Improving construction and demolition waste data - Revision history

Editor at 18:21, 12 January 2021

2021-01-12T18:21:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 12 January 2021
Line 113:		Line 113:
	* How data can stop waste.		* How data can stop waste.
	* Landfill tax.		* Landfill tax.
		+	* National Federation of Demolition Contractors NFDC.
	* Recyclable construction materials.		* Recyclable construction materials.
	* Site Waste Management Plan.		* Site Waste Management Plan.

Designing Buildings at 09:29, 12 December 2020

2020-12-12T09:29:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 12 December 2020
Line 118:		Line 118:
	* SMARTWaste.		* SMARTWaste.

−	[[Category:~~Research_/_Innovation~~]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:~~Standards_~~/~~_measurements~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Standard~~]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:DCN_Standard]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Standards_/_measurements]]

Designing Buildings at 15:41, 20 March 2019

2019-03-20T15:41:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 20 March 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Specialists in construction and demolition (C&D) waste at BRE, undertook a study to assess the shape of information regarding C&D waste in the UK. This is part of the work the BRE Trust is doing to help 'building a better world together'.		Specialists in construction and demolition (C&D) waste at BRE, undertook a study to assess the shape of information regarding C&D waste in the UK. This is part of the work the BRE Trust is doing to help 'building a better world together'.

−	A summary of the study is provided below, and the full study is available by ~~[http://www.bresitesmart.com/contact-us/~~ contacting the SmartWaste] team at BRE.	+	A summary of the study is provided below, and the full study is available by contacting the SmartWaste team at BRE.

	= A study of UK construction and demolition waste data =		= A study of UK construction and demolition waste data =
Line 34:		Line 34:
	\| Mineral Products Association		\| Mineral Products Association
	\| Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities		\| Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities
−	\|	+	\| 45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK. Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England
−	45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK.	+
−	Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England	+
	\| Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years		\| Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years
−	\|	+	\| Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output Source of information used to estimate construction output no clear
−	Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output	+
−	Source of information used to estimate construction output no clear	+
	\|-		\|-
	\| UEPG (European Aggregates Associate)		\| UEPG (European Aggregates Associate)
Line 52:		Line 48:
	\| Estimate of percentage of inert demolition waste that is reused or recycled onsite		\| Estimate of percentage of inert demolition waste that is reused or recycled onsite
	\| 54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK		\| 54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK
−	\|	+	\| Produced annually Based on member information
−	Produced annually	+	\| For demolition only Breakdown for England not currently available
−	Based on member information	+
−	\|	+
−	For demolition only	+
−	Breakdown for England not currently available	+
	\|-		\|-
	\| SmartWaste (related to aggregates)		\| SmartWaste (related to aggregates)
Line 63:		Line 55:
	\| 32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite		\| 32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite
	\|		\|
−	Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases	+	Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases Can be updated regularly
−	Can be updated regularly	+

	Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data		Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data
−	\|	+	\| Data limited to users of SmartWaste Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials
−	Data limited to users of SmartWaste	+
−	Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials	+
	\|-		\|-
	\| SmartWaste (related to soils)		\| SmartWaste (related to soils)
Line 75:		Line 64:
	\| 50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite		\| 50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite
	\|		\|
−	Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases	+	Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases Can be updated regularly
−	Can be updated regularly	+

	Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data		Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data
Line 117:		Line 105:
	--[[User:BRE_Buzz\|BRE Buzz]]		--[[User:BRE_Buzz\|BRE Buzz]]

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===	+

	* BRE Buzz articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.		* BRE Buzz articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
Line 132:		Line 118:
	* SMARTWaste.		* SMARTWaste.

−	[[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Standards_/_measurements]]	+	[[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:Standards_/_measurements]] [[Category:DCN_Standard]]

Editor at 14:55, 1 February 2019

2019-02-01T14:55:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 1 February 2019
Line 26:		Line 26:

	{\|		{\|
−	\|width="20%"\|DATA SOURCE	+	\|width="20%"\| DATA SOURCE
−	\|width="20%"\|INFORMATION	+	\|width="20%"\| INFORMATION
−	\|width="20%"\|DATA	+	\|width="20%"\| DATA
−	\|width="20%"\|BENEFITS	+	\|width="20%"\| BENEFITS
−	\|width="20%"\|ISSUES	+	\|width="20%"\| ISSUES
	\|-		\|-
−	\|Mineral Products Association	+	\| Mineral Products Association
−	\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities	+	\| Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities
−	\|45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK.	+	\|
		+	45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK.
	Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England		Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England
−	\|Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years	+	\| Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years
−	\|Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output	+	\|
		+	Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output
	Source of information used to estimate construction output no clear		Source of information used to estimate construction output no clear
	\|-		\|-
−	\|UEPG (European Aggregates Associate)	+	\| UEPG (European Aggregates Associate)
−	\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate produced	+	\| Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate produced
−	\|44 Million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in UK in 2012	+	\| 44 Million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in UK in 2012
	\|		\|
−	\|Not additional data as based on MPA data	+
		+	\| Not additional data as based on MPA data
	\|-		\|-
−	\|National Federation of Demolition Contractors	+	\| National Federation of Demolition Contractors
−	\|Estimate of percentage of inert demolition waste that is reused or recycled onsite	+	\| Estimate of percentage of inert demolition waste that is reused or recycled onsite
−	\|54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK	+	\| 54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK
−	\|Produced annually	+	\|
		+	Produced annually
	Based on member information		Based on member information
−	\|For demolition only	+	\|
		+	For demolition only
	Breakdown for England not currently available		Breakdown for England not currently available
	\|-		\|-
−	\|SmartWaste (related to aggregates)	+	\| SmartWaste (related to aggregates)
−	\|Estimate of the percentage of inert CD&E waste that is reused or recycled onsite	+	\| Estimate of the percentage of inert CD&E waste that is reused or recycled onsite
−	\|32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite	+	\| 32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite
−	\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases	+	\|
		+	Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases
	Can be updated regularly		Can be updated regularly

	Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data		Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data
−	\|Data limited to users of SmartWaste	+	\|
		+	Data limited to users of SmartWaste
	Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials		Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials
	\|-		\|-
−	\|SmartWaste (related to soils)	+	\| SmartWaste (related to soils)
−	\|Estimate of the % of soil produced that is reused or recycled onsite	+	\| Estimate of the % of soil produced that is reused or recycled onsite
−	\|50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite	+	\| 50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite
−	\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases	+	\|
		+	Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases
	Can be updated regularly		Can be updated regularly

	Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data		Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data
−	\|Some companies do not record onsite reuse of materials	+	\| Some companies do not record onsite reuse of materials
	\|}		\|}
−
−

	[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article2.jpg\|link=File:Rubble-Buzz-article2.jpg]]		[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article2.jpg\|link=File:Rubble-Buzz-article2.jpg]]
Line 118:		Line 124:
	* BRE SMARTWaste John Muir release.		* BRE SMARTWaste John Muir release.
	* Circular economy.		* Circular economy.
		+	* Design for deconstruction – helping construction unlock the benefits of the circular economy.
	* How data can stop waste.		* How data can stop waste.
	* Landfill tax.		* Landfill tax.

Designing Buildings at 12:11, 1 March 2017

2017-03-01T12:11:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:11, 1 March 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Data on C&D waste is used in different ways by different stakeholders – from setting targets for individual projects, to providing information to report against EU targets.		Data on C&D waste is used in different ways by different stakeholders – from setting targets for individual projects, to providing information to report against EU targets.

−	However, a ~~[http://www.rwmexhibition.com/files/ed61133_160115sa_rwm_ambassadors_waste_data_report_vfinal_with_logo.pdf~~ recent report by the RWM Ambassadors] highlighted the significant gaps and weaknesses in C&D waste data. The BRE study is intended to improve the C&D waste data used by DEFRA to report against EU targets.	+	However, a recent report by the RWM Ambassadors highlighted the significant gaps and weaknesses in C&D waste data. The BRE study is intended to improve the C&D waste data used by DEFRA to report against EU targets.

	Waste data reports have been developed over a number of years by DEFRA, but some areas are based on assumptions that may be outdated or where better data may now be available.		Waste data reports have been developed over a number of years by DEFRA, but some areas are based on assumptions that may be outdated or where better data may now be available.

Designing Buildings at 11:42, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T11:42:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 18 January 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	= Introduction =		= Introduction =

−	Specialists in construction and demolition (C&D) waste at BRE, ~~have recently completed~~ a study to assess the shape of information regarding C&D waste in the UK. This is part of the work the BRE Trust is doing to help in building a better world together.	+	Specialists in construction and demolition (C&D) waste at BRE, undertook a study to assess the shape of information regarding C&D waste in the UK. This is part of the work the BRE Trust is doing to help 'building a better world together'.

−	~~Below is a~~ summary of ~~this~~ study ~~to give you a flavour of the findings~~, and the full study is available by [http://www.bresitesmart.com/contact-us/ contacting the SmartWaste] team at BRE.	+	A summary of the study is provided below, and the full study is available by [http://www.bresitesmart.com/contact-us/ contacting the SmartWaste] team at BRE.

	= A study of UK construction and demolition waste data =		= A study of UK construction and demolition waste data =

−	Data on C&D waste is used in different ways by ~~various~~ stakeholders – from setting targets for individual projects, to providing information to report against EU targets. A [http://www.rwmexhibition.com/files/ed61133_160115sa_rwm_ambassadors_waste_data_report_vfinal_with_logo.pdf recent report by the RWM Ambassadors] highlighted the significant gaps and weaknesses in C&D waste data.	+	Data on C&D waste is used in different ways by different stakeholders – from setting targets for individual projects, to providing information to report against EU targets.

−	The BRE study ~~aims~~ to ~~help~~ improve the C&D waste data used by DEFRA to report against EU targets.	+	However, a [http://www.rwmexhibition.com/files/ed61133_160115sa_rwm_ambassadors_waste_data_report_vfinal_with_logo.pdf recent report by the RWM Ambassadors] highlighted the significant gaps and weaknesses in C&D waste data. The BRE study is intended to improve the C&D waste data used by DEFRA to report against EU targets.

−	~~Currently, waste~~ data reports have been developed over ~~several~~ years by DEFRA, ~~yet there are~~ some areas based on assumptions that may be outdated or where better data may now be available.	+	Waste data reports have been developed over a number of years by DEFRA, but some areas are based on assumptions that may be outdated or where better data may now be available.

	Two main areas for reporting against European targets were highlighted, and their various sources of data assessed.		Two main areas for reporting against European targets were highlighted, and their various sources of data assessed.
Line 23:		Line 23:
	However, this does not include recycled aggregate or soils produced and dealt with on site (known as ‘under an exemption’). This is estimated from the Minerals Products Association (MPA) data from 2008 which is adjusted annually based on construction industry value. This review aimed to supplement this useful information with additional, more recent data.		However, this does not include recycled aggregate or soils produced and dealt with on site (known as ‘under an exemption’). This is estimated from the Minerals Products Association (MPA) data from 2008 which is adjusted annually based on construction industry value. This review aimed to supplement this useful information with additional, more recent data.

−	The table below shows various sources of information – highlighting benefits and issues associated with each.	+	The table below shows various sources of information – highlighting the benefits and issues associated with each.

	{\|		{\|
Line 80:		Line 80:
	= Currently there is no way to know the breakdown of materials in C&D waste =		= Currently there is no way to know the breakdown of materials in C&D waste =

−	As with home recycling, when mixed waste goes through a sorting facility, many different types of waste from different sources are ~~all~~ combined ~~(glass, wood and plastics go in together)~~. Once this mixed waste is sorted, it is not known how much of the segregated materials ~~comes~~ from each ~~person/~~source.	+	As with home recycling, when mixed waste goes through a sorting facility, many different types of waste from different sources are combined. Once this mixed waste is sorted, it is not known how much of the segregated materials come from each source.

	In the construction industry, knowing the proportions and quantities of individual materials in mixed waste can help both individual companies and the sector as a whole to identify issues and set targets.		In the construction industry, knowing the proportions and quantities of individual materials in mixed waste can help both individual companies and the sector as a whole to identify issues and set targets.

−	Various data sources were reviewed around this issue, showing a significant difference in breakdowns produced from each.	+	Various data sources were reviewed around this issue, showing a significant difference in the breakdowns produced from each.

	In particular, the WRAP (Waste Resources Action Programme) data suggests there are very low proportions of metal, timber, plastic and glass; whereas company specific data (from a review of a variety of organisations’ CSR reporting) indicates much higher proportions of these materials.		In particular, the WRAP (Waste Resources Action Programme) data suggests there are very low proportions of metal, timber, plastic and glass; whereas company specific data (from a review of a variety of organisations’ CSR reporting) indicates much higher proportions of these materials.
Line 94:		Line 94:
	The issue of availability and weaknesses of C&D data was recently discussed at RWM, where Stuart Blofeld from SmartWaste took part in a panel discussion.		The issue of availability and weaknesses of C&D data was recently discussed at RWM, where Stuart Blofeld from SmartWaste took part in a panel discussion.

−	The main points from this session were that ~~the construction sector are quite good at collecting data but that more use could be made of this data to effect real change on construction and demolition sites.~~	+	The main points from this session were that:

−	~~Leading~~ on ~~from this, ongoing~~ discussions with various ~~stakeholders~~ (construction professionals, waste management professionals and government agencies), should continue to ensure progress is made in collecting reliable, useful data.	+	* The construction sector is quite good at collecting data but that more use could be made of it to effect real change on construction and demolition sites.
		+	* Ongoing discussions with various (construction professionals, waste management professionals and government agencies), should continue to ensure progress is made in collecting reliable, useful data.
		+	* Ongoing analysis of SmartWaste data could help provide information for the industry, helping set targets for waste reduction and improved materials management.

−	~~Ongoing analysis of SmartWaste data should help to provide information for industry and individual companies, helping set targets for waste reduction and~~ improved ~~materials management.~~	+	= How can this situation be improved? =

−	~~= How can this situation be improved for companies and the industry? =~~	+	Data from NFDC and SmartWaste could be used alongside MPA information to allow improved estimates of internally recycled materials – resulting in a better understanding of how these materials are managed, enabling government and key construction stakeholders to develop and improve on this.
−		+
−	Data from NFDC and SmartWaste could be used alongside MPA information to ~~provide~~ improved estimates of internally recycled materials – resulting in a better understanding of how these materials are managed, enabling government and key construction stakeholders to develop and improve on this.	+

	The data contained within SmartWaste could be used alongside more information from individual companies to provide an estimate of material breakdowns – this will help construction companies identify materials to target for waste reduction.		The data contained within SmartWaste could be used alongside more information from individual companies to provide an estimate of material breakdowns – this will help construction companies identify materials to target for waste reduction.

Editor at 11:10, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T11:10:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 18 January 2017
Line 35:		Line 35:
	\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities		\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities
	\|45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK.		\|45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK.
−
	Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England		Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England
	\|Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years		\|Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years
Line 117:		Line 116:

	* BRE Buzz articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.		* BRE Buzz articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
−	*	+	* BRE SMARTWaste John Muir release.
		+	* Circular economy.
		+	* How data can stop waste.
		+	* Landfill tax.
		+	* Recyclable construction materials.
		+	* Site Waste Management Plan.
		+	* SiteSmart.
		+	* SMARTWaste.

	[[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Standards_/_measurements]]		[[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Standards_/_measurements]]

Editor at 11:08, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T11:08:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 18 January 2017
Line 34:		Line 34:
	\|Mineral Products Association		\|Mineral Products Association
	\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities		\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities
−	\|45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK. Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England	+	\|45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK.
		+
		+	Estimated that 38.9 million tonnes for England
	\|Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years		\|Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years
	\|Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output		\|Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output
−
	Source of information used to estimate construction output no clear		Source of information used to estimate construction output no clear
	\|-		\|-
Line 50:		Line 51:
	\|54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK		\|54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK
	\|Produced annually		\|Produced annually
−
	Based on member information		Based on member information
	\|For demolition only		\|For demolition only
−
	Breakdown for England not currently available		Breakdown for England not currently available
	\|-		\|-
Line 60:		Line 59:
	\|32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite		\|32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite
	\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases		\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases
−
	Can be updated regularly		Can be updated regularly

	Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data		Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data
	\|Data limited to users of SmartWaste		\|Data limited to users of SmartWaste
−
	Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials		Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials
	\|-		\|-
Line 72:		Line 69:
	\|50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite		\|50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite
	\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases		\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases
−
	Can be updated regularly		Can be updated regularly

Editor at 11:08, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T11:08:05Z

Editor at 11:05, 18 January 2017

2017-01-18T11:05:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:05, 18 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article.jpg]]	+	[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article.jpg\|link=File:Rubble-Buzz-article.jpg]]

	= Introduction =		= Introduction =
Line 26:		Line 26:

	{\|		{\|
−	\|width="20%"\|~~Data Source~~	+	\|width="20%"\|DATA SOURCE
−	\|width="20%"\|~~Information~~	+	\|width="20%"\|INFORMATION
−	\|width="20%"\|~~Data~~	+	\|width="20%"\|DATA
−	\|width="20%"\|~~Benefits~~	+	\|width="20%"\|BENEFITS
−	\|width="20%"\|~~Issues~~	+	\|width="20%"\|ISSUES
	\|-		\|-
	\|Mineral Products Association		\|Mineral Products Association
	\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities		\|Estimate of amount of recycled aggregate from C&D activities
−	\|45.3 ~~Million~~ tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK. Estimated that 38.9 Million tonnes for England	+	\|45.3 million tonnes of recycled aggregate produced in 2012 in UK. Estimated that 38.9 Million tonnes for England
	\|Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years		\|Ongoing data so would allow for comparison with previous years
	\|Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output		\|Based on data from 2008 and updated based on construction output
Line 50:		Line 50:
	\|54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK		\|54.4% of inert demolition waste produced is reused or recycled onsite in UK
	\|Produced annually		\|Produced annually
−
	Based on member information		Based on member information
	\|For demolition only		\|For demolition only
−
	Breakdown for England not currently available		Breakdown for England not currently available
	\|-		\|-
Line 60:		Line 58:
	\|32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite		\|32.5% of inert CD&E waste is reused or recycled onsite
	\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases		\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases
−
	Can be updated regularly		Can be updated regularly

	Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data		Based on SmartWaste members waste arisings data
	\|Data limited to users of SmartWaste		\|Data limited to users of SmartWaste
−
	Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials		Some companies who use SmartWaste do not record onsite reuse of materials
	\|-		\|-
Line 72:		Line 68:
	\|50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite		\|50.8% of soils produced are reused or recycled onsite
	\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases		\|Can be broken down into construction, demolition and excavation phases
−
	Can be updated regularly		Can be updated regularly

Line 81:		Line 76:


−	[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article2.jpg]]	+	[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article2.jpg\|link=File:Rubble-Buzz-article2.jpg]]

	= Currently there is no way to know the breakdown of materials in C&D waste =		= Currently there is no way to know the breakdown of materials in C&D waste =
Line 93:		Line 88:
	In particular, the WRAP (Waste Resources Action Programme) data suggests there are very low proportions of metal, timber, plastic and glass; whereas company specific data (from a review of a variety of organisations’ CSR reporting) indicates much higher proportions of these materials.		In particular, the WRAP (Waste Resources Action Programme) data suggests there are very low proportions of metal, timber, plastic and glass; whereas company specific data (from a review of a variety of organisations’ CSR reporting) indicates much higher proportions of these materials.

−	[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article3.jpg]]	+	[[File:Rubble-Buzz-article3.jpg\|link=File:Rubble-Buzz-article3.jpg]]

	= September RWM discussion panel =		= September RWM discussion panel =