Equitable estoppel - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:18, 20 January 2021

2021-01-20T07:18:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 20 January 2021
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* Modifying clauses in standard forms of contract.		* Modifying clauses in standard forms of contract.

−	[[Category:~~Case_law~~]] [[Category:~~DCN_Case_Law~~]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Case_Law]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]

Designing Buildings at 10:53, 15 March 2019

2019-03-15T10:53:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 15 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Equitable Estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person to act in a certain way, which resulted in the other person being injured in some way.		Equitable Estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person to act in a certain way, which resulted in the other person being injured in some way.

−	If a party leads another party to believe that he will not enforce ~~his~~ strict legal rights, then the Courts will prevent ~~him~~ from doing so at a later stage	+	If a party leads another party to believe that they will not enforce their strict legal rights, then the Courts will prevent them from doing so at a later stage.

−	Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an ~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_contract_law~~ English contract law~~] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion~~ decision] in the ~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice~~ High Court]. It reaffirmed and extended the doctrine of ~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel#Promissory_estoppel_2~~ promissory estoppel] in contract law in England and Wales. However, the most significant part of the judgment is ~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obiter_dicta~~ obiter dicta] as it relates to hypothetical facts; that is, the landlord did not seek repayment of the full wartime rent.	+	Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an English contract law decision in the High Court. It reaffirmed and extended the doctrine of promissory estoppel in contract law in England and Wales. However, the most significant part of the judgment is obiter dicta as it relates to hypothetical facts; that is, the landlord did not seek repayment of the full wartime rent.

−	~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning~~ Denning J] held estoppel to be applicable if ...	+	Denning J held estoppel to be applicable if ...

	... a promise was made which was intended to create legal relations and which, to the knowledge of the person making the promise, was going to be acted on by the person to whom it was made and which was in fact so acted on.		... a promise was made which was intended to create legal relations and which, to the knowledge of the person making the promise, was going to be acted on by the person to whom it was made and which was in fact so acted on.

−	[[Category:~~Articles_needing_more_work~~]]	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki: =
		+
		+	* Agency.
		+	* Collateral Warranty.
		+	* Construction contract.
		+	* Contract conditions.
		+	* Contract v tort.
		+	* Contracts under seal.
		+	* Essentials of a contract.
		+	* Estoppel contracts.
		+	* Modifying clauses in standard forms of contract.
		+
		+	[[Category:Case_law]] [[Category:DCN_Case_Law]] [[Category:Contracts_/_payment]]

Designing Buildings at 20:28, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T20:28:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 25 February 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If a party leads another party to believe that he will not enforce his strict legal rights, then the Courts will prevent him from doing so at a later stage		If a party leads another party to believe that he will not enforce his strict legal rights, then the Courts will prevent him from doing so at a later stage

−	Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_contract_law English contract law] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion decision] in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice High Court]. It reaffirmed and extended the doctrine of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel#Promissory_estoppel_2 promissory estoppel] in ~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_law~~ contract law] in ~~[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_and_Wales~~ England and Wales]. However, the most significant part of the judgment is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obiter_dicta obiter dicta] as it relates to hypothetical facts; that is, the landlord did not seek repayment of the full wartime rent.	+	Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_contract_law English contract law] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion decision] in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice High Court]. It reaffirmed and extended the doctrine of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel#Promissory_estoppel_2 promissory estoppel] in contract law in England and Wales. However, the most significant part of the judgment is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obiter_dicta obiter dicta] as it relates to hypothetical facts; that is, the landlord did not seek repayment of the full wartime rent.

	[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning Denning J] held estoppel to be applicable if ...		[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning Denning J] held estoppel to be applicable if ...

Stephen.mckenna@quigggolden.com at 16:07, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T16:07:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:07, 25 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Equitable Estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person to act in a certain way, which resulted in the other person being injured in some way.		Equitable Estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person to act in a certain way, which resulted in the other person being injured in some way.
		+
		+	If a party leads another party to believe that he will not enforce his strict legal rights, then the Courts will prevent him from doing so at a later stage

	Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_contract_law English contract law] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion decision] in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice High Court]. It reaffirmed and extended the doctrine of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel#Promissory_estoppel_2 promissory estoppel] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_law contract law] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_and_Wales England and Wales]. However, the most significant part of the judgment is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obiter_dicta obiter dicta] as it relates to hypothetical facts; that is, the landlord did not seek repayment of the full wartime rent.		Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_contract_law English contract law] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion decision] in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice High Court]. It reaffirmed and extended the doctrine of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel#Promissory_estoppel_2 promissory estoppel] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_law contract law] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_and_Wales England and Wales]. However, the most significant part of the judgment is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obiter_dicta obiter dicta] as it relates to hypothetical facts; that is, the landlord did not seek repayment of the full wartime rent.

Stephen.mckenna@quigggolden.com: Created page with "Equitable Estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has ind..."

2019-02-25T15:55:30Z

Created page with "Equitable Estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has ind..."

New page

Equitable Estoppel is a defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person to act in a certain way, which resulted in the other person being injured in some way.

Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_contract_law English contract law] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion decision] in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_Justice High Court]. It reaffirmed and extended the doctrine of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estoppel#Promissory_estoppel_2 promissory estoppel] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_law contract law] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_and_Wales England and Wales]. However, the most significant part of the judgment is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obiter_dicta obiter dicta] as it relates to hypothetical facts; that is, the landlord did not seek repayment of the full wartime rent.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning Denning J] held estoppel to be applicable if ...

... a promise was made which was intended to create legal relations and which, to the knowledge of the person making the promise, was going to be acted on by the person to whom it was made and which was in fact so acted on.

[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]