Measurement contracts (sometimes called ‘re-measurement’ or ‘measure and value’ contracts) can be used in situations where the design (or type of works) can be described in reasonable detail, but the amount cannot. For example, excavation works where the quantity of excavation required is difficult to assess until after the works have begun, or refurbishment projects where there are some uncertainties about the works that will be required. A measurement contract might also be appropriate on projects where the design has not been completed in sufficient detail for bills of quantities to be produced.
It should be possible to describe the works in sufficient detail to determine a programme and to obtain rates from tenderers. Generally tenderers rates will be based on drawings and approximate quantities.
The actual contract sum (sometimes called the 'ascertained final sum') cannot be determined when the contract is entered into, but is calculated on completion, based on ‘re-measurement’ of the actual work carried out and the rates tendered.
Measurement contracts can allow an early start on site, before design is complete, and they can allow changes to be made to the works relatively easily. However, there is inevitably some risk for the client as the cost of the works is not known. In effect, the client is taking the risk for any ‘unknowns’, and whilst this can result in competitive prices from contractors, the level of uncertainty for the client means that measurement contracts are rare other than on civil engineering projects.
See also: Measured term contract.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Writing an article on Designing Buildings Wiki can help raise your profile, and it's good for the industry too. Find out how…
The Department for Communities and Local Government has published a technical consultation which puts forward a significant range of proposals to change the planning system.
British Social Attitudes Survey reveals that opposition to new homes fell from 46 percent in 2010, to 31 percent in 2013. Opposition fell across all ages, tenures, incomes and locations.
Comment piece in support of Boris Island. "There is an overwhelming case... however, vested interests and caution are pointing to a fudged short-term solution"