
		+	* Competition with existing companies.

	Most planning applications are decided by Senior Planning Officers under delegated authority, however if a planning application is considered at a planning committee meeting, people that objected to the application should be invited to attend. A representative of those objecting may be permitted to make a short presentation to the committee.		Most planning applications are decided by Senior Planning Officers under delegated authority, however if a planning application is considered at a planning committee meeting, people that objected to the application should be invited to attend. A representative of those objecting may be permitted to make a short presentation to the committee.

−	If the applicant appeals against the decision there should be a further opportunity to object.~~<br/>~~	+	If the applicant appeals against the decision there should be a further opportunity to object.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =

	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===
−	*Community Infrastructure Levy.~~<br/>~~	+
−	*Localism Act.~~<br/>~~	+	* Community Infrastructure Levy.
−	*National Planning Policy Framework.	+	* How long does it take to get planning permission.
−	*Neighbourhood planning.~~<br/>~~	+	* How long does planning permission last.
−	*Planning authority.	+	* Localism Act.
−	*Planning permission.	+	* National Planning Policy Framework.
−	*Planning policy.	+	* Neighbourhood planning.
−	*Planning appeal.	+	* Planning authority.
		+	* Planning permission.
		+	* Planning policy.
		+	* Planning appeal.

	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]

Designing Buildings at 06:42, 25 June 2014

2014-06-25T06:42:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 25 June 2014
Line 52:		Line 52:
	*Localism Act.<br/>		*Localism Act.<br/>
	*National Planning Policy Framework.		*National Planning Policy Framework.
−	*Neighbourhood planning. <br/>	+	*Neighbourhood planning.<br/>
		+	*Planning authority.
	*Planning permission.		*Planning permission.
		+	*Planning policy.
	*Planning appeal.		*Planning appeal.

	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]

Designing Buildings at 13:47, 10 May 2013

2013-05-10T13:47:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 10 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It is very common for people to object to planning applications citing grounds that are not valid. The local planning authority will not be able to take these objections into account when reaching their decision. However, as responsibility for dealing with planning applications has been delegated to local authorities, valid reasons for objection vary from one authority to another and there is no central, comprehensive list of valid objections.	+
		+	When a planning application is submitted to a local planning authority, there must be a public consultation period of three to eight weeks to give people affected by the application the opportunity to comment, either supporting the application or objecting to it. When groups of people work together to prepare their comments, they will have a much greater chance of influencing the decision that the local planning authority reaches.
		+
		+	It is very important that the application is read properly before commenting and that comments are restricted to material considerations. It is common for people to object to planning applications citing grounds that are not valid. The local planning authority will not be able to take these objections into account when reaching their decision. However, as responsibility for dealing with planning applications has been delegated to local authorities, valid reasons for objection vary from one authority to another and there is no central, comprehensive list of valid objections.

	A list of objections that will generally be accepted is presented below. This is followed by objections that are commonly made but are generally not accepted.		A list of objections that will generally be accepted is presented below. This is followed by objections that are commonly made but are generally not accepted.

	Objections that are generally valid include:		Objections that are generally valid include:
−
	*The proposed development is contrary to national, regional or local planning policy, government circulars, orders or statutory instruments.		*The proposed development is contrary to national, regional or local planning policy, government circulars, orders or statutory instruments.
	*The proposed development is not in keeping with the stylistic context or scale of the local area.		*The proposed development is not in keeping with the stylistic context or scale of the local area.
Line 30:		Line 32:

	Objections that are generally not valid include:		Objections that are generally not valid include:
−
	*Building regulations issues.		*Building regulations issues.
	*Private issues such as boundary disputes.		*Private issues such as boundary disputes.
Line 41:		Line 42:
	*Competition with existing companies.		*Competition with existing companies.

−	~~----~~	+	Most planning applications are decided by Senior Planning Officers under delegated authority, however if a planning application is considered at a planning committee meeting, people that objected to the application should be invited to attend. A representative of those objecting may be permitted to make a short presentation to the committee.
		+
		+	If the applicant appeals against the decision there should be a further opportunity to object.<br/>

−	= ~~See also~~ =	+	= Find out more =

		+	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===
		+	*Community Infrastructure Levy.<br/>
		+	*Localism Act.<br/>
		+	*National Planning Policy Framework.
		+	*Neighbourhood planning. <br/>
	*Planning permission.		*Planning permission.
	*Planning appeal.		*Planning appeal.

	[[Category:Planning_permission]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]]

Designing Buildings at 08:13, 29 February 2012

2012-02-29T08:13:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 29 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It is very common for people to object to planning applications ~~using~~ grounds that are not valid. The local planning authority will not be able to take these objections into account when reaching their decision. However, as responsibility for dealing with planning applications has been ~~given~~ to local authorities, valid reasons for objection vary from one authority to another and there is no central, comprehensive list of valid ~~reasons for objection~~.	+	It is very common for people to object to planning applications citing grounds that are not valid. The local planning authority will not be able to take these objections into account when reaching their decision. However, as responsibility for dealing with planning applications has been delegated to local authorities, valid reasons for objection vary from one authority to another and there is no central, comprehensive list of valid objections.

−	A list of objections that will generally be ~~valid~~ is presented below. This is followed by objections that are commonly made but are generally not ~~valid~~.	+	A list of objections that will generally be accepted is presented below. This is followed by objections that are commonly made but are generally not accepted.

	Objections that are generally valid include:		Objections that are generally valid include:

	*The proposed development is contrary to national, regional or local planning policy, government circulars, orders or statutory instruments.		*The proposed development is contrary to national, regional or local planning policy, government circulars, orders or statutory instruments.
−	*The propose development will have a negative impact on the amenity of another property, through noise, overlooking, overshadowing, smells, light pollution, loss of daylight, loss of privacy, dust, vibration or late night activities.
	*The proposed development is not in keeping with the stylistic context or scale of the local area.		*The proposed development is not in keeping with the stylistic context or scale of the local area.
		+	*The proposed development will have a negative impact on the amenity of another property, through noise, overlooking, overshadowing, smells, light pollution, loss of daylight, loss of privacy, dust, vibration or late night activities.
	*The proposed use is not compatible with existing uses, for example an industrial use in a residential area.		*The proposed use is not compatible with existing uses, for example an industrial use in a residential area.
	*The development may cause traffic problems such as traffic generation, access or safety problems.		*The development may cause traffic problems such as traffic generation, access or safety problems.