Penfold Review - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 08:46, 15 November 2020

2020-11-15T08:46:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 15 November 2020
Line 89:		Line 89:
	* [http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/statements/greening-20120716b/ Written Ministerial Statement: Implementation of the Penfold Review] 16 July 2012.		* [http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/statements/greening-20120716b/ Written Ministerial Statement: Implementation of the Penfold Review] 16 July 2012.

−	[[Category:~~Publications_/_reports~~]] [[Category:~~Planning_permission~~]] [[Category:~~Policy~~]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:DCN_Report]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]

Designing Buildings at 14:22, 3 July 2020

2020-07-03T14:22:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 3 July 2020
Line 83:		Line 83:
	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.		* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.
	* Highway's Agency draft improvement plan 2012.		* Highway's Agency draft improvement plan 2012.
−	* ~~[http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/5516/RTPI-response-to-Penfold-Review.pdf~~ RTPI's submission] to the Review.	+	* RTPI's submission to the Review.
	* Written statement by Stephen Hammond, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport. [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/implementation-of-the-penfold-review--3 Proposals to simplify the process of stopping up or diverting a highway will be announced in a consultation response today]. 9 January 2013.		* Written statement by Stephen Hammond, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport. [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/implementation-of-the-penfold-review--3 Proposals to simplify the process of stopping up or diverting a highway will be announced in a consultation response today]. 9 January 2013.
	* [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/enterpriseandregulatoryreform.html Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill].		* [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/enterpriseandregulatoryreform.html Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill].
Line 89:		Line 89:
	* [http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/statements/greening-20120716b/ Written Ministerial Statement: Implementation of the Penfold Review] 16 July 2012.		* [http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/statements/greening-20120716b/ Written Ministerial Statement: Implementation of the Penfold Review] 16 July 2012.

−	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]	+	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]

Designing Buildings at 12:12, 28 March 2019

2019-03-28T12:12:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 28 March 2019
Line 57:		Line 57:
	In 2013, the Growth and Infrastructure Act introduced a series of reforms intended to reduce the red tape that the government considers hampers business investment, new infrastructure and job creation. See Growth and Infrastructure Act for more information.		In 2013, the Growth and Infrastructure Act introduced a series of reforms intended to reduce the red tape that the government considers hampers business investment, new infrastructure and job creation. See Growth and Infrastructure Act for more information.

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===	+

	* Conservation area.		* Conservation area.
Line 77:		Line 75:
	* What approvals are needed before construction begins.		* What approvals are needed before construction begins.

−	=== External references ===	+	= External references =

	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.		* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.
Line 84:		Line 82:
	* [http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.		* [http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.
	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.		* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.
−	* ~~[http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/planning/draft-improvement-plan/~~ Highway's Agency draft improvement plan] 2012.	+	* Highway's Agency draft improvement plan 2012.
	* [http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/5516/RTPI-response-to-Penfold-Review.pdf RTPI's submission] to the Review.		* [http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/5516/RTPI-response-to-Penfold-Review.pdf RTPI's submission] to the Review.
	* Written statement by Stephen Hammond, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport. [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/implementation-of-the-penfold-review--3 Proposals to simplify the process of stopping up or diverting a highway will be announced in a consultation response today]. 9 January 2013.		* Written statement by Stephen Hammond, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport. [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/implementation-of-the-penfold-review--3 Proposals to simplify the process of stopping up or diverting a highway will be announced in a consultation response today]. 9 January 2013.

Designing Buildings at 08:39, 8 June 2017

2017-06-08T08:39:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:39, 8 June 2017
Line 75:		Line 75:
	* Sustainability.		* Sustainability.
	* Taylor Review.		* Taylor Review.
		+	* What approvals are needed before construction begins.

	=== External references ===		=== External references ===

Designing Buildings at 07:12, 17 May 2017

2017-05-17T07:12:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:12, 17 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	= Introduction =		= Introduction =

Line 17:		Line 16:

	Penfold found that there was:		Penfold found that there was:
−	*Unnecessary bureaucracy.	+
−	*Uncertainty about the time that approvals are likely to take.	+	* Unnecessary bureaucracy.
−	*Duplication of roles.	+	* Uncertainty about the time that approvals are likely to take.
−	*An absence of a service culture.	+	* Duplication of roles.
−	*Inconsistency between approving bodies.	+	* An absence of a service culture.
−	*Poor interaction between approving bodies.	+	* Inconsistency between approving bodies.
−	*A lack of understanding of the impacts the approval process has on development.	+	* Poor interaction between approving bodies.
−	*No standard approval process for developers to follow.	+	* A lack of understanding of the impacts the approval process has on development.
		+	* No standard approval process for developers to follow.

	= Recommendations =		= Recommendations =
Line 31:		Line 31:

	These included:		These included:
−	*Strengthening the service culture of consenting bodies.	+
−	*Improving co-ordination, collaboration and interaction between consenting bodies and the government departments that oversee them.	+	* Strengthening the service culture of consenting bodies.
−	*Improving the accessibility of information and guidance.	+	* Improving co-ordination, collaboration and interaction between consenting bodies and the government departments that oversee them.
−	*Ensuring that once the question of whether a development should happen has been decided, the focus should move to ‘how’ it should happen.	+	* Improving the accessibility of information and guidance.
−	*Simultaneous consideration of issues influencing decisions.	+	* Ensuring that once the question of whether a development should happen has been decided, the focus should move to ‘how’ it should happen.
−	*Wider adoption of best practice.	+	* Simultaneous consideration of issues influencing decisions.
−	*Reducing the number of situations in which consents are required.	+	* Wider adoption of best practice.
−	*Clarifying the boundaries between, and better integrating planning and non-planning consents.	+	* Reducing the number of situations in which consents are required.
−	*Combining certain consents, for example; merging conservation area consent with planning permission and combining listed building consent and scheduled monument consent.	+	* Clarifying the boundaries between, and better integrating planning and non-planning consents.
		+	* Combining certain consents, for example; merging conservation area consent with planning permission and combining listed building consent and scheduled monument consent.

	The review stopped short of recommending a ‘unified’ consent.		The review stopped short of recommending a ‘unified’ consent.
Line 46:		Line 47:

	In November 2011 the government published the [http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] setting out a programme for the implementation of the review’s recommendations. This included:		In November 2011 the government published the [http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] setting out a programme for the implementation of the review’s recommendations. This included:
−	*Scrapping unnecessary development consents and simplifying others.	+
−	*Reforming the practices of public bodies that grant or advise on development consents.	+	* Scrapping unnecessary development consents and simplifying others.
−	*Setting a timescale for making decisions on applications.	+	* Reforming the practices of public bodies that grant or advise on development consents.
−	*Making the application process easier.	+	* Setting a timescale for making decisions on applications.
		+	* Making the application process easier.

	In addition, a number of draft improvement plans for key public bodies was published in April 2012 (see the external references at the end of this article), and the [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/enterpriseandregulatoryreform.html Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill] was drafted, setting out proposals in relation to listed buildings and conservation area consents.		In addition, a number of draft improvement plans for key public bodies was published in April 2012 (see the external references at the end of this article), and the [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/enterpriseandregulatoryreform.html Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill] was drafted, setting out proposals in relation to listed buildings and conservation area consents.

−	In 2013, the Growth and Infrastructure Act introduced a series of reforms intended to reduce the red tape that the government considers hampers business investment, new infrastructure and job creation. See Growth and Infrastructure Act for more information.~~<br/>~~	+	In 2013, the Growth and Infrastructure Act introduced a series of reforms intended to reduce the red tape that the government considers hampers business investment, new infrastructure and job creation. See Growth and Infrastructure Act for more information.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =

	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===
−	*Conservation area.	+
−	*Growth and Infrastructure Act.	+	* Conservation area.
−	*Killian Pretty Review.	+	* Conservation area consent.
−	*Listed buildings.	+	* Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013.
−	*National Planning Policy Framework.	+	* Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 and listed buildings.
−	*Planning permission.	+	* Growth and Infrastructure Act.
−	*Planning policy replaced by the NPPF.	+	* Killian Pretty Review.
−	*Statutory approvals.	+	* Listed buildings.
−	*Statutory authorities.	+	* National Planning Policy Framework.
−	*Sustainability.	+	* Planning permission.
−	*Taylor Review.	+	* Planning policy replaced by the NPPF.
		+	* Statutory approvals.
		+	* Statutory authorities.
		+	* Sustainability.
		+	* Taylor Review.

	=== External references ===		=== External references ===
−	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.
−	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.
−	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.
−	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.
−	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.
−	*[http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/planning/draft-improvement-plan/ Highway's Agency draft improvement plan] 2012.
−	*[http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/5516/RTPI-response-to-Penfold-Review.pdf RTPI's submission] to the Review.
−	*Written statement by Stephen Hammond, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport. [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/implementation-of-the-penfold-review--3 Proposals to simplify the process of stopping up or diverting a highway will be announced in a consultation response today]. 9 January 2013.
−	*[http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/enterpriseandregulatoryreform.html Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill].
−	*[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/419/contents/made The Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order] 1995. Annex A contains full schedule of possible statutory and non-statutory consultees and the circumstance under which they should be consulted.
−	*[http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/statements/greening-20120716b/ Written Ministerial Statement: Implementation of the Penfold Review] 16 July 2012.

−	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]]	+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.
−	[[Category:Planning_permission]]	+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.
−	[[Category:Policy]]	+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.
−	[[Category:Property_development]]	+	* [http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.
		+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.
		+	* [http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/planning/draft-improvement-plan/ Highway's Agency draft improvement plan] 2012.
		+	* [http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/5516/RTPI-response-to-Penfold-Review.pdf RTPI's submission] to the Review.
		+	* Written statement by Stephen Hammond, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport. [https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/implementation-of-the-penfold-review--3 Proposals to simplify the process of stopping up or diverting a highway will be announced in a consultation response today]. 9 January 2013.
		+	* [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/enterpriseandregulatoryreform.html Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill].
		+	* [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1995/419/contents/made The Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order] 1995. Annex A contains full schedule of possible statutory and non-statutory consultees and the circumstance under which they should be consulted.
		+	* [http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/statements/greening-20120716b/ Written Ministerial Statement: Implementation of the Penfold Review] 16 July 2012.
		+
		+	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Property_development]]

Designing Buildings at 14:33, 10 April 2015

2015-04-10T14:33:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:33, 10 April 2015
Line 75:		Line 75:
	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.		*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.
	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.		*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.
−	*[http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/eh-improvement-plan-planning-services-12-13.pdf English Heritage's improvement plan for services] 2012.
	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.		*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.
	*[http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/planning/draft-improvement-plan/ Highway's Agency draft improvement plan] 2012.		*[http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/planning/draft-improvement-plan/ Highway's Agency draft improvement plan] 2012.

Mustafa Pasha at 15:43, 20 January 2015

2015-01-20T15:43:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 20 January 2015
Line 76:		Line 76:
	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.		*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.
	*[http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/eh-improvement-plan-planning-services-12-13.pdf English Heritage's improvement plan for services] 2012.		*[http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/eh-improvement-plan-planning-services-12-13.pdf English Heritage's improvement plan for services] 2012.
−	*[http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.	+	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140605090108/http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/images/neautumnstatementimprovementplan_tcm6-31060.pdf Natural England's improvement plan] 2012.
	*[http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/planning/draft-improvement-plan/ Highway's Agency draft improvement plan] 2012.		*[http://www.highways.gov.uk/our-road-network/planning/draft-improvement-plan/ Highway's Agency draft improvement plan] 2012.
	*[http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/5516/RTPI-response-to-Penfold-Review.pdf RTPI's submission] to the Review.		*[http://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/5516/RTPI-response-to-Penfold-Review.pdf RTPI's submission] to the Review.

Mustafa Pasha at 15:42, 20 January 2015

2015-01-20T15:42:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 20 January 2015
Line 73:		Line 73:
	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.		*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.
	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.		*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.
−	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.	+	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.
	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.		*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.
	*[http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/eh-improvement-plan-planning-services-12-13.pdf English Heritage's improvement plan for services] 2012.		*[http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/eh-improvement-plan-planning-services-12-13.pdf English Heritage's improvement plan for services] 2012.

Mustafa Pasha at 15:39, 20 January 2015

2015-01-20T15:39:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 20 January 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Commissioned the Department of Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), Penfold's remit was ‘…to identify opportunities to deregulate, as a means of supporting business investment in development…’.		Commissioned the Department of Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), Penfold's remit was ‘…to identify opportunities to deregulate, as a means of supporting business investment in development…’.

−	The Penfold Review, “[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-~~757~~-penfold-review-~~interim~~-report.pdf Review of non-planning consents]” was published on July 18th 2010.	+	The Penfold Review, “[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Review of non-planning consents]” was published on July 18th 2010.

	= Findings =		= Findings =
Line 72:		Line 72:
	=== External references ===		=== External references ===
	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.		*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.
−	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.	+	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.
	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.		*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.
	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.		*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/i/11-1413-implementation-of-penfold-review.pdf Implementation report on the Penfold Review] 2011.

Mustafa Pasha at 15:36, 20 January 2015

2015-01-20T15:36:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 20 January 2015
Line 71:		Line 71:

	=== External references ===		=== External references ===
−	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.	+	*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/10-757-penfold-review-interim-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – interim report] 2010.
	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.		*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/better-regulation/docs/p/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report.pdf Penfold: review of non-planning consents – final report] 2010.
	*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.		*[http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/g/10-1216-government-response-penfold-non-planning-consents.pdf Government response to the Penfold Review] 2010.