Construction knowledge survey results - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 08:10, 30 December 2020

2020-12-30T08:10:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:10, 30 December 2020
Line 125:		Line 125:
	[[Construction_knowledge_task_group\|Find out more about the Construction Knowledge Task Group]].		[[Construction_knowledge_task_group\|Find out more about the Construction Knowledge Task Group]].

−	[[Category:Do_not_autolink]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Dataset]] [[Category:DCN_News]] [[Category:Do_not_autolink]]

Designing Buildings at 16:43, 7 January 2019

2019-01-07T16:43:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 7 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~DRAFT FOR COMMENT~~
−
	{\|		{\|
	\|width="100%"\| [[File:Cktg_Logo_3.png\|link=File:Cktg_Logo_3.png]]		\|width="100%"\| [[File:Cktg_Logo_3.png\|link=File:Cktg_Logo_3.png]]

Designing Buildings at 09:03, 17 December 2018

2018-12-17T09:03:47Z

Designing Buildings at 07:40, 17 December 2018

2018-12-17T07:40:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:40, 17 December 2018
Line 52:		Line 52:
	Although it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions based on these small sample sizes, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently, with the most frequent users of knowledge referring to it more than 4 times as often as the least frequent users.		Although it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions based on these small sample sizes, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently, with the most frequent users of knowledge referring to it more than 4 times as often as the least frequent users.

−	[[File:~~CKTG survey 2 professions frequency graph v3~~.png]]	+	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v3.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v3.png]]

	In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more formal ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.		In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more formal ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.
Line 116:		Line 116:

	{\|		{\|
−	\| []	+	\| [[File:Knowledge maturity levels v2.png]]
	\|-		\|-
	\| Using the analogy of [[BIM_maturity_levels\|BIM maturity levels]], knowledge needs to be moved from level 1 to at least level 2.		\| Using the analogy of [[BIM_maturity_levels\|BIM maturity levels]], knowledge needs to be moved from level 1 to at least level 2.

Designing Buildings at 07:28, 17 December 2018

2018-12-17T07:28:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 17 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	DRAFT FOR COMMENT
		+
	{\|		{\|
	\|width="100%"\| [[File:Cktg_Logo_3.png\|link=File:Cktg_Logo_3.png]]		\|width="100%"\| [[File:Cktg_Logo_3.png\|link=File:Cktg_Logo_3.png]]
Line 50:		Line 52:
	Although it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions based on these small sample sizes, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently, with the most frequent users of knowledge referring to it more than 4 times as often as the least frequent users.		Although it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions based on these small sample sizes, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently, with the most frequent users of knowledge referring to it more than 4 times as often as the least frequent users.

−	[]	+	[[File:CKTG survey 2 professions frequency graph v3.png]]

	In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more formal ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.		In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more formal ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.

Designing Buildings at 07:23, 17 December 2018

2018-12-17T07:23:50Z

Designing Buildings at 07:16, 17 December 2018

2018-12-17T07:16:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 17 December 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* A third of practitioners do not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job.		* A third of practitioners do not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job.
	* Practitioners find cost and sign-up forms significant barriers to accessing the knowledge they trust, so they use free-to-access knowledge sources instead, even though they don’t trust them as much.		* Practitioners find cost and sign-up forms significant barriers to accessing the knowledge they trust, so they use free-to-access knowledge sources instead, even though they don’t trust them as much.
		+	* Practitioners are overwhelmed by the amount of knowledge available and frustrated by its fragmentation.
	* There is a ‘them and us’ culture separating those that are in the knowledge loop and those that are not.		* There is a ‘them and us’ culture separating those that are in the knowledge loop and those that are not.
	* Knowledge needs to follow the example of data and information, which BIM has taken into the 21st century.		* Knowledge needs to follow the example of data and information, which BIM has taken into the 21st century.

Designing Buildings at 07:13, 17 December 2018

2018-12-17T07:13:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 17 December 2018
Line 47:		Line 47:
	The frequency with which different types of practitioner refer to knowledge was analysed. However, the number of respondents from some groups was very low and so these results should be treated with caution.		The frequency with which different types of practitioner refer to knowledge was analysed. However, the number of respondents from some groups was very low and so these results should be treated with caution.

−	Although it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently, with the most frequent users of knowledge referring to ~~knowledge~~ more than 4 times as often as the least frequent users.	+	Although it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions based on these small sample sizes, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently, with the most frequent users of knowledge referring to it more than 4 times as often as the least frequent users.

−	[~~[File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v2.png]~~]	+	[]

	In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more formal ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.		In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more formal ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.
Line 55:		Line 55:
	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png]]

−	Other types of knowledge ~~that~~ respondents say they refer to include; data, indices, market research, project information, and personal experience.	+	Other types of knowledge respondents say they refer to include; data, indices, market research, project information, and personal experience.

	= What are the most popular sources of knowledge? =		= What are the most popular sources of knowledge? =

−	~~Inevitably, the~~ internet is the most frequently-used source of knowledge, with web searches and free online sources accounting for almost 50% of the knowledge accessed.	+	The internet is the most frequently-used source of knowledge, with web searches and free online sources accounting for almost 50% of the knowledge accessed.

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_sources_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_sources_graph_v4.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_sources_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_sources_graph_v4.png]]
Line 76:		Line 76:

	* Newsletters, social media (in particular Linkedin), forums and video.		* Newsletters, social media (in particular Linkedin), forums and video.
−	* Specialists, suppliers~~, consultants~~ and networks.	+	* Specialists, suppliers and consultants.
		+	* Personal or corporate networks.
	* Government resources.		* Government resources.

Designing Buildings at 07:06, 17 December 2018

2018-12-17T07:06:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 17 December 2018
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\| [[File:Knowledge_pyramid_orange.png\|link=File:Knowledge_pyramid_orange.png]]		\| [[File:Knowledge_pyramid_orange.png\|link=File:Knowledge_pyramid_orange.png]]
	\|-		\|-
−	\| Knowledge is distinct from data and information in that it has been organised so it can be applied.	+	\| Knowledge is distinct from data and information in that it has been organised so that it can be applied.
	\|}		\|}

−	During November 2018, construction industry practitioners were invited to take part in a survey, created by the [[Construction_knowledge_task_group\|Construction Knowledge Task Group (CKTG)]] to help understand how ~~construction~~ knowledge is ~~currently~~ used by the industry, and how it can be improved.	+	During November 2018, construction industry practitioners were invited to take part in a survey created by the [[Construction_knowledge_task_group\|Construction Knowledge Task Group (CKTG)]] to help understand how knowledge is used by the industry and how it can be improved.

−	The survey was prepared following [[Fit_for_purpose_-_Big_data_reveals_the_construction_knowledge_gap\|research carried out in 2017]] and a series of follow-up meetings in 2018 that suggested the emergence of the internet and digital technologies mean ~~that~~ the way knowledge is prepared, formatted and disseminated needs to change. Whilst the advent of BIM has taken data and information into the 21st century, knowledge is still prepared and shared as it if is going to be printed~~, to~~ sit on a shelf.	+	The survey was prepared following [[Fit_for_purpose_-_Big_data_reveals_the_construction_knowledge_gap\|research carried out in 2017]] and a series of follow-up meetings in 2018 that suggested the emergence of the internet and digital technologies mean the way knowledge is prepared, formatted and disseminated needs to change. Whilst the advent of BIM has taken data and information into the 21st century, knowledge is still prepared and shared as it if is going to be printed and will sit on a shelf.

−	The survey was intended to obtain quantitative and qualitative feedback from practitioners about the types of knowledge they use, where they find it, ~~how much~~ they trust it, what ~~the~~ barriers ~~are to using~~ it ~~and what can~~ be ~~done to improve it~~. It was distributed to the membership and other networks of the organisations in that form the [[Construction_knowledge_task_group\|CKTG]].	+	The survey was intended to obtain quantitative and qualitative feedback from practitioners about the types of knowledge they use, where they find it, whether they trust it, what barriers they encounter and how it might be improved. It was distributed to the membership and other networks of the organisations that form the [[Construction_knowledge_task_group\|CKTG]].

	= Who took part =		= Who took part =

−	299 practitioners completed the survey, including surveyors, project managers, engineers, architects and many more. ~~This~~ sample ~~size is~~ large and diverse enough to allow reasonable conclusions to be drawn about the state of knowledge across the construction industry.	+	299 practitioners completed the survey, including surveyors, project managers, engineers, architects and many more. The sample was large and diverse enough to allow reasonable conclusions to be drawn about the state of knowledge across the construction industry.

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_profession_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_profession_graph_v4.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_profession_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_profession_graph_v4.png]]

−	The vast majority were from the UK (86%), and 87% were members of industry institutes or associations ~~(some may~~ not have ~~been aware of corporate memberships)~~.	+	The vast majority of respondents were from the UK (86%), and 87% were members of industry institutes or associations. It is likely that many also benefit from corporate memberships that they might not have listed.

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_membership_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_membership_graph_v2.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_membership_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_membership_graph_v2.png]]

Designing Buildings at 13:36, 16 December 2018

2018-12-16T13:36:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 16 December 2018
Line 39:		Line 39:
	= The results =		= The results =

−	In response to the main headline question, more than a third of practitioners admitted that they did not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job. This begs the question – are they doing some knowledge, and if so, how critical is it?	+	In response to the main headline question, more than a third of practitioners admitted that they did not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job. This begs the question – are they doing without some knowledge, and if so, how critical is it?

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 17 December 2018
Line 8:		Line 8:

	* A third of practitioners do not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job.		* A third of practitioners do not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job.
−	* Practitioners find cost and sign-up forms significant barriers to accessing the knowledge they trust, so they use free-to-access knowledge ~~sources~~ instead~~, even though they don’t trust them as much~~.	+	* Practitioners find cost and sign-up forms significant barriers to accessing the knowledge they trust, so they use less trustworthy, free-to-access knowledge instead.
	* Practitioners are overwhelmed by the amount of knowledge available and frustrated by its fragmentation.		* Practitioners are overwhelmed by the amount of knowledge available and frustrated by its fragmentation.
	* There is a ‘them and us’ culture separating those that are in the knowledge loop and those that are not.		* There is a ‘them and us’ culture separating those that are in the knowledge loop and those that are not.
Line 42:		Line 42:
	= The results =		= The results =

−	In response to the main headline question, more than a third of practitioners admitted ~~that~~ they did not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job. This begs the question – are they doing without some knowledge, and if so, how critical is it?	+	In response to the main headline question, more than a third of practitioners admitted they did not have easy access to all the knowledge they need to do their job. This begs the question – are they doing without some knowledge, and if so, how critical is it?

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_easy_access_graph.png]]
Line 48:		Line 48:
	= What knowledge do people use? =		= What knowledge do people use? =

−	The frequency with which different types of practitioner refer to knowledge was analysed~~. However, the number of respondents from some groups was very low and so these results should be treated with caution~~.	+	The frequency with which different types of practitioner refer to knowledge was analysed.

−	~~Although~~ it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions based on these small sample sizes, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently~~, with the most frequent users of knowledge referring to it more than 4 times as often as the least frequent users~~.	+	The number of respondents from some groups was very low and so these results should be treated with caution. However, whilst it is not possible to draw absolute conclusions based on these small sample sizes, very broadly it appears that the most frequent consumers of knowledge are designers, whilst decision makers use knowledge least frequently.

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v3.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v3.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v3.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_professions_frequency_graph_v3.png]]

−	In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more ~~formal~~ ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.	+	In response to the question 'what types of knowledge do you refer to?' practitioners appear to access practical knowledge that is necessary for their day-to-day activities most frequently. This backs up the research carried out in 2017 which suggested people are searching for answers to help them solve problems or to understand the industry better. Knowledge that is imparts more traditional ‘learning’ is accessed less frequently.

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_types_graph_v4.png]]
Line 89:		Line 89:
	The main barrier was simply not being aware of what is out there, with respondents' comments suggesting they are overwhelmed by the amount of knowledge available, confused by contradictory knowledge, and frustrated by the number of silos they have to search to find what they need.		The main barrier was simply not being aware of what is out there, with respondents' comments suggesting they are overwhelmed by the amount of knowledge available, confused by contradictory knowledge, and frustrated by the number of silos they have to search to find what they need.

−	Surprisingly, sign-up forms ranked almost as highly as cost in terms of barriers to access. This may be because many practitioners ~~access~~ subscription services paid for by their employers ~~so cost is not an issue to them personally~~. However, SME’s and sole practitioners commented that the cost of accessing knowledge was a significant problem for them.	+	Surprisingly, sign-up forms ranked almost as highly as cost in terms of barriers to access. This may be because many practitioners subscription services are paid for by their employers. However, SME’s and sole practitioners commented that the cost of accessing knowledge was a significant problem for them.

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png]]
Line 101:		Line 101:
	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_changes_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_changes_graph_v2.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_changes_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_changes_graph_v2.png]]

−	Many of the comments about potential improvements related to creating a single method of accessing all knowledge sources, and the use of artificial intelligence to help personalise results based on individual priorities, the level of detail required, professional specialisms and so on.	+	Many of the comments about potential improvements related to creating a single method for accessing all knowledge sources, and the use of artificial intelligence to help personalise results based on individual priorities, the level of detail required, professional specialisms and so on.

	= Open comments =		= Open comments =

−	Respondents used the open-ended section at the end of the survey to make a wide range of comments. Many of these implied there is a ‘them and us’ culture, in which subscribers have easy access to knowledge but non-subscribers do not. This was a particular problem for SME’s and sole practitioners, but it was also raised as an issue by practitioners in larger organisations who can find themselves involved in new subject areas for one-off projects~~, in which they are not in the knowledge loop and have to make additional payments for the knowledge they need~~.	+	Respondents used the open-ended section at the end of the survey to make a wide range of comments. Many of these implied there is a ‘them and us’ culture, in which subscribers have easy access to knowledge but non-subscribers do not. This was a particular problem for SME’s and sole practitioners, but it was also raised as an issue by practitioners in larger organisations who can find themselves involved in new subject areas for one-off projects.

	The industry was also criticised for being disconnected, for not being open enough, and for using its resources to disseminate marketing material rather than useful knowledge.		The industry was also criticised for being disconnected, for not being open enough, and for using its resources to disseminate marketing material rather than useful knowledge.
Line 116:		Line 116:

	{\|		{\|
−	\| [[File:~~Knowledge maturity levels v2~~.png]]	+	\| [[File:Knowledge_maturity_levels_v2.png\|link=File:Knowledge_maturity_levels_v2.png]]
	\|-		\|-
	\| Using the analogy of [[BIM_maturity_levels\|BIM maturity levels]], knowledge needs to be moved from level 1 to at least level 2.		\| Using the analogy of [[BIM_maturity_levels\|BIM maturity levels]], knowledge needs to be moved from level 1 to at least level 2.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 17 December 2018
Line 87:		Line 87:
	The main barrier was simply not being aware of what is out there, with respondents' comments suggesting they are overwhelmed by the amount of knowledge available, confused by contradictory knowledge, and frustrated by the number of silos they have to search to find what they need.		The main barrier was simply not being aware of what is out there, with respondents' comments suggesting they are overwhelmed by the amount of knowledge available, confused by contradictory knowledge, and frustrated by the number of silos they have to search to find what they need.

−	Surprisingly, sign-up forms ranked almost as highly as cost in terms of barriers to access. This may be because many practitioners ~~are given~~ access to subscription services by their employers so cost is not an issue to them personally. However, SME’s commented that the cost of accessing ~~specialist~~ knowledge ~~for one-off projects~~ was a significant problem.	+	Surprisingly, sign-up forms ranked almost as highly as cost in terms of barriers to access. This may be because many practitioners access subscription services paid for by their employers so cost is not an issue to them personally. However, SME’s and sole practitioners commented that the cost of accessing knowledge was a significant problem for them.

	[[File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png]]		[[File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png\|link=File:CKTG_survey_2_barriers_graph_v2.png]]
Line 103:		Line 103:
	= Open comments =		= Open comments =

−	Respondents used the open-ended section at the end of the survey to make a wide range of comments. Many of these implied there is a ‘them and us’ culture, in which subscribers have easy access to knowledge but non-subscribers do not. This was a particular problem for SME’s and sole practitioners, but it was also raised as an issue by practitioners in larger organisations who can find themselves involved in new subject areas for one-off projects, in which they are not in the knowledge loop, and have to make additional payments for the knowledge they need.	+	Respondents used the open-ended section at the end of the survey to make a wide range of comments. Many of these implied there is a ‘them and us’ culture, in which subscribers have easy access to knowledge but non-subscribers do not. This was a particular problem for SME’s and sole practitioners, but it was also raised as an issue by practitioners in larger organisations who can find themselves involved in new subject areas for one-off projects, in which they are not in the knowledge loop and have to make additional payments for the knowledge they need.

	The industry was also criticised for being disconnected, for not being open enough, and for using its resources to disseminate marketing material rather than useful knowledge.		The industry was also criticised for being disconnected, for not being open enough, and for using its resources to disseminate marketing material rather than useful knowledge.
Line 111:		Line 111:
	It is clear that there is a long way to go to bring construction industry knowledge into the 21st century. BIM has shown the way with the standardisation, management and sharing of data and information, but to date, knowledge has not received the same rigorous attention.		It is clear that there is a long way to go to bring construction industry knowledge into the 21st century. BIM has shown the way with the standardisation, management and sharing of data and information, but to date, knowledge has not received the same rigorous attention.

−	Knowledge needs to be treated as an industry asset. We use ~~considerable~~ resources ~~creating~~ knowledge, and we need to maximise the value ~~that~~ the industry is able to extract from it.	+	Knowledge needs to be treated as an industry asset. We use significant resources to create knowledge, and we need to maximise the value the industry is able to extract from it.

	{\|		{\|
−	\| [~~[File:Knowledge_maturity_levels.png\|link=File:Knowledge_maturity_levels.png]~~]	+	\| []
	\|-		\|-
	\| Using the analogy of [[BIM_maturity_levels\|BIM maturity levels]], knowledge needs to be moved from level 1 to at least level 2.		\| Using the analogy of [[BIM_maturity_levels\|BIM maturity levels]], knowledge needs to be moved from level 1 to at least level 2.
	\|}		\|}

−	This survey suggests that the future should be one in which knowledge is better integrated, in fewer silos; is more easy-to-access and available through more flexible subscriptions. It suggests that intelligent search tools should be created to help individuals find the knowledge they need on demand	+	This survey suggests that the future should be one in which knowledge is better integrated, in fewer silos, is more easy-to-access and available through more flexible subscriptions. It suggests that intelligent search tools should be created to help individuals find the knowledge they need on demand.

	The CKTG will take up this challenge and will meet in January to discuss how to drive this agenda forward.		The CKTG will take up this challenge and will meet in January to discuss how to drive this agenda forward.