Change control procedure for building design and construction
Changes to a project may have impacts on time, cost or quality. Broadly, the later in the development of the project that changes occur, the greater those impacts are likely to be.
At certain stages in the design process, a complete package of information will be provided for the client to approve. Once this approval has been given, a change control procedure may be introduced to ensure that the approved information is not changed without the express permission of the client.
The CIOB 'Code of practice for project management' (4th edition), defines change control as 'a process that ensures potential changes to the deliverables of a project or the sequence of work in a project, are recorded, evaluated, authorised and managed.'
Examples of stages where change control procedures might be introduced include:
- At the end of the concept design stage if the project is tendered at this stage (for example on a design and build project).
- At the end of the concept design stage when the project brief (and employer's information requirements) might be frozen.
- During the detailed design stage when the detailed design, technical design and specification are finalised.
- During the tender stage when the tender documentation has been prepared.
- When the contractor is appointed and any further changes may qualify as variations.
It is important that the need for changes is minimised. This can be done by:
- Undertaking thorough site investigations and condition surveys.
- Ensuring that the project brief is comprehensive and is supported by stakeholders.
- Ensuring that legislative requirements are properly integrated into the project.
- Ensuring that risks are properly identified.
- Ensuring that designs are properly co-ordinated before tender.
It is common for the cost consultant to report on the estimated cost of changes and for the client to prioritise which changes are acceptable. The client may decide to fund additional costs from a design contingency. A change control procedure should clearly define the process by which changes are requested and approved and who is responsible for those processes, including:
- The reasons for the change.
- Who is requesting the change.
- The consequences of the change, including health and safety, time, quality, cost (and who will bear the cost).
- Proposals for mitigation of any consequences.
- The risks associated with the change.
- Alternatives to the proposed change.
- Time by which the change must be instructed.
There may then be:
- Client evaluation of whether the impact of the change is acceptable and whether the proposal provides value for money.
- Client instructions to the consultant team.
- Contract administrator instructions to the contractor.
The client may have to consider a number of requests for changes and may therefore need the appropriate information to be able to prioritise them relative to one another.
Change control procedures should be formally set out in a project quality plan to ensure that changes to controlled aspects of the project are referred for review to the right person at the right time and so that changes are properly documented and reflected in all project information.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Abortive work.
- Change control: a quality perspective.
- Change management.
- Common data environment.
- Condition Report.
- Construction industry knowledge standard.
- Cost control.
- Design freeze.
- Design chill.
- Document control.
- End of stage report.
- Gateways.
- Henry Boot Construction Ltd v Alstom Combined Cycles.
- Project brief derogations.
- Milestones.
- Scope creep.
- Variation.
- Value engineering.
- Value management.
[edit] External references
- OGC guidance on managing changes to requirements.
- OGC Achieving Excellence Guide 3 - Project ProcurementLifecyclepage 21.
- RICS draft guidance note: Managing the design delivery (including an example project change notice).
Featured articles and news
Not buildings. Happy holiday from DB.
Improving government projects with data and AI
Enabling better outcomes, efficient modern delivery and influential leadership on government projects.
BSRIA Living Laboratory Innovation Challenge
Final days for submission, closing March 29.
Windows, their frames, forms, factors and functions.
The hidden subtleties of U-Value calculations
Different contexts and what to include as variables.
A brief run down with related articles.
Electrical sector calls for safer public EV charge points
Serious concerns about electrical safety in the public domain.
Building Blocks manifesto presented to parliament
Architects Declare call in for support of five critical policies.
The four elements of project management with APM
Analysis, expectations, collaborative communication and partnerships.
City of London launches Heritage Building Retrofit Toolkit
Empowering owners to initiate necessary adaptations.
Guidance on RAAC in listed buildings
Published by Purcell, endorsed by IHBC, SPAB and C20.
Learning from the past.
Reluctance to hire people with criminal convictions revealed
Employing People with Criminal Convictions Report.
Tackling unconscious bias; Women's History Month
Personal reflections, as the last week of March approaches.
Comments
How do i cite this article
Have a look at this https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Citing_an_article_on_Designing_Buildings