Planning appeal summaries 2025 - Revision history

Designing Buildings: Protected "Planning appeal summaries 2025" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2026-04-19T10:19:35Z

Protected "Planning appeal summaries 2025" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

← Older revision

Revision as of 10:19, 19 April 2026

Designing Buildings at 10:19, 19 April 2026

2026-04-19T10:19:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:19, 19 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Ref: 3353206	+	= Ref: 3353206 =

	The Old Southern Railway Stables in the London Borough of Southwark is a locally listed building and a non-designated heritage asset. The applicant wishes to renovate and extend the existing building for residential and commercial use. The inspector concluded that the design of the extension would have an unsympathetic form, scale and bulk, making it intrusive and overbearing on the host building and street scene. Dismissed.		The Old Southern Railway Stables in the London Borough of Southwark is a locally listed building and a non-designated heritage asset. The applicant wishes to renovate and extend the existing building for residential and commercial use. The inspector concluded that the design of the extension would have an unsympathetic form, scale and bulk, making it intrusive and overbearing on the host building and street scene. Dismissed.

−	Refs: 3355509 and 3355508	+	= Refs: 3355509 and 3355508 =

	These appeals relate to a refusal of listed building consent and advertisement consent for the installation of logo signs on a listed Regency jewellers shop in Cheltenham. The signs proposed would be externally illuminated through halo lighting and constructed of red plexiglass Perspex, with an internally illuminated clock face. The inspector concluded that the halo-lit logo signs would create a bright brash appearance when lit, which would appear incongruous against the traditional materials of the listed building, and that the steel clock with white clockface and gold numbering, projecting some 0.9 metres from the building, would appear bulky. This would appear out of place with the refined features and subdued colours of the listed building and other buildings in the conservation area. Both appeals dismissed.		These appeals relate to a refusal of listed building consent and advertisement consent for the installation of logo signs on a listed Regency jewellers shop in Cheltenham. The signs proposed would be externally illuminated through halo lighting and constructed of red plexiglass Perspex, with an internally illuminated clock face. The inspector concluded that the halo-lit logo signs would create a bright brash appearance when lit, which would appear incongruous against the traditional materials of the listed building, and that the steel clock with white clockface and gold numbering, projecting some 0.9 metres from the building, would appear bulky. This would appear out of place with the refined features and subdued colours of the listed building and other buildings in the conservation area. Both appeals dismissed.

−	Ref: 3358638 An inspector allowed an appeal for the installation of ensuite bathrooms to guest bedrooms on the fourth floor of a listed building designed by Ernest George and Harold Peto, and built for the dramatist WS Gilbert of Gilbert and Sullivan. The fourth floor was a narrow area under the apex of the roof between the front and rear gables, accessed by a tight staircase. The inspector concluded that the insertion of ensuites would not harm the simple cellular layout nor affect its social hierarchy. Allowed.	+	= Ref: 3358638 =

−	Ref: LBA-1702021	+	An inspector allowed an appeal for the installation of ensuite bathrooms to guest bedrooms on the fourth floor of a listed building designed by Ernest George and Harold Peto, and built for the dramatist WS Gilbert of Gilbert and Sullivan. The fourth floor was a narrow area under the apex of the roof between the front and rear gables, accessed by a tight staircase. The inspector concluded that the insertion of ensuites would not harm the simple cellular layout nor affect its social hierarchy. Allowed.
		+
		+	= Ref: LBA-1702021 =

	The removal of bells from a redundant church in Holywood, Galloway, Scotland, was refused by a reporter on the basis that the bells were an intrinsic part of the Category B listed building, and their removal would harm its significance. Dismissed.		The removal of bells from a redundant church in Holywood, Galloway, Scotland, was refused by a reporter on the basis that the bells were an intrinsic part of the Category B listed building, and their removal would harm its significance. Dismissed.

−	Ref: 3319608	+	= Ref: 3319608 =

	This appeal related to a 74-page listed building enforcement notice for the excavation of basement floors to a listed building in Westminster, London. The Grade II-listed host dwelling, dating to 1729, comprises three floors with a basement. The appellant inserted a further basement to accommodate a gymnasium, sauna, bathroom, cinema and storage, and changed the levels of the existing basement. The inspector concluded that the unauthorised alterations to the listed building resulted in harm to the special interest (significance), with very limited public benefits. Dismissed.		This appeal related to a 74-page listed building enforcement notice for the excavation of basement floors to a listed building in Westminster, London. The Grade II-listed host dwelling, dating to 1729, comprises three floors with a basement. The appellant inserted a further basement to accommodate a gymnasium, sauna, bathroom, cinema and storage, and changed the levels of the existing basement. The inspector concluded that the unauthorised alterations to the listed building resulted in harm to the special interest (significance), with very limited public benefits. Dismissed.

−	Ref: 3351431	+	= Ref: 3351431 =

	This appeal relates to an application for 177 apartments for multi-generation living, including open-market, affordable and retirement housing. The application was refused on heritage and flooding grounds. The appeal site was adjacent to a conservation area, and within the setting of many listed buildings and non-designated heritage assets. Historic England objected to the scheme on the basis the design was unsympathetic. It preferred a development that would follow the scale, finer grain and form of the development exhibited by the buildings adjacent to it within the conservation area. The inspector disagreed and stated that it would revitalise a derelict piece of unattractive industrial land. The previous development on the site, the inspector said, was not part of a historic development pattern, and a contrasting form and scale would not necessarily be significantly out of scale, incongruous or unattractive. Allowed.		This appeal relates to an application for 177 apartments for multi-generation living, including open-market, affordable and retirement housing. The application was refused on heritage and flooding grounds. The appeal site was adjacent to a conservation area, and within the setting of many listed buildings and non-designated heritage assets. Historic England objected to the scheme on the basis the design was unsympathetic. It preferred a development that would follow the scale, finer grain and form of the development exhibited by the buildings adjacent to it within the conservation area. The inspector disagreed and stated that it would revitalise a derelict piece of unattractive industrial land. The previous development on the site, the inspector said, was not part of a historic development pattern, and a contrasting form and scale would not necessarily be significantly out of scale, incongruous or unattractive. Allowed.

−	Ref: LBA-140-2017 This appeal related to the unauthorised installation of replacement windows in a Grade A-listed building in Walkerburn, Scottish Borders. The reporter described the scheme as having stick-on astragals, heavy frames and trickle vents, and concluded that they would not preserve the listed building or its features of architectural or historic interest. Dismissed.	+	= Ref: LBA-140-2017 =
		+
		+	This appeal related to the unauthorised installation of replacement windows in a Grade A-listed building in Walkerburn, Scottish Borders. The reporter described the scheme as having stick-on astragals, heavy frames and trickle vents, and concluded that they would not preserve the listed building or its features of architectural or historic interest. Dismissed.
		+
		+	= Ref: CAS-03710-X8S2k6 and CAS-03714-C8B6W6 =

−	~~Ref: CAS-03710-X8S2k6 and CAS-03714-C8B6W6~~ This appeal relates to a proposal for three new terraced dwellings, and the rebuilding of a barn and its conversion to a dwelling, in Powys, Wales. The main issue was the impact on the setting of an adjacent listed building, Ivy House, a late Georgian house with cobbled courtyard and outbuildings, which is enclosed by a stone wall extending along the access driveway. Although the inspector stated that the proposed design of the new buildings would be in keeping with the listed building, the widening of the access road and demolition of part of the wall, which is attached to the listed building, would harm the significance of the listed building. Dismissed	+	This appeal relates to a proposal for three new terraced dwellings, and the rebuilding of a barn and its conversion to a dwelling, in Powys, Wales. The main issue was the impact on the setting of an adjacent listed building, Ivy House, a late Georgian house with cobbled courtyard and outbuildings, which is enclosed by a stone wall extending along the access driveway. Although the inspector stated that the proposed design of the new buildings would be in keeping with the listed building, the widening of the access road and demolition of part of the wall, which is attached to the listed building, would harm the significance of the listed building. Dismissed

	-----		-----

Designing Buildings: Created page with "Ref: 3353206 The Old Southern Railway Stables in the London Borough of Southwark is a locally listed building and a non-designated heritage asset. The applicant wishes to renova..."

2026-04-19T10:18:18Z

Created page with "Ref: 3353206 The Old Southern Railway Stables in the London Borough of Southwark is a locally listed building and a non-designated heritage asset. The applicant wishes to renova..."

New page

Ref: 3353206

The Old Southern Railway Stables in the London Borough of Southwark is a locally listed building and a non-designated heritage asset. The applicant wishes to renovate and extend the existing building for residential and commercial use. The inspector concluded that the design of the extension would have an unsympathetic form, scale and bulk, making it intrusive and overbearing on the host building and street scene. Dismissed.

Refs: 3355509 and 3355508

These appeals relate to a refusal of listed building consent and advertisement consent for the installation of logo signs on a listed Regency jewellers shop in Cheltenham. The signs proposed would be externally illuminated through halo lighting and constructed of red plexiglass Perspex, with an internally illuminated clock face. The inspector concluded that the halo-lit logo signs would create a bright brash appearance when lit, which would appear incongruous against the traditional materials of the listed building, and that the steel clock with white clockface and gold numbering, projecting some 0.9 metres from the building, would appear bulky. This would appear out of place with the refined features and subdued colours of the listed building and other buildings in the conservation area. Both appeals dismissed.

Ref: 3358638 An inspector allowed an appeal for the installation of ensuite bathrooms to guest bedrooms on the fourth floor of a listed building designed by Ernest George and Harold Peto, and built for the dramatist WS Gilbert of Gilbert and Sullivan. The fourth floor was a narrow area under the apex of the roof between the front and rear gables, accessed by a tight staircase. The inspector concluded that the insertion of ensuites would not harm the simple cellular layout nor affect its social hierarchy. Allowed.

Ref: LBA-1702021

The removal of bells from a redundant church in Holywood, Galloway, Scotland, was refused by a reporter on the basis that the bells were an intrinsic part of the Category B listed building, and their removal would harm its significance. Dismissed.

Ref: 3319608

This appeal related to a 74-page listed building enforcement notice for the excavation of basement floors to a listed building in Westminster, London. The Grade II-listed host dwelling, dating to 1729, comprises three floors with a basement. The appellant inserted a further basement to accommodate a gymnasium, sauna, bathroom, cinema and storage, and changed the levels of the existing basement. The inspector concluded that the unauthorised alterations to the listed building resulted in harm to the special interest (significance), with very limited public benefits. Dismissed.

Ref: 3351431

This appeal relates to an application for 177 apartments for multi-generation living, including open-market, affordable and retirement housing. The application was refused on heritage and flooding grounds. The appeal site was adjacent to a conservation area, and within the setting of many listed buildings and non-designated heritage assets. Historic England objected to the scheme on the basis the design was unsympathetic. It preferred a development that would follow the scale, finer grain and form of the development exhibited by the buildings adjacent to it within the conservation area. The inspector disagreed and stated that it would revitalise a derelict piece of unattractive industrial land. The previous development on the site, the inspector said, was not part of a historic development pattern, and a contrasting form and scale would not necessarily be significantly out of scale, incongruous or unattractive. Allowed.

Ref: LBA-140-2017 This appeal related to the unauthorised installation of replacement windows in a Grade A-listed building in Walkerburn, Scottish Borders. The reporter described the scheme as having stick-on astragals, heavy frames and trickle vents, and concluded that they would not preserve the listed building or its features of architectural or historic interest. Dismissed.

Ref: CAS-03710-X8S2k6 and CAS-03714-C8B6W6 This appeal relates to a proposal for three new terraced dwellings, and the rebuilding of a barn and its conversion to a dwelling, in Powys, Wales. The main issue was the impact on the setting of an adjacent listed building, Ivy House, a late Georgian house with cobbled courtyard and outbuildings, which is enclosed by a stone wall extending along the access driveway. Although the inspector stated that the proposed design of the new buildings would be in keeping with the listed building, the widening of the access road and demolition of part of the wall, which is attached to the listed building, would harm the significance of the listed building. Dismissed

-----
This article originally appeared in the Institute of Historic Building Conservation’s (IHBC’s) [https://ihbconline.co.uk/cont_arch/?p=1584 Context 184], published in September 2025. It was written by Alexandra Fairclough, a member of the IHBC law panel and a barrister (non-practising). She teaches heritage law at Manchester School of Architecture, and is principal built heritage and design officer at Bolton Council.

--[[User:Institute_of_Historic_Building_Conservation|Institute of Historic Building Conservation]]

= Related articles on Designing Buildings Conservation. =

* Conservation area.
* Conservation.
* Heritage.
* Historic environment.
* IHBC articles.
* IHBC.
* Planning permission.
* Planning appeal.

[[Category:DCN_Case_Law]] [[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Conservation]]