Loss and expense - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 10:52, 17 March 2022

2022-03-17T10:52:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 17 March 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:
	NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.		NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* Business interruption cover under COVID-19.		* Business interruption cover under COVID-19.

Editor at 13:50, 8 October 2020

2020-10-08T13:50:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 8 October 2020
Line 24:		Line 24:
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

		+	* Business interruption cover under COVID-19.
	* Causes of construction disputes.		* Causes of construction disputes.
	* Civil procedure rules.		* Civil procedure rules.

Designing Buildings at 06:56, 30 August 2020

2020-08-30T06:56:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 30 August 2020
Line 54:		Line 54:
	= External references =		= External references =

−	* Ascertaining Loss and Expense RICS: ISBN 978 1 78321 114 2	+	* Ascertaining Loss and Expense RICS: [[Special:BookSources/9781783211142\|ISBN 978 1 78321 114 2]]

−	[[Category:~~Standards_/_measurements~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Standard~~]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:Standards_/_measurements]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]

Designing Buildings at 10:15, 6 February 2020

2020-02-06T10:15:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:15, 6 February 2020
Line 19:		Line 19:

	There is disparity between contract types about whether items such as head office overheads can be included in claims for loss and expense, and some court rulings have allowed such claims. If there are specific consequential losses which the parties to the contract wish to exclude, it may be prudent therefore to state these explicitly within the contract.		There is disparity between contract types about whether items such as head office overheads can be included in claims for loss and expense, and some court rulings have allowed such claims. If there are specific consequential losses which the parties to the contract wish to exclude, it may be prudent therefore to state these explicitly within the contract.
−
−	~~Ascertaining Loss and Expense RICS: ISBN 978 1 78321 114 2~~

	NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.		NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.
Line 54:		Line 52:
	* What is a default?		* What is a default?

−	[[Category:Standards_/_measurements]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]	+	= External references =
		+
		+	* Ascertaining Loss and Expense RICS: ISBN 978 1 78321 114 2
		+
		+	[[Category:Standards_/_measurements]] [[Category:DCN_Standard]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]

194.35.233.22 at 09:14, 6 February 2020

2020-02-06T09:14:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 6 February 2020
Line 19:		Line 19:

	There is disparity between contract types about whether items such as head office overheads can be included in claims for loss and expense, and some court rulings have allowed such claims. If there are specific consequential losses which the parties to the contract wish to exclude, it may be prudent therefore to state these explicitly within the contract.		There is disparity between contract types about whether items such as head office overheads can be included in claims for loss and expense, and some court rulings have allowed such claims. If there are specific consequential losses which the parties to the contract wish to exclude, it may be prudent therefore to state these explicitly within the contract.
		+
		+	Ascertaining Loss and Expense RICS: ISBN 978 1 78321 114 2

	NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.		NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.
Line 52:		Line 54:
	* What is a default?		* What is a default?

−	[[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]	+	[[Category:Standards_/_measurements]] [[Category:Construction_management]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]] [[Category:Procurement]]

Designing Buildings: Reverted edits by Harchitines (talk) to last revision by Editor

2020-01-05T09:16:09Z

Reverted edits by Harchitines (talk) to last revision by Editor

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:16, 5 January 2020
Line 21:		Line 21:

	NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.		NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.
−
−	~~= Viable Reasons for Claim =~~
−
−	~~Prove your case all the way through!~~
−
−	~~Client responsible~~
−
−	~~1. Prolongation on site - easy to prove~~
−
−	~~2. Head office overhead costs for a large company - difficult to prove~~
−
−	3. Disruption / loss of productivity - ‘fragmented working’, in which the claimant contends that the actions of the other party have prevented or hindered the claimant from executing the affected works

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

Harchitines at 19:05, 4 January 2020

2020-01-04T19:05:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 4 January 2020
Line 21:		Line 21:

	NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.		NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.
		+
		+	= Viable Reasons for Claim =
		+
		+	Prove your case all the way through!
		+
		+	Client responsible
		+
		+	1. Prolongation on site - easy to prove
		+
		+	2. Head office overhead costs for a large company - difficult to prove
		+
		+	3. Disruption / loss of productivity - ‘fragmented working’, in which the claimant contends that the actions of the other party have prevented or hindered the claimant from executing the affected works

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

Editor at 17:50, 27 March 2019

2019-03-27T17:50:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 27 March 2019
Line 22:		Line 22:
	NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.		NB: The New Engineering Contract (NEC3) contains provision for the contractor to claim payment for 'compensation events' rather than loss and expense.

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===	+

	* Causes of construction disputes.		* Causes of construction disputes.
Line 31:		Line 29:
	* Consequential loss.		* Consequential loss.
	* Contract claims.		* Contract claims.
		+	* Contractual right.
	* Cost overruns.		* Cost overruns.
	* Defects.		* Defects.

Editor: Reverted edits by 60.224.136.68 (talk) to last revision by Editor

2018-10-18T10:03:56Z

Reverted edits by 60.224.136.68 (talk) to last revision by Editor

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 18 October 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Issues relating to CDM.		* Issues relating to CDM.

−	Claims ~~mapapey~~ comprise costs resulting from disruption to the works or from delays to the works (prolongation).	+	Claims may comprise costs resulting from disruption to the works or from delays to the works (prolongation).

	The contractor must give written notice of a claim as soon as it becomes reasonably apparent that the regular progress of the works is being materially affected. This need not necessarily result in a delay to the completion date, and so claims for loss and expense and claims for extensions of time do not necessarily always run together.		The contractor must give written notice of a claim as soon as it becomes reasonably apparent that the regular progress of the works is being materially affected. This need not necessarily result in a delay to the completion date, and so claims for loss and expense and claims for extensions of time do not necessarily always run together.

60.224.136.68 at 07:36, 18 October 2018

2018-10-18T07:36:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:36, 18 October 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Issues relating to CDM.		* Issues relating to CDM.

−	Claims ~~may~~ comprise costs resulting from disruption to the works or from delays to the works (prolongation).	+	Claims mapapey comprise costs resulting from disruption to the works or from delays to the works (prolongation).

	The contractor must give written notice of a claim as soon as it becomes reasonably apparent that the regular progress of the works is being materially affected. This need not necessarily result in a delay to the completion date, and so claims for loss and expense and claims for extensions of time do not necessarily always run together.		The contractor must give written notice of a claim as soon as it becomes reasonably apparent that the regular progress of the works is being materially affected. This need not necessarily result in a delay to the completion date, and so claims for loss and expense and claims for extensions of time do not necessarily always run together.