Future flood prevention - Revision history

Editor at 17:07, 10 February 2022

2022-02-10T17:07:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 10 February 2022
Line 45:		Line 45:
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

		+	* Adaptive pathways.
	* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.		* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.
	* BREEAM Flood risk management.		* BREEAM Flood risk management.

Editor at 17:19, 4 February 2022

2022-02-04T17:19:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 4 February 2022
Line 37:		Line 37:
	= Government response =		= Government response =

−	On 24 January 2017, the select committee published [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmenvfru/926/92602.htm Future flood prevention: Government's response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2016-17]. The report criticised the government for not taking up its recommendations and called on the ~~DEFRA~~ to provide greater safeguards and assurance to local communities through stronger planning rules and improvements to flood insurance coverage. It also suggested the government should develop robust long-term plans and fundamentally overhaul the governance and streamline the delivery of flood risk management.	+	On 24 January 2017, the select committee published [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmenvfru/926/92602.htm Future flood prevention: Government's response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2016-17]. The report criticised the government for not taking up its recommendations and called on the Defra to provide greater safeguards and assurance to local communities through stronger planning rules and improvements to flood insurance coverage. It also suggested the government should develop robust long-term plans and fundamentally overhaul the governance and streamline the delivery of flood risk management.

	Jim Fitzpatrick MP, Acting Chair of the committee, said:		Jim Fitzpatrick MP, Acting Chair of the committee, said:
Line 43:		Line 43:
	“Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."		“Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.		* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.
Line 56:		Line 56:
	* Flood risk.		* Flood risk.
	* Flood risk management plan.		* Flood risk management plan.
		+	* Lead local flood authorities LLFAs.
	* Pitt review.		* Pitt review.
	* Planning for floods.		* Planning for floods.

Designing Buildings at 07:00, 25 November 2020

2020-11-25T07:00:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 25 November 2020
Line 62:		Line 62:
	* Water engineering.		* Water engineering.

−	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Water]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:DCN_Report]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Water]]

Designing Buildings at 07:58, 21 April 2019

2019-04-21T07:58:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:58, 21 April 2019
Line 47:		Line 47:
	* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.		* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.
	* BREEAM Flood risk management.		* BREEAM Flood risk management.
		+	* BS 851188.
	* Catchment flood management plans.		* Catchment flood management plans.
	* Coastal defences.		* Coastal defences.

Designing Buildings at 14:06, 29 March 2019

2019-03-29T14:06:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 29 March 2019
Line 61:		Line 61:
	* Water engineering.		* Water engineering.

−	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]]	+	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Water]]

Designing Buildings at 16:17, 12 February 2019

2019-02-12T16:17:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 12 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	= Introduction =
		+
	On 28 October 2016, the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee published [https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/news-parliament-2015/future-flood-prevention-report-published-16-17/ Future flood prevention], a report calling for changes to flood management in England to tackle the rising threat posed by climate change.		On 28 October 2016, the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee published [https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/news-parliament-2015/future-flood-prevention-report-published-16-17/ Future flood prevention], a report calling for changes to flood management in England to tackle the rising threat posed by climate change.

Line 41:		Line 43:
	“Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."		“Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===	+

	* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.		* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.
Line 50:		Line 50:
	* Coastal defences.		* Coastal defences.
	* Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee.		* Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee.
		+	* Flood.
	* Flood and Water Management Act.		* Flood and Water Management Act.
	* Flood defences.		* Flood defences.

Designing Buildings at 10:05, 16 September 2018

2018-09-16T10:05:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 16 September 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===

		+	* Applying flood resilience technologies GG 84.
	* BREEAM Flood risk management.		* BREEAM Flood risk management.
	* Catchment flood management plans.		* Catchment flood management plans.
Line 55:		Line 56:
	* Pitt review.		* Pitt review.
	* Planning for floods.		* Planning for floods.
−	* Rainwater harvesting.
	* River engineering.		* River engineering.
	* Sustainable urban drainage systems.		* Sustainable urban drainage systems.
−	* Sustainability.
	* Water engineering.		* Water engineering.

	[[Category:Publications_/_reports]]		[[Category:Publications_/_reports]]

Designing Buildings at 08:34, 27 April 2018

2018-04-27T08:34:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:34, 27 April 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===

		+	* BREEAM Flood risk management.
	* Catchment flood management plans.		* Catchment flood management plans.
	* Coastal defences.		* Coastal defences.
Line 52:		Line 53:
	* Flood risk.		* Flood risk.
	* Flood risk management plan.		* Flood risk management plan.
−	* Future proofing.
−	* Hex House project.
−	* Highway drainage.
	* Pitt review.		* Pitt review.
	* Planning for floods.		* Planning for floods.
	* Rainwater harvesting.		* Rainwater harvesting.
	* River engineering.		* River engineering.
−	* Select committee.
	* Sustainable urban drainage systems.		* Sustainable urban drainage systems.
	* Sustainability.		* Sustainability.

Editor at 16:15, 30 December 2017

2017-12-30T16:15:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 30 December 2017
Line 37:		Line 37:
	On 24 January 2017, the select committee published [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmenvfru/926/92602.htm Future flood prevention: Government's response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2016-17]. The report criticised the government for not taking up its recommendations and called on the DEFRA to provide greater safeguards and assurance to local communities through stronger planning rules and improvements to flood insurance coverage. It also suggested the government should develop robust long-term plans and fundamentally overhaul the governance and streamline the delivery of flood risk management.		On 24 January 2017, the select committee published [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmenvfru/926/92602.htm Future flood prevention: Government's response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2016-17]. The report criticised the government for not taking up its recommendations and called on the DEFRA to provide greater safeguards and assurance to local communities through stronger planning rules and improvements to flood insurance coverage. It also suggested the government should develop robust long-term plans and fundamentally overhaul the governance and streamline the delivery of flood risk management.

−	Jim Fitzpatrick MP, Acting Chair of the committee, said: “Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."	+	Jim Fitzpatrick MP, Acting Chair of the committee, said:
		+
		+	“Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =
Line 47:		Line 49:
	* Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee.		* Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee.
	* Flood and Water Management Act.		* Flood and Water Management Act.
		+	* Flood defences.
	* Flood risk.		* Flood risk.
	* Flood risk management plan.		* Flood risk management plan.

Designing Buildings at 10:20, 24 January 2017

2017-01-24T10:20:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, 24 January 2017
Line 33:		Line 33:
	"Our proposed model would streamline roles and pool expertise to allow bodies to deliver their unique roles. Funding would be firmly linked to outcomes: the Commissioner would hold the new English Rivers and Coastal Authority to account on whether it spends its budgets efficiently - whether by directly undertaking work or by commissioning projects from catchment partnerships or Internal Drainage Boards. New Regional Boards would enable a close link between national plans and local aims."		"Our proposed model would streamline roles and pool expertise to allow bodies to deliver their unique roles. Funding would be firmly linked to outcomes: the Commissioner would hold the new English Rivers and Coastal Authority to account on whether it spends its budgets efficiently - whether by directly undertaking work or by commissioning projects from catchment partnerships or Internal Drainage Boards. New Regional Boards would enable a close link between national plans and local aims."

−	~~On 24 January 2017, the committee published [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmenvfru/926/92602.htm Future flood prevention:~~ Government's response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2016-17]. The report criticised the government for not taking up its recommendations and called on the DEFRA to provide greater safeguards and assurance to local communities through stronger planning rules and improvements to flood insurance coverage. It also suggested the government should develop robust long-term plans and fundamentally overhaul the governance and streamline the delivery of flood risk management.	+	= Government response =

−	Jim Fitzpatrick MP, Acting Chair of the ~~Committee~~, said: “Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."	+	On 24 January 2017, the select committee published [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmenvfru/926/92602.htm Future flood prevention: Government's response to the Committee's Second Report of Session 2016-17]. The report criticised the government for not taking up its recommendations and called on the DEFRA to provide greater safeguards and assurance to local communities through stronger planning rules and improvements to flood insurance coverage. It also suggested the government should develop robust long-term plans and fundamentally overhaul the governance and streamline the delivery of flood risk management.
		+
		+	Jim Fitzpatrick MP, Acting Chair of the committee, said: “Defra has failed to give sufficient justification for its rejection of our recommendations for important new measures to improve flood protection. Ministers must give us more detailed information on how the Government is using its £2.5 billion flood defence budget to slow the flow of water across river catchments so as to stop communities flooding in future. Ministers must also update us on their actions to ensure that the insurance, planning and building regulation regimes reduce flood risk and improve property resilience."

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =