Biodiversity offsetting - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 11:01, 15 February 2021

2021-02-15T11:01:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:01, 15 February 2021
Line 54:		Line 54:
	* [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 Evidence to the Commons Environment Audit Committee]. 23 October 2013.		* [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 Evidence to the Commons Environment Audit Committee]. 23 October 2013.

−	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Sustainability]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Surrey_Hills_AONB]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Sustainability]]

Designing Buildings at 08:01, 17 November 2020

2020-11-17T08:01:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 17 November 2020
Line 54:		Line 54:
	* [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 Evidence to the Commons Environment Audit Committee]. 23 October 2013.		* [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 Evidence to the Commons Environment Audit Committee]. 23 October 2013.

−	[[Category:~~Planning_permission~~]] [[Category:~~Policy~~]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Sustainability]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_Definition]] [[Category:DCN_Guidance]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Sustainability]]

Editor at 15:21, 7 July 2020

2020-07-07T15:21:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 7 July 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* BREEAM Protection of ecological features.		* BREEAM Protection of ecological features.
	* BREEAM Minimising impact on existing site ecology.		* BREEAM Minimising impact on existing site ecology.
		+	* Campaigning for biodiversity.
	* Ecological impact assessment.		* Ecological impact assessment.
	* Ecological network.		* Ecological network.
Line 53:		Line 54:
	* [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 Evidence to the Commons Environment Audit Committee]. 23 October 2013.		* [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 Evidence to the Commons Environment Audit Committee]. 23 October 2013.

−	[[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:Sustainability]]	+	[[Category:Planning_permission]] [[Category:Policy]] [[Category:DCN_Policy]] [[Category:Sustainability]]

Designing Buildings at 08:59, 26 June 2020

2020-06-26T08:59:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:59, 26 June 2020
Line 44:		Line 44:
	* Ecology connectivity.		* Ecology connectivity.
	* Environmental impact assessment.		* Environmental impact assessment.
		+	* Environmental net gain.
	* Green roofs.		* Green roofs.
	* Translocation.		* Translocation.

Designing Buildings at 09:43, 23 June 2020

2020-06-23T09:43:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 23 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Shutterstock_112365611_cropped_adjusted.jpg\|link=File:Shutterstock_112365611_cropped_adjusted.jpg]]		[[File:Shutterstock_112365611_cropped_adjusted.jpg\|link=File:Shutterstock_112365611_cropped_adjusted.jpg]]

−	~~The~~ UK government ~~is undertaking~~ a consultation on the introduction of biodiversity offsetting as part of the planning system.	+	In 2013, the UK government undertook a consultation on the introduction of biodiversity offsetting as part of the planning system.

−	Biodiversity offsetting, in simple terms, is a market tool which enables the off-site creation, restoration or enhancement of habitats as compensation for habitat and species loss resulting from a development. ~~From the Government’s point of view, it is a win-win:~~	+	Biodiversity offsetting, in simple terms, is a market tool which enables the off-site creation, restoration or enhancement of habitats as compensation for habitat and species loss resulting from a development.

−	* A minimum of “No net loss” of biodiversity from development ~~secured in the long term.~~	+	The principle stipulates that “if significant harm resulting from a development cannot be avoided (through locating on an alternative site with less harmful impacts), adequately mitigated or at last resort, compensated for, then planning permission should be refused”.
−	* A quicker and simpler planning ~~process~~.	+

−	~~The~~ biodiversity offsetting ~~proposal as~~ it ~~stands, does not intend~~ to ~~replace the existing mitigation hierarchy principle in force in the National Planning Policy Framework~~. ~~The principle stipulates~~ that ~~“if significant harm resulting~~ from a development ~~cannot be avoided (through locating on an alternative~~ site ~~with less harmful impacts)~~, ~~adequately mitigated~~ or ~~at last resort, compensated for, then planning permission should~~ be ~~refused”. It is crucial~~ that ~~this principle is reinforced~~.	+	Detractors were concerned that biodiversity offsetting would be a “licence to trash”. Ecosystems are extremely complex mechanisms and it may be simplistic to think localised areas can be destroyed and adequately compensated for by providing an offset elsewhere. Add to that the fact that compensation habitats could be located hundreds of miles from the development site, or that free-trading systems could be allowed meaning that any type of habitat could be provided as an offset as long as it generates sufficient biodiversity units, and there may be genuine concerns.

−	Detractors are concerned that biodiversity offsetting would be a “licence to trash”. Ecosystems are extremely complex mechanisms and it is seems rather simplistic to think localised areas can be destroyed and adequately compensated for by providing an offset elsewhere. Add to that the fact that compensation habitats could be located hundreds of miles from the development site, or that free-trading systems could be allowed meaning that any type of habitat could be provided as an offset as long as it generates sufficient biodiversity units, and genuine concerns should come to the fore.	+	Perhaps unsurprisingly, the lack of comprehensive data on off-setting projects is one of the biggest challenges. Planning authorities rarely check that offsets really do take place as promised, and this potentially becomes more complex if off-setting is provided outside the approving authority boundary.
−		+
−	The outcome of six 2-year pilot projects across the UK are not yet known, having commenced in April 2012. The lessons learnt from these projects should provide important evidence to inform the development of the UK biodiversity offsetting proposal. In addition, biodiversity offsetting has been used in a number of countries for many years. A critical evaluation of these projects would further strengthen any UK policy. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the lack of comprehensive data on ~~these~~ off-setting projects is one of the biggest challenges. Planning authorities rarely check that offsets really do take place as promised, and this potentially becomes more complex if off-setting is provided outside the approving authority boundary.	+

	It is also worth considering the long-term social and broader environmental value that is to be gained from the sensitive development of a site. The integration of biodiversity and green space into a development helps to reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing our reliance on energy-intensive air-conditioning and with careful planning can also contribute to flood storage and improvements in water quality. The benefits of green space and wildlife on public health is well-documented, it is a key factor in reducing stress and depression which increases national productivity and reduces strains on our health care system. Finally, it is vital that our children understand the services that ecosystems provide, from medicine to food, from nutrient preservation to flood prevention. The best way to ensure that the new generation understand and appreciate the value of ecosystems and biodiversity is to enable and encourage the exploration of nature on the doorstep, regardless of where they live.		It is also worth considering the long-term social and broader environmental value that is to be gained from the sensitive development of a site. The integration of biodiversity and green space into a development helps to reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing our reliance on energy-intensive air-conditioning and with careful planning can also contribute to flood storage and improvements in water quality. The benefits of green space and wildlife on public health is well-documented, it is a key factor in reducing stress and depression which increases national productivity and reduces strains on our health care system. Finally, it is vital that our children understand the services that ecosystems provide, from medicine to food, from nutrient preservation to flood prevention. The best way to ensure that the new generation understand and appreciate the value of ecosystems and biodiversity is to enable and encourage the exploration of nature on the doorstep, regardless of where they live.
Line 18:		Line 15:
	In essence, if biodiversity offsets are genuinely used as a last resort measure to ensure that unavoidable damage to habitats are adequately assessed and compensated through a transparent and consistent methodology which incorporates lessons learnt, it seems rather a good thing. On the other hand, if biodiversity offsets are used as a quick fix purely to speed up the planning process and allow over-stretched planning teams to take a more lenient approach to the application of the mitigation hierarchy then it is a serious area for concern.		In essence, if biodiversity offsets are genuinely used as a last resort measure to ensure that unavoidable damage to habitats are adequately assessed and compensated through a transparent and consistent methodology which incorporates lessons learnt, it seems rather a good thing. On the other hand, if biodiversity offsets are used as a quick fix purely to speed up the planning process and allow over-stretched planning teams to take a more lenient approach to the application of the mitigation hierarchy then it is a serious area for concern.

−	~~-----~~	+	= Updates =
−	Updates ~~added by Designing Buildings Wiki:~~	+

	DEFRA’s consultation process '[https://consult.defra.gov.uk/biodiversity/biodiversity_offsetting Biodiversity offsetting in England]' ran until 7 November 2013.		DEFRA’s consultation process '[https://consult.defra.gov.uk/biodiversity/biodiversity_offsetting Biodiversity offsetting in England]' ran until 7 November 2013.

Designing Buildings at 15:11, 24 December 2019

2019-12-24T15:11:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 24 December 2019
Line 34:		Line 34:
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

		+	* Benefit transfer.
	* Biodiversity in the urban environment.		* Biodiversity in the urban environment.
	* Biodiversity net gain consultation.		* Biodiversity net gain consultation.

Designing Buildings at 14:54, 28 March 2019

2019-03-28T14:54:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 28 March 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:
	In [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 evidence to the House of Commons Environment Audit Committee] on 23 October 2013 Environment Secretary Owen Paterson said: "I think that, in order to get people’s support, it has to be reasonably local and within reasonably easy reach. If people are going to lose an environmental asset and they want to enjoy something else, I think it has to be reasonably close … I think if we make it too distant, we will not get the support on the ground."		In [http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/WrittenEvidence.svc/EvidencePdf/3165 evidence to the House of Commons Environment Audit Committee] on 23 October 2013 Environment Secretary Owen Paterson said: "I think that, in order to get people’s support, it has to be reasonably local and within reasonably easy reach. If people are going to lose an environmental asset and they want to enjoy something else, I think it has to be reasonably close … I think if we make it too distant, we will not get the support on the ground."

−	In November 2013, a ~~[http://www.cieem.net/news/158/alge-publish-report-on-ecological-capacity-and-competence-in-english-planning-authorities~~ report by the Association of Local Government Ecologists] (ALGE) warned of a skills gap in the ability of local authority planners to administer the system, pointing out that 90% had no ecological qualifications and only a third of planning authorities had an in-house ecologist.	+	In November 2013, a report by the Association of Local Government Ecologists (ALGE) warned of a skills gap in the ability of local authority planners to administer the system, pointing out that 90% had no ecological qualifications and only a third of planning authorities had an in-house ecologist.

	A [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/news/governement-response-biodiversity-offsetting-/ House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee report] was published on 6 November 2013, and on 28 March 2014, DEFRA confirmed that it accepted the Committee’s recommendation to finalise biodiversity offsetting proposals only after pilot exercises have been completed and evaluated (ref [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/news/governement-response-biodiversity-offsetting-/ parliament.uk]).		A [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/news/governement-response-biodiversity-offsetting-/ House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee report] was published on 6 November 2013, and on 28 March 2014, DEFRA confirmed that it accepted the Committee’s recommendation to finalise biodiversity offsetting proposals only after pilot exercises have been completed and evaluated (ref [http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/news/governement-response-biodiversity-offsetting-/ parliament.uk]).

Designing Buildings at 14:49, 23 January 2019

2019-01-23T14:49:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 23 January 2019
Line 48:		Line 48:
	* Environmental impact assessment.		* Environmental impact assessment.
	* Green roofs.		* Green roofs.
		+	* Translocation.

	= External references =		= External references =

Designing Buildings at 09:25, 14 December 2018

2018-12-14T09:25:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, 14 December 2018
Line 45:		Line 45:
	* Ecologist.		* Ecologist.
	* Ecology compensation.		* Ecology compensation.
		+	* Ecology connectivity.
	* Environmental impact assessment.		* Environmental impact assessment.
	* Green roofs.		* Green roofs.

Designing Buildings at 11:10, 13 December 2018

2018-12-13T11:10:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 13 December 2018
Line 32:		Line 32:
	This article was written by Chloe Souque from --[[User:KLH_Sustainability\|KLH Sustainability]] as part of an ongoing series of blogs for Designing Buildings Wiki.		This article was written by Chloe Souque from --[[User:KLH_Sustainability\|KLH Sustainability]] as part of an ongoing series of blogs for Designing Buildings Wiki.

−	= ~~Find out more~~ =	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki =

−	~~=== Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki ===~~
−
−	* Bats.
	* Biodiversity in the urban environment.		* Biodiversity in the urban environment.
	* Biodiversity net gain consultation.		* Biodiversity net gain consultation.
−	* Biophilia.
	* BREEAM Ecological value of site.		* BREEAM Ecological value of site.
	* BREEAM Enhancing site ecology.		* BREEAM Enhancing site ecology.
Line 48:		Line 44:
	* Ecological survey.		* Ecological survey.
	* Ecologist.		* Ecologist.
		+	* Ecology compensation.
	* Environmental impact assessment.		* Environmental impact assessment.
−	* Great crested newt.
	* Green roofs.		* Green roofs.
−	* Nature improvement area.
−	* Protected species.
−	* Protected species licence.
−	* Swift brick.
−	* Tree preservation order.

−	=== External references ===	+	= External references =

	* [https://consult.defra.gov.uk/biodiversity/biodiversity_offsetting Biodiversity off-setting in England].		* [https://consult.defra.gov.uk/biodiversity/biodiversity_offsetting Biodiversity off-setting in England].