Contracts under seal v under hand - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 10:37, 17 July 2024

2024-07-17T10:37:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 17 July 2024
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.		Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* Articles of agreement.		* Articles of agreement.
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* Contract claims.		* Contract claims.
	* Construction contract.		* Construction contract.
		+	* ESignatures.
	* Engrossment.		* Engrossment.
	* Letter of award.		* Letter of award.

Designing Buildings at 07:53, 28 August 2020

2020-08-28T07:53:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:53, 28 August 2020
Line 48:		Line 48:
	* [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/40/schedule/17 Companies Act 1989].		* [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/40/schedule/17 Companies Act 1989].

−	[[Category:~~Other_legislation~~]] [[Category:DCN_Legislation]] [[Category:Property_law]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Legislation]] [[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:Property_law]]

165.225.80.165 at 14:06, 25 July 2019

2019-07-25T14:06:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 25 July 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:
	= Legislation =		= Legislation =

−	Much of the law relating to the execution of deeds was swept away on 31 ~~]uly~~ 1990 by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 dealing with the execution of deeds by individuals, and by the Companies Act 1989 dealing with the execution of deeds by companies.	+	Much of the law relating to the execution of deeds was swept away on 31 July 1990 by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 dealing with the execution of deeds by individuals, and by the Companies Act 1989 dealing with the execution of deeds by companies.

	Section 1(3) of the Act provides that a deed must be signed by the person who is to be bound and the signature must be attested by a witness. If this procedure is not followed then the document will not be valid as a deed.		Section 1(3) of the Act provides that a deed must be signed by the person who is to be bound and the signature must be attested by a witness. If this procedure is not followed then the document will not be valid as a deed.
Line 48:		Line 48:
	* [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/40/schedule/17 Companies Act 1989].		* [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/40/schedule/17 Companies Act 1989].

−	[[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:Property_law]]	+	[[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:DCN_Legislation]] [[Category:Property_law]]

Editor at 14:02, 29 October 2018

2018-10-29T14:02:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 29 October 2018
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.		Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.

−	~~= Find out more =~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =
−		+
−	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===	+

	* Articles of agreement.		* Articles of agreement.
Line 43:		Line 41:
	* Litigation.		* Litigation.
	* Technology and Construction Court.		* Technology and Construction Court.
		+	* Title.

	=== External references ===		=== External references ===

Editor at 14:54, 8 March 2018

2018-03-08T14:54:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 8 March 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	There are two important differences between simple contracts, and contracts that are under seal (deeds):		There are two important differences between simple contracts, and contracts that are under seal (deeds):

−	Firstly, simple contracts and contracts under seal have different limitation periods. An action founded on simple contract cannot be brought after six years from the date on which the cause of the action accrued. The limitation period for a contract under seal is 12 years.	+	Firstly, simple contracts and contracts under seal have different limitation periods. An action founded on a simple contract cannot be brought after six years from the date on which the cause of the action accrued. The limitation period for a contract under seal is 12 years.

	Secondly, unlike a simple contract, a contract under seal does not have to be supported by valuable consideration.		Secondly, unlike a simple contract, a contract under seal does not have to be supported by valuable consideration.

Editor at 17:43, 8 January 2018

2018-01-08T17:43:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 8 January 2018
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The Act does not abolish the old common law rule that to be effective a deed must be delivered by the person who is to be bound. Delivery does not mean the physical handing over of the document but the evincing of an intention, whether by words or conduct, that the party is to be bound. Such intention was satisfied prior to the Act by signature and it is submitted that signature will continue to satisfy the requirement of delivery.		The Act does not abolish the old common law rule that to be effective a deed must be delivered by the person who is to be bound. Delivery does not mean the physical handing over of the document but the evincing of an intention, whether by words or conduct, that the party is to be bound. Such intention was satisfied prior to the Act by signature and it is submitted that signature will continue to satisfy the requirement of delivery.

−	Companies may still use their seals to execute a deed provided that this is in accordance with their Articles of Association. Section 130 of the Companies Act 1989 introducing a new section 36(a) to the Companies Act 1985 provides by sub-section 4 that if a document is signed by a director and the secretary of the company or by two directors of the company and is expressed (in whatever form of words) to be executed by the company it will have the same effect as if it had been executed under the common seal of the company, i.e a deed.	+	Companies may still use their seals to execute a deed provided that this is in accordance with their Articles of Association. Section 130 of the Companies Act 1989 introducing a new section 36(a) to the Companies Act 1985 provides by sub-section 4 that if a document is signed by a director and the secretary of the company or by two directors of the company and is expressed (in whatever form of words) to be executed by the company it will have the same effect as if it had been executed under the common seal of the company, i.e. a deed.

	Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.		Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.
Line 40:		Line 40:
	* Construction contract.		* Construction contract.
	* Engrossment.		* Engrossment.
		+	* Letter of award.
	* Litigation.		* Litigation.
	* Technology and Construction Court.		* Technology and Construction Court.

Editor at 16:18, 22 December 2017

2017-12-22T16:18:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 22 December 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Firstly, simple contracts and contracts under seal have different limitation periods. An action founded on simple contract cannot be brought after six years from the date on which the cause of the action accrued. The limitation period for a contract under seal is 12 years.		Firstly, simple contracts and contracts under seal have different limitation periods. An action founded on simple contract cannot be brought after six years from the date on which the cause of the action accrued. The limitation period for a contract under seal is 12 years.

−	Secondly, unlike a simple contract, a contract under seal does not have to be supported by valuable consideration. For example, where a collateral warranty consists of unilateral undertakings by one party, the contract must be a contract under seal if it is to be enforceable. It is important to note that whilst consideration is not necessary for a contract under seal in the absence of valuable consideration and, arguably, in the absence of something more than mere nominal consideration, the remedy of specific performance will not be available in respect of the contractual undertakings (~~See~~ Milroy V. Lord). Specific performance is an equitable remedy requiring the contract breaker to fulfil their contractual obligations, rather than awarding damages for breach. Equity does not assist a volunteer, hence the need for consideration. It is suggested that a deed, which relies on merely nominal consideration, could be rescued by the addition of a consideration, which consists of ‘the mutual undertakings’ of the parties to a deed.	+	Secondly, unlike a simple contract, a contract under seal does not have to be supported by valuable consideration.
		+
		+	For example, where a collateral warranty consists of unilateral undertakings by one party, the contract must be a contract under seal if it is to be enforceable. It is important to note that whilst consideration is not necessary for a contract under seal in the absence of valuable consideration and, arguably, in the absence of something more than mere nominal consideration, the remedy of specific performance will not be available in respect of the contractual undertakings (see Milroy v Lord).
		+
		+	Specific performance is an equitable remedy requiring the contract breaker to fulfil their contractual obligations, rather than awarding damages for breach. Equity does not assist a volunteer, hence the need for consideration. It is suggested that a deed, which relies on merely nominal consideration, could be rescued by the addition of a consideration, which consists of ‘the mutual undertakings’ of the parties to a deed.

	= Legislation =		= Legislation =
Line 21:		Line 25:
	The Act does not abolish the old common law rule that to be effective a deed must be delivered by the person who is to be bound. Delivery does not mean the physical handing over of the document but the evincing of an intention, whether by words or conduct, that the party is to be bound. Such intention was satisfied prior to the Act by signature and it is submitted that signature will continue to satisfy the requirement of delivery.		The Act does not abolish the old common law rule that to be effective a deed must be delivered by the person who is to be bound. Delivery does not mean the physical handing over of the document but the evincing of an intention, whether by words or conduct, that the party is to be bound. Such intention was satisfied prior to the Act by signature and it is submitted that signature will continue to satisfy the requirement of delivery.

−	Companies may still use their seals to execute a deed provided that this is in accordance with their Articles of Association. Section 130 of the Companies Act 1989 introducing a new section 36(a) to the Companies Act 1985 provides by sub-section 4 that if a document is signed by a director and the secretary of the company or by two directors of the company and is expressed (in whatever form of words) to be executed by the company it will have the same effect as if it had been executed under the common seal of the company, i.e a deed. Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.	+	Companies may still use their seals to execute a deed provided that this is in accordance with their Articles of Association. Section 130 of the Companies Act 1989 introducing a new section 36(a) to the Companies Act 1985 provides by sub-section 4 that if a document is signed by a director and the secretary of the company or by two directors of the company and is expressed (in whatever form of words) to be executed by the company it will have the same effect as if it had been executed under the common seal of the company, i.e a deed.
		+
		+	Further, sub-section 5 provides that a document which makes it clear on its wording that it is intended to be a deed has the effect of a deed even though the specific requirements for execution dealt with in sub-section 4 above are not complied with. For example, a document that is described as a deed and is executed by one director of the company will operate as a deed. Extreme care must be taken to ensure, if it is intended only to create a simple contract, that a company giving a collateral warranty does not accidentally execute the document in such a manner as to give rise to a deed.

	= Find out more =		= Find out more =

Editor at 09:53, 21 January 2016

2016-01-21T09:53:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:53, 21 January 2016
Line 27:		Line 27:
	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===

		+	* Articles of agreement.
	* Breach of contract.		* Breach of contract.
	* Causes of construction disputes.		* Causes of construction disputes.

Designing Buildings at 08:44, 13 December 2015

2015-12-13T08:44:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 13 December 2015
Line 31:		Line 31:
	* Collateral warranties.		* Collateral warranties.
	* Contract claims.		* Contract claims.
−	* ~~Contract~~.	+	* Construction contract.
		+	* Engrossment.
	* Litigation.		* Litigation.
	* Technology and Construction Court.		* Technology and Construction Court.

195.167.178.194 at 14:50, 3 December 2015

2015-12-03T14:50:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 3 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−
	= Introduction =		= Introduction =

Line 27:		Line 26:

	=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===		=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===
−	*Breach of contract.	+
−	*Causes of construction disputes.	+	* Breach of contract.
−	*Collateral warranties.	+	* Causes of construction disputes.
−	*Contract claims.	+	* Collateral warranties.
−	*Contract.	+	* Contract claims.
−	*Litigation.	+	* Contract.
−	*Technology and Construction Court.	+	* Litigation.
		+	* Technology and Construction Court.

	=== External references ===		=== External references ===
−	*[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/34/contents Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989].
−	*[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/40/schedule/17 Companies Act 1989].

−	[[Category:Other_legislation]]	+	* [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/34/contents Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989].
−	[[Category:Property_law]]	+	* [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/40/schedule/17 Companies Act 1989].
		+
		+	[[Category:Other_legislation]] [[Category:Property_law]]