Novus actus interveniens - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 08:52, 14 August 2024

2024-08-14T08:52:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 14 August 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:
	See: Contribution and apportionment for more information.		See: Contribution and apportionment for more information.

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck).		* Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck).

Designing Buildings at 08:42, 30 October 2020

2020-10-30T08:42:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, 30 October 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:
	* Contribution and apportionment.		* Contribution and apportionment.

−	[[Category:~~Other_legislation~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Legislation~~]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:Other_legislation]]

Designing Buildings at 07:25, 20 February 2020

2020-02-20T07:25:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:25, 20 February 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a subesquent intervening ~~act~~ breaks the chain of causation with the loss or damage sustained and so the defendant is not liable.	+	‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a subesquent intervening action breaks the chain of causation with the loss or damage sustained and so the defendant is not liable.

	This can be as a result of:		This can be as a result of:

−	* The ~~act~~ of a third party, unless the action was foreseeable, such as negligence by a third party.	+	* The action of a third party, unless the action was foreseeable, such as negligence by a third party.
−	* The ~~act~~ of the claimant where their actions were disproportionate or unreasonable.	+	* The action of the claimant where their actions were disproportionate or unreasonable.
	* Some natural event or coincidence, such as an extraordinary weather event.		* Some natural event or coincidence, such as an extraordinary weather event.

−	Under certain circumstances, the courts may decide to apportion the loss between the parties. See ~~contribution~~ and apportionment for more information.	+	Under certain circumstances, the courts may decide to apportion the loss between the parties.
		+
		+	See: Contribution and apportionment for more information.

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
Line 15:		Line 17:
	* Contribution and apportionment.		* Contribution and apportionment.

−	[[Category:Other_legislation]]	+	[[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:DCN_Legislation]]

Designing Buildings at 07:23, 20 February 2020

2020-02-20T07:23:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 20 February 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−		+	‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a subesquent intervening act breaks the chain of causation with the loss or damage sustained and so the defendant is not liable.
−	‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a subesquent intervening act breaks the chain of causation with the loss or damage sustained and so the defendant is not liable.	+

	This can be as a result of:		This can be as a result of:
−	*The act of a third party, unless the action was foreseeable, such as negligence by a third party.	+
−	*The act of the claimant where their actions were disproportionate or unreasonable.	+	* The act of a third party, unless the action was foreseeable, such as negligence by a third party.
−	*Some natural event or coincidence, such as an extraordinary weather event.	+	* The act of the claimant where their actions were disproportionate or unreasonable.
		+	* Some natural event or coincidence, such as an extraordinary weather event.

	Under certain circumstances, the courts may decide to apportion the loss between the parties. See contribution and apportionment for more information.		Under certain circumstances, the courts may decide to apportion the loss between the parties. See contribution and apportionment for more information.

−	= ~~Find out more~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

−	~~=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===~~	+	* Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck).
−	*Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck).	+	* Causation.
−	*Causation.	+	* Contribution and apportionment.
−	*Contribution and apportionment.	+

	[[Category:Other_legislation]]		[[Category:Other_legislation]]

Designing Buildings at 07:06, 26 July 2014

2014-07-26T07:06:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 26 July 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a subesquent intervening act breaks the chain of causation with the loss or damage sustained and so the defendant is not liable.		‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a subesquent intervening act breaks the chain of causation with the loss or damage sustained and so the defendant is not liable.

−	This can be as a result of:	+	This can be as a result of:
	*The act of a third party, unless the action was foreseeable, such as negligence by a third party.		*The act of a third party, unless the action was foreseeable, such as negligence by a third party.
	*The act of the claimant where their actions were disproportionate or unreasonable.		*The act of the claimant where their actions were disproportionate or unreasonable.
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*Contribution and apportionment.		*Contribution and apportionment.

−	~~[[Category:Case_law]]~~
	[[Category:Other_legislation]]		[[Category:Other_legislation]]

Designing Buildings: Created page with " ‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a s..."

2014-04-12T10:30:47Z

Created page with " ‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a s..."

New page

‘novus actus interveniens’ ("new act intervening") is a legal term which refers to breaking the chain of causation such that even if the defendant has acted negligently, a subesquent intervening act breaks the chain of causation with the loss or damage sustained and so the defendant is not liable.

This can be as a result of:
*The act of a third party, unless the action was foreseeable, such as negligence by a third party.
*The act of the claimant where their actions were disproportionate or unreasonable.
*Some natural event or coincidence, such as an extraordinary weather event.

Under certain circumstances, the courts may decide to apportion the loss between the parties. See contribution and apportionment for more information.

= Find out more =

=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===
*Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck).
*Causation.
*Contribution and apportionment.

[[Category:Case_law]]
[[Category:Other_legislation]]