Greenfield land - Revision history

Editor at 11:33, 29 October 2021

2021-10-29T11:33:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 29 October 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* Deleterious materials.		* Deleterious materials.
	* Demolition.		* Demolition.
		+	* Flood mapping key to future development in Wales.
	* Green belt planning practice guidance.		* Green belt planning practice guidance.
	* Green belt.		* Green belt.
Line 35:		Line 36:
	* Urban sprawl.		* Urban sprawl.

−	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:~~Surrey_Hills_AONB~~]] [[Category:~~Planning_permission~~]] [[Category:~~Sustainability~~]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[Category:Surrey_Hills_AONB]]

Designing Buildings at 11:18, 15 February 2021

2021-02-15T11:18:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 15 February 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* Urban sprawl.		* Urban sprawl.

−	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Surrey_Hills_AONB]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]

Editor: Reverted edits by 151.229.148.53 (talk) to last revision by Designing Buildings

2020-10-29T14:58:36Z

Reverted edits by 151.229.148.53 (talk) to last revision by Designing Buildings

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 29 October 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.		Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.

−	This is ~~ass~~ opposed to 'brownfield land' or ‘previously-developed land’ (PDL), ‘…which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated fixed surface infrastructure.’ (Ref. Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) 2010).	+	This is as opposed to 'brownfield land' or ‘previously-developed land’ (PDL), ‘…which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated fixed surface infrastructure.’ (Ref. Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) 2010).

	The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages '...the effective use of land by reusing land that has been previously developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value...’		The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages '...the effective use of land by reusing land that has been previously developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value...’

151.229.148.53 at 14:18, 29 October 2020

2020-10-29T14:18:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 29 October 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.		Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.

−	This is as opposed to 'brownfield land' or ‘previously-developed land’ (PDL), ‘…which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated fixed surface infrastructure.’ (Ref. Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) 2010).	+	This is ass opposed to 'brownfield land' or ‘previously-developed land’ (PDL), ‘…which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated fixed surface infrastructure.’ (Ref. Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) 2010).

	The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages '...the effective use of land by reusing land that has been previously developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value...’		The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages '...the effective use of land by reusing land that has been previously developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value...’

Designing Buildings at 13:46, 6 October 2020

2020-10-06T13:46:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 6 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[File:Countryside-~~2175353 640~~.jpg]]	+	[[File:Countryside-2175353_640.jpg\|link=File:Countryside-2175353_640.jpg]]

	Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.		Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* Urban sprawl.		* Urban sprawl.

−	[[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]

Designing Buildings at 15:35, 27 March 2020

2020-03-27T15:35:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 27 March 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[File:Countryside-2175353 640.jpg]]
		+
	Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.		Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.

Designing Buildings at 15:32, 27 March 2020

2020-03-27T15:32:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 27 March 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Land that has been developed, is only very rarely reverted back to greenfield land.		Land that has been developed, is only very rarely reverted back to greenfield land.
		+
		+	The term 'pristine greenfield' refers to: 'Land that has not been impacted by humans and maintains thriving viable habitat. Land that has not been developed, but has been altered and degraded through ranching, mono-culture agriculture, crowding, pollution or other means is not considered pristine greenfield...' Ref [https://living-future.org/lbc/ The Living Building Challenge 4.0, A Visionary Path to a Regenerative Future], published by the International Living Future Institute in June 2019.

	Greenfield sites should not be confused with 'green belts'. Green belts establish a buffer zone between urban and rural land, separating town and country and preserving land for forestry, agriculture and wildlife where environmental conditions can be improved and conservation encouraged. Greenfield sites need not be within a green belt.		Greenfield sites should not be confused with 'green belts'. Green belts establish a buffer zone between urban and rural land, separating town and country and preserving land for forestry, agriculture and wildlife where environmental conditions can be improved and conservation encouraged. Greenfield sites need not be within a green belt.
Line 15:		Line 17:
	NB: In 2014, the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) suggested that a new land classification should be created, ‘amberfield land’, which would identify ‘ready to go land’. It suggested that creating a pipeline of ready-to-go amberfield land would increase the supply of housing and create new development opportunities.		NB: In 2014, the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) suggested that a new land classification should be created, ‘amberfield land’, which would identify ‘ready to go land’. It suggested that creating a pipeline of ready-to-go amberfield land would increase the supply of housing and create new development opportunities.

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings ===	+

	* Amberfield land.		* Amberfield land.

Designing Buildings at 10:22, 10 December 2018

2018-12-10T10:22:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 10 December 2018
Line 30:		Line 30:
	* National Planning Policy Framework.		* National Planning Policy Framework.
	* Regeneration.		* Regeneration.
		+	* Types of land.
	* Urban sprawl.		* Urban sprawl.

	[[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]

Editor at 16:27, 20 August 2018

2018-08-20T16:27:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 20 August 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.		Greenfield land (or greenfield sites) is land that is not constrained by existing buildings or infrastructure.

−	This is as opposed to 'brownfield land' or ‘previously-developed land’ (PDL), ‘…which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated fixed surface infrastructure.’ (~~ref~~ Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) 2010).	+	This is as opposed to 'brownfield land' or ‘previously-developed land’ (PDL), ‘…which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including the curtilage of the developed land and any associated fixed surface infrastructure.’ (Ref. Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) 2010).

	The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages '...the effective use of land by reusing land that has been previously developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value...’		The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) encourages '...the effective use of land by reusing land that has been previously developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value...’

−	The Environment Agency suggests that, '~~Concentrating~~ development on brownfield sites can help to make the best use of existing services such as transport and waste management. It can encourage more sustainable lifestyles by providing an opportunity to recycle land, clean up contaminated sites, and assist environmental, social and economic regeneration. It also reduces pressure to build on greenfield land and helps protect the countryside.' (~~ref~~ Environment Agency: Position Paper 2003).	+	The Environment Agency suggests that, 'concentrating development on brownfield sites can help to make the best use of existing services such as transport and waste management. It can encourage more sustainable lifestyles by providing an opportunity to recycle land, clean up contaminated sites, and assist environmental, social and economic regeneration. It also reduces pressure to build on greenfield land and helps protect the countryside.' (Ref. Environment Agency: Position Paper 2003).

	Developers and designers can sometimes instinctively prefer the idea of building on a greenfield site as it can offer a ‘blank canvas’ with fewer constraints and potentially lower costs. However, greenfield sites can come with their own problems, offering few drivers to steer the design in a particular direction, access issues and poor connectivity as well as difficulties with utilities supply, and greater exposure to the elements. They can also result in a loss of amenity land, ecological habitats, biodiversity and agricultural land.		Developers and designers can sometimes instinctively prefer the idea of building on a greenfield site as it can offer a ‘blank canvas’ with fewer constraints and potentially lower costs. However, greenfield sites can come with their own problems, offering few drivers to steer the design in a particular direction, access issues and poor connectivity as well as difficulties with utilities supply, and greater exposure to the elements. They can also result in a loss of amenity land, ecological habitats, biodiversity and agricultural land.
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Greenfield sites should not be confused with 'green belts'. Green belts establish a buffer zone between urban and rural land, separating town and country and preserving land for forestry, agriculture and wildlife where environmental conditions can be improved and conservation encouraged. Greenfield sites need not be within a green belt.		Greenfield sites should not be confused with 'green belts'. Green belts establish a buffer zone between urban and rural land, separating town and country and preserving land for forestry, agriculture and wildlife where environmental conditions can be improved and conservation encouraged. Greenfield sites need not be within a green belt.

−	NB in 2014, the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) suggested that a new land classification should be created, ‘amberfield land’, which would identify ‘ready to go land’. It suggested that creating a pipeline of ready-to-go amberfield land would increase the supply of housing and create new development opportunities.	+	NB: In 2014, the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) suggested that a new land classification should be created, ‘amberfield land’, which would identify ‘ready to go land’. It suggested that creating a pipeline of ready-to-go amberfield land would increase the supply of housing and create new development opportunities.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* Green belt planning practice guidance.		* Green belt planning practice guidance.
	* Green belt.		* Green belt.
		+	* Land.
	* National Planning Policy Framework.		* National Planning Policy Framework.
	* Regeneration.		* Regeneration.

Editor at 13:41, 28 August 2017

2017-08-28T13:41:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 28 August 2017
Line 29:		Line 29:
	* National Planning Policy Framework.		* National Planning Policy Framework.
	* Regeneration.		* Regeneration.
		+	* Urban sprawl.

	[[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]		[[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Sustainability]]