Architecture and the need for innovation
Creating architecture is a roll that has continually evolved.
In the early-19th century the Institute of British Architects was formed in London to promote and direct the education of architects. It was later renamed the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) and it still operates under that name today, alongside other architectural institutes such as the Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists (CIAT).
One way or another the role of the architect has had to change in relation to industry innovations. The introduction of the pencil in the late 16th century along with the earlier introduction of paper in Europe allowed for the production of pre-construction drawings. Later, the specialisation of the trade led to innovations around the drawing board such as the introduction of parallel motion, but the availability of personal computers and the advent of computer aided design (CAD) has subsequently led to their demise. Today the majority of drawings are drafted using polylines and layers as opposed to pens and razor blades.
Architects have always seen change as an opportunity. This can be seen in the evolution of the role and its migration to the T-shaped professional model, where the architect is no longer solely a master of their own profession, but knowledgeable about other construction design professions, document control procedures, CAD management, the build and installation process, and more recently data analysis and software application development.
Now with the introduction of efficiency gains and automation brought about through the application of the Building Information Modelling (BIM) process, architecture has another opportunity to innovate, if sufficient leadership can be demonstrated.
Work by BRE Academy, in collaboration with CIAT, the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB), the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA), and Ecobuild, has demonstrated a skills gap within the industry around technology and digital aspects of design and construction, with BIM and smart technology skills identified as those most in need. The survey suggests that architectural professionals who excel at data analytics and software development may be early adopters of the professions future profile. However, there is a conflicting view.
Within the construction industry, architectural roles have always been the most 'human', dealing with relationships, negotiations, and active listening. Indeed, research by the World Economic Forum identifies these traits as among the most desirable skills for future professionals including; complex problem solving, critical thinking, creativity, people management, and coordinating with others. Due to its mastery of such skills, the role of the architect or technologist has been identified by the BBC as highly unlikely to be automated.
So then there is a decision to be made: when considering the future role of the architectural professional within construction, should it move towards the 'man', or the 'machine'?
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki:
Featured articles and news
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.