Joinder - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:20, 10 November 2020

2020-11-10T07:20:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:20, 10 November 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	An alternative to joinder is consolidation. This involves two or more separate claims with a strong link with each other being continued together with one claim being nominated as the lead. For example, this could be appropriate when the same allegations of negligence or breach of contract are made against the same defendant but in relation to different claims. Again, the court must exercise their power to consolidate claims with consideration of the time and cost implications.		An alternative to joinder is consolidation. This involves two or more separate claims with a strong link with each other being continued together with one claim being nominated as the lead. For example, this could be appropriate when the same allegations of negligence or breach of contract are made against the same defendant but in relation to different claims. Again, the court must exercise their power to consolidate claims with consideration of the time and cost implications.

−	= ~~Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki: =
−		+
−	Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki:	+

	* Adjudication.		* Adjudication.
Line 35:		Line 33:
	* InBrief - [http://www.inbrief.co.uk/claim-preparations/joining-participants-and-causes-of-action.htm# Joining participants and causes of action]		* InBrief - [http://www.inbrief.co.uk/claim-preparations/joining-participants-and-causes-of-action.htm# Joining participants and causes of action]

−	[[Category:~~Case_law~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Case_Law~~]] [[Category:~~Other_legislation~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Legislation~~]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]

Editor at 13:08, 29 January 2016

2016-01-29T13:08:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 29 January 2016
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* Adjudication.		* Adjudication.
	* Arbitration.		* Arbitration.
		+	* Construction Industry Model Arbitration Rules CIMAR.
	* Construction litigation.		* Construction litigation.
	* Contribution and apportionment.		* Contribution and apportionment.
Line 34:		Line 35:
	* InBrief - [http://www.inbrief.co.uk/claim-preparations/joining-participants-and-causes-of-action.htm# Joining participants and causes of action]		* InBrief - [http://www.inbrief.co.uk/claim-preparations/joining-participants-and-causes-of-action.htm# Joining participants and causes of action]

−	[[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]	+	[[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:DCN_Case_Law]] [[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:DCN_Legislation]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]

Editor: Created page with "This is the joining of a person/s to an action where common questions of law or fact arise. Many construction disputes are resolved by the major participants to being joined in ..."

2016-01-22T16:21:21Z

Created page with "This is the joining of a person/s to an action where common questions of law or fact arise. Many construction disputes are resolved by the major participants to being joined in ..."

New page

This is the joining of a person/s to an action where common questions of law or fact arise.

Many construction disputes are resolved by the major participants to being joined in one proceeding. The benefit of this is that all related disputes are dealt with at once, with the consistency of being resolved by a single judge, jury, adjudicator, arbitration panel and so on.

If a dispute is subject to arbitration, as specified in the contract, then these provisions govern the issue of whether multiple parties can be joined in one arbitration (joinder).

For example, where design flaws are alleged to have contributed to a defect in the construction works, employers may seek to have the design professional(s) added as a party to proceedings to either defend their services or accept liability. Alternatively, two claimants could have a joint right, for example where there are joint contractors suing another party to the contract.

In adjudication proceedings, a party may at any time request additional parties to be joined, subject to the agreement of the adjudicator, existing parties and the additional parties.

When courts are presented with a claim comprising a number of causes of action or parties that have been joined together, they have the power to separate them if the joinder is regarded as inconvenient. This could be because the joinder makes the claim unnecessarily complicated, or may cause delays or increase the costs in the claim.

An alternative to joinder is consolidation. This involves two or more separate claims with a strong link with each other being continued together with one claim being nominated as the lead. For example, this could be appropriate when the same allegations of negligence or breach of contract are made against the same defendant but in relation to different claims. Again, the court must exercise their power to consolidate claims with consideration of the time and cost implications.

= Find out more =

Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki:

* Adjudication.
* Arbitration.
* Construction litigation.
* Contribution and apportionment.
* Damages in construction contracts.
* Decennial liability.
* Good faith in construction contracts.
* Legal and equitable assignment
* Negligence in building design and construction.
* Novation.
* Recovery of third party losses.

=== External references ===

* ‘The Construction Contracts Book’ (2nd ed.), BRENNAN, D.S. et al, American Bar Association (2008)
* InBrief - [http://www.inbrief.co.uk/claim-preparations/joining-participants-and-causes-of-action.htm# Joining participants and causes of action]

[[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]