Mixed news from the Perkins Review - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:10, 8 February 2021

2021-02-08T07:10:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:10, 8 February 2021
Line 78:		Line 78:
	* [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/280916/Engineers_Week_pre-post_polling_data.xlsx Attitudes to engineering: before and after Tomorrow's Engineers Week 2013].		* [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/280916/Engineers_Week_pre-post_polling_data.xlsx Attitudes to engineering: before and after Tomorrow's Engineers Week 2013].

−	[[Category:~~Education~~]] [[Category:DCN_Education_and_Training]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Education_and_Training]] [[Category:Education]]

Editor at 14:29, 8 February 2019

2019-02-08T14:29:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 8 February 2019
Line 52:		Line 52:
	--[[User:The_Institution_of_Civil_Engineers\|The Institution of Civil Engineers]]		--[[User:The_Institution_of_Civil_Engineers\|The Institution of Civil Engineers]]

−	[[Category:Education]]	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
		+
		+	* Apprenticeships levy.
		+	* Boardroom to building site skills gap survey.
		+	* Building services engineer.
		+	* CIBSE.
		+	* Civil engineer.
		+	* Construction industry reports.
		+	* Diversity in the construction industry.
		+	* Engineer.
		+	* Institution of Civil Engineers.
		+	* Institution of Structural Engineers.
		+	* Government construction strategy.
		+	* National Infrastructure Plan for Skills.
		+	* Project engineer.
		+	* Protection for apprenticeships.
		+	* Recruiting and retaining talent in the construction industry.
		+	* Skills to build.
		+	* Structural engineer.
		+	* Tackling the construction skills shortage.
		+
		+	=== External references ===
		+
		+	* Professor John Perkins’ [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/engineering-skills-perkins-review Review of engineering skills].
		+	* [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/280916/Engineers_Week_pre-post_polling_data.xlsx Attitudes to engineering: before and after Tomorrow's Engineers Week 2013].
		+
		+	[[Category:Education]] [[Category:DCN_Education_and_Training]]

Editor at 12:27, 8 February 2019

2019-02-08T12:27:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 8 February 2019
Line 51:		Line 51:

	--[[User:The_Institution_of_Civil_Engineers\|The Institution of Civil Engineers]]		--[[User:The_Institution_of_Civil_Engineers\|The Institution of Civil Engineers]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Education]]

Editor at 12:27, 8 February 2019

2019-02-08T12:27:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 8 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{\|		{\|
−	\| [[File:Tomorrows-~~engineers large~~.jpg]]	+	\| [[File:Tomorrows-engineers_large.jpg\|link=File:Tomorrows-engineers_large.jpg]]
	\|-		\|-
	\| The new report praised campaigns such as Tomorrow's Engineers.		\| The new report praised campaigns such as Tomorrow's Engineers.
Line 48:		Line 48:

	-----		-----
−	This article was written by Andrew Stanley, head of education policy at the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). It first appeared as a blog at [https://www.ice.org.uk/news-and-insight/the-infrastructure-blog/february-2019/mixed-news-from-the-perkins-review-revisited www.ice.org.uk]	+	This article was written by Andrew Stanley, head of education policy at the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). It first appeared as a blog in February 2019 at [https://www.ice.org.uk/news-and-insight/the-infrastructure-blog/february-2019/mixed-news-from-the-perkins-review-revisited www.ice.org.uk].

	--[[User:The_Institution_of_Civil_Engineers\|The Institution of Civil Engineers]]		--[[User:The_Institution_of_Civil_Engineers\|The Institution of Civil Engineers]]

Editor: Created page with "{| | File:Tomorrows-engineers large.jpg |- | The new report praised campaigns such as Tomorrow's Engineers. |} Back in 2013, Professor John Perkins, then Chief Scientific Ad..."

2019-02-08T10:56:57Z

Created page with "{| | File:Tomorrows-engineers large.jpg |- | The new report praised campaigns such as Tomorrow's Engineers. |} Back in 2013, Professor John Perkins, then Chief Scientific Ad..."

New page

{|
| [[File:Tomorrows-engineers large.jpg]]
|-
| The new report praised campaigns such as Tomorrow's Engineers.
|}

Back in 2013, Professor John Perkins, then Chief Scientific Adviser to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, published his report on the state of engineering education and training, and the skills shortage in the United Kingdom. Unusually for a report such as this, the Perkins Review has been cited and quoted ever since.

Fast forward to the summer of 2018, and John Perkins, with the support of the Royal Academy of Engineering (RAEng), gathered a group of us from the engineering community to produce Engineering skills for the future – the 2013 Perkins Review revisited, a unique opportunity to look at progress made on the original recommendations and maintain momentum.

Working through the summer and autumn to produce the drafts, the report was pulled together in December 2018 and launched at the House of Lords on January 30, 2019 with an upbeat address from Professor Juergen Maier, chief executive of Siemens.

Progress has very much been a matter of good news and mixed news

= The good news =

Starting with the good news. The support given to the Tomorrow’s Engineers employer engagement programme, the work of the Careers and Enterprise Company connecting schools and colleges with employers, and the Royal Academy’s ‘This is Engineering’ campaign launched in 2018 (the ‘year of engineering’), have all maintained the focus on engineering skills.

Also, and almost simultaneously, the government has announced a measured and pragmatic strategy to recruit and retain teachers, addressing one of the review’s main recommendations to address the shortages of maths, physics and design technology subject specialists.

= The ‘mixed’ news =

The picture for the further education and skills sector, which ICE, EEF (The manufacturers’ organisation) and CIPHE (Chartered Institute of Plumbing and Heating Engineering) drafted, has been more mixed.

There are welcome moves to develop a coherent and ambitious technical education offer through the new T-levels (The Construction: Design, Surveying and Planning route, encompassing civil engineering, starts in 2020 in England only).

However, there are concerns about whether the funding mechanism for post-16 education will be enough to pay for engineering programmes, and whether Wales and Northern Ireland will align with the emerging English system.

= Apprenticeship and post-16 academic recommendations =

The apprenticeship levy – which employers with a pay bill of over £3m a year must pay - has also had a mixed reception from employers.

The report recommends relaxing the restriction on levy spending so that employers can also use the funds for upskilling and reskilling their workforces.

The report also recommends a major review of the post-16 academic pathway.

Although maths is now the most popular A-level subject, the numbers taking A-level maths and physics have plateaued, while the EBacc performance measure has resulted in far fewer students taking design and arts subjects at GCSE.

The review recommends a broader and more balanced curriculum at 16+, enabling young people to study maths, science and technology along with arts and humanities.

= The Brexit shadow =

While speakers at the launch were optimistic and ready to push forward, it was impossible to ignore the shadow cast by Brexit.

With 124,000 engineers required every year to 2024, and construction reliant on EU workers, the need to push apprenticeships to grow our own workforce, and develop a pragmatic migration policy are vital. Thirty percent of civil engineering students graduating from UK universities are from overseas, for example, and represent a resource that should not be wasted.

The review stresses the necessity for UK universities to be attractive to both international students and staff, if they are to retain their world-leading status.

-----
This article was written by Andrew Stanley, head of education policy at the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). It first appeared as a blog at [https://www.ice.org.uk/news-and-insight/the-infrastructure-blog/february-2019/mixed-news-from-the-perkins-review-revisited www.ice.org.uk]

--[[User:The_Institution_of_Civil_Engineers|The Institution of Civil Engineers]]