- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 25 Apr 2017
Modernising composite materials regulations
‘Modernising composite materials regulations’, published by the University of Southampton, claims that inappropriate standards and regulations are holding back an approach that could be worth £4bn by 2030 if ‘barriers to innovation’ were removed'.
The first-of-its-kind study was carried out by a multi-disciplinary team from the University of Southampton, and its findings are supported by a number of leading organisations, including the Composites Leadership Forum and Composites UK.
The report recognises that the UK is a global leader in the research and development of composite materials and structures, but points out that bringing new products to market could be made much easier.
It proposes modernising the current regulations to enable industry to migrate from current systems of assurance, based on material ‘equivalence’, to a performance-based system. This would harmonise the regulatory regime for composite materials across all sectors, and galvanize manufacturing in the UK.
Professor Ole Thybo Thomsen, head of the infrastructure research group at Southampton and co-author of the position paper, said:
“Advanced polymer composite materials have a huge potential to shape the modern world. The use of composites in aerospace and automobile design is now the norm, but they have much broader potential for use in other sectors such as in building and bridge construction, railway and rail infrastructure, as well as marine and offshore. In aerospace alone, 52% by weight of the latest generation of aircraft are now composed of composite materials.”
Professor Simon Quinn, director of the university’s Research Institute for Industry (RiFi) and the lead researcher of the paper, said:
“In the UK there is currently very limited coordination and centralisation of the codes and standards data associated with new composite materials. There is neither a coherent development of certified testing facilities, nor a formal process for different sectors to share information and best practice. These factors have reduced productivity, discouraged research and development and innovation, and significantly increased the time to market for new composite products.”
To download the executive summary of the report, go here.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Whole-life costs consider all costs associated with the life of a building, from inception to disposal. Find out more here.
Reports emerge of injuries caused by Apple employees colliding with the campus' glazed walls.
The winners of NIC's ideas competition on transforming the Cambridge to Oxford arc discuss their concept.
Create new habitats and improve air quality and wellbeing.
New report provides 12 key actions which could close the structural talent gap in the construction industry.
These can be used to find out whether a proposed development is likely to be approved. Read more here.
Studying a built environment degree? Check out our helpful student resources section.
New BRE research paper explores how blockchain technology can benefit the built environment industry.
Timber is a natural carbon sink, but it must not end up in landfill at the end of its useful life.
BSRIA has collaborated with the Department of Health on research into air permeability in isolation rooms.