Information Rejection - Revision history

Editor at 07:28, 4 April 2023

2023-04-04T07:28:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 4 April 2023
Line 12:		Line 12:

	* Not derived from the project team's 3D BIM volume(s)		* Not derived from the project team's 3D BIM volume(s)
−	* CAD files reverse-BIM'd in to 3D volumes by a third party	+	* CAD files reverse BIM'd in to 3D volumes by a third party
	* Exo-BIM data not exported from the BIM volumes e.g. manually added to spreadsheets		* Exo-BIM data not exported from the BIM volumes e.g. manually added to spreadsheets
	* Non-compliant with project BIM protocols		* Non-compliant with project BIM protocols
Line 27:		Line 27:
	= Detection =		= Detection =

−	To detect the ~~occurance~~ of attempts to exchange drawings and data not derived from the required 'live' 3D BIM volume, the BIM protocols must state that any file exchanged on the CDE must have an associated 3D BIM Volume to verify as the source of that information.	+	To detect the occurence of attempts to exchange drawings and data not derived from the required 'live' 3D BIM volume, the BIM protocols must state that any file exchanged on the CDE must have an associated 3D BIM Volume to verify as the source of that information.

	Where a clear disparity between the two occurs, or there is an absence of a 3D BIM Volume to verify the drawing or data against. That will be deemed a breach of the agreed rules and information Rejection will be the resulting action.		Where a clear disparity between the two occurs, or there is an absence of a 3D BIM Volume to verify the drawing or data against. That will be deemed a breach of the agreed rules and information Rejection will be the resulting action.
Line 43:		Line 43:
	Create a BIM Services Agreement or similar, to be signed by each Appointed Party or Supplier in a Task Team prior to appointment to a project.		Create a BIM Services Agreement or similar, to be signed by each Appointed Party or Supplier in a Task Team prior to appointment to a project.

−	Amongst the descriptions of how and why Appointed Party's must read and understand the BIM protocols, it will be ~~neccessary~~ to ~~defne~~ the resulting actions that will be applied to the responsible party when their exchanged information on the CDE is discovered to be derived from exo-BIM sources and methods.	+	Amongst the descriptions of how and why Appointed Party's must read and understand the BIM protocols, it will be necessary to define the resulting actions that will be applied to the responsible party when their exchanged information on the CDE is discovered to be derived from exo-BIM sources and methods.

−	In the BIM ~~ExecutionPlan~~ under standards applied, cite the UK BIM Framework's "Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery".	+	In the BIM Execution Plan under standards applied, cite the UK BIM Framework's "Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery".

	= Exemplar =		= Exemplar =
Line 54:		Line 54:

	Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data files exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.		Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data files exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.
−
−	~~= References =~~
−
−	~~See Sections 1.3/1.4 and Table 12 in the UK BIM Framework: Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery below:~~
−
−	~~[https://ukbimframework.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ISO-19650-Guidance-Part-2-Single-Page-Print.pdf ISO-19650-Guidance-Part-2-Single-Page-Print.pdf (ukbimframework.org)]~~

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =
Line 81:		Line 75:
	* Revit.		* Revit.
	* Uniclass.		* Uniclass.
		+
		+	= External references =
		+
		+	See Sections 1.3/1.4 and Table 12 in the UK BIM Framework: Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery below:
		+
		+	[https://ukbimframework.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ISO-19650-Guidance-Part-2-Single-Page-Print.pdf ISO-19650-Guidance-Part-2-Single-Page-Print.pdf (ukbimframework.org)]

	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Software]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Products_/_components]]		[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Software]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Products_/_components]]

NXUS-BIM at 14:56, 13 January 2023

2023-01-13T14:56:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 13 January 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:
	= Concept =		= Concept =

−	"Information Rejection". IR is the scenario whereby an Appointed Party or supplier attempts to exchange files on a CDE that are:~~<br />~~	+	"Information Rejection". IR is the scenario whereby an Appointed Party or supplier attempts to exchange files on a CDE that are:
		+
		+	* Not derived from the project team's 3D BIM volume(s)
		+	* CAD files reverse-BIM'd in to 3D volumes by a third party
		+	* Exo-BIM data not exported from the BIM volumes e.g. manually added to spreadsheets
		+	* Non-compliant with project BIM protocols
		+	* 2D Drawings not derived from the 3D BIM volume(s)
		+
	<br />		<br />
−	~~- Not derived from the project team's 3D BIM volume(s)<br />~~	+	The potential consequences for having exchange information rejected are:
−	~~- CAD files reverse-BIM'd in to 3D volumes by a third party<br />~~	+
−	~~- Exo-BIM data not exported from the BIM volumes e.g. manually added to spreadsheets<br />~~	+	* Responsibility for causing delays
−	~~- Non-compliant with project BIM protocols<br />~~	+	* Charges imposed for delays
−	~~- 2D Drawings not derived from the 3D BIM volume(s)<br />~~	+	* Percentage of fees withheld
−	~~<br />~~	+	* Termination of appointment
−	The potential consequences for having exchange information rejected are:~~<br />~~	+
−	~~<br />~~	+
−	- Responsibility for causing delays~~<br />~~	+
−	- Charges imposed for delays~~<br />~~	+
−	- Percentage of fees withheld~~<br />~~	+
−	- Termination of appointment	+

	= Detection =		= Detection =

NXUS-BIM at 17:26, 1 January 2023

2023-01-01T17:26:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 1 January 2023
Line 43:		Line 43:

	Amongst the descriptions of how and why Appointed Party's must read and understand the BIM protocols, it will be neccessary to defne the resulting actions that will be applied to the responsible party when their exchanged information on the CDE is discovered to be derived from exo-BIM sources and methods.		Amongst the descriptions of how and why Appointed Party's must read and understand the BIM protocols, it will be neccessary to defne the resulting actions that will be applied to the responsible party when their exchanged information on the CDE is discovered to be derived from exo-BIM sources and methods.
		+
		+	In the BIM ExecutionPlan under standards applied, cite the UK BIM Framework's "Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery".

	= Exemplar =		= Exemplar =

−	Below as a typical example of how to define the circumstances and outcomes to Appointed Party if they fail to apply BIM processes in ~~the~~ design and exchanged files:	+	Below is a typical example of how to define the circumstances and outcomes to the Appointed Party(s) if they fail to apply BIM processes in their design and exchanged files:

	Information Rejection:		Information Rejection:

−	Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data ~~file~~ exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.	+	Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data files exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.

	= References =		= References =

NXUS-BIM at 17:20, 1 January 2023

2023-01-01T17:20:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 1 January 2023
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Where a clear disparity between the two occurs, or there is an absence of a 3D BIM Volume to verify the drawing or data against. That will be deemed a breach of the agreed rules and information Rejection will be the resulting action.		Where a clear disparity between the two occurs, or there is an absence of a 3D BIM Volume to verify the drawing or data against. That will be deemed a breach of the agreed rules and information Rejection will be the resulting action.
		+
		+	= Action =
		+
		+	In the BEP cite a reference to the UK BIM Framework's "Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery".
		+
		+	According to Table 12 in the aforementioned UK BIM Framework document, when exchanged information is audited and verified at Status S6, if rejected the status will be reduced to S0 "Work in Progress and not yet suitable to be Shared outside the task team.".
		+
		+	Read the references to information acceptance and rejection defined within the aforementioned reference and have the Information Manager and Document Controller implement it via the protocols. See Prevention.

	= Prevention =		= Prevention =
Line 43:		Line 51:

	Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data file exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.		Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data file exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.
		+
		+	= References =
		+
		+	See Sections 1.3/1.4 and Table 12 in the UK BIM Framework: Information management according to BS EN ISO 19650 Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery below:
		+
		+	[https://ukbimframework.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ISO-19650-Guidance-Part-2-Single-Page-Print.pdf ISO-19650-Guidance-Part-2-Single-Page-Print.pdf (ukbimframework.org)]

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

Editor at 13:31, 29 December 2022

2022-12-29T13:31:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 29 December 2022
Line 43:		Line 43:

	Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data file exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.		Starting from the first file exchange uploaded to the CDE, all drawings, details, schedules and other data file exchanged will be verified against your 3D .RVT/.IFC model exchanged at the same cycle. Be aware that if the files are found not to be derived from this 3D file, all exchanged files will be rejected and notice given to you for deviating from this agreement. Rejection of your files will have negative consequences with regards to your fees and potential charges imposed for causing delays. Your appointment to this project may also be terminated for breaching this agreement. Refer to the contracts director for further details.
		+
		+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =
		+
		+	* Asset information requirements AIR.
		+	* BIM articles.
		+	* BIM dimensions.
		+	* BIM execution plan.
		+	* BIM glossary of terms.
		+	* BIM maturity levels.
		+	* BIM resources.
		+	* Construction Operations Building Information Exchange (COBie).
		+	* Common data environment.
		+	* Data drops..
		+	* Digital information.
		+	* Digital model.
		+	* Federated building information model.
		+	* Government Soft Landings.
		+	* Industry Foundation Classes.
		+	* Information management.
		+	* Revit.
		+	* Uniclass.
		+
		+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Software]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Products_/_components]]

Editor at 13:27, 29 December 2022

2022-12-29T13:27:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 29 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~BACKGROUND~~	+	= Background =

−	BIM protocols for an ~~organization~~ or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.	+	BIM protocols for an organisation or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.

−	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design based on 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the ~~colaborative~~ process will not adequately take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.	+	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design based on 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the collaborative process will not adequately take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.

−	A disparity and time shift between the live 3D federated models typically exchanged fortnightly on the CDE and the exo-BIM derived design occurs, this results in ~~innacuracy~~, failure to collaborate effectively, delays on site and reduced overall value to the client.	+	A disparity and time shift between the live 3D federated models typically exchanged fortnightly on the CDE and the exo-BIM derived design occurs, this results in inacuracy, failure to collaborate effectively, delays on site and reduced overall value to the client.

−	~~CONCEPT~~	+	= Concept =

	"Information Rejection". IR is the scenario whereby an Appointed Party or supplier attempts to exchange files on a CDE that are:<br />		"Information Rejection". IR is the scenario whereby an Appointed Party or supplier attempts to exchange files on a CDE that are:<br />
Line 24:		Line 24:
	- Termination of appointment		- Termination of appointment

−	~~DETECTION~~	+	= Detection =

	To detect the occurance of attempts to exchange drawings and data not derived from the required 'live' 3D BIM volume, the BIM protocols must state that any file exchanged on the CDE must have an associated 3D BIM Volume to verify as the source of that information.		To detect the occurance of attempts to exchange drawings and data not derived from the required 'live' 3D BIM volume, the BIM protocols must state that any file exchanged on the CDE must have an associated 3D BIM Volume to verify as the source of that information.

−	Where a clear ~~dsparity~~ between the two occurs, or there is an absence of a 3D BIM Volume to verify the drawing or data against. That will be deemed a breach of the agreed rules and information Rejection will be the resulting action.	+	Where a clear disparity between the two occurs, or there is an absence of a 3D BIM Volume to verify the drawing or data against. That will be deemed a breach of the agreed rules and information Rejection will be the resulting action.

−	~~PREVENTION~~	+	= Prevention =

	Create a BIM Services Agreement or similar, to be signed by each Appointed Party or Supplier in a Task Team prior to appointment to a project.		Create a BIM Services Agreement or similar, to be signed by each Appointed Party or Supplier in a Task Team prior to appointment to a project.
Line 36:		Line 36:
	Amongst the descriptions of how and why Appointed Party's must read and understand the BIM protocols, it will be neccessary to defne the resulting actions that will be applied to the responsible party when their exchanged information on the CDE is discovered to be derived from exo-BIM sources and methods.		Amongst the descriptions of how and why Appointed Party's must read and understand the BIM protocols, it will be neccessary to defne the resulting actions that will be applied to the responsible party when their exchanged information on the CDE is discovered to be derived from exo-BIM sources and methods.

−	~~EXEMPLAR~~	+	= Exemplar =

	Below as a typical example of how to define the circumstances and outcomes to Appointed Party if they fail to apply BIM processes in the design and exchanged files:		Below as a typical example of how to define the circumstances and outcomes to Appointed Party if they fail to apply BIM processes in the design and exchanged files:

NXUS-BIM at 18:46, 18 December 2022

2022-12-18T18:46:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 18 December 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.		BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.

−	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design in 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not adequately take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.	+	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design based on 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not adequately take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.

	A disparity and time shift between the live 3D federated models typically exchanged fortnightly on the CDE and the exo-BIM derived design occurs, this results in innacuracy, failure to collaborate effectively, delays on site and reduced overall value to the client.		A disparity and time shift between the live 3D federated models typically exchanged fortnightly on the CDE and the exo-BIM derived design occurs, this results in innacuracy, failure to collaborate effectively, delays on site and reduced overall value to the client.

NXUS-BIM at 18:45, 18 December 2022

2022-12-18T18:45:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 18 December 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.		BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.

−	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design in 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.	+	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design in 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not adequately take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.

	A disparity and time shift between the live 3D federated models typically exchanged fortnightly on the CDE and the exo-BIM derived design occurs, this results in innacuracy, failure to collaborate effectively, delays on site and reduced overall value to the client.		A disparity and time shift between the live 3D federated models typically exchanged fortnightly on the CDE and the exo-BIM derived design occurs, this results in innacuracy, failure to collaborate effectively, delays on site and reduced overall value to the client.

NXUS-BIM at 18:44, 18 December 2022

2022-12-18T18:44:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 18 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	BACKGROUND		BACKGROUND

−	BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from ~~the~~ project BIM ~~volumes~~, but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.	+	BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from their project BIM volume(s), but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.

	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design in 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.		What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design in 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.

NXUS-BIM at 18:43, 18 December 2022

2022-12-18T18:43:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 18 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	BACKGROUND		BACKGROUND

−	BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry ~~sometime~~ finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from the project BIM volumes, but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.	+	BIM protocols for an organization or project may state that Appointed Parties must deliver the project information files in accordance those agreed BIM protocols. The industry sometimes finds that Appointed Parties agree to implement BIM processes as the source of their design, and that their deliverables will be derived, exported or 'cut' from the project BIM volumes, but they fail to do so and instead implement exo-BIM processes. Due in some cases to lack of skills and competency with the designated design team.

	What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design in 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.		What is sometimes reported by Information Managers and BIM Coordinators are attempts by some consultants to develop their exo-BIM design in 2D CAD files exported (by a third party in some cases) from the other consultants federated 3D model volumes. The resulting exo-BIM 2D design developed outside of the colaborative process will not take in to account design issues including clashes with other consultants's design intent.