Archiblog's Ordering - Revision history

Archiblog: Undo revision 319747 by Archiblog (talk)

2026-04-02T10:47:29Z

Undo revision 319747 by Archiblog (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 2 April 2026
Line 154:		Line 154:

	-----		-----
−	~~= Related articles on Designing Buildings =~~	+	[https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Archiblog%27s_Ordering BACK TO TOP]

		+	== Related articles on Designing Buildings ==
		+
		+	-----
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Anticipatory_Design Anticipatory Design]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Anticipatory_Design Anticipatory Design]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bucky%27s_Ordering Bucky's Ordering]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bucky%27s_Ordering Bucky's Ordering]

Archiblog at 10:46, 2 April 2026

2026-04-02T10:46:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 2 April 2026
Line 154:		Line 154:

	-----		-----
−	~~[https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Archiblog%27s_Ordering BACK TO TOP]~~	+	= Related articles on Designing Buildings =

−	~~== Related articles on Designing Buildings ==~~
−
−	~~-----~~
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Anticipatory_Design Anticipatory Design]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Anticipatory_Design Anticipatory Design]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bucky%27s_Ordering Bucky's Ordering]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bucky%27s_Ordering Bucky's Ordering]

Archiblog at 10:43, 2 April 2026

2026-04-02T10:43:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 2 April 2026
Line 113:		Line 113:
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Archiblog%27s_Ordering Archiblog's Ordering]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Archiblog%27s_Ordering Archiblog's Ordering]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architecture:_Doubt,_Delight,_and_Change Architecture: Doubt, Delight, and Change]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architecture:_Doubt,_Delight,_and_Change Architecture: Doubt, Delight, and Change]
		+	* ARCHITECTURE: Redefining it as progressing
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/ATOM:_A_generating_system_designed_by_Cedric_Price ATOM: A generating system designed by Cedric Price]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/ATOM:_A_generating_system_designed_by_Cedric_Price ATOM: A generating system designed by Cedric Price]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Beeching_cuts:_The_railway_network_in_Nottinghamshire Beeching cuts: The railway network in Nottinghamshire]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Beeching_cuts:_The_railway_network_in_Nottinghamshire Beeching cuts: The railway network in Nottinghamshire]
Line 164:		Line 165:
	== ==		== ==

−	[[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]	+	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]

Editor at 23:01, 11 December 2025

2025-12-11T23:01:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 11 December 2025
Line 164:		Line 164:
	== ==		== ==

−	~~[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]]~~ [[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]	+	[[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]

Archiblog at 10:58, 6 December 2025

2025-12-06T10:58:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:58, 6 December 2025
Line 162:		Line 162:

	-----		-----
−	== ~~Notes on a possible thesis on architecture~~ ==	+	== ==
−		+
−	~~== 0 Abstract ==~~	+
−		+
−	~~== 1 Overview/Introduction ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to set up my research question	+
−	* to state/frame my research question (conjecture) clearly	+
−	* to introduce my (working) hypothesis	+
−	* to indicate my central argument	+
−	* to introduce the possibility of a third triad	+
−		+
−	~~== 2 Theoretical Background ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to position Vitruvius (static aspirations) against Price (dynamic aspirations)	+
−	* to position Vitruvius’ triad (firmitas, utilitas, venustas) as the baseline framework (control case)	+
−	* to position Price’s triad (doubt, delight, change) as the new hypothesis or antithesis - i.e. show Vitruvius’ triad as the “established theory” & Price’s as the “new conjecture.”	+
−	* to note that Vitruvius’ “delight” is not identical to Price’s “delight.”	+
−	* to explain why formalizing the premise matters	+
−	* to explain why a new framework is needed: Vitruvian permanence vs. Pricean adaptability.	+
−	* nb Vitruvius’ triad functions as criteria - Price’s triad functions as both criteria and methodology	+
−	*	+
−		+
−	~~== 3 Definition of Key Terms ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to operationalize three triads - Vitruvius thesis (null hypothesis); Price antithesis Conjecture); my synthesis / new proposition: a third triad (new working proposition)	+
−	* to define what I mean by “relevance”	+
−	* to define what I mean by “contemporary social aspirations.”	+
−		+
−	~~== 4 Formal Proposition (Hypothesis) ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to consider Price's premise as a formal conditional	+
−	* to present it as a possible testable claim	+
−		+
−	~~== 5. Operationalization (Methodology) ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to explain how I will test the hypotheses	+
−	* to explain how I will use case study analysis (IFCCA competition	+
−	* to explain how I will do a comparison of permanence vs. adaptability.	+
−	* to explain how I will use Banham’s notion of operational time to frame analysis.	+
−	* to state Popperian method:	+
−	* to test Price’s triad against real cases with possibility of falsification.	+
−	* to test Vitruvius = null hypothesis	+
−	* to test my new hypothesis (emerging after testing both) or alternative synthesis triad(s)	+
−		+
−	~~== 6. Case Studies (Testing Ground) ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to apply Vitruvius’ triad and Price’s triad to the five IFCCA entries.	+
−	* to ask: Which framework explains the design intent more convincingly?	+
−	* to highlight contrasts: Eisenman (static permanence) vs. Price (adaptive change).	+
−	* to treat this section as the “experiment” testing my hypothesis.	+
−		+
−	~~== 7. Critique & Limitations (Results + Analysis/ Discussion) ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to summarize findings:	+
−	** Price’s triad appears more suited to contemporary architecture.	+
−	** But it destabilizes architecture by questioning its very necessity.	+
−	** Universality claim is still tentative (working hypothesis).	+
−	* nb this section becomes the critical evaluation of results, like a “discussion” in a scientific paper.	+
−	* to discuss corroboration vs. limits (where Price’s triad struggles).	+
−		+
−	~~== 8. Research Applications (Implications) ==~~	+
−		+
−	* to extend findings into practice and pedagogy:	+
−	** Design studios (testing future generations).	+
−	** Public projects (evaluation and policy).	+
−	** Post-occupancy studies (feedback loops).	+
−	* nb this shows the applicability of the tested hypothesis.	+
−	* to show how the framework might still guide practice, even if not universally true.	+
−		+
−	~~== 9 Conclusion ==~~	+
−		+
−	~~<ul>~~	+
−	~~<li><p>For example:</p>~~	+
−	<p>This thesis proposes that Cedric Price's triad of doubt, delight, and change can be treated as a testable hypothesis in contemporary architectural theory. Testing against IFCCA case studies demonstrates its potential as a supplement or replacement for Vitruvius' triad.</p>	+
−	<p>The synthesis triad — Resilience, Experience, Reflexivity — offers a methodologically rigorous, universally applicable framework for evaluation and practice, integrating historical, experiential, and reflexive dimensions of architecture.</p>	+
−	~~<p>Future research may expand the scope of empirical testing and explore pedagogical, policy, and post-occupancy applications of these criteria.</p></li></ul>~~	+
−		+
−	~~== 10 References ==~~	+
−		+
−	* Bibliography to include my “data” and supporting material / evidence base	+

	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]

Archiblog at 10:57, 6 December 2025

2025-12-06T10:57:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 6 December 2025
Line 117:		Line 117:
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bucky%27s_Ordering Bucky's Ordering]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Bucky%27s_Ordering Bucky's Ordering]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Cedric_Price Cedric Price]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Cedric_Price Cedric Price]
		+	* Cedric Price Interview
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/City_Cluster,_City_of_London City Cluster, City of London]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/City_Cluster,_City_of_London City Cluster, City of London]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/City_Cluster,_Kit_of_Parts City Cluster, Kit of Parts]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/City_Cluster,_Kit_of_Parts City Cluster, Kit of Parts]

Archiblog at 07:56, 20 October 2025

2025-10-20T07:56:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 20 October 2025
Line 148:		Line 148:
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/The_shadow_institution The shadow institution]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/The_shadow_institution The shadow institution]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/The_Shed The Shed]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/The_Shed The Shed]
		+	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/User_talk:Archiblog User talk:] [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/User_talk:Archiblog Archiblog]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Varsity_Line Varsity Line]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Varsity_Line Varsity Line]

Archiblog at 09:22, 23 August 2025

2025-08-23T09:22:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 23 August 2025
Line 160:		Line 160:

	-----		-----
		+	== Notes on a possible thesis on architecture ==
		+
		+	== 0 Abstract ==
		+
		+	== 1 Overview/Introduction ==
		+
		+	* to set up my research question
		+	* to state/frame my research question (conjecture) clearly
		+	* to introduce my (working) hypothesis
		+	* to indicate my central argument
		+	* to introduce the possibility of a third triad
		+
		+	== 2 Theoretical Background ==
		+
		+	* to position Vitruvius (static aspirations) against Price (dynamic aspirations)
		+	* to position Vitruvius’ triad (firmitas, utilitas, venustas) as the baseline framework (control case)
		+	* to position Price’s triad (doubt, delight, change) as the new hypothesis or antithesis - i.e. show Vitruvius’ triad as the “established theory” & Price’s as the “new conjecture.”
		+	* to note that Vitruvius’ “delight” is not identical to Price’s “delight.”
		+	* to explain why formalizing the premise matters
		+	* to explain why a new framework is needed: Vitruvian permanence vs. Pricean adaptability.
		+	* nb Vitruvius’ triad functions as criteria - Price’s triad functions as both criteria and methodology
		+	*
		+
		+	== 3 Definition of Key Terms ==
		+
		+	* to operationalize three triads - Vitruvius thesis (null hypothesis); Price antithesis Conjecture); my synthesis / new proposition: a third triad (new working proposition)
		+	* to define what I mean by “relevance”
		+	* to define what I mean by “contemporary social aspirations.”
		+
		+	== 4 Formal Proposition (Hypothesis) ==
		+
		+	* to consider Price's premise as a formal conditional
		+	* to present it as a possible testable claim
		+
		+	== 5. Operationalization (Methodology) ==
		+
		+	* to explain how I will test the hypotheses
		+	* to explain how I will use case study analysis (IFCCA competition
		+	* to explain how I will do a comparison of permanence vs. adaptability.
		+	* to explain how I will use Banham’s notion of operational time to frame analysis.
		+	* to state Popperian method:
		+	* to test Price’s triad against real cases with possibility of falsification.
		+	* to test Vitruvius = null hypothesis
		+	* to test my new hypothesis (emerging after testing both) or alternative synthesis triad(s)
		+
		+	== 6. Case Studies (Testing Ground) ==
		+
		+	* to apply Vitruvius’ triad and Price’s triad to the five IFCCA entries.
		+	* to ask: Which framework explains the design intent more convincingly?
		+	* to highlight contrasts: Eisenman (static permanence) vs. Price (adaptive change).
		+	* to treat this section as the “experiment” testing my hypothesis.
		+
		+	== 7. Critique & Limitations (Results + Analysis/ Discussion) ==
		+
		+	* to summarize findings:
		+	** Price’s triad appears more suited to contemporary architecture.
		+	** But it destabilizes architecture by questioning its very necessity.
		+	** Universality claim is still tentative (working hypothesis).
		+	* nb this section becomes the critical evaluation of results, like a “discussion” in a scientific paper.
		+	* to discuss corroboration vs. limits (where Price’s triad struggles).
		+
		+	== 8. Research Applications (Implications) ==
		+
		+	* to extend findings into practice and pedagogy:
		+	** Design studios (testing future generations).
		+	** Public projects (evaluation and policy).
		+	** Post-occupancy studies (feedback loops).
		+	* nb this shows the applicability of the tested hypothesis.
		+	* to show how the framework might still guide practice, even if not universally true.
		+
		+	== 9 Conclusion ==
		+
		+	<ul>
		+	<li><p>For example:</p>
		+	<p>This thesis proposes that Cedric Price's triad of doubt, delight, and change can be treated as a testable hypothesis in contemporary architectural theory. Testing against IFCCA case studies demonstrates its potential as a supplement or replacement for Vitruvius' triad.</p>
		+	<p>The synthesis triad — Resilience, Experience, Reflexivity — offers a methodologically rigorous, universally applicable framework for evaluation and practice, integrating historical, experiential, and reflexive dimensions of architecture.</p>
		+	<p>Future research may expand the scope of empirical testing and explore pedagogical, policy, and post-occupancy applications of these criteria.</p></li></ul>
		+
		+	== 10 References ==
		+
		+	* Bibliography to include my “data” and supporting material / evidence base
		+
	[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]		[[Category:Articles_needing_more_work]] [[Category:Education]] [[Category:History]] [[Category:Projects_and_case_studies]] [[Category:Research_/_Innovation]] [[Category:Design]]

Archiblog at 06:53, 20 August 2025

2025-08-20T06:53:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:53, 20 August 2025
Line 112:		Line 112:
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Anticipatory_Design Anticipatory Design]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Anticipatory_Design Anticipatory Design]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Archiblog%27s_Ordering Archiblog's Ordering]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Archiblog%27s_Ordering Archiblog's Ordering]
		+	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Architecture:_Doubt,_Delight,_and_Change Architecture: Doubt, Delight, and Change]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/ATOM:_A_generating_system_designed_by_Cedric_Price ATOM: A generating system designed by Cedric Price]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/ATOM:_A_generating_system_designed_by_Cedric_Price ATOM: A generating system designed by Cedric Price]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Beeching_cuts:_The_railway_network_in_Nottinghamshire Beeching cuts: The railway network in Nottinghamshire]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Beeching_cuts:_The_railway_network_in_Nottinghamshire Beeching cuts: The railway network in Nottinghamshire]

Archiblog at 09:33, 12 May 2025

2025-05-12T09:33:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:33, 12 May 2025
Line 131:		Line 131:
	* Geographic Information Systems: QGIS		* Geographic Information Systems: QGIS
	* Housing in the UK		* Housing in the UK
−	* HOUSING IN THE UK: Further ongoing research
	* Housing in the UK: Datasets		* Housing in the UK: Datasets
		+	* HOUSING IN THE UK: Further ongoing research
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Housing_Research_by_Cedric_Price Housing Research by Cedric Price]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Housing_Research_by_Cedric_Price Housing Research by Cedric Price]
	* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Hudson_Yards:_Manhattan Hudson Yards: Manhattan]		* [https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Hudson_Yards:_Manhattan Hudson Yards: Manhattan]