Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest IROPI - Revision history

Editor at 09:51, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T09:51:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:51, 4 April 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:

	* BNG.		* BNG.
		+	* Defra Infrastructure Board.
	* Environmental Impact Assessment.		* Environmental Impact Assessment.
	* Environmental Statement.		* Environmental Statement.

Editor at 09:50, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T09:50:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 4 April 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:
	The phrase is also mentioned in relation to the Defra Infrastructure Board established to unblock barriers to development at an early stage and accelerate the delivery of major infrastructure projects in the UK by facilitating greater collaboration and stronger oversight within Defra and its arm’s-length bodies. It was the third recommendation of the corporate report [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-economic-growth-and-nature-recovery-an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape/an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape-foreword-and-executive-summary An independent review of Defra’s regulatory landscape], which was published 2 April 2025.		The phrase is also mentioned in relation to the Defra Infrastructure Board established to unblock barriers to development at an early stage and accelerate the delivery of major infrastructure projects in the UK by facilitating greater collaboration and stronger oversight within Defra and its arm’s-length bodies. It was the third recommendation of the corporate report [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-economic-growth-and-nature-recovery-an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape/an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape-foreword-and-executive-summary An independent review of Defra’s regulatory landscape], which was published 2 April 2025.

−	Related articles on Designing Buildings	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

−	Building ~~Safety Regulator~~.	+	* BNG.
		+	* Environmental Impact Assessment.
		+	* Environmental Statement.
		+	* Government response to the Building a Safer Future consultation.
		+	* Grenfell articles.
		+	* Grenfell Tower Fire.
		+	* Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report.
		+	* National infrastructure plan.
		+	* National planning policy framework NPPF.
		+	* Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
		+	* Principal contractor.
		+	* Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.
		+	* What Town Planners Do: Exploring Planning Practices and the Public Interest through Workplace Ethnographies.
		+	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/National_planning_policy_framework_NPPF National planning policy framework NPPF]

−	~~CDM~~	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Standard]] [[Category:Definitions]] [[Category:Public_procedures]] [[Category:Roles_/_services]]
−		+
−	~~Duty holder.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Fire.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Government response to the Building a Safer Future consultation.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Grenfell articles.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Grenfell Tower Fire.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report.~~	+
−		+
−	~~National infrastructure plan.~~	+
−		+
−	~~National planning policy framework NPPF.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Principal contractor.~~	+
−		+
−	~~Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.~~	+
−		+
−	~~What Town Planners Do~~: ~~Exploring Planning Practices and the Public Interest through Workplace Ethnographies.~~	+
−		+
−	[~~https~~:~~//www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/National_planning_policy_framework_NPPF National planning policy framework NPPF~~]	+
−		+
−	[[Category:~~Articles_needing_more_work~~]]	+

Editor at 09:49, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T09:49:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 4 April 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:

	The phrase is also mentioned in relation to the Defra Infrastructure Board established to unblock barriers to development at an early stage and accelerate the delivery of major infrastructure projects in the UK by facilitating greater collaboration and stronger oversight within Defra and its arm’s-length bodies. It was the third recommendation of the corporate report [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-economic-growth-and-nature-recovery-an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape/an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape-foreword-and-executive-summary An independent review of Defra’s regulatory landscape], which was published 2 April 2025.		The phrase is also mentioned in relation to the Defra Infrastructure Board established to unblock barriers to development at an early stage and accelerate the delivery of major infrastructure projects in the UK by facilitating greater collaboration and stronger oversight within Defra and its arm’s-length bodies. It was the third recommendation of the corporate report [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-economic-growth-and-nature-recovery-an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape/an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape-foreword-and-executive-summary An independent review of Defra’s regulatory landscape], which was published 2 April 2025.
		+
		+	Related articles on Designing Buildings
		+
		+	Building Safety Regulator.
		+
		+	CDM
		+
		+	Duty holder.
		+
		+	Fire.
		+
		+	Government response to the Building a Safer Future consultation.
		+
		+	Grenfell articles.
		+
		+	Grenfell Tower Fire.
		+
		+	Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report.
		+
		+	National infrastructure plan.
		+
		+	National planning policy framework NPPF.
		+
		+	Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
		+
		+	Principal contractor.
		+
		+	Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.
		+
		+	What Town Planners Do: Exploring Planning Practices and the Public Interest through Workplace Ethnographies.
		+
		+	[https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/National_planning_policy_framework_NPPF National planning policy framework NPPF]

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]

Editor at 09:01, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T09:01:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:01, 4 April 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions to achieve the project's objectives reducing adverse impacts.		* Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions to achieve the project's objectives reducing adverse impacts.
	* Stage 4: Where no feasible alternatives exist, assessment is made see if there are "imperative reasons of overriding public interest" that justify the project, even with its adverse impacts.		* Stage 4: Where no feasible alternatives exist, assessment is made see if there are "imperative reasons of overriding public interest" that justify the project, even with its adverse impacts.
		+
		+	The phrase is also mentioned in relation to the Defra Infrastructure Board established to unblock barriers to development at an early stage and accelerate the delivery of major infrastructure projects in the UK by facilitating greater collaboration and stronger oversight within Defra and its arm’s-length bodies. It was the third recommendation of the corporate report [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/delivering-economic-growth-and-nature-recovery-an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape/an-independent-review-of-defras-regulatory-landscape-foreword-and-executive-summary An independent review of Defra’s regulatory landscape], which was published 2 April 2025.

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]

Editor at 08:57, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T08:57:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 4 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The phrase Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest (IROPI) originates from Article 6(4) of the EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC), which was adopted on 21 May, 1992. The phrase ~~means~~ to ~~allow exception to a nature protection regulation if certain conditions are met~~, which ~~is normally established by a four stage process:~~	+	The phrase Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest (IROPI) originates from Article 6(4) of the EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC), which was adopted on 21 May, 1992. The UK continues to use the phrase since leaving the EU, commonly in reference to the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, which transposed the land and marine aspects of the EU Habitats Directive and certain elements of the Wild Birds Directive into domestic law.

−	* Stage 1: Screening~~: Determines~~ if the plan or project is likely to have significant effects on a site.	+	The phrase means to allow exception to a certain nature protection regulation if particular conditions are met, which is normally established by a four stage process, from initial screening to assessing for IROPI:
		+
		+	* Stage 1: Screening determines if the plan or project is likely to have significant effects on a site.
	* Stage 2: Appropriate detail assessment of potential impacts, identifying ways to avoid or minimise them.		* Stage 2: Appropriate detail assessment of potential impacts, identifying ways to avoid or minimise them.
	* Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions to achieve the project's objectives reducing adverse impacts.		* Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions to achieve the project's objectives reducing adverse impacts.

Editor at 08:52, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T08:52:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 4 April 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* Stage 1: Screening: Determines if the plan or project is likely to have significant effects on a site.		* Stage 1: Screening: Determines if the plan or project is likely to have significant effects on a site.
	* Stage 2: Appropriate detail assessment of potential impacts, identifying ways to avoid or minimise them.		* Stage 2: Appropriate detail assessment of potential impacts, identifying ways to avoid or minimise them.
−	* Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions:	+	* Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions to achieve the project's objectives reducing adverse impacts.
−	* This stage examines alternative ways of achieving the project's objectives ~~that would avoid or reduce~~ adverse impacts ~~on the European site~~.	+	* Stage 4: Where no feasible alternatives exist, assessment is made see if there are "imperative reasons of overriding public interest" that justify the project, even with its adverse impacts.
−	* Stage 4: ~~IROPI Assessment:~~	+
−	* If no feasible alternatives exist, ~~this stage assesses whether~~ there are "imperative reasons of overriding public interest" that justify the project, even with its adverse impacts.	+

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]

Editor at 08:50, 4 April 2025

2025-04-04T08:50:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 4 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	xx	+	The phrase Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest (IROPI) originates from Article 6(4) of the EU Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC), which was adopted on 21 May, 1992. The phrase means to allow exception to a nature protection regulation if certain conditions are met, which is normally established by a four stage process:
		+
		+	* Stage 1: Screening: Determines if the plan or project is likely to have significant effects on a site.
		+	* Stage 2: Appropriate detail assessment of potential impacts, identifying ways to avoid or minimise them.
		+	* Stage 3: Assessment of alternative solutions:
		+	* This stage examines alternative ways of achieving the project's objectives that would avoid or reduce adverse impacts on the European site.
		+	* Stage 4: IROPI Assessment:
		+	* If no feasible alternatives exist, this stage assesses whether there are "imperative reasons of overriding public interest" that justify the project, even with its adverse impacts.

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]

Editor: moved Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest to Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest IROPI

2025-04-04T08:35:31Z

moved Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest to Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest IROPI

← Older revision

Revision as of 08:35, 4 April 2025

Editor: Created page with "xx Category:Articles_needing_more_work "

2025-04-04T08:35:07Z

Created page with "xx Category:Articles_needing_more_work "

New page

xx

[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]