CAS answers an expensive problem for industry - Revision history

Editor at 04:47, 24 August 2022

2022-08-24T04:47:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 24 August 2022
Line 23:		Line 23:
	This article was written by Paul Reeve, ECA Director of CSR. It was previously published on the website of the Electrical Contractors Association (ECA) in May 2019 and can be accessed [https://www.eca.co.uk/blog/may-2019/cas-answers-an-expensive-problem-for-industry here.]		This article was written by Paul Reeve, ECA Director of CSR. It was previously published on the website of the Electrical Contractors Association (ECA) in May 2019 and can be accessed [https://www.eca.co.uk/blog/may-2019/cas-answers-an-expensive-problem-for-industry here.]

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* Appointing consultants.		* Appointing consultants.

Editor at 08:19, 14 April 2021

2021-04-14T08:19:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 14 April 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	The proliferation of these question sets over the years has created major problems for suppliers and, it turns out buyers, due to the unnecessary cost and effort of filling-in multiple questionnaires. In addition, chasing assessment forms and certification badges has detracted from the real business of ensuring and delivering supply chain capability.		The proliferation of these question sets over the years has created major problems for suppliers and, it turns out buyers, due to the unnecessary cost and effort of filling-in multiple questionnaires. In addition, chasing assessment forms and certification badges has detracted from the real business of ensuring and delivering supply chain capability.

−	The construction industry has long sought to put an end to this problem with a commonly recognised set of pre-qualification questions (PQQ), and at the beginning of April, Build UK and CECA, supported by ECA and others, issued a new pre-qualification ‘Common Assessment Standard’ (CAS), paving the way for a much-needed solution.	+	The construction industry has long sought to put an end to this problem with a commonly recognised set of pre-qualification questions (PQQ), and at the beginning of April 2021, Build UK and CECA, supported by ECA and others, issued a new pre-qualification ‘Common Assessment Standard’ (CAS), paving the way for a much-needed solution.

	The Common Assessment Standard is a step towards the aims of the Construction Leadership Council and the current Sector Deal, both of which highlight the need to remove the burden and inefficiencies of excessive pre-qualification. Indeed, it has long been a goal in the industry to achieve “one assessment scheme, many providers” and the CAS moves us a lot closer to that goal.		The Common Assessment Standard is a step towards the aims of the Construction Leadership Council and the current Sector Deal, both of which highlight the need to remove the burden and inefficiencies of excessive pre-qualification. Indeed, it has long been a goal in the industry to achieve “one assessment scheme, many providers” and the CAS moves us a lot closer to that goal.

Editor at 11:10, 29 March 2021

2021-03-29T11:10:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 29 March 2021
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* OJEU.		* OJEU.
	* PAS 91.		* PAS 91.
		+	* Pre-qualification standard 2021.
	* Pre tender interview.		* Pre tender interview.
	* Procurement route.		* Procurement route.

Editor at 09:56, 29 March 2021

2021-03-29T09:56:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:56, 29 March 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:

	* Appointing consultants.		* Appointing consultants.
		+	* Articles by the Electrical Contractors' Association (ECA).
	* Bid writer.		* Bid writer.
	* Constructionline.		* Constructionline.

Designing Buildings at 07:00, 25 January 2021

2021-01-25T07:00:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 25 January 2021
Line 57:		Line 57:
	--[[User:ECA\|ECA]]		--[[User:ECA\|ECA]]

−	[[Category:Procurement]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Organisation]] [[Category:DCN_Standard]] [[Category:Procurement]]

Editor at 11:15, 6 June 2019

2019-06-06T11:15:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 6 June 2019
Line 54:		Line 54:
	* PACE [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100503135839/http://www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/PACE_-_GACC.pdf Guidance on the Appointment of Constractors and Consultants] P480 Pre Selection Procedures.		* PACE [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100503135839/http://www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/PACE_-_GACC.pdf Guidance on the Appointment of Constractors and Consultants] P480 Pre Selection Procedures.
	* [http://www.constructionline.co.uk/static/ Construction Line].		* [http://www.constructionline.co.uk/static/ Construction Line].
−	* [http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Government-Construction-Strategy.pdf PAS 91]

	--[[User:ECA\|ECA]]		--[[User:ECA\|ECA]]

	[[Category:Procurement]]		[[Category:Procurement]]

Editor at 11:11, 6 June 2019

2019-06-06T11:11:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 6 June 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{\|		{\|
−	\| [[File:~~Checklist 800~~.jpg]]	+	\| [[File:Checklist_800.jpg\|link=File:Checklist_800.jpg]]
	\|}		\|}

Line 45:		Line 45:

	= External references =		= External references =
		+
		+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100503135839/http://www.ogc.gov.uk/templates,_tools_and_model_documentation_pre-qualification_questionnaire_for_tender_evaluation.asp OGC Pre-Qualification Questionnaire for selecting suppliers].
		+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100503135839/http://www.ogc.gov.uk/process_ojeu_-_pqq.asp OGC PQQ].
		+	* [http://www.constructionline.co.uk/static/ Construction Line].
		+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100503135839/http://www.ogc.gov.uk/creating_opportunities_for_smes_and_third_sector_organisations_supplier_selection_and_pre-qualification_guidance,_tools_and_tips.asp OGC Supplier Selection and Pre-Qualification: Guidance, tools and tips].
		+	* [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100503135839/http://www.ogc.gov.uk/supplier_selection_and_award_pre-qualification_questionnaire.asp OGC Pre-Qualification Questionnaire].
		+	* [http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Government-Construction-Strategy.pdf Pre-qualification - PAS 91: the use of this standardised wording for PQQ's has been mandated within Government].
		+	* PACE [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100503135839/http://www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/PACE_-_GACC.pdf Guidance on the Appointment of Constractors and Consultants] P480 Pre Selection Procedures.
		+	* [http://www.constructionline.co.uk/static/ Construction Line].
		+	* [http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Government-Construction-Strategy.pdf PAS 91]

	--[[User:ECA\|ECA]]		--[[User:ECA\|ECA]]

	[[Category:Procurement]]		[[Category:Procurement]]

Editor: Created page with "{| | File:Checklist 800.jpg |} Many readers will be well aware of the numerous supplier pre-qualification schemes and questionnaires that operate throughout the construction..."

2019-06-06T11:09:44Z

Created page with "{| | File:Checklist 800.jpg |} Many readers will be well aware of the numerous supplier pre-qualification schemes and questionnaires that operate throughout the construction..."

New page

{|
| [[File:Checklist 800.jpg]]
|}

Many readers will be well aware of the numerous supplier pre-qualification schemes and questionnaires that operate throughout the construction supply chain.

The proliferation of these question sets over the years has created major problems for suppliers and, it turns out buyers, due to the unnecessary cost and effort of filling-in multiple questionnaires. In addition, chasing assessment forms and certification badges has detracted from the real business of ensuring and delivering supply chain capability.

The construction industry has long sought to put an end to this problem with a commonly recognised set of pre-qualification questions (PQQ), and at the beginning of April, Build UK and CECA, supported by ECA and others, issued a new pre-qualification ‘Common Assessment Standard’ (CAS), paving the way for a much-needed solution.

The Common Assessment Standard is a step towards the aims of the Construction Leadership Council and the current Sector Deal, both of which highlight the need to remove the burden and inefficiencies of excessive pre-qualification. Indeed, it has long been a goal in the industry to achieve “one assessment scheme, many providers” and the CAS moves us a lot closer to that goal.

The CAS builds on BSI’s widely-adopted ‘PAS 91’ construction pre-qualification document, and it allows enquires about topics that include company and financial matters, HS&E, quality, equality and corporate social responsibility (CSR). As such, it covers the general questions that buyers reasonably need to ask suppliers through either a ‘desktop’ assessment or, if necessary, an assessment visit to the supplier’s offices. The CAS does not include project- or task-specific enquires which, in any case, are best covered by further, bespoke dialogue between buyers and suppliers.

The new CAS will not change the prequalification landscape overnight, but it offers the prospect of significant business benefits to clients, main contractors and suppliers alike. Initially, it will be delivered by three leading assessment schemes (CHAS, Constructionline and Achilles) but the eventual aim is that other bodies which meet the necessary assessor criteria will also be able to offer CAS assessments.

An important next stage, set for this summer, will be the introduction of ‘supplier data sharing’ between the CAS assessors, which should boost take-up by main contractors and help to give suppliers confidence in the CAS. While widespread adoption of the CAS by commercial and public-sector buyers will be vital to success, the many thousands of suppliers across construction and maintenance – the paying customers for most pre-qualification questions – will need a CAS-based assessment regime they can get behind. Additionally, support from government and the relevant enforcement agencies would help to consolidate the CAS throughout the industry.

Removing the burden of excessive prequalification would clearly be a major achievement. With widespread industry and stakeholder support, the new CAS may be able to put that prize within our grasp.

= About this article =

This article was written by Paul Reeve, ECA Director of CSR. It was previously published on the website of the Electrical Contractors Association (ECA) in May 2019 and can be accessed [https://www.eca.co.uk/blog/may-2019/cas-answers-an-expensive-problem-for-industry here.]

= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

* Appointing consultants.
* Bid writer.
* Constructionline.
* Construction contract.
* Expression of interest.
* Invitation to tender.
* Mid tender interview.
* OJEU.
* PAS 91.
* Pre tender interview.
* Procurement route.
* Selection criteria.
* Small and medium-sized enterprises.
* Tender.
* Tender documentation.
* Tender evaluation.
* Tender processes.
* The benefits of e-procurement in construction.

= External references =

--[[User:ECA|ECA]]

[[Category:Procurement]]