Biodiversity COP 16 in brief - Revision history

Designing Buildings at 07:08, 8 November 2024

2024-11-08T07:08:12Z

Editor at 12:16, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T12:16:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 5 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[File:~~COP16 Biod 1000~~.jpg]]	+	[[File:COP16_Biod_1000.jpg\|link=File:COP16_Biod_1000.jpg]]

	= UK government perspective =		= UK government perspective =
Line 9:		Line 9:
	See the article Britain on global stage to support nature recovery at COP16 for further details.		See the article Britain on global stage to support nature recovery at COP16 for further details.

−	[[File:~~Gov A wildlflower meadow on the Penbrokeshire coast looking towards Penberry 900~~.jpg]]	+	[[File:Gov_A_wildlflower_meadow_on_the_Penbrokeshire_coast_looking_towards_Penberry_900.jpg\|link=File:Gov_A_wildlflower_meadow_on_the_Penbrokeshire_coast_looking_towards_Penberry_900.jpg]]
		+
		+	= Relevance for the construction industry =
		+
		+	The Environment Act, received royal assent on November 9, 2021 and followed UN reports and increased government awareness, including studies showing the UK having lost more biodiversity than any G7 country. The Environment Act replaced many aspects of UK legislation that were covered by European law prior to Brexit and were no longer applicable after the UK left the European Union. The general aims of the Act remained focused on reducing landfill, improving air and water quality, and protecting biodiversity and wildlife, all of which the construction industry has a direct impact on in the Uk. The act set out a number of components relating to biodiversity net gain (BNG), including amending the Town and Country Planning Act (TCPA), requiring a minimum 10% biodiversity gain, significant on- and off-sitehabitat to be secured for at least 30 years, an on-and off-site delivery approach with a biodiversity credit scheme, and a national register for net-gain delivery sites. The construction industry as a whole in particular concerning material supply chains, embodied carbon, construction related emissions and in-use building emissions, all indirectly impact biodiversity at a global scale.
		+
		+	For further information see Designing Buildings article Biodiversity net gain with related updates and terms explained.

	= Meeting suspended after two agreements =		= Meeting suspended after two agreements =

Editor at 12:06, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T12:06:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 5 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[File:COP16 Biod 1000.jpg]]
		+
	= UK government perspective =		= UK government perspective =

Line 4:		Line 6:

	The UK Government also set out the path to protect 30% of land by 2030, known as 30by30, the criteria for 30by30 on land in England is still being developed. A 30by30 pilot is planned for later in 2024, and the government will work with partners to develop a 30by30 delivery strategy in 2025.		The UK Government also set out the path to protect 30% of land by 2030, known as 30by30, the criteria for 30by30 on land in England is still being developed. A 30by30 pilot is planned for later in 2024, and the government will work with partners to develop a 30by30 delivery strategy in 2025.
		+
		+	See the article Britain on global stage to support nature recovery at COP16 for further details.
		+
		+	[[File:Gov A wildlflower meadow on the Penbrokeshire coast looking towards Penberry 900.jpg]]

	= Meeting suspended after two agreements =		= Meeting suspended after two agreements =
Line 63:		Line 69:
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

		+	* Biodiversity COP 16: Making Peace with Nature.
		+	* Biodiversity in building design and construction
		+	* Biodiversity in the urban environment.
		+	* Biodiversity Gain.
		+	* Biodiversity gain plan.
		+	* Biodiversity gain site.
		+	* Biodiversity gain site register.
		+	* Biodiversity net gain.
		+	* Biodiversity net gain regulations and implementation.
		+	* Biodiversity net gain with related updates and terms explained.
		+	* Biodiversity offsetting.
		+	* Biodiversity units.
		+	* Biodiversity metric.
		+	* Carbon emissions.
		+	* Carbon plan.
		+	* Climate change science.
		+	* Climate Change Levy.
		+	* Climate Change Committee progress reports.
	* Conference of parties all events		* Conference of parties all events
−	* ~~COP28 and the Path Ahead for Industry~~.	+	* Ecological impact assessment.
−	* ~~COP21 Paris 2015~~.	+	* Ecology.
−	* ~~COPs~~ and ~~the last day of no 28~~.	+	* Environmental impact assessment.
		+	* Government net zero review 2022.
		+	* Habitat.
		+	* Habitat management and monitoring plan HMMP.
		+	* Local Nature Recovery Strategy LNRS.
	* Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC.		* Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC.
	* Kyoto protocol.		* Kyoto protocol.
		+	* Local Nature Recovery Strategy LNRS.
		+	* Net zero carbon 2050.
		+	* Net zero strategy: build back greener.
		+	* Sustainability.
	* The Edge policy proposals for the built and natural environment 2022.		* The Edge policy proposals for the built and natural environment 2022.
		+	* The Low Carbon Transition Plan: National strategy for climate and energy.
	* The sustainability of construction works.		* The sustainability of construction works.
		+	* UK Climate Change Risk Assessment.
	* What is the Conference of the Parties ?		* What is the Conference of the Parties ?

−	[[Category:~~Articles_needing_more_work~~]]	+	[[Category:DCN_Commentary]] [[Category:DCN_News]] [[Category:DCN_Organisation]] [[Category:DCN_Report]] [[Category:DCN_Research,_Development_and_Innovation]] [[Category:DCN_Specification]] [[Category:DCN_Standard]] [[Category:International]] [[Category:News]] [[Category:Organisations]] [[Category:Publications_/_reports]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Water]] [[Category:Regulations]] [[Category:Standards_/_measurements]] [[Category:Sustainability]] [[Category:Taxation]]

Editor at 12:00, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T12:00:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 5 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	= UK ~~contribution~~ =	+	= UK government perspective =

−	~~Ahe~~ the ~~start~~ of the ~~event~~ the	+	Ruth Davis has been appointed by the UK government as the very first Special Representative for Nature, alongside Rachel Kyte as Special Representative for Climate, a role abolished by the previous conservative government. As Special Representative for Nature Ruth Davis will drive coordinated international action on nature.
		+
		+	The UK Government also set out the path to protect 30% of land by 2030, known as 30by30, the criteria for 30by30 on land in England is still being developed. A 30by30 pilot is planned for later in 2024, and the government will work with partners to develop a 30by30 delivery strategy in 2025.

	= Meeting suspended after two agreements =		= Meeting suspended after two agreements =
Line 43:		Line 45:
	Guidelines proposed for managing invasive alien species, touching on issues such as e-commerce, multicriteria analysis methodologies and others. Addressing one of the top five direct drivers of biodiversity loss, highlighting the need for international cooperation, capacity-building, and technical support for developing countries. New databases, improved cross-border trade regulations, and enhanced coordination with e-commerce platforms aim to address gaps in managing risks and align with the goals of KMGBF, as cross-sectoral collaboration is central to biodiversity protection.		Guidelines proposed for managing invasive alien species, touching on issues such as e-commerce, multicriteria analysis methodologies and others. Addressing one of the top five direct drivers of biodiversity loss, highlighting the need for international cooperation, capacity-building, and technical support for developing countries. New databases, improved cross-border trade regulations, and enhanced coordination with e-commerce platforms aim to address gaps in managing risks and align with the goals of KMGBF, as cross-sectoral collaboration is central to biodiversity protection.

−	Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)	+	= Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) =
−		+
−	COP 16 agreed on a new and evolved process to identify ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs). Under the CBD, work on EBSAs, which identifies the most critical and vulnerable parts of the ocean, began in 2010 and became a central area of onean-related work. Continued development of the programme was stymied for more than 8 years due to legal and political concerns. COP 16 gave new life to this process, agreeing on new mechanisms to identify new EBSAs and update existing ones, ensuring that the cataloging of information of these areas can support planning and management with the most advanced science and knowledge available.	+
−		+
−	This comes at a time when EBSAs can play an important role for marine biodiversity protection, with major steps being taken to implement the 30×30 protected areas target and to prepare for the future implementation of the new agreement for marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction..	+
−		+
−	~~Sustainable Wildlife Management and Plant Conservation~~	+
−		+
−	Among the most crucial areas of discussion was the protection of wild species. A decision on sustainable wildlife management underscores the necessity of monitoring, capacity-building, and the inclusive participation of indigenous peoples, local communities, and women. To this end, the decision calls for the cooperation of international bodies like CITES and FAO to implement. The framework encourages research on how wildlife use, biodiversity loss, and zoonotic diseases are interconnected, a vital area for a world increasingly aware of the public health implications of biodiversity loss.	+
−		+
−	Additionally, COP 16 saw a commitment to align plant conservation efforts with the KMGBF monitoring framework. This includes updating the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation with specific indicators and a standardized reporting template, ensuring that progress in plant protection is measurable and consistent with global biodiversity targets.	+
−		+
−	~~Biodiversity and health~~	+
−		+
−	At COP 16, CBD Parties approved a Global Action Plan on Biodiversity and Health designed to help curb the emergence of zoonotic diseases, prevent non-communicable diseases, and promote sustainable ecosystems. The strategy embraces a holistic “One Health” approach that recognizes the health of ecosystems, animals, and humans as interconnected.	+
−		+
−	Recognizing that biodiversity loss and poor health often share common drivers—such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change—the Plan emphasizes the urgency of tackling these threats to benefit both ecosystems and humans.	+
−		+
−	The strategy underlines the need for education and promoting understanding of the connections between biodiversity and health, and the need to strengthen policies that promote sustainable ecosystems, support traditional medicine, and reduce habitat destruction. Special attention is accorded to vulnerable populations, including Indigenous peoples, who depend on local biodiversity for food, medicine, and cultural identity, as well as youth, seen as vital contributors to conservation and health initiatives.	+

−	~~At the heart of the plan is a collaborative framework that brings together health professionals, conservationists, and policymakers. The~~ COP ~~decision invites nations~~ to ~~designate national focal points~~ for biodiversity and ~~health~~, ~~and to develop policies reflecting these interconnections, integrating biodiversity-health considerations~~ in ~~policies across~~ the ~~range~~ of ~~sectors from agriculture to urban planning~~.	+	COP 16 revitalised efforts to identify and protect EBSAs, key areas in the ocean that are critical for biodiversity. New mechanisms were agreed upon to update existing EBSAs and identify new ones, aiding in the protection of marine biodiversity, particularly in light of the global 30x30 protected areas target and the upcoming marine biodiversity agreement for areas beyond national jurisdiction.

−	~~Parties further called for close cooperation with international organizations, including the World Health Organization, to develop monitoring tools~~ and ~~metrics for assessing the progress of biodiversity-health initiatives.~~	+	= Wildlife Management and Plant Conservation =

−	~~Risk assessment~~	+	Discussions also focused on sustainable wildlife management and plant conservation, with calls for improved monitoring, capacity building, and inclusive participation from Indigenous communities and women. The framework encourages the development of research on the interconnectedness of wildlife use, biodiversity loss, and zoonotic diseases, highlighting the public health implications of biodiversity degradation.

−	In Cali, Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety welcomed new, voluntary guidance on assessing the risks posed by living modified organisms (LMOs) containing engineered gene drives, a milestone in international biosafety managementaiming to bolster the scientific rigor and ~~transparency of risk assessment procedures in the Protocol.~~	+	= Biodiversity and Health =

−	~~Engineered gene drives have~~ the ~~capacity to propagate genetic modifications rapidly through wild populations~~ and the ~~move to strengthen protocols comes amid increased debate over genetic engineering~~, ~~particularly for applications for pest control~~, ~~disease control~~, and ~~agriculture~~. The ~~new guidance prioritizes scientific transparency and accuracy in risk assessments~~, ~~an essential step toward unified safety standards~~ for ~~managing LMOs worldwide~~.	+	A key decision at COP 16 was the approval of a Global Action Plan on Biodiversity and Health. This strategy emphasizes the "One Health" approach, recognizing the interconnections between human, animal, and ecosystem health. The plan aims to curb zoonotic diseases, prevent non-communicable diseases, and promote sustainable ecosystems. It also calls for greater collaboration between health professionals, conservationists, and policymakers to integrate biodiversity considerations into public health policies.

−	~~The new guidance materials bring together the best available scientific resources and guidance materials available for environmental risk assessment, while also emphasizing the precautionary approach.~~	+	= Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs) =

−	~~The~~ voluntary ~~nature of these~~ guidelines ~~allows individual countries~~ to ~~tailor assessments to national contexts~~, ~~considering ecological variables unique to their environments. This flexibility is crucial in regions with diverse ecosystems and will help regulators make informed decisions, taking into account~~ both ~~the benefits~~ and risks of ~~LMOs with gene drives~~.	+	COP 16 approved new voluntary guidelines for assessing the risks associated with living modified organisms (LMOs) containing engineered gene drives. These technologies have the potential to rapidly spread genetic modifications through wild populations, posing both opportunities and risks for biodiversity. The new guidelines prioritize scientific transparency and ensure that risk assessments are tailored to the specific ecological contexts of each country.

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

Editor at 11:49, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T11:49:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 5 November 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	= Cali Fund to sharing the benefits from Digital Genetic Information (DGI) launched =		= Cali Fund to sharing the benefits from Digital Genetic Information (DGI) launched =

−	Multilateral mechanism~~, including a~~ global fund, to share the benefits from ~~uses~~ of digital sequence information on genetic resources (DSI) more fairly and equitably. Addresses how pharmaceutical, biotechnology, animal and plant breeding and other industries benefiting from DSI should share ~~those benefits~~ with developing countries and ~~Indigenous Peoples~~ and local communities. The agreed guidelines, indicate that large companies and major entities benefiting commercially from DSI uses should contribute to the Cali Fund, as a percentage of profits or revenues. Targetting larger companies reliant on DSI, it exempts academic, public research institutions and other entities using DSI but not directly benefiting. Developing world countries will benefit from a large part of this fund, to support implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) according to the priorities and at least half the funding is expected to support the self-identified needs of indigenous peoples and local communities. Monitoring and reporting will ensure industries see the impact of their contributions in a transparent and open way, with regular reviews to build efficiency and efficacy over time.	+	Multilateral mechanism with global fund, to share the benefits from use of digital sequence information on genetic resources (DSI) more fairly and equitably. Addresses how pharmaceutical, biotechnology, animal and plant breeding and other industries benefiting from DSI, should share with developing countries and indigenous peoples and local communities. The agreed guidelines, indicate that large companies and major entities benefiting commercially from DSI uses should contribute to the Cali Fund, as a percentage of profits or revenues. Targetting larger companies reliant on DSI, it exempts academic, public research institutions and other entities using DSI but not directly benefiting.
		+
		+	Developing world countries will benefit from a large part of this fund, to support implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) according to the priorities and at least half the funding is expected to support the self-identified needs of indigenous peoples and local communities. Monitoring and reporting will ensure industries see the impact of their contributions in a transparent and open way, with regular reviews to build efficiency and efficacy over time.

	= Strengthened role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Biodiversity Efforts =		= Strengthened role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Biodiversity Efforts =
Line 19:		Line 21:
	* the fair and equitable sharing of benefits		* the fair and equitable sharing of benefits

−	as ~~well~~ as the implementation of the KMGBF. ~~Through~~ this ~~Programme~~, ~~rights~~, ~~contributions~~ and ~~traditional~~ knowledge of indigenous peoples ~~and~~ local communities are further ~~embedded~~ in the ~~global agenda~~.	+	Parties agreed to establish a new permanent subsidiary body, with its modus operandi to be developed over the next two years. The new Subsidiary Body is expected to elevate issues related to the implementation of Article 8j, enhancing engagement and participation of indigenous peoples and local communities in all convention processes. A further decision was taken to recognise the role of people of African descent, comprising collectives embodying traditional lifestyles, in implementing the Convention and in the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
		+
		+	= Funding biodiversity via strategic resource mobilisation =
		+
		+	Discussions will be resumed later to approve a new “Strategy for Resource Mobilisation” to help secure $200 billion annually by 2030 to support biodiversity initiatives worldwide, representing one of the KMGBF’s goals. Another is the redirection by 2030 of $500 billion per year in subsidies that harm biodiversity. The possibility to create of a new dedicated global financing instrument for biodiversity to receive, disburse, mobilise and articulate funding needs will be investigated.
		+
		+	Other frameworks include: The Global Biodiversity Framework Fund (GBFF), agreed at COP 15 in 2022 and established in less than a year by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) supporting countries with fragile ecosystems, such as small island states and economies in transition. The Kunming Biodiversity Fund (KBF), supports accelerated action to deliver 2030 Agenda, SDG targets and 2050 goals of the KB Global Biodiversity Framework, particularly in developing countries.
		+
		+	COP 16 also considered an evaluation of the effectiveness of the GEF, serving as the financial mechanism of the Convention, this noted that the GEF has made significant progress in its role in resource mobilisation and implementation.
		+
		+	= Implementing and Monitoring the KMGBF =
		+
		+	There was a stock take of progress in implementing the KMGBF since its creation in 2022. 119 countries submitted national biodiversity targets, 44 countries submitted National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans as policy documents which to support the implementing national targets. Remarkable progress in two years and highlighted need to accelerate.
		+
		+	= Synthetic Biology =
		+
		+	Considering the potential benefits and risks of synthetic biology, addressing inequity in the participation of developing countries in the field, a new thematic action plan to help address the capacity-building, technology transfer and knowledge-sharing needs of Parties, and Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. An expert group to guide identification of synthetic biology’s potential benefits and review the potential impacts of recent technological developments in relation to the CBD’s three fundamental objectives and in implementing the KMGBF.
		+
		+	= Invasive Alien Species =
		+
		+	Guidelines proposed for managing invasive alien species, touching on issues such as e-commerce, multicriteria analysis methodologies and others. Addressing one of the top five direct drivers of biodiversity loss, highlighting the need for international cooperation, capacity-building, and technical support for developing countries. New databases, improved cross-border trade regulations, and enhanced coordination with e-commerce platforms aim to address gaps in managing risks and align with the goals of KMGBF, as cross-sectoral collaboration is central to biodiversity protection.
		+
		+	Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)
		+
		+	COP 16 agreed on a new and evolved process to identify ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs). Under the CBD, work on EBSAs, which identifies the most critical and vulnerable parts of the ocean, began in 2010 and became a central area of onean-related work. Continued development of the programme was stymied for more than 8 years due to legal and political concerns. COP 16 gave new life to this process, agreeing on new mechanisms to identify new EBSAs and update existing ones, ensuring that the cataloging of information of these areas can support planning and management with the most advanced science and knowledge available.
		+
		+	This comes at a time when EBSAs can play an important role for marine biodiversity protection, with major steps being taken to implement the 30×30 protected areas target and to prepare for the future implementation of the new agreement for marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction..
		+
		+	Sustainable Wildlife Management and Plant Conservation
		+
		+	Among the most crucial areas of discussion was the protection of wild species. A decision on sustainable wildlife management underscores the necessity of monitoring, capacity-building, and the inclusive participation of indigenous peoples, local communities, and women. To this end, the decision calls for the cooperation of international bodies like CITES and FAO to implement. The framework encourages research on how wildlife use, biodiversity loss, and zoonotic diseases are interconnected, a vital area for a world increasingly aware of the public health implications of biodiversity loss.
		+
		+	Additionally, COP 16 saw a commitment to align plant conservation efforts with the KMGBF monitoring framework. This includes updating the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation with specific indicators and a standardized reporting template, ensuring that progress in plant protection is measurable and consistent with global biodiversity targets.
		+
		+	Biodiversity and health
		+
		+	At COP 16, CBD Parties approved a Global Action Plan on Biodiversity and Health designed to help curb the emergence of zoonotic diseases, prevent non-communicable diseases, and promote sustainable ecosystems. The strategy embraces a holistic “One Health” approach that recognizes the health of ecosystems, animals, and humans as interconnected.
		+
		+	Recognizing that biodiversity loss and poor health often share common drivers—such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change—the Plan emphasizes the urgency of tackling these threats to benefit both ecosystems and humans.
		+
		+	The strategy underlines the need for education and promoting understanding of the connections between biodiversity and health, and the need to strengthen policies that promote sustainable ecosystems, support traditional medicine, and reduce habitat destruction. Special attention is accorded to vulnerable populations, including Indigenous peoples, who depend on local biodiversity for food, medicine, and cultural identity, as well as youth, seen as vital contributors to conservation and health initiatives.
		+
		+	At the heart of the plan is a collaborative framework that brings together health professionals, conservationists, and policymakers. The COP decision invites nations to designate national focal points for biodiversity and health, and to develop policies reflecting these interconnections, integrating biodiversity-health considerations in policies across the range of sectors from agriculture to urban planning.
		+
		+	Parties further called for close cooperation with international organizations, including the World Health Organization, to develop monitoring tools and metrics for assessing the progress of biodiversity-health initiatives.
		+
		+	Risk assessment
		+
		+	In Cali, Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety welcomed new, voluntary guidance on assessing the risks posed by living modified organisms (LMOs) containing engineered gene drives, a milestone in international biosafety managementaiming to bolster the scientific rigor and transparency of risk assessment procedures in the Protocol.
		+
		+	Engineered gene drives have the capacity to propagate genetic modifications rapidly through wild populations and the move to strengthen protocols comes amid increased debate over genetic engineering, particularly for applications for pest control, disease control, and agriculture. The new guidance prioritizes scientific transparency and accuracy in risk assessments, an essential step toward unified safety standards for managing LMOs worldwide.

−	~~Parties also agreed to establish a new permanent subsidiary body on article 8j and other Provisions, with its modus operandi to be developed over the next two years.~~ The new ~~Subsidiary Body is expected to elevate issues related to~~ the ~~implementation of Article 8j~~ and ~~enhance~~ the ~~engagement and participation of indigenous peoples and local communities in all convention processes~~.	+	The new guidance materials bring together the best available scientific resources and guidance materials available for environmental risk assessment, while also emphasizing the precautionary approach.

−	~~A further decision was taken~~ to ~~recognise the role of people of African descent, comprising collectives embodying traditional lifestyles~~, in ~~implementing the Convention~~ and in the ~~conservation~~ and ~~sustainable use~~ of ~~biodiversity~~.	+	The voluntary nature of these guidelines allows individual countries to tailor assessments to national contexts, considering ecological variables unique to their environments. This flexibility is crucial in regions with diverse ecosystems and will help regulators make informed decisions, taking into account both the benefits and risks of LMOs with gene drives.

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

Editor at 11:31, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T11:31:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 5 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	= UK contribution =
		+
		+	Ahe the start of the event the
		+
	= Meeting suspended after two agreements =		= Meeting suspended after two agreements =

Editor at 07:28, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T07:28:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 5 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	= Meeting suspended after two agreements =
		+
		+	The 16th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 16) was suspended in the morning of Nov. 2 after agreement on an expanded role of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in saving biodiversity and an agreement on the operationalisation of a new global mechanism to share benefits from digital genetic information.
		+
		+	= Cali Fund to sharing the benefits from Digital Genetic Information (DGI) launched =
		+
		+	Multilateral mechanism, including a global fund, to share the benefits from uses of digital sequence information on genetic resources (DSI) more fairly and equitably. Addresses how pharmaceutical, biotechnology, animal and plant breeding and other industries benefiting from DSI should share those benefits with developing countries and Indigenous Peoples and local communities. The agreed guidelines, indicate that large companies and major entities benefiting commercially from DSI uses should contribute to the Cali Fund, as a percentage of profits or revenues. Targetting larger companies reliant on DSI, it exempts academic, public research institutions and other entities using DSI but not directly benefiting. Developing world countries will benefit from a large part of this fund, to support implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) according to the priorities and at least half the funding is expected to support the self-identified needs of indigenous peoples and local communities. Monitoring and reporting will ensure industries see the impact of their contributions in a transparent and open way, with regular reviews to build efficiency and efficacy over time.
		+
		+	= Strengthened role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Biodiversity Efforts =
		+
		+	New Programme of Work related to indigenous peoples and local communities, setting out specific tasks to ensure their meaningful contribution towards the three objectives of the Convention:
		+
		+	* the conservation of biological diversity
		+	* the sustainable use of biological diversity
		+	* the fair and equitable sharing of benefits
		+
		+	as well as the implementation of the KMGBF. Through this Programme, rights, contributions and traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities are further embedded in the global agenda.
		+
		+	Parties also agreed to establish a new permanent subsidiary body on article 8j and other Provisions, with its modus operandi to be developed over the next two years. The new Subsidiary Body is expected to elevate issues related to the implementation of Article 8j and enhance the engagement and participation of indigenous peoples and local communities in all convention processes.
		+
		+	A further decision was taken to recognise the role of people of African descent, comprising collectives embodying traditional lifestyles, in implementing the Convention and in the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
		+
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

Editor at 07:11, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T07:11:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:11, 5 November 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

−	Conference of parties all events	+	* Conference of parties all events
−		+	* COP28 and the Path Ahead for Industry.
−	COP28 and the Path Ahead for Industry.	+	* COP21 Paris 2015.
−		+	* COPs and the last day of no 28.
−	COP21 Paris 2015.	+	* Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC.
−		+	* Kyoto protocol.
−	COPs and the last day of no 28.	+	* The Edge policy proposals for the built and natural environment 2022.
−		+	* The sustainability of construction works.
−	Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC.	+	* What is the Conference of the Parties ?
−		+
−	Kyoto protocol.	+
−		+
−	The Edge policy proposals for the built and natural environment 2022.	+
−		+
−	The sustainability of construction works.	+

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]

Editor: Created page with "= Related articles on Designing Buildings = Conference of parties all events COP28 and the Path Ahead for Industry. COP21 Paris 2015. COPs and the last day of no 28. Intergo..."

2024-11-05T07:08:42Z

Created page with "= Related articles on Designing Buildings = Conference of parties all events COP28 and the Path Ahead for Industry. COP21 Paris 2015. COPs and the last day of no 28. Intergo..."

New page

= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

Conference of parties all events

COP28 and the Path Ahead for Industry.

COP21 Paris 2015.

COPs and the last day of no 28.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC.

Kyoto protocol.

The Edge policy proposals for the built and natural environment 2022.

The sustainability of construction works.

[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:08, 8 November 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	= UK government perspective =		= UK government perspective =

−	Ruth Davis has been appointed by the UK government as the ~~very~~ first Special Representative for Nature, alongside Rachel Kyte as Special Representative for Climate, a role abolished by the previous conservative government. As Special Representative for Nature Ruth Davis will drive coordinated international action on nature.	+	In 2024, Ruth Davis has been appointed by the UK government as the first Special Representative for Nature, alongside Rachel Kyte as Special Representative for Climate, a role abolished by the previous conservative government. As Special Representative for Nature Ruth Davis will drive coordinated international action on nature.

−	The UK Government also set out the path to protect 30% of land by 2030, known as 30by30, the criteria for 30by30 on land in England is still being developed. A 30by30 pilot is planned for later in 2024, and the government will work with partners to develop a 30by30 delivery strategy in 2025.	+	The UK Government also set out the path to protect 30% of land by 2030, known as 30by30, although the criteria for 30by30 on land in England is still being developed. A 30by30 pilot is planned for later in 2024, and the government will work with partners to develop a 30by30 delivery strategy in 2025.

	See the article Britain on global stage to support nature recovery at COP16 for further details.		See the article Britain on global stage to support nature recovery at COP16 for further details.
Line 13:		Line 13:
	= Relevance for the construction industry =		= Relevance for the construction industry =

−	The Environment Act, received royal assent on November 9, 2021 and followed UN reports and increased government awareness, including studies showing the UK ~~having~~ lost more biodiversity than any G7 country. The Environment Act replaced many aspects of UK legislation that were covered by European law prior to Brexit and were no longer applicable after the UK left the European Union. The general aims of the Act ~~remained~~ focused on reducing landfill, improving air and water quality, and protecting biodiversity and wildlife, all of which the construction industry has a direct impact on in the Uk. The act ~~set~~ out a number of components relating to biodiversity net gain (BNG), including amending the Town and Country Planning Act (TCPA), requiring a minimum 10% biodiversity gain, significant on- and off-~~sitehabitat~~ to be secured for at least 30 years, an on-and off-site delivery approach with a biodiversity credit scheme, and a national register for net-gain delivery sites. The construction industry as a whole in particular concerning material supply chains, embodied carbon, construction related emissions and in-use building emissions, all indirectly impact biodiversity at a global scale.	+	The Environment Act, received royal assent on November 9, 2021 and followed UN reports and increased government awareness, including studies showing the UK has lost more biodiversity than any other G7 country. The Environment Act replaced many aspects of UK legislation that were covered by European law prior to Brexit and were no longer applicable after the UK left the European Union.
		+
		+	The general aims of the Act remain focused on reducing landfill, improving air and water quality, and protecting biodiversity and wildlife, all of which the construction industry has a direct impact on in the UK. The act sets out a number of components relating to biodiversity net gain (BNG), including amending the Town and Country Planning Act (TCPA), requiring a minimum 10% biodiversity gain, significant on- and off-site habitat to be secured for at least 30 years, an on-and off-site delivery approach with a biodiversity credit scheme, and a national register for net-gain delivery sites.

	For further information see Designing Buildings article Biodiversity net gain with related updates and terms explained.		For further information see Designing Buildings article Biodiversity net gain with related updates and terms explained.
Line 19:		Line 21:
	= Meeting suspended after two agreements =		= Meeting suspended after two agreements =

−	The 16th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 16) was suspended in the morning of Nov. 2 after agreement on an expanded role of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in saving biodiversity and an agreement on the operationalisation of a new global mechanism to share benefits from digital genetic information.	+	The 16th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 16) was suspended in the morning of Nov. 2 2024 after agreement on an expanded role of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in saving biodiversity and an agreement on the operationalisation of a new global mechanism to share benefits from digital genetic information.

	= Cali Fund to sharing the benefits from Digital Genetic Information (DGI) launched =		= Cali Fund to sharing the benefits from Digital Genetic Information (DGI) launched =

−	Multilateral mechanism ~~with global fund,~~ to share the benefits from use of digital sequence information on genetic resources (DSI) more fairly and equitably. ~~Addresses~~ how pharmaceutical, biotechnology, animal and plant breeding and other industries benefiting from DSI, should share with developing countries and indigenous peoples and local communities. The agreed guidelines, indicate that large companies and major entities benefiting commercially from DSI uses should contribute to the Cali Fund, as a percentage of profits or revenues. ~~Targetting~~ larger companies reliant on DSI, it exempts academic, public research institutions and other entities using DSI but not directly benefiting.	+	Multilateral mechanism are intended to share the benefits from the use of digital sequence information on genetic resources (DSI) more fairly and equitably. It addresses how pharmaceutical, biotechnology, animal and plant breeding and other industries benefiting from DSI, should share with developing countries and indigenous peoples and local communities. The agreed guidelines, indicate that large companies and major entities benefiting commercially from DSI uses should contribute to the Cali Fund, as a percentage of profits or revenues. It targets larger companies reliant on DSI, and exempts academic, public research institutions and other entities using DSI but not directly benefiting from it.

	Developing world countries will benefit from a large part of this fund, to support implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) according to the priorities and at least half the funding is expected to support the self-identified needs of indigenous peoples and local communities. Monitoring and reporting will ensure industries see the impact of their contributions in a transparent and open way, with regular reviews to build efficiency and efficacy over time.		Developing world countries will benefit from a large part of this fund, to support implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) according to the priorities and at least half the funding is expected to support the self-identified needs of indigenous peoples and local communities. Monitoring and reporting will ensure industries see the impact of their contributions in a transparent and open way, with regular reviews to build efficiency and efficacy over time.
Line 29:		Line 31:
	= Strengthened role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Biodiversity Efforts =		= Strengthened role of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Biodiversity Efforts =

−	New Programme of Work related to indigenous peoples and local communities, ~~setting~~ out specific tasks to ensure their meaningful contribution towards the three objectives of the Convention:	+	New Programme of Work related to indigenous peoples and local communities, sets out specific tasks to ensure their meaningful contribution towards the three objectives of the Convention:

	* the conservation of biological diversity		* the conservation of biological diversity
Line 39:		Line 41:
	= Funding biodiversity via strategic resource mobilisation =		= Funding biodiversity via strategic resource mobilisation =

−	Discussions will be resumed later to approve a new “Strategy for Resource Mobilisation” to help secure $200 billion annually by 2030 to support biodiversity initiatives worldwide, representing one of the KMGBF’s goals. Another is the redirection by 2030 of $500 billion per year in subsidies that harm biodiversity. The possibility ~~to create~~ of a new dedicated global financing instrument for biodiversity to receive, disburse, mobilise and articulate funding needs will be investigated.	+	Discussions will be resumed later to approve a new “Strategy for Resource Mobilisation” to help secure $200 billion annually by 2030 to support biodiversity initiatives worldwide, representing one of the KMGBF’s goals. Another is the redirection by 2030 of $500 billion per year in subsidies that harm biodiversity. The possibility of creating a new dedicated global financing instrument for biodiversity to receive, disburse, mobilise and articulate funding needs will be investigated.

	Other frameworks include: The Global Biodiversity Framework Fund (GBFF), agreed at COP 15 in 2022 and established in less than a year by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) supporting countries with fragile ecosystems, such as small island states and economies in transition. The Kunming Biodiversity Fund (KBF), supports accelerated action to deliver 2030 Agenda, SDG targets and 2050 goals of the KB Global Biodiversity Framework, particularly in developing countries.		Other frameworks include: The Global Biodiversity Framework Fund (GBFF), agreed at COP 15 in 2022 and established in less than a year by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) supporting countries with fragile ecosystems, such as small island states and economies in transition. The Kunming Biodiversity Fund (KBF), supports accelerated action to deliver 2030 Agenda, SDG targets and 2050 goals of the KB Global Biodiversity Framework, particularly in developing countries.
Line 47:		Line 49:
	= Implementing and Monitoring the KMGBF =		= Implementing and Monitoring the KMGBF =

−	There was a stock take of progress in implementing the KMGBF since its creation in 2022. 119 countries submitted national biodiversity targets, 44 countries submitted National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans as policy documents which to support the implementing national targets~~. Remarkable progress in two years and highlighted need to accelerate~~.	+	There was a stock take of progress in implementing the KMGBF since its creation in 2022. 119 countries submitted national biodiversity targets, 44 countries submitted National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans as policy documents which to support the implementing national targets.

	= Synthetic Biology =		= Synthetic Biology =

−	Considering the potential benefits and risks of synthetic biology, addressing inequity in the participation of developing countries in the field, a new thematic action plan to help address the capacity-building, technology transfer and knowledge-sharing needs of Parties, and Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. An expert group to guide identification of synthetic biology’s potential benefits and review the potential impacts of recent technological developments in relation to the CBD’s three fundamental objectives and in implementing the KMGBF.	+	Other developments include:
		+
		+	* Considering the potential benefits and risks of synthetic biology, addressing inequity in the participation of developing countries in the field, a new thematic action plan to help address the capacity-building, technology transfer and knowledge-sharing needs of Parties, and Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.
		+	* An expert group to guide identification of synthetic biology’s potential benefits and review the potential impacts of recent technological developments in relation to the CBD’s three fundamental objectives and in implementing the KMGBF.

	= Invasive Alien Species =		= Invasive Alien Species =

−	Guidelines proposed for managing invasive alien species, touching on issues such as e-commerce, ~~multicriteria~~ analysis methodologies and others. Addressing one of the top five direct drivers of biodiversity loss, highlighting the need for international cooperation, capacity-building, and technical support for developing countries. New databases, improved cross-border trade regulations, and enhanced coordination with e-commerce platforms aim to address gaps in managing risks and align with the goals of KMGBF, as cross-sectoral collaboration is central to biodiversity protection.	+	Guidelines were proposed for managing invasive alien species, touching on issues such as e-commerce, multi-criteria analysis methodologies and others. Addressing one of the top five direct drivers of biodiversity loss, highlighting the need for international cooperation, capacity-building, and technical support for developing countries. New databases, improved cross-border trade regulations, and enhanced coordination with e-commerce platforms aim to address gaps in managing risks and align with the goals of KMGBF, as cross-sectoral collaboration is central to biodiversity protection.

	= Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) =		= Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) =
Line 71:		Line 76:
	= Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs) =		= Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs) =

−	COP 16 approved new voluntary guidelines for assessing the risks associated with living modified organisms (LMOs) containing engineered gene drives. These technologies have the potential to rapidly spread genetic modifications through wild populations, posing both opportunities and risks for biodiversity. The new guidelines ~~prioritize~~ scientific transparency and ensure that risk assessments are tailored to the specific ecological contexts of each country.	+	COP 16 approved new voluntary guidelines for assessing the risks associated with living modified organisms (LMOs) containing engineered gene drives. These technologies have the potential to rapidly spread genetic modifications through wild populations, posing both opportunities and risks for biodiversity. The new guidelines prioritise scientific transparency and ensure that risk assessments are tailored to the specific ecological contexts of each country.

	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =		= Related articles on Designing Buildings =