Blue hydrogen - Revision history

Editor at 12:14, 14 January 2022

2022-01-14T12:14:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 14 January 2022
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* Planning now for hydrogen		* Planning now for hydrogen
	* Sixth carbon budget.		* Sixth carbon budget.
		+	* Smoothing the path to net zero.

	= External resources =		= External resources =

Editor at 17:25, 22 November 2021

2021-11-22T17:25:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 22 November 2021
Line 31:		Line 31:
	'Perhaps surprisingly, the greenhouse gas footprint of blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, again with our default assumptions. In a sensitivity analysis in which the methane emission rate from natural gas is reduced to a low value of 1.54%, greenhouse gas emissions from blue hydrogen are still greater than from simply burning natural gas, and are only 18% to 25% less than for grey hydrogen. Our analysis assumes that captured carbon dioxide can be stored indefinitely, an optimistic and unproven assumption. Even if true though, the use of blue hydrogen appears difficult to justify on climate grounds.'		'Perhaps surprisingly, the greenhouse gas footprint of blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, again with our default assumptions. In a sensitivity analysis in which the methane emission rate from natural gas is reduced to a low value of 1.54%, greenhouse gas emissions from blue hydrogen are still greater than from simply burning natural gas, and are only 18% to 25% less than for grey hydrogen. Our analysis assumes that captured carbon dioxide can be stored indefinitely, an optimistic and unproven assumption. Even if true though, the use of blue hydrogen appears difficult to justify on climate grounds.'

−	= Related articles on Designing Buildings ~~Wiki~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

	* A systems approach to net-zero.		* A systems approach to net-zero.
		+	* BSRIA Briefing 2021.
	* Carbon capture and storage.		* Carbon capture and storage.
	* ECA responds to the UK hydrogen strategy.		* ECA responds to the UK hydrogen strategy.

Editor at 16:53, 1 September 2021

2021-09-01T16:53:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:53, 1 September 2021
Line 45:		Line 45:
	* HM [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Government Government], [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1011283/UK-Hydrogen-Strategy_web.pdf UK Hydrogen Strategy].		* HM [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Government Government], [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1011283/UK-Hydrogen-Strategy_web.pdf UK Hydrogen Strategy].
	* Robert W Howarth of Cornell University and Mark Z Jacobson, Energy Science & Engineering, [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.956 ‘How green is blue hydrogen?]’		* Robert W Howarth of Cornell University and Mark Z Jacobson, Energy Science & Engineering, [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.956 ‘How green is blue hydrogen?]’
		+
		+	[[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Product_Knowledge]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:Definitions]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Products_/_components]]

Designing Buildings at 09:45, 23 August 2021

2021-08-23T09:45:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 23 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{\|		{\|
−	\| [[File:Bluehydrogen.jpg]]	+	\| [[File:Bluehydrogen.jpg\|link=File:Bluehydrogen.jpg]]
	\|}		\|}

Line 11:		Line 11:
	= Methods of production =		= Methods of production =

−	There are two primary methods of creating blue hydrogen (H2). One is through the gasification of methane in combination with ~~certain~~ materials (such as natural gas) and steam. This is referred to as the process of SMR or steam methane reforming.	+	There are two primary methods of creating blue hydrogen (H2). One is through the gasification of methane in combination with materials (such as natural gas) and steam. This is referred to as the process of SMR or steam methane reforming.

	The other method of blue hydrogen production is through coal gasification. This process results in the generation of greenhouse gases in the form of carbon dioxide, which require capture and storage (also known as sequestration).		The other method of blue hydrogen production is through coal gasification. This process results in the generation of greenhouse gases in the form of carbon dioxide, which require capture and storage (also known as sequestration).
Line 19:		Line 19:
	= Critics of blue hydrogen =		= Critics of blue hydrogen =

−	Blue hydrogen production has been proposed as part of the UK’s path to a zero carbon future by 2030. Sceptics have voiced concerns ~~over these claims~~, pointing out the method’s continued dependence on fossil fuels ~~such as carbon (~~which are required in the process). They also doubt that all CO2 emissions can be successfully captured during the production of blue hydrogen through coal gasification.	+	Blue hydrogen production has been proposed as part of the UK’s path to a zero carbon future by 2030. Sceptics have voiced concerns, pointing out the method’s continued dependence on fossil fuels which are required in the process. They also doubt that all CO2 emissions can be successfully captured during the production of blue hydrogen through coal gasification.

−	There is also criticism ~~over~~ the environmental consequences associated with methane emissions that are a by product of the SMR process. Due to its ability to trap heat in the atmosphere, methane has been linked to climate change.	+	There is also criticism regarding the environmental consequences associated with methane emissions that are a by product of the SMR process. Due to its ability to trap heat in the atmosphere, methane has been linked to climate change.

	On 12 August 2021, Energy Science & Engineering published, [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.956 ‘How green is blue hydrogen?]’ Written by Robert W Howarth of Cornell University and Mark Z Jacobson of Stanford University, the research examines the viability of blue hydrogen which has been called a low emission fuel source.		On 12 August 2021, Energy Science & Engineering published, [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.956 ‘How green is blue hydrogen?]’ Written by Robert W Howarth of Cornell University and Mark Z Jacobson of Stanford University, the research examines the viability of blue hydrogen which has been called a low emission fuel source.
Line 27:		Line 27:
	The researchers undertook “...the first effort in a peer-reviewed paper to examine the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of blue hydrogen accounting for emissions of both carbon dioxide and unburned fugitive methane'.		The researchers undertook “...the first effort in a peer-reviewed paper to examine the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of blue hydrogen accounting for emissions of both carbon dioxide and unburned fugitive methane'.

−	~~Through their analysis, the~~ researchers concluded that 'far from being low carbon, greenhouse gas emissions from the production of blue hydrogen are quite high, particularly due to the release of fugitive methane. For our default assumptions (3.5% emission rate of methane from natural gas and a 20-year global warming potential), total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for blue hydrogen are only 9% to 12% less than for grey hydrogen. While carbon dioxide emissions are lower, fugitive methane emissions for blue hydrogen are higher than for grey hydrogen because of an increased use of natural gas to power the carbon capture.	+	The researchers concluded that 'far from being low carbon, greenhouse gas emissions from the production of blue hydrogen are quite high, particularly due to the release of fugitive methane. For our default assumptions (3.5% emission rate of methane from natural gas and a 20-year global warming potential), total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for blue hydrogen are only 9% to 12% less than for grey hydrogen. While carbon dioxide emissions are lower, fugitive methane emissions for blue hydrogen are higher than for grey hydrogen because of an increased use of natural gas to power the carbon capture.

	'Perhaps surprisingly, the greenhouse gas footprint of blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, again with our default assumptions. In a sensitivity analysis in which the methane emission rate from natural gas is reduced to a low value of 1.54%, greenhouse gas emissions from blue hydrogen are still greater than from simply burning natural gas, and are only 18% to 25% less than for grey hydrogen. Our analysis assumes that captured carbon dioxide can be stored indefinitely, an optimistic and unproven assumption. Even if true though, the use of blue hydrogen appears difficult to justify on climate grounds.'		'Perhaps surprisingly, the greenhouse gas footprint of blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, again with our default assumptions. In a sensitivity analysis in which the methane emission rate from natural gas is reduced to a low value of 1.54%, greenhouse gas emissions from blue hydrogen are still greater than from simply burning natural gas, and are only 18% to 25% less than for grey hydrogen. Our analysis assumes that captured carbon dioxide can be stored indefinitely, an optimistic and unproven assumption. Even if true though, the use of blue hydrogen appears difficult to justify on climate grounds.'

Editor: Created page with "{| | File:Bluehydrogen.jpg |} = Introduction = Blue hydrogen is a type of hydrogen fuel. It has been included as part of the first UK hydrogen strategy, which was introduce..."

2021-08-20T14:13:27Z

Created page with "{| | File:Bluehydrogen.jpg |} = Introduction = Blue hydrogen is a type of hydrogen fuel. It has been included as part of the first UK hydrogen strategy, which was introduce..."

New page

{|
| [[File:Bluehydrogen.jpg]]
|}

= Introduction =

Blue hydrogen is a type of hydrogen fuel. It has been included as part of the first UK hydrogen strategy, which was introduced by the Government in August 2021.

Ref [https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-government-launches-plan-for-a-world-leading-hydrogen-economy https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-government-launches-plan-for-a-world-leading-hydrogen-economy]

= Methods of production =

There are two primary methods of creating blue hydrogen (H2). One is through the gasification of methane in combination with certain materials (such as natural gas) and steam. This is referred to as the process of SMR or steam methane reforming.

The other method of blue hydrogen production is through coal gasification. This process results in the generation of greenhouse gases in the form of carbon dioxide, which require capture and storage (also known as sequestration).

Carbon dioxide sequestration is typically achieved through methods of carbon capture and storage (CCS). CCS refers to a range of technologies that capture carbon dioxide emissions and then store them permanently so they do not enter the atmosphere and contribute to climate change.

= Critics of blue hydrogen =

Blue hydrogen production has been proposed as part of the UK’s path to a zero carbon future by 2030. Sceptics have voiced concerns over these claims, pointing out the method’s continued dependence on fossil fuels such as carbon (which are required in the process). They also doubt that all CO2 emissions can be successfully captured during the production of blue hydrogen through coal gasification.

There is also criticism over the environmental consequences associated with methane emissions that are a by product of the SMR process. Due to its ability to trap heat in the atmosphere, methane has been linked to climate change.

On 12 August 2021, Energy Science & Engineering published, [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.956 ‘How green is blue hydrogen?]’ Written by Robert W Howarth of Cornell University and Mark Z Jacobson of Stanford University, the research examines the viability of blue hydrogen which has been called a low emission fuel source.

The researchers undertook “...the first effort in a peer-reviewed paper to examine the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of blue hydrogen accounting for emissions of both carbon dioxide and unburned fugitive methane'.

Through their analysis, the researchers concluded that 'far from being low carbon, greenhouse gas emissions from the production of blue hydrogen are quite high, particularly due to the release of fugitive methane. For our default assumptions (3.5% emission rate of methane from natural gas and a 20-year global warming potential), total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for blue hydrogen are only 9% to 12% less than for grey hydrogen. While carbon dioxide emissions are lower, fugitive methane emissions for blue hydrogen are higher than for grey hydrogen because of an increased use of natural gas to power the carbon capture.

'Perhaps surprisingly, the greenhouse gas footprint of blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than burning natural gas or coal for heat and some 60% greater than burning diesel oil for heat, again with our default assumptions. In a sensitivity analysis in which the methane emission rate from natural gas is reduced to a low value of 1.54%, greenhouse gas emissions from blue hydrogen are still greater than from simply burning natural gas, and are only 18% to 25% less than for grey hydrogen. Our analysis assumes that captured carbon dioxide can be stored indefinitely, an optimistic and unproven assumption. Even if true though, the use of blue hydrogen appears difficult to justify on climate grounds.'

= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

* A systems approach to net-zero.
* Carbon capture and storage.
* ECA responds to the UK hydrogen strategy.
* Hydrogen.
* Is hydrogen the heating fuel of the future?
* Planning now for hydrogen
* Sixth carbon budget.

= External resources =

* HM [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Government Government], [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1011283/UK-Hydrogen-Strategy_web.pdf UK Hydrogen Strategy].
* Robert W Howarth of Cornell University and Mark Z Jacobson, Energy Science & Engineering, [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.956 ‘How green is blue hydrogen?]’