Community infrastructure levy CIL
Section 206 of the Planning Act 2008 gives ‘charging authorities’ (generally the local planning authority) the power to charge the community infrastructure levy (CIL). It is a charge that local authorities can choose to impose on new developments to fund local infrastructure. This could include infrastructure such as:
- Transport schemes.
- Flood defences.
- Green spaces.
- Leisure centres.
Charging authorities must:
- prepare and publish a document known as the “charging schedule” which will set out the rates of Community Infrastructure Levy which will apply in the authority’s area.
- apply the levy revenue it receives to funding the provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of infrastructure to support the development of its area, and;
- report to the local community on the amount of levy revenue collected, spent and retained each year.
ref Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG): Community Infrastructure Levy guidance 14 December 2012.
The levy is charged by square metre of floor space of a development. It can be charged on any new dwelling or any other development that has 100 square metres or more gross internal floor space. The floor space of existing buildings that are going to be demolished can be deducted, as can the development of the interior of existing buildings. Charities and social housing schemes may be exempt from the levy. Once planning permission is granted, collecting authorities will issue applicants with a levy liability notice which becomes due when development commences.
NB since 24 February 2014, homes that are owner-occupied and built or commissioned by individuals, families or groups of individuals for their own use are exempt from the levy (ref Gov.uk Levy cuts to help hard-working people build their own home). See The Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) Regulations 2014 for more information.
 Relationship between the levy and planning obligations.
Planning obligations (also known as Section 106 Agreements) are obligations attached to land that is the subject of a planning permission. Planning obligations are used to mitigate or compensate for the negative impacts of a development or to prescribe the nature of a development. They are intended to make acceptable developments which would otherwise be unacceptable.
In 2010 measures within the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations came into force clarifying the relationship between planning obligations and the community infrastructure levy and restricting the use of planning obligations.
Planning obligations must meet three new statutory tests from 6 April 2010:
- They must be necessary to make the development acceptable.
- They must be directly related to the development.
- They must be in scale to the development.
In December 2012, CLG published Community Infrastructure Levy guidance. Paragraphs 84 – 91 set out in detail the relationship between the levy and planning obligations. They suggest that when the levy is introduced, charging authorities should scale back Section 106 requirements ‘to those matters that are directly related to a specific site, and are not set out in a regulation 123 list'. A regulation 123 list sets out those projects or types of infrastructure that a charging authority intends to fund through they levy.
The guidance is intended to ensure that there is transparency about what the charging authority intends to fund through the levy and where Section 106 contributions may continue to be sought. This should ensure that there is no ‘double dipping’, where developers are asked to pay twice for infrastructure. Once an authority has introduced the levy in its local area, it must not use obligations to pay for infrastructure they intend to fund via the levy.
Planning obligations will no longer be the basis for a tariff. Once an authority introduces the levy in their area, it can no longer pool more than five contributions for infrastructure capable of being funded by the levy.
NB The Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) Regulations have now been amended several times, and further changes and clarifications are expected. See reform below.
NB On 28 November 2014, Eric Pickles MP, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced plans to make clear that Section 106 agreements should generally not be sought from the smallest housebuilders on sites of 10 homes or fewer, including self-build, extensions and annexes. In very rural areas, sites of 5 homes or fewer should not face the charge. See Section 106 exemption for more information.
The National Planning Policy Framework states that when local authorities are deciding whether to impose planning conditions, they should consider the combined effect that those conditions and the levy will have on the proposed development.
 Neighbourhood funding element
In January 2013, planning minister Nick Boles announced that where there is a neighbourhood plan in place that has been accepted in a referendum, communities (such as town or parish councils) will be given 25% of the levy when planning permission for a development is approved. This money will be available to spend on infrastructure from an approved list, including improvements such as ‘..to re-roof a village hall, refurbish a municipal pool or take over a community pub’.
The funding will be passed to the community group in accordance with a timetable agreed with the local planning authority. The community group will be expected to work with the local planning authority in deciding how it should be spent. Where there is no town or parish council, the local planning authority will retain the funds and spend them ‘…in accordance with the wishes of the community’.
NB The neighbourhood funding element does not apply in Wales. Instead, the charging authority passes 15% of the levy funds to community councils.
Amended regulations came into force on 25 April 2013. These enabled a proportion of the Community Infrastructure Levy to pass to parish councils and provided for Mayoral Development Corporations to become, and cease being the charging authority.
In addition, the Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) Regulations 2014 came into force on the 24th February 2014, introducing a number of changes:
- Delaying limitations to the pooling of section 106 agreements until April 2015.
- Creating an exemption for self-builders and residential annexes and extensions.
- Allowing local authorities to set differential rates according to the size of developments.
- Allowing local authorities to accept ‘payments in kind’ through the provision of on-site or off-site infrastructure.
- Changing the ‘vacancy test'.
- Creating a requirement to strike an appropriate balance between the need to fund infrastructure from the levy and the economic viability of developments.
See The Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) Regulations 2014 for more information.
From 6 April 2015, local authorities can no longer pool more than five section 106 obligation contributions to pay for a single infrastructure project or type of infrastructure if it is a type of infrastructure that is capable of being funded by the community infrastructure levy. Provisions that are not capable of being funded by the levy, such as affordable housing, are not restricted.
 Assessments of performance
In July 2014, Savills published a report 'CIL, The Countdown to April 2015' suggesting that the levy will not be in place in two thirds of local authorities when the rules on the pooling of section 106 agreements come into effect.
In October 2014, Savills published a report 'CIL, is it delivering' which found that, 'Charging authorities have seen a 49% fall in the number of new residential planning consents granted in the 12 months following the implementation of CIL. This is in contrast to an increase of 32% across the whole of England, over the equivalent time period.'
In November 2015, the government announced that CIL would be the focus of a new review to ensure people benefit from local development in their area.
The aims of the review, to be chaired by Liz Peace, are:
- To assess CIL’s performance in providing a faster, fairer, more certain and transparent means of funding infrastructure through developer contributions.
- To examine the relationship between CIL and Section 106 agreements.
- To consider the impact of CIL’s neighbourhood element of helping increase community support for development.
- To consider the operation of reliefs and exemptions.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Affordable housing.
- The Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) Regulations 2014.
- Community right to bid.
- Community right to build.
- Detailed planning permission.
- Localism act.
- National Planning Policy Framework.
- Neighbourhood development order.
- Neighbourhood planning.
- Outline planning permission.
- Planning permission.
- Planning appeal.
- Planning fees.
- Planning conditions.
- Planning obligations.
- Review announced of the Community Infrastructure Levy.
- Section 38 agreement.
- Section 106 agreement.
- Section 106 exemption.
- Section 278 agreement.
- Self-build initiative.
- Viability test.
- Gov.uk Levy cuts to help hard-working people build their own home. 24 February 2014.
- Planning portal: About the Community Infrastructure Levy.
- Planning portal: Community Infrastructure Levy Summary.
- Planning portal: Community Infrastructure Levy Overview.
- Planning portal: Guidance on conditions and obligations.
- Community infrastructure levy regulations in full.
- Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG): Community Infrastructure Levy guidance 14 December 2012.
- CLG: Communities to receive cash boost for choosing development. January 2013.
- The Planning Act 2008
- The Community Infrastructure Levy (Amendment) Regulations 2013.
- The Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations (2010)
Featured articles and news
Paying for off-site goods or materials can be useful, but it puts the client at risk.
People power can be transformative if properly informed and inspired.
ZHA win competition to build an Urban Heritage Administration Centre in Saudi Arabia.
Leaps, not steps, are needed to avoid a ticking time bomb, say BRE in response to Farmer Review.
A multi-purpose hall in France covered in a translucent orange membrane.
Winning designs revealed for a rock formation-influenced residential complex in Rennes.
An article explaining the techniques, regulations and environmental impacts of carbon capture and storage.
Watch one of the first documentaries by the acclaimed Adam Curtis, examining the substandard system building of the 1960s.
Take a look at the tech start-up that could transform construction design and communication.
This house in Barcelona uses an innovative new facade tiling system to blend into the landscape.
The origins, evolution and future of Level 3 BIM.