Designing Buildings Wiki user feedback survey 2018 - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:14, 4 February 2021

2021-02-04T07:14:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 4 February 2021
Line 47:		Line 47:
	We were left with one final suggestion to ponder '...why don't you pick another industry and do it again?'		We were left with one final suggestion to ponder '...why don't you pick another industry and do it again?'

−	[[Category:Do_not_autolink]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Dataset]] [[Category:DCN_News]] [[Category:Do_not_autolink]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]]

Designing Buildings: Protected "Designing Buildings Wiki user feedback survey 2018" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2018-06-11T10:47:41Z

Protected "Designing Buildings Wiki user feedback survey 2018" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

← Older revision

Revision as of 10:47, 11 June 2018

Designing Buildings at 10:44, 11 June 2018

2018-06-11T10:44:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 11 June 2018
Line 21:		Line 21:
	98% have never encountered a problem using the site.		98% have never encountered a problem using the site.

−	88% find the information on the site very useful of fairly useful .	+	88% find the information on the site very useful of fairly useful.

	86% either really like, or like the design of the site.		86% either really like, or like the design of the site.
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Generally, the responses people gave open-ended questions were positive, asking for more of the same, and in particular praising the accessibility of the site and and the vast array of links between articles that allow users to navigate intuitively from one piece of information to the another.		Generally, the responses people gave open-ended questions were positive, asking for more of the same, and in particular praising the accessibility of the site and and the vast array of links between articles that allow users to navigate intuitively from one piece of information to the another.

−	But there were also some criticisms:	+	But there were also some suggestions for changes and a few criticisms:

	{\|		{\|
Line 36:		Line 36:
	There were calls for more international information, or information that is not so UK-centric.		There were calls for more international information, or information that is not so UK-centric.

−	There was criticism that some information is not totally up to date, or not detailed enough.	+	There was criticism that some information is not totally up-to-date, or not detailed enough.

	There was criticism that it can take too long to find specific information.		There was criticism that it can take too long to find specific information.
	\|}		\|}

−	We will now go through the responses in detail and see which ones we can take on board as we continue to develop ~~and improve~~ Designing Buildings Wiki. Thank you to everyone that took the time to participate, this feedback is ~~inviable~~ to us in making sure we improve the site in ways that ~~best~~ suit you.	+	We will now go through the responses in detail and see which ones we can take on board as we continue to develop Designing Buildings Wiki. Thank you to everyone that took the time to participate, this feedback is invaluable to us in making sure we improve the site in ways that suit you.

	If there is anything else you would like to tell us, email: [mailto:info@designingbuildings.co.uk info@designingbuildings.co.uk].		If there is anything else you would like to tell us, email: [mailto:info@designingbuildings.co.uk info@designingbuildings.co.uk].

Designing Buildings: moved Designing Buildnigs Wiki user feedback survey 2018 to Designing Buildings Wiki user feedback survey 2018

2018-06-11T10:39:13Z

moved Designing Buildnigs Wiki user feedback survey 2018 to Designing Buildings Wiki user feedback survey 2018

← Older revision

Revision as of 10:39, 11 June 2018

Designing Buildings at 10:38, 11 June 2018

2018-06-11T10:38:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 11 June 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	At the beginning of June 2018, we ran a ~~quick~~ user survey to find out what you love about Designing Buildings Wiki, what you hate about it, and what you would like us to change. This feedback will help us improve the site so that you get more what you want and less of what you don’t.	+	At the beginning of June 2018, we ran a user survey to find out what you love about Designing Buildings Wiki, what you hate about it, and what you would like us to change. This feedback will help us improve the site so that you get more of what you want and less of what you don’t.

	{\|		{\|
−	\| ~~[[File:Survey_participants~~.~~png\|link=File:Survey_participants.png]]~~	+	\| Participants came from a diverse range of backgrounds, but the vast majority were designers or consultants.
	\|-		\|-
−	\| ~~Participants came from a diverse range of backgrounds, but the cast majority were designers or consultants~~.	+	\| [[File:Survey_participants.png\|link=File:Survey_participants.png]]
	\|}		\|}

−	Nearly two thirds of the respondents had found the site through a google search~~. Most of them respondents~~ now use ~~the site~~ at least every week~~, either~~ to carry out research , or to improve their understanding of the industry.	+	Nearly two thirds of the respondents had found the site through a google search, and most now use it at least every week to carry out research or to improve their understanding of the industry.

	Starting with the good news:		Starting with the good news:
Line 21:		Line 21:
	98% have never encountered a problem using the site.		98% have never encountered a problem using the site.

−	88% find the information on the site ~~fairly useful or~~ very useful.	+	88% find the information on the site very useful of fairly useful .

−	86% either like, or ~~really~~ like the design of the site.	+	86% either really like, or like the design of the site.
	\|}		\|}

−	Generally, the responses people gave ~~the more~~ open-ended questions were positive, asking for more of the same, and in particular praising ~~its~~ accessibility and the links between articles that allow users to navigate intuitively from one ~~article~~ to the ~~next~~.	+	Generally, the responses people gave open-ended questions were positive, asking for more of the same, and in particular praising the accessibility of the site and and the vast array of links between articles that allow users to navigate intuitively from one piece of information to the another.

	But there were also some criticisms:		But there were also some criticisms:
Line 32:		Line 32:
	{\|		{\|
	\|width="100%"\|		\|width="100%"\|
−	~~Sometimes~~ information ~~is not totally up to date~~, ~~or it is not detailed enough~~.	+	There was a demand for more ways of sharing information, through video, images, webinars and forums.

−	There ~~is a demand~~ for more international information, or information that is not so UK-centric.	+	There were calls for more international information, or information that is not so UK-centric.

−	There is ~~also a demand for more ways of communicating information, through video,more images~~, ~~webinars and forums~~.	+	There was criticism that some information is not totally up to date, or not detailed enough.

−	It can take too long to find specific information.	+	There was criticism that it can take too long to find specific information.
	\|}		\|}

	We will now go through the responses in detail and see which ones we can take on board as we continue to develop and improve Designing Buildings Wiki. Thank you to everyone that took the time to participate, this feedback is inviable to us in making sure we improve the site in ways that best suit you.		We will now go through the responses in detail and see which ones we can take on board as we continue to develop and improve Designing Buildings Wiki. Thank you to everyone that took the time to participate, this feedback is inviable to us in making sure we improve the site in ways that best suit you.

−	We were left with one final suggestion to ponder '...pick another industry and do it ~~again…~~'	+	If there is anything else you would like to tell us, email: [mailto:info@designingbuildings.co.uk info@designingbuildings.co.uk].
		+
		+	We were left with one final suggestion to ponder '...why don't you pick another industry and do it again?'

	[[Category:Do_not_autolink]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]]		[[Category:Do_not_autolink]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]]

Designing Buildings at 10:31, 11 June 2018

2018-06-11T10:31:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, 11 June 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:

	{\|		{\|
−	\| [[File:~~Survey participants~~.png]]	+	\| [[File:Survey_participants.png\|link=File:Survey_participants.png]]
	\|-		\|-
	\| Participants came from a diverse range of backgrounds, but the cast majority were designers or consultants.		\| Participants came from a diverse range of backgrounds, but the cast majority were designers or consultants.
Line 12:		Line 12:

	{\|		{\|
−	\|width="100%"\| [[File:~~Survey response~~.png]]	+	\|width="100%"\| [[File:Survey_response.png\|link=File:Survey_response.png]]
	\|-		\|-
	\|		\|
Line 30:		Line 30:
	But there were also some criticisms:		But there were also some criticisms:

−	* Sometimes information is not totally up to date, or it is not detailed enough.	+	{\|
−	* There is a demand for more international information, or information that is not so UK-centric.	+	\|width="100%"\|
−	* There is also a demand for more ways of communicating information, through video,more images, webinars and forums.	+	Sometimes information is not totally up to date, or it is not detailed enough.
−	* It can take too long to find specific information.	+
		+	There is a demand for more international information, or information that is not so UK-centric.
		+
		+	There is also a demand for more ways of communicating information, through video,more images, webinars and forums.
		+
		+	It can take too long to find specific information.
		+	\|}

−	Thank you to everyone that took the time to participate, this feedback is inviable to us in making sure we improve the site in ways that best suit you~~. We will go through the responses in detail and see which ones we can take on board as we continue to develop and improve Designing Buildings Wiki~~.	+	We will now go through the responses in detail and see which ones we can take on board as we continue to develop and improve Designing Buildings Wiki. Thank you to everyone that took the time to participate, this feedback is inviable to us in making sure we improve the site in ways that best suit you.

−	We were left with one final ~~comment, suggesting we~~ pick another industry and do it again…..	+	We were left with one final suggestion to ponder '...pick another industry and do it again…'

−	[[Category:Do_not_autolink]]	+	[[Category:Do_not_autolink]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]]

Designing Buildings: Created page with "At the beginning of June 2018, we ran a quick user survey to find out what you love about Designing Buildings Wiki, what you hate about it, and what you would like us to change. ..."

2018-06-11T10:30:01Z

Created page with "At the beginning of June 2018, we ran a quick user survey to find out what you love about Designing Buildings Wiki, what you hate about it, and what you would like us to change. ..."

New page

At the beginning of June 2018, we ran a quick user survey to find out what you love about Designing Buildings Wiki, what you hate about it, and what you would like us to change. This feedback will help us improve the site so that you get more what you want and less of what you don’t.

{|
| [[File:Survey participants.png]]
|-
| Participants came from a diverse range of backgrounds, but the cast majority were designers or consultants.
|}

Nearly two thirds of the respondents had found the site through a google search. Most of them respondents now use the site at least every week, either to carry out research , or to improve their understanding of the industry.

Starting with the good news:

{|
|width="100%"| [[File:Survey response.png]]
|-
|
100% of the respondents would recommend Designing Buildings Wiki to someone else.

100% find it very easy or fairly easy to find information on the site.

98% have never encountered a problem using the site.

88% find the information on the site fairly useful or very useful.

86% either like, or really like the design of the site.
|}

Generally, the responses people gave the more open-ended questions were positive, asking for more of the same, and in particular praising its accessibility and the links between articles that allow users to navigate intuitively from one article to the next.

But there were also some criticisms:

* Sometimes information is not totally up to date, or it is not detailed enough.
* There is a demand for more international information, or information that is not so UK-centric.
* There is also a demand for more ways of communicating information, through video,more images, webinars and forums.
* It can take too long to find specific information.

Thank you to everyone that took the time to participate, this feedback is inviable to us in making sure we improve the site in ways that best suit you. We will go through the responses in detail and see which ones we can take on board as we continue to develop and improve Designing Buildings Wiki.

We were left with one final comment, suggesting we pick another industry and do it again…..

[[Category:Do_not_autolink]]