Architectural Technology Awards 2021 - Revision history

Editor at 11:22, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:22:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 26 October 2021
Line 137:		Line 137:

	* Architectural technologist.		* Architectural technologist.
−	* Architectural Technology Awards 2017.
−	* Architectural Technology Awards 2018.
−	* Architectural Technology Awards 2019.
	* Architectural Technology Awards 2020.		* Architectural Technology Awards 2020.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2019.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2018.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2017.
	* Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists CIAT.		* Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists CIAT.
	* CIAT articles.		* CIAT articles.

Editor at 11:21, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:21:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 26 October 2021
Line 137:		Line 137:

	* Architectural technologist.		* Architectural technologist.
−	* Architectural Technology Awards 2019.
−	* Architectural Technology Awards 2018.
	* Architectural Technology Awards 2017.		* Architectural Technology Awards 2017.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2018.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2019.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2020.
	* Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists CIAT.		* Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists CIAT.
	* CIAT articles.		* CIAT articles.

Editor at 11:18, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:18:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 26 October 2021
Line 125:		Line 125:
	He has taken on a relevant and new area, managing to undertake a methodological approach to deliver the aim and objectives and the research's intended outcomes. Daniel has made some interesting conclusions and recommendations which will be of significance to anyone within the Architectural Technology discipline.		He has taken on a relevant and new area, managing to undertake a methodological approach to deliver the aim and objectives and the research's intended outcomes. Daniel has made some interesting conclusions and recommendations which will be of significance to anyone within the Architectural Technology discipline.

−	All the ~~Awards~~, ~~Finalists~~ and winners are featured on the [https://architecturaltechnology.com/awards.html CIAT website] ~~and in the winter issue of AT Journal~~.	+	= Further details =
		+
		+	All the awards, finalists and winners are featured on the [https://architecturaltechnology.com/awards.html CIAT website].

	-----		-----

Editor at 11:15, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:15:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 26 October 2021
Line 135:		Line 135:

	* Architectural technologist.		* Architectural technologist.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2019.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2018.
	* Architectural Technology Awards 2017.		* Architectural Technology Awards 2017.
−	* Architectural ~~Technology Awards 2020~~.	+	* Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists CIAT.
	* CIAT articles.		* CIAT articles.
−	* ~~Karyn Williams Woman Architectural Technologist~~ of the ~~Year 2019~~.	+	* The history of the architectural profession.
		+
		+	= External resources =
		+
		+	* CIAT, [https://architecturaltechnology.com/awards.html AT Awards 2021 (overview)].
		+	* CIAT, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6ENvT58UZ8&t=254s AT Awards 2021 (video of event).]
		+
		+	[[Category:DCN_Event]] [[Category:DCN_News]] [[Category:DCN_Organisation]] [[Category:DCN_Presentation]] [[Category:News]] [[Category:Organisations]]

Editor at 11:10, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:10:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 26 October 2021
Line 132:		Line 132:
	--[[User:CIAT\|CIAT]]		--[[User:CIAT\|CIAT]]

−	Related articles on Designing Buildings	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =
		+
		+	* Architectural technologist.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2017.
		+	* Architectural Technology Awards 2020.
		+	* CIAT articles.
		+	* Karyn Williams Woman Architectural Technologist of the Year 2019.

Editor at 11:08, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:08:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 26 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:ATAwards2.jpg\|link=File:ATAwards2.jpg]]		[[File:ATAwards2.jpg\|link=File:ATAwards2.jpg]]
		+
		+	= Introduction =

	The AT Awards 2021 took place on 22 October. A recording of the event is available to watch on the CIAT [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA0d3oZ9XflcsKSl1We8MjQ YouTube Channel]. Presented by CIAT President Eddie Weir on 22 October 2021, the Awards celebrated outstanding achievements in Architectural Technology for both students and practitioners.		The AT Awards 2021 took place on 22 October. A recording of the event is available to watch on the CIAT [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA0d3oZ9XflcsKSl1We8MjQ YouTube Channel]. Presented by CIAT President Eddie Weir on 22 October 2021, the Awards celebrated outstanding achievements in Architectural Technology for both students and practitioners.

Editor: moved AT Awards: 2021 winners to Architectural Technology Awards 2021

2021-10-26T11:08:18Z

moved AT Awards: 2021 winners to Architectural Technology Awards 2021

← Older revision

Revision as of 11:08, 26 October 2021

Editor at 11:07, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:07:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 26 October 2021
Line 126:		Line 126:

	-----		-----
−	This article originally appeared on the CIAT website. It was published on 25 October 2021.	+	This article originally appeared on the CIAT website under the headline, '[https://architecturaltechnology.com/resource/at-awards-2021-winners.html AT Awards: 2021 winners]'. It was published on 25 October 2021.

	--[[User:CIAT\|CIAT]]		--[[User:CIAT\|CIAT]]

	Related articles on Designing Buildings		Related articles on Designing Buildings

Editor at 11:02, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T11:02:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:02, 26 October 2021
Line 103:		Line 103:
	= Student Award for Excellence in Architectural Technology \| Report (recognising outstanding research achievement in Architectural Technology from a dissertation assignment) =		= Student Award for Excellence in Architectural Technology \| Report (recognising outstanding research achievement in Architectural Technology from a dissertation assignment) =

−	Winner: Space Layout Design: Developing a Workflow to Enable Communication to Those With Autism Spectrum Disorder, Investigating the Potential Use of Augmented Reality, Josephine McGoldrick, Ulster University~~<br />~~	+	== Winner: Space Layout Design: Developing a Workflow to Enable Communication to Those With Autism Spectrum Disorder, Investigating the Potential Use of Augmented Reality, Josephine McGoldrick, Ulster University ==
		+
	Josephine's report on developing a technological workflow to enable communication to those with Autism Spectrum Disorder is a wonderful piece that demonstrates the potential use of technology to not only help the client, but also specific end users at all stages of the design process; and afterwards as buildings, spaces and functions adapt over time.		Josephine's report on developing a technological workflow to enable communication to those with Autism Spectrum Disorder is a wonderful piece that demonstrates the potential use of technology to not only help the client, but also specific end users at all stages of the design process; and afterwards as buildings, spaces and functions adapt over time.

Line 110:		Line 111:
	This work is a brilliant example of excellence in Architectural Technology and an exemplar for the Student Award Report category.		This work is a brilliant example of excellence in Architectural Technology and an exemplar for the Student Award Report category.

−	Highly Commended: A Pairs Comparison and Analysis of Current 3D Printing Construction Technologies in Coherence with Industry Defined Innovation Value Drivers, Aaron Richardson, Strathclyde University~~<br />~~	+	== Highly Commended: A Pairs Comparison and Analysis of Current 3D Printing Construction Technologies in Coherence with Industry Defined Innovation Value Drivers, Aaron Richardson, Strathclyde University ==
		+
	A timely and worthwhile topic from Aaron to research 3D printing construction technologies in the current construction climates and under COVID-19 conditions.		A timely and worthwhile topic from Aaron to research 3D printing construction technologies in the current construction climates and under COVID-19 conditions.

−	Despite limitation imposed by the pandemic, Aaron has managed to conduct a robust and well-structured research. With a sound and rigorous literature review carried out, this has helped ground the research in the existing body of knowledge in this area. The methodology is proportionate, meets the research design and helps achieve the intended promise of the study. ~~Excellently~~ written and a fascinating report for those in the Architectural Technology discipline.	+	Despite limitation imposed by the pandemic, Aaron has managed to conduct robust and well-structured research. With a sound and rigorous literature review carried out, this has helped ground the research in the existing body of knowledge in this area. The methodology is proportionate, meets the research design and helps achieve the intended promise of the study. It is excellently written and is a fascinating report for those in the Architectural Technology discipline.
		+
		+	== Commended: A Technical Study Exploring the Use of Re-Purposed Aggregates and Cement Along with Curing Techniques to Create Concrete to Different Design Strengths For Use in a Theatre, Daniel Green, Coventry University ==
		+
		+	Daniel's report explores the appropriateness of recycled tyre aggregate and fly ash as recyclable aggregate and cement alternatives. His research was well structured, clear and easy to follow.
		+
		+	He has taken on a relevant and new area, managing to undertake a methodological approach to deliver the aim and objectives and the research's intended outcomes. Daniel has made some interesting conclusions and recommendations which will be of significance to anyone within the Architectural Technology discipline.
		+
		+	All the Awards, Finalists and winners are featured on the [https://architecturaltechnology.com/awards.html CIAT website] and in the winter issue of AT Journal.

−	~~Commended: A Technical Study Exploring the Use of Re~~-~~Purposed Aggregates and Cement Along with Curing Techniques to Create Concrete to Different Design Strengths For Use in a Theatre, Daniel Green, Coventry University<br />~~	+	-----
−	~~Daniel's report explores~~ the ~~appropriateness of recycled tyre aggregate and fly ash as recyclable aggregate and cement alternatives~~. ~~His research~~ was ~~well-structured, clear and easy to follow~~.	+	This article originally appeared on the CIAT website. It was published on 25 October 2021.

−	He has taken on a relevant and new area, managing to undertake a methological approach to deliver the aim and objectives and the research's intended outcomes. Daniel has made some interesting conclusions and recommendations which will be of significance to anyone within the Architectural Technology discipline.	+	--[[User:CIAT\|CIAT]]

−	~~<br />~~	+	Related articles on Designing Buildings
−	~~All the Awards, Finalists and winners are featured~~ on ~~the CIAT website here and in the winter issue of AT Journal.~~	+

Editor at 10:54, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T10:54:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:54, 26 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[File:ATAwards2.jpg]]	+	[[File:ATAwards2.jpg\|link=File:ATAwards2.jpg]]

	The AT Awards 2021 took place on 22 October. A recording of the event is available to watch on the CIAT [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA0d3oZ9XflcsKSl1We8MjQ YouTube Channel]. Presented by CIAT President Eddie Weir on 22 October 2021, the Awards celebrated outstanding achievements in Architectural Technology for both students and practitioners.		The AT Awards 2021 took place on 22 October. A recording of the event is available to watch on the CIAT [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA0d3oZ9XflcsKSl1We8MjQ YouTube Channel]. Presented by CIAT President Eddie Weir on 22 October 2021, the Awards celebrated outstanding achievements in Architectural Technology for both students and practitioners.
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Craig's communal hub for the Trent Basin Residential Scheme is an excellently considered, highly technical, ecological and inclusive design – it is practical, yet exciting!		Craig's communal hub for the Trent Basin Residential Scheme is an excellently considered, highly technical, ecological and inclusive design – it is practical, yet exciting!

−	The design and material specification are superb, including ~~accessiblity~~ considerations scoped within the context plans as well as a fire strategy. A high level of sustainability opportunities detailed and expertly presented. BREEAM rating and acknowledgement of the credits calculation system is ~~treatment~~ to Craig's understanding of sustainable and green building design. The different spaces, overall development usage and level of thought considering the clients requirements is excellent. There is a clear understanding of the optimised design from the proposed ME and circulation GIA percentage targets.	+	The design and material specification are superb, including accessibility considerations scoped within the context plans as well as a fire strategy. A high level of sustainability opportunities detailed and expertly presented. BREEAM rating and acknowledgement of the credits calculation system is a testament to Craig's understanding of sustainable and green building design. The different spaces, overall development usage and level of thought considering the clients' requirements is excellent. There is a clear understanding of the optimised design from the proposed ME and circulation GIA percentage targets.

−	There is great care and attention in the gorgeous detailing, the fabric-first approach and the ecological choices made in relation to the structure, the fabric, and the services in this design. Craig is a technically driven individual who has demonstrated excellence in Architectural Technology and a very worthy joint winner.	+	There is great care and attention in the gorgeous detailing, the fabric first approach and the ecological choices made in relation to the structure, the fabric and the services in this design. Craig is a technically driven individual who has demonstrated excellence in Architectural Technology and a very worthy joint winner.
		+
		+	== Winner: Strawberry Hill Healthcare Village, Luke Williams, Nottingham Trent University ==

−	~~Winner: Strawberry Hill Healthcare Village, Luke Williams, Nottingham Trent University<br />~~
	Strawberry Hill is a new healthcare village which is visually striking. Luke has approached this project with mature, considered and resolved detailing and a lot of work has gone into developing its fantastic design.		Strawberry Hill is a new healthcare village which is visually striking. Luke has approached this project with mature, considered and resolved detailing and a lot of work has gone into developing its fantastic design.

−	The building form, spread and use of the land is impressive and Luke demonstrates the importance to designing a building that fits and respects the ecological and clients' requirements. Of particular interest was the falling/returning to earth forms and these were exceptionally presented. Luke has a further benefit for prevailing wind and an opportunity to harvest this as part of the sustainability design – quality design that is also sustainable is hard to achieve. The overall structural concept is well thought through and coordinates with the architectural design. The level of detail resolution is impressive and superbly presented.	+	The building form, spread and use of the land is impressive, and Luke demonstrates the importance of designing a building that fits and respects the ecological and clients' requirements. Of particular interest was the falling/returning to earth forms, and these were exceptionally presented. Luke has a further benefit for prevailing wind and an opportunity to harvest this as part of the sustainability design – quality design that is also sustainable is hard to achieve. The overall structural concept is well thought through and coordinates with the architectural design. The level of detail resolution is impressive and superbly presented.

−	On sustainability, Luke goes into detail on the project targets and key areas he proposes to meet the BREEAM targets. This being one of the main drivers, including the detail resolution, make this project ~~standout~~ as a joint winner for the Student Award for Excellence in Architectural Technology.	+	On sustainability, Luke goes into detail on the project targets and key areas he proposes to meet the BREEAM targets. This being one of the main drivers, including the detail resolution, make this project stand out as a joint winner for the Student Award for Excellence in Architectural Technology.
		+
		+	== Highly Commended: The Home Office Project, Harvey Hale ACIAT, Anglia Ruskin University ==

−	~~Highly Commended: The Home Office Project, Harvey Hale ACIAT, Anglia Ruskin University<br />~~
	Harvey has created a very challenging and interesting mixed-use development scheme that allows professionals and their families to live and work within a resilient community. To address a work-life balance using the current economic crisis is a brilliant concept, as well as the overall targets to provide a sustainable and technically resolved project, was successfully achieved and presented superbly.		Harvey has created a very challenging and interesting mixed-use development scheme that allows professionals and their families to live and work within a resilient community. To address a work-life balance using the current economic crisis is a brilliant concept, as well as the overall targets to provide a sustainable and technically resolved project, was successfully achieved and presented superbly.

	Harvey covers a lot of items throughout the report and drawing sheets, demonstrating technical excellence. From hand sketch isometrics to fully resolved technical solutions and amplification details, it was interesting to explore the layers and overall approach taken using the materials and integration of sustainable systems. One standout detail is the section providing an overall sustainability approach/systems adopted for the project. The work is a real showpiece.		Harvey covers a lot of items throughout the report and drawing sheets, demonstrating technical excellence. From hand sketch isometrics to fully resolved technical solutions and amplification details, it was interesting to explore the layers and overall approach taken using the materials and integration of sustainable systems. One standout detail is the section providing an overall sustainability approach/systems adopted for the project. The work is a real showpiece.

−	~~<br />~~	+	= Student Award for Excellence in Architectural Technology \| Report (recognising outstanding research achievement in Architectural Technology from a dissertation assignment) =
−	Student Award for Excellence in Architectural Technology \| Report (recognising outstanding research achievement in Architectural Technology from a dissertation assignment)~~<br />~~	+
	Winner: Space Layout Design: Developing a Workflow to Enable Communication to Those With Autism Spectrum Disorder, Investigating the Potential Use of Augmented Reality, Josephine McGoldrick, Ulster University<br />		Winner: Space Layout Design: Developing a Workflow to Enable Communication to Those With Autism Spectrum Disorder, Investigating the Potential Use of Augmented Reality, Josephine McGoldrick, Ulster University<br />
	Josephine's report on developing a technological workflow to enable communication to those with Autism Spectrum Disorder is a wonderful piece that demonstrates the potential use of technology to not only help the client, but also specific end users at all stages of the design process; and afterwards as buildings, spaces and functions adapt over time.		Josephine's report on developing a technological workflow to enable communication to those with Autism Spectrum Disorder is a wonderful piece that demonstrates the potential use of technology to not only help the client, but also specific end users at all stages of the design process; and afterwards as buildings, spaces and functions adapt over time.