Pepper-potting - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 06:15, 13 October 2020

2020-10-13T06:15:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:15, 13 October 2020
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* [http://urbanrim.org.uk/mixed%20tenure.htm Mixed Tenure housing development, Brian Williams, 2009].		* [http://urbanrim.org.uk/mixed%20tenure.htm Mixed Tenure housing development, Brian Williams, 2009].

−	[[Category:~~Policy~~]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]

Designing Buildings at 12:06, 1 March 2017

2017-03-01T12:06:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 1 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form mixed tenure development. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and more affluent residents live in a mixed community through the ‘sprinkling’ of social housing amongst privately-owned housing. Other forms of mixed-tenure development may provide a more structured, less ‘random’ mix, perhaps clustering different types of resident in different streets, or parts of a development.		The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form mixed tenure development. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and more affluent residents live in a mixed community through the ‘sprinkling’ of social housing amongst privately-owned housing. Other forms of mixed-tenure development may provide a more structured, less ‘random’ mix, perhaps clustering different types of resident in different streets, or parts of a development.

Line 10:		Line 9:
	However, It is seen by others as an attempt at social engineering, forcing people to live in community groups that they would not themselves choose. It is also thought by some to be a mechanism that allows the government to avoid providing council housing, and as a way of hiding poverty by dispersing it, rather than dealing with the causes of poverty themselves.		However, It is seen by others as an attempt at social engineering, forcing people to live in community groups that they would not themselves choose. It is also thought by some to be a mechanism that allows the government to avoid providing council housing, and as a way of hiding poverty by dispersing it, rather than dealing with the causes of poverty themselves.

−	Some owner-occupiers believe that pepper-potting reduces the value of their property, and that the mixing of people from different backgrounds can lead to conflict. However, on 28 September 2015, the NHBC Foundation and the Homes and Communities Agency, published ~~[http://www.nhbcfoundation.org/Publications/Research-Review/Tenure-integration-in-housing-developments-NF66~~ Tenure integration in housing developments - NF66]. This literature review considered the success of different approaches to mixed-tenure developments. It found that:	+	Some owner-occupiers believe that pepper-potting reduces the value of their property, and that the mixing of people from different backgrounds can lead to conflict. However, on 28 September 2015, the NHBC Foundation and the Homes and Communities Agency, published 'Tenure integration in housing developments - NF66'. This literature review considered the success of different approaches to mixed-tenure developments. It found that:
−	*Financing is the main barrier to mixed tenure development.	+
−	*If the design and quality of the overall development is of a high standard, property prices are not necessarily affected by a mixture of tenures.	+	* Financing is the main barrier to mixed tenure development.
−	*A wider range of typologies and unit sizes enables people to move from one type to another and so stabilises neighbourhoods.	+	* If the design and quality of the overall development is of a high standard, property prices are not necessarily affected by a mixture of tenures.
−	*Management structures and costs should be agreed before building begins.	+	* A wider range of typologies and unit sizes enables people to move from one type to another and so stabilises neighbourhoods.
−	*The boom of the private rented sector has changed the anticipated tenure mix.	+	* Management structures and costs should be agreed before building begins.
		+	* The boom of the private rented sector has changed the anticipated tenure mix.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =

	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki. ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki. ===
−	*Affordable housing.	+
−	*Mixed tenure development.	+	* Affordable housing.
−	*Neighbourhood planning.	+	* Mixed tenure development.
−	*NPPF.	+	* Neighbourhood planning.
−	*Rent to buy.	+	* NPPF.
−	*Right to acquire.	+	* Rent to buy.
−	*Right to buy.	+	* Right to acquire.
−	*Section 106 agreement.	+	* Right to buy.
−	*Smart cities.	+	* Section 106 agreement.
		+	* Smart cities.

	=== External references ===		=== External references ===
−	*[http://urbanrim.org.uk/mixed%20tenure.htm Mixed Tenure housing development, Brian Williams, 2009].

−	[[Category:Policy]]	+	* [http://urbanrim.org.uk/mixed%20tenure.htm Mixed Tenure housing development, Brian Williams, 2009].
−	[[Category:Property_development]]	+
		+	[[Category:Policy]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]

Designing Buildings at 10:24, 2 October 2015

2015-10-02T10:24:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:24, 2 October 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki. ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki. ===
	*Affordable housing.		*Affordable housing.
−	*Buy to rent.
	*Mixed tenure development.		*Mixed tenure development.
	*Neighbourhood planning.		*Neighbourhood planning.
	*NPPF.		*NPPF.
−	*Right to ~~aqcuire~~.	+	*Rent to buy.
		+	*Right to acquire.
	*Right to buy.		*Right to buy.
	*Section 106 agreement.		*Section 106 agreement.

Designing Buildings at 10:21, 2 October 2015

2015-10-02T10:21:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 2 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form ~~of ‘integrated housing’, ‘mixed tenure’ or ‘tenure integration’~~. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and more affluent residents live in a mixed community through the ‘sprinkling’ of social housing amongst privately-owned housing. Other forms of mixed-tenure development may provide a more structured, less ‘random’ mix, perhaps clustering different types of resident in different streets, or parts of a development.	+	The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form mixed tenure development. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and more affluent residents live in a mixed community through the ‘sprinkling’ of social housing amongst privately-owned housing. Other forms of mixed-tenure development may provide a more structured, less ‘random’ mix, perhaps clustering different types of resident in different streets, or parts of a development.

	It is thought by some that this mixing of people from different socio-economic backgrounds creates more diverse, socially cohesive and interesting communities and helps to improve social mobility. The alternative system of uniform estates or ‘mono-tenure' developments can lead to segregation of different socio-economic groups and to the creation of deprived ghettos.		It is thought by some that this mixing of people from different socio-economic backgrounds creates more diverse, socially cohesive and interesting communities and helps to improve social mobility. The alternative system of uniform estates or ‘mono-tenure' developments can lead to segregation of different socio-economic groups and to the creation of deprived ghettos.

Designing Buildings at 10:20, 2 October 2015

2015-10-02T10:20:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, 2 October 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:
	*Affordable housing.		*Affordable housing.
	*Buy to rent.		*Buy to rent.
		+	*Mixed tenure development.
	*Neighbourhood planning.		*Neighbourhood planning.
	*NPPF.		*NPPF.

Designing Buildings at 08:49, 2 October 2015

2015-10-02T08:49:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 2 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form of ‘integrated housing’, ‘mixed tenure’ or ‘tenure integration’. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and more affluent residents live in a mixed community through the ‘sprinkling’ of social housing amongst privately-owned housing. Other forms of mixed-tenure development may provide a more structured, less ‘random’ mix, perhaps clustering different types of resident in different streets, or parts of ~~streets~~.	+	The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form of ‘integrated housing’, ‘mixed tenure’ or ‘tenure integration’. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and more affluent residents live in a mixed community through the ‘sprinkling’ of social housing amongst privately-owned housing. Other forms of mixed-tenure development may provide a more structured, less ‘random’ mix, perhaps clustering different types of resident in different streets, or parts of a development.

−	It is thought by some that this mixing of people from different socio-economic backgrounds creates a more diverse, socially cohesive and interesting communities and helps to improve social mobility. The alternative system of uniform estates or ‘mono-tenure ~~developments’~~ can lead to segregation of different socio-economic groups and to the creation of deprived ghettos.	+	It is thought by some that this mixing of people from different socio-economic backgrounds creates more diverse, socially cohesive and interesting communities and helps to improve social mobility. The alternative system of uniform estates or ‘mono-tenure' developments can lead to segregation of different socio-economic groups and to the creation of deprived ghettos.

−	It can also be used as a policy to compel developers of private housing to make some provision of social housing.	+	Pepper-potting can also be used as a policy to compel developers of private housing to make some provision of social housing.

−	Pepper-potting has been common since the 1970’s and has been encouraged by successive governments through the use policies such as the right to buy and right to acquire and through section 106 agreements requiring that a proportion of new housing is built as ‘affordable housing’, that is, ‘...social rented housing, affordable rented housing and intermediate housing, provided to eligible households whose needs are not met by the market’ (Ref National Planning Policy Framework)	+	Pepper-potting has been common since the 1970’s and has been encouraged by successive governments through the use policies such as the right to buy and right to acquire and through section 106 agreements requiring that a proportion of new housing is built as ‘affordable housing’ (that is, ‘...social rented housing, affordable rented housing and intermediate housing, provided to eligible households whose needs are not met by the market’ Ref National Planning Policy Framework).

−	However, It ~~can be~~ seen as an attempt at social engineering, forcing people to live in community groups that they would not themselves choose. It is also ~~seen~~ by some as a mechanism ~~allowing~~ the government to avoid providing council housing ~~itself~~, and as a way of hiding poverty by dispersing it, rather than dealing with the causes of poverty themselves.	+	However, It is seen by others as an attempt at social engineering, forcing people to live in community groups that they would not themselves choose. It is also thought by some to be a mechanism that allows the government to avoid providing council housing, and as a way of hiding poverty by dispersing it, rather than dealing with the causes of poverty themselves.

−	Some owner-occupiers believe that pepper-potting reduces the value of their property, and the mixing of people from different backgrounds can lead to conflict. However, on 28 September 2015, NHBC Foundation~~, in collaboration with~~ the Homes and Communities Agency, published [http://www.nhbcfoundation.org/Publications/Research-Review/Tenure-integration-in-housing-developments-NF66 Tenure integration in housing developments - NF66]. This literature review considered the success of different approaches to mixed-tenure developments. ~~Its findings included~~:	+	Some owner-occupiers believe that pepper-potting reduces the value of their property, and that the mixing of people from different backgrounds can lead to conflict. However, on 28 September 2015, the NHBC Foundation and the Homes and Communities Agency, published [http://www.nhbcfoundation.org/Publications/Research-Review/Tenure-integration-in-housing-developments-NF66 Tenure integration in housing developments - NF66]. This literature review considered the success of different approaches to mixed-tenure developments. It found that:
	*Financing is the main barrier to mixed tenure development.		*Financing is the main barrier to mixed tenure development.
−	*If the design and quality of the overall development is of a high standard, property prices ~~were~~ not necessarily affected by a mixture of tenures.	+	*If the design and quality of the overall development is of a high standard, property prices are not necessarily affected by a mixture of tenures.
−	*A wider range of typologies and unit sizes ~~enabled~~ people to move from one type to another and so ~~stabilised~~ neighbourhoods.	+	*A wider range of typologies and unit sizes enables people to move from one type to another and so stabilises neighbourhoods.
−	*Management structures and costs should be agreed before building.	+	*Management structures and costs should be agreed before building begins.
−	*The boom of the private rented sector has changed the anticipated tenure mix.	+	*The boom of the private rented sector has changed the anticipated tenure mix.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =
Line 21:		Line 21:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki. ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki. ===
	*Affordable housing.		*Affordable housing.
		+	*Buy to rent.
	*Neighbourhood planning.		*Neighbourhood planning.
	*NPPF.		*NPPF.
		+	*Right to aqcuire.
		+	*Right to buy.
		+	*Section 106 agreement.
	*Smart cities.		*Smart cities.

Designing Buildings: Created page with " The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form of ‘integrated housing’, ‘mixed tenure’ or ‘tenure integration’. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and ..."

2015-10-02T08:42:50Z

Created page with " The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form of ‘integrated housing’, ‘mixed tenure’ or ‘tenure integration’. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and ..."

New page

The term ‘pepper-potting’ is a form of ‘integrated housing’, ‘mixed tenure’ or ‘tenure integration’. It describes an urban planning strategy in which poorer and more affluent residents live in a mixed community through the ‘sprinkling’ of social housing amongst privately-owned housing. Other forms of mixed-tenure development may provide a more structured, less ‘random’ mix, perhaps clustering different types of resident in different streets, or parts of streets.

It is thought by some that this mixing of people from different socio-economic backgrounds creates a more diverse, socially cohesive and interesting communities and helps to improve social mobility. The alternative system of uniform estates or ‘mono-tenure developments’ can lead to segregation of different socio-economic groups and to the creation of deprived ghettos.

It can also be used as a policy to compel developers of private housing to make some provision of social housing.

Pepper-potting has been common since the 1970’s and has been encouraged by successive governments through the use policies such as the right to buy and right to acquire and through section 106 agreements requiring that a proportion of new housing is built as ‘affordable housing’, that is, ‘...social rented housing, affordable rented housing and intermediate housing, provided to eligible households whose needs are not met by the market’ (Ref National Planning Policy Framework)

However, It can be seen as an attempt at social engineering, forcing people to live in community groups that they would not themselves choose. It is also seen by some as a mechanism allowing the government to avoid providing council housing itself, and as a way of hiding poverty by dispersing it, rather than dealing with the causes of poverty themselves.

Some owner-occupiers believe that pepper-potting reduces the value of their property, and the mixing of people from different backgrounds can lead to conflict. However, on 28 September 2015, NHBC Foundation, in collaboration with the Homes and Communities Agency, published [http://www.nhbcfoundation.org/Publications/Research-Review/Tenure-integration-in-housing-developments-NF66 Tenure integration in housing developments - NF66]. This literature review considered the success of different approaches to mixed-tenure developments. Its findings included:
*Financing is the main barrier to mixed tenure development.
*If the design and quality of the overall development is of a high standard, property prices were not necessarily affected by a mixture of tenures.
*A wider range of typologies and unit sizes enabled people to move from one type to another and so stabilised neighbourhoods.
*Management structures and costs should be agreed before building.
*The boom of the private rented sector has changed the anticipated tenure mix.

= Find out more =

=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki. ===
*Affordable housing.
*Neighbourhood planning.
*NPPF.
*Smart cities.

=== External references ===
*[http://urbanrim.org.uk/mixed%20tenure.htm Mixed Tenure housing development, Brian Williams, 2009].

[[Category:Policy]]
[[Category:Property_development]]